A brief overview of the use of additive manufacturing of con-create materials in construction

• Autorzy: Mierzwiński Dariusz , Łach Michał , Gądek Szymon , Lin Wei-Ting , Hung Tran Doan , Korniejenko Kinga

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.32933/ActaInnovations.48.2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, additive technology is becoming increasingly popular in different areas, including its applications in construction industry. The main aim of the chapter is to show the selected applications of 3D printing technology in the construction industry and the usage of this technology on distinct stages of a construction project, from architectural design to performance of residential buildings and other civil engineering constructions. The chapter is based on a critical analysis of the literature sources, as well as the authors' experiences. The data collected are supported by selected case studies from five projects. The main findings show that 3D printing brings a lot of advantages in the construction industry, for instance: low labour costs, less waste, and high efficiency, but it still requires development and optimization.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

construction industry; additive technology; 3D printing; geopolymer

PL

przemysł budowlany; technologia addytywna; druk 3D; geopolimer

• Wydawca: Centrum Badań i Innowacji Pro-Akademia ; Ukrainian Academy of Sciences - Research and Development Centre for Industrial Problems of Development
• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 48
• Strony: 22--37
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 86 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mierzwiński Dariusz

• Faculty of Material Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-3546

autor

Łach Michał

• Faculty of Material Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-9415

autor

Gądek Szymon

• Faculty of Material Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-2494

autor

Lin Wei-Ting

• Department of Civil Engineering, National Ilan University, no.1, sec. 1, Shennong Rd., Yilan 260, Taiwan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4792-4457

autor

Hung Tran Doan

• Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Nha Trang Universit, Nguyen Dinh Chieu 2, Nha Trang 650000, Vietnam

autor

Korniejenko Kinga

• Faculty of Material Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-3982

Bibliografia

• [1] P.J. Benghozi, D. Krob, F. Rowe, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Preface, in: M. Gzik, Z. Paszenda, E. Pietka, E. Tkacz, K. Milewski (Eds.), Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Springer, 2013: p. Volume 1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37317-6.
• [2] R.W. Schirmer, M. Abendroth, S. Roth, L. Kühnel, H. Zeidler, B. Kiefer, Simulation-supported characterization of 3D-printed biodegradable structures, GAMM Mitteilungen. 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.202100018.
• [3] J.G. Sanjayan, B. Nematollahi, M. Xia, T. Marchment, Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 172 (2018) 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.232.
• [4] N. Labonnote, A. Rønnquist, B. Manum, P. Rüther, Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities, Autom. Constr. 72 (2016) 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.
• [5] B. Panda, M.J. Tan, Rheological behavior of high volume fly ash mixtures containing micro silica for digital construction application, Mater. Lett. 237 (2019) 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.131.
• [6] D.G. Soltan, V.C. Li, A self-reinforced cementitious composite for building-scale 3D printing, Cem. Concr. Compos. 90 (2018) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.017.
• [7] M. Xia, J. Sanjayan, Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications, Mater. Des. 110 (2016) 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.136.
• [8] K. Korniejenko, M. Łach, Geopolymers reinforced by short and long fibres – innovative materials for additive manufacturing, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 28 (2020) 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.06.005.
• [9] S. Qaidi, A. Yahia, B.A. Tayeh, H. Unis, R. Faraj, A. Mohammed, 3D printed geopolymer composites: A review, Mater. Today Sustain. 20 (2022) 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100240.
• [10] Z. Li, L. Wang, G. Ma, Mechanical improvement of continuous steel microcable reinforced geopolymer composites for 3D printing subjected to different loading conditions, Compos. Part B Eng. 187 (2020) 107796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107796.
• [11] K. Korniejenko, Do we need innovations? 3D printing technology for construction materials, (2020). https://uia-initiative.eu/en/news/do-we-need-innovations-3d-printing-technology-construction-materials-zoom-2.
• [12] C. Montes, K. Broussard, M. Gongre, N. Simicevic, J. Mejia, J. Tham, E. Allouche, G. Davis, Evaluation of lunar regolith geopolymer binder as a radioactive shielding material for space exploration applications, Adv. Sp. Res. 56 (2015) 1212–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.044.
• [13] G. Davis, C. Montes, S. Eklund, Preparation of lunar regolith based geopolymer cement under heat and vacuum, Adv. Sp. Res. 59 (2017) 1872–1885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.024.
• [14] K. Korniejenko, K. Pławecka, B. Kozub, An Overview for Modern Energy-Efficient Solutions for Lunar and Martian Habitats Made Based on Geopolymers Composites and 3D Printing Technology, Energies. 15 (2022) 9322. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249322.
• [15] J. Marczyk, C. Ziejewska, K. Pławecka, A. Bak, M. Łach, K. Korniejenko, I. Hager, J. Mikuła, W.T. Lin, M. Hebda, Optimizing the L/S Ratio in Geopolymers for the Production of Large-Size Elements with 3D Printing Technology, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 3362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093362.
• [16] C. Achillas, D. Aidonis, E. Iakovou, M. Thymianidis, D. Tzetzis, A methodological framework for the inclusion of modern additive manufacturing into the production portfolio of a focused factory, J. Manuf. Syst. 37 (2015) 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.014.
• [17] A. V. Rahul, M. Santhanam, H. Meena, Z. Ghani, 3D printable concrete: Mixture design and test methods, Cem. Concr. Compos. 97 (2019) 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014.
• [18] M. Xia, J.G. Sanjayan, Methods of enhancing strength of geopolymer produced from powder-based 3D printing process, Mater. Lett. 227 (2018) 281–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.05.100.
• [19] D. Klewinghaus, 3D Printing in the Kabisch-Lab, Napędy i Sterow. 22 (2018) 1–3.
• [20] H. Yi, 4D-printed parametric façade in architecture: prototyping a self-shaping skin using programmable two-way shape memory composite (TWSMC), Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 29 (2022) 4132–4152. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0428.
• [21] E. Kamel, A. Kazemian, BIM-integrated thermal analysis and building energy modeling in 3D-printed residential buildings, Energy Build. 279 (2023) 112670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112670.
• [22] M. Major, I. Minda, Zastosowanie technologii druku przestrzennego w budownictwie, Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Częstochowskiej. Bud. 172 (2017) 238–247. https://doi.org/10.17512/znb.2016.1.23.
• [23] J. Konopacki, Suitability of consumer 3D FDM printers as a tool to create architectural models, Przestrz. i Forma. 18 (2020) 65–80.
• [24] V. Parfenov, S. Igoshin, D. Masaylo, A. Orlov, D. Kuliashou, Use of 3D Laser Scanning and Additive Technologies for Reconstruction of Damaged and Destroyed Cultural Heritage Objects, Quantum Beam Sci. 6 (2022) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs6010011.
• [25] M. Žujović, R. Obradović, I. Rakonjac, J. Milošević, 3D Printing Technologies in Architectural Design and Construction: A Systematic Literature Review, Buildings. 12 (2022) 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091319.
• [26] C.H. Ko, Constraints and limitations of concrete 3D printing in architecture, J. Eng. Des. Technol. 20 (2021) 1334–1348. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-11-2020-0456.
• [27] S. Pessoa, A.S. Guimarães, S.S. Lucas, N. Simões, 3D printing in the construction industry - A systematic review of the thermal performance in buildings, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 141 (2021) 110794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110794.
• [28] I. Hager, A. Golonka, R. Putanowicz, 3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction?, Procedia Eng. 151 (2016) 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357.
• [29] M.A. Hossain, A. Zhumabekova, S.C. Paul, J.R. Kim, A review of 3D printing in construction and its impact on the labor market, Sustain. 12 (2020) 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208492.
• [30] EMT Systems, Domy z druku 3D, (2019).
• [31] R. García-Alvarado, G. Moroni-Orellana, P. Banda-Pérez, Architectural evaluation of 3d-printed buildings, Buildings. 11 (2021) 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060254.
• [32] S. Ma, S. Fu, Q. Wang, L. Xu, P. He, C. Sun, X. Duan, Z. Zhang, D. Jia, Y. Zhou, 3D Printing of Damage‐tolerant Martian Regolith Simulant‐based Geopolymer Composites, Addit. Manuf. 58 (2022) 103025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103025.
• [33] S. Lim, R.A. Buswell, T.T. Le, S.A. Austin, A.G.F. Gibb, T. Thorpe, Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes, Autom. Constr. 21 (2012) 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010.
• [34] S. Jokic, P. Novikov, Large Scale 3D Printing. Mataerial, Iaac. (2013). http://iaac.net/research-projects/large-scale-3d-printing/material/.
• [35] J. Liu, V. Nguyen-Van, B. Panda, K. Fox, A. Du Plessis, P. Tran, Additive Manufacturing of Sustainable Construction Materials and Form-finding Structures: A Review on Recent Progresses, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 9 (2022) 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0331.
• [36] A. Al Rashid, S.A. Khan, S. G. Al-Ghamdi, M. Koç, Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment, Autom. Constr. 118 (2020) 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268.
• [37] J. Costa, E. Sequeiros, M.T. Vieira, M. Vieira, Additive Manufacturing, U.Porto J. Eng. 7 (2021) 53–69. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-6493_007.003_0005.
• [38] D. Lowke, E. Dini, A. Perrot, D. Weger, C. Gehlen, B. Dillenburger, Particle-bed 3D printing in concreto construction – Possibilities and challenges, Cem. Concr. Res. 112 (2018) 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.018.
• [39] P. Shakor, S.H. Chu, A. Puzatova, E. Dini, Review of binder jetting 3D printing in the construction industry, Prog. Addit. Manuf. 7 (2022) 643–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00252-9.
• [40] A. Pajonk, A. Prieto, U. Blum, U. Knaack, Multi-material additive manufacturing in architecture and construction: A review, J. Build. Eng. 45 (2022) 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103603.
• [41] A. Meurisse, A. Makaya, C. Willsch, M. Sperl, Solar 3D printing of lunar regolith, Acta Astronaut. 152 (2018) 800–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.063.
• [42] Contour Crafting, Technologies for building immediate infrastructure on the Moon and Mars for Future Colonization, (2017). https://www.contourcrafting.com/space.
• [43] J.S.J. Van Deventer, J.L. Provis, P. Duxson, D.G. Brice, Chemical research and climate change as drivers in the commercial adoption of alkali activated materials, Waste and Biomass Valorization. 1 (2010) 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9015-9.
• [44] Q. Munir, T. Kärki, Cost analysis of various factors for geopolymer 3d printing of construction products in factories and on construction sites, Recycling. 6 (2021) 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6030060.
• [45] A. Rintala, J. Havukainen, M. Abdulkareem, Estimating the cost-competitiveness of recycling-based geopolymer concretes, Recycling. 6 (2021) 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6030046.
• [46] V.V. Nguyen, V.S. Le, P. Louda, M.M. Szczypiński, R. Ercoli, R. Vojtěch, P. Łoś, K. Prałat, P. Plaskota, T. Pacyniak, K.E. Buczkowska, Low-Density Geopolymer Composites for the Construction Industry, Polymers (Basel). 14 (2022) 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020304.
• [47] H. Zhong, M. Zhang, 3D printing geopolymers: A review, Cem. Concr. Compos. 128 (2022) 104455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104455.
• [48] M.H. Raza, R.Y. Zhong, M. Khan, Recent advances and productivity analysis of 3D printed geopolymers, Addit. Manuf. 52 (2022) 102685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102685.
• [49] Wikimedia Foundation, Geopolymer cement, Geopolymer Cem. (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geopolymer_cement.
• [50] L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201.
• [51] J. Archez, N. Texier-Mandoki, X. Bourbon, J.F. Caron, S. Rossignol, Shaping of geopolymer composites by 3D printing, J. Build. Eng. 34 (2021) 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101894.
• [52] A. Koper, K. Prałat, J. Ciemnicka, K. Buczkowska, Influence of the calcination temperature of synthetic gypsum on the particle size distribution and setting time of modified building materials, Energies. 13 (2020) 5759. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215759.
• [53] B. Xiao, C. Chen, X. Yin, Recent advancements of robotics in construction, Autom. Constr. 144 (2022) 104591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104591.
• [54] Y. Teng, J. Xu, W. Pan, Y. Zhang, A systematic review of the integration of building information modeling into life cycle assessment, Build. Environ. 221 (2022) 109260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109260.
• [55] Q. Yuan, C. Gao, T. Huang, S. Zuo, H. Yao, K. Zhang, Y. Huang, J. Liu, Factors Influencing the Properties of Extrusion-Based 3D-Printed Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Slag Mortar, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051969.
• [56] P. Wu, J. Wang, X. Wang, A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry, Autom. Constr. 68 (2016) 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005.
• [57] T. Wangler, E. Lloret, L. Reiter, N. Hack, F. Gramazio, M. Kohler, M. Bernhard, B. Dillenburger, J. Buchli, N. Roussel, R. Flatt, Digital concrete: Opportunities and challenges, RILEM Tech. Lett. 1 (2016) 67–75. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16.
• [58] M. Gomaa, W. Jabi, V. Soebarto, Y.M. Xie, Digital manufacturing for earth construction: A critical review, J. Clean. Prod. 338 (2022) 130630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130630.
• [59] A. Jipa, B. Dillenburger, 3D Printed Formwork for Concrete: State-of-the-Art, Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 9 (2022) 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.0024.
• [60] E. Tucker, Shanghai is now home to the world’s largest 3D printed bridge, The Spaces, (2023).
• [61] S. Luhar, I. Luhar, Additive Manufacturing in the Geopolymer Construction Technology: A Review, Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 14 (2020) 150–161. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836802014010150.
• [62] K. Pacewicz, A. Sobotka, L. Gołek, Characteristic of materials for the 3D printed building constructions by additive printing, MATEC Web Conf. 222 (2018) 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822201013.
• [63] A. Sobotka, K. Pacewicz, Building Site Organization with 3D Technology in Use, Procedia Eng. 161 (2016) 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.582.
• [64] C. Harrouk, Dubai Municipality to Become the World’s Largest 3D-Printed Building, ArchDaily. (2019). https://www.archdaily.com/930857/dubai-municipality-to-become-the-worlds-largest-3d-printed-building.
• [65] R.A. Buswell, R.C. Soar, A.G.F. Gibb, A. Thorpe, Freeform Construction: Mega-scale Rapid Manufacturing for construction, Autom. Constr. 16 (2007) 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.05.002.
• [66] N. Cheniuntai, Groundbreaking project, Apis Cor. (2019). http://apis-cor.com/dubai-project.
• [67] B. Panda, S.C. Paul, N.A.N. Mohamed, Y.W.D. Tay, M.J. Tan, Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 113 (2018) 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.051.
• [68] V. Voney, P. Odaglia, C. Brumaud, B. Dillenburger, G. Habert, From casting to 3D printing geopolymers: A proof of concept, Cem. Concr. Res. 143 (2021) 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106374.
• [69] 3ders.org, 10 completely 3D printed houses appear in Shanghai, built under a day, (2014).
• [70] S. McGuire, Dubai Inaugurates First 3D Printed Office Building, (2016). https://www.giatecscientific.com/education/dubai-inaugurates-first-3d-printed-office-building-constructed-in-17-days/.
• [71] A. Dalton, World’s first 3D-printed office opens in Dubai, Engadget. (2016).
• [72] Urban Innovative Actions, Lappeenranta, (2023). https://uia-initiative.eu/en/uia-cities/lappeenranta.
• [73] M. Matilainen, Urban Infra Revolution UIR, Geopolymer Camp. (2018).
• [74] C. Ziejewska, J. Marczyk, K. Korniejenko, S. Bednarz, P. Sroczyk, M. Łach, J. Mikuła, B. Figiela, M. Szechyńska-Hebda, M. Hebda, 3D Printing of Concrete-Geopolymer Hybrids, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082819.
• [75] J. Marczyk, C. Ziejewska, S. Gadek, K. Korniejenko, M. Łach, M. Góra, I. Kurek, N. Dogan-Saglamtimur, M. Hebda, M. Szechynska-Hebda, Hybrid materials based on fly ash, metakaolin, and cement for 3d printing, Materials (Basel). 14 (2021) 6874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226874.
• [76] K. Korniejenko, P. Kejzlar, P. Louda, The Influence of the Material Structure on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Composites Reinforced with Short Fibers Obtained with Additive Technologies, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (2022) 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042023.
• [77] Y. Han, Z. Yang, T. Ding, J. Xiao, Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete, J. Clean. Prod. 278 (2021) 123884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884.
• [78] L. Gebhard, J. Burger, J. Mata-Falcón, E. Lloret Fritschi, F. Gramazio, M. Kohler, W. Kaufmann, Towards efficient concrete structures with ultra-thin 3D printed formwork: exploring reinforcement strategies and optimisation, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 17 (2022) 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2022.2041873.
• [79] B. Panda, C. Unluer, M.J. Tan, Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing, Cem. Concr. Compos. 94 (2018) 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002.
• [80] S. Alonso-Canon, E. Blanco-Fernandez, D. Castro-Fresno, A.I. Yoris-Nobile, L. Castañon-Jano, Reinforcements in 3D printing concrete structures, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 23 (2023) 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00552-z.
• [81] I. Hager, M. Maroszek, K. Mróz, R. Kęsek, M. Hebda, L. Dvorkin, V. Marchuk, Interlayer Bond Strength Testing in 3D-Printed Mineral Materials for Construction Applications, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 4112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124112.
• [82] J. Sun, D. Ye, J. Zou, X. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Yuan, H. Liang, H. Qu, J. Binner, J. Bai, A review on additive manufacturing of ceramic matrix composites, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 138 (2023) 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.039.
• [83] M. Amran, H.S. Abdelgader, A.M. Onaizi, R. Fediuk, T. Ozbakkaloglu, R.S.M. Rashid, G. Murali, 3D-printable alkali-activated concretes for building applications: A critical review, Constr. Build. Mater. 319 (2022) 126126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126126.
• [84] A. Windapo, M. Yende, O. Kala, L. Maboreke, L. Matshidze, The Adoption of 3D Printing as a Construction Methodology in South Africa: What Are the Barriers?, in: Lect. Notes Civ. Eng., 2023: pp. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97748-1_7.
• [85] H. Song, X. Li, An overview on the rheology, mechanical properties, durability, 3D printing, and microstructural performance of nanomaterials in cementitious composites, Materials (Basel). 14 (2021) 2950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112950.
• [86] J. Xiao, G. Ji, Y. Zhang, G. Ma, V. Mechtcherine, J. Pan, L. Wang, T. Ding, Z. Duan, S. Du, Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities, Cem. Concr. Compos. 122 (2021) 104115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).