Wskaźniki morfometryczne w geomorfologii tektonicznej

• Autorzy: Różycka M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12657/landfana.030.001

Warianty tytułu

EN

Morphometric indices in tectonic geomorphology

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Geomorfologia tektoniczna jest dynamicznie rozwijającą się dziedziną nauki – głównie za sprawą nowych możliwości badawczych, które pojawiły się wraz z rozwojem narzędzi udostępnianych za pośrednictwem Geograficznych Systemów Informacyjnych (GIS) oraz z wprowadzeniem cyfrowych zestawów danych wysokościowych. Dzięki temu rozwijany jest przede wszystkim ilościowy kierunek tych badań. Niniejsza praca ma charakter przeglądowy. Zestawiono w niej, podzielono oraz omówiono wskaźniki morfometryczne wykorzystywane w badaniach nad młodą aktywnością tektoniczną obszarów, zwracając jednocześnie uwagę na ograniczenia interpretacyjne związane z ich wykorzystywaniem. Przegląd literatury uwzględnia opracowania zarówno polskie, jak i zagraniczne opublikowane w latach 2000–2015.

EN

New research possibilities that emerged from the development of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and digital topography underpin the growth of tectonic geomorphology, mainly in respect to quantitatively oriented investigations. This paper presents a review of morphometric parameters that have been applied in morphotectonic studies in Poland and worldwide and is essentially based on papers published from 2000 to 2015. Classification of tectonic activity indicators is presented, as well as limitations in their interpretation are discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

geomorfologia tektoniczna; wskaźniki morfometryczne; aktywność tektoniczna

EN

tectonic geomorphology; morphometric indices; tectonic activity

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Geomorfologów Polskich
• Czasopismo: Landform Analysis
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 30
• Strony: 3--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 131 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Różycka M.

• Instytut Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Bibliografia

• Alipoor R., Poorkermani M., Zare M., El Hamdouni R., 2011. Active tectonic assessment around Rudbar Lorestan dam site, High Zagros Belt (SW of Iran). Geomorphology 128: 1–14, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.014.
• Al-Taj M., Shakour F., Atallah M., 2007. Morphotectonic indices of the Dead Sea Transform, Jordan. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria 30: 5–11.
• Altın T.B., 2012. Geomorphic signatures of active tectonic in drainage basins in the southern Bolkar Mountain, Turkey. Indian Society of Remote Sensing 40: 271–285, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0145-8.
• Antón L., De Vicente G., Muñoz-Martín A., Stokes M., 2014. Using river long profiles and geomorphic indices to evaluate the geomorphological signature of continental scale drainage capture, Duero basin (NW Iberia). Geomorphology 206: 250–261, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.09.028.
• Ata H.A., 2008. A test of the validity of morphometric analysis in determining tectonic activity from ASTER derived DEMs in the Jordan-Dead Sea Transform Zone. University of Arkansas, rozprawa doktorska, Online: http://cast.uark.edu/assets/files/PDF/HUSAM-ATA_Final_Dissertation_Complete.pdf – 26.07.2015.
• Avena G.C., Giuliano G., Lupia Palmieri E., 1967. Sulla valutazione quantitativa Della gerarchizzazione ed evoluzione dei reticoli fluviali. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 86(4): 781–796.
• Azañón J.M., Pérez-Peña J.V., Giaconia F., Booth-Rea G., Martínez-Martínez J.M., Rodríguez-Peces M.J., 2012. Active tectonics in the central and eastern Betic Cordillera through morphotectonic analysis: the case of Sierra Nevada and Sierra Alhamilla. Journal of Iberian Geology 38(1): 225–238, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_JIGE.2012.v38.n1.39214.
• Badura J., Zuchiewicz W., Górecki A., Sroka W., Przybylski B., 2003. Morfometria strefy sudeckiego uskoku brzeżnego między Złotym Stokiem a Dobromierzem. Przegląd Geologiczny 51(12): 1048–1057.
• Badura J., Zuchiewicz W., Štěpančíková P., Przybylski B., Kontny B., Cacoń S., 2007. The Sudetic Marginal Fault: A young morphotectonic feature at the NE margin of the Bohemian Massif, Central Europe. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia 4(4): 7–29.
• Badura J., Zuchiewicz W., Štěpančíková P., Tokarski A. K., Świerczewska A., Przybylski B., 2008. Strefa sudeckiego uskoku brzeżnego w świetle wyników badań morfotektonicznych i analizy spękanych klastów w osadach czwartorzędowych. Abstrakty, Pierwszy Polski Kongres Geologiczny, Kraków 26–28 czerwca 2008, Polskie Towarzystwo Geologiczne, Kraków: 7–8.
• Bafti A.S., 2009. Tectonics movements of Kuhbanan fault system in Bahabad region, Central Iran. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences 1: 92–98.
• Bahrami S., 2013. Analyzing the drainage system anomaly of Zagros basins: Implications for active tectonics. Tectonophysics 608: 914–928, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.07.026.
• Brice J.C., 1964. Channel patterns and terraces of the Loup River, Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 422–D.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., 2002. The dependence of relief on tectonics in the South-West Escarpment Zone of Tomaszowskie Roztocze (SE Poland). Landform Analysis 3: 13–24.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., 2013. Morfotektonika w annopolsko-lwowskim segmencie pasa wyżynnego w świetle analizy cyfrowego modelu wysokościowego oraz wskaźników morfometrycznych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Hołub B., 2007. Przejawy neogeńskiej tektoniki w przełomowym odcinku doliny Sopotu w strefie krawędziowej Roztocza Tomaszowskiego. W: M. Harasimiuk, T. Brzezińska-Wójcik, R. Dobrowolski, P. Mroczek, J. Warowna (red.), Budowa geologiczna regionu lubelskiego i problemy ochrony litosfery. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin: 153–165.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Miłkowska D., Tucki A., 2002. Wpływ neotektoniki na rozwój rzeźby w dorzeczu Gorajca na Roztoczu (SE Polska). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia, Sectio B 54(4): 55–74.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Chabudziński Ł., Gawrysiak L., 2010 a. Neotectonic mobility of the Roztocze region, Ukrainian part, Central Europe: insights from morphometric studies. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae 80: 167–183.
• Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Gawrysiak L., Chabudziński Ł., 2010 b. Metody morfometryczne w badaniach geomorfologicznych regionu lubelskiego. Landform Analysis 12: 7–22.
• Bull W.B., 1977. Tectonic geomorphology of the Mojave Desert. U.S. Geological Survey Contract Report 14-08-001-G-394, Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Engineering, Menlo Park, California.
• Bull W.B., 1978. Geomorphic tectonic activity classes of the south front of the San Gabriel Mountains, California. U.S. Geological Survey Contract Report 14-08-001-G-394, Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Engineering, Menlo Park, California.
• Bull W.B., 2007. Tectonic Geomorphology of Mountains: A New Approach to Paleoseismology. Blackwell Publishing.
• Bull W.B., McFadden L.D., 1977. Tectonic geomorphology north and south of the Garlock Fault, California. W: D. O. Doehring (red.), Geomorphology in Arid Regions. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Geomorphology Symposium, State University of New York at Binghamton: 115–138.
• Burbank D.W., Anderson R.S., 2001. Tectonic Geomorphology. Blackwell Science.
• Burbank D.W., Anderson R.S., 2011. Tectonic Geomorphology (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Cannon P.J., 1976. Generation of explicite parameter for a quantitative geomorphic study of the Mill Creek drainage basin. Oklahoma Geology Notes 36(1): 3–16.
• Castillo M., Muñoz-Salinas E., Ferrari L., 2014. Response of a landscape to tectonics using channel steepness indices (ksn) and OSL: A case of study from the Jalisco Block, Western Mexico. Geomorphology 221: 204–214, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.06.017.
• Chabudziński Ł., Brzezińska-Wójcik T., 2013. Zastosowanie ArcNEO do oceny przejawów neotektoniki na przykładzie zlewni górnego Wieprza (Roztocze, środkowo-wschodnia Polska). Landform Analysis 24: 11–22, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12657/landfana.024.002.
• Chen Y., Sung Q., Cheng K., 2003. Along-strike variations of morphotectonic features in the Western Foothills of Taiwan: tectonic implications based on stream-gradient and hypsometric analysis. Geomorphology 56: 109–137, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00059-X.
• Chorley R.L., 1957. Climate and morphometry. Journal of Geology 65(6): 628–638.
• Cox R.T., 1994. Analysis of drainage basin symmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: an example form the Mississippi Embayment. Geological Society of America Bulletin 106: 571–581.
• Cuong N.Q., Zuchiewicz W., 2001a. Morphotectonic properties of the Lo River Fault near Tam Dao in North Vietnam. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 1: 15–22.
• Cuong N.G., Zuchiewicz W., 2001b. Morfotektonika uskoku rzeki Lo w rejonie Tam Dao (północny Wietnam): próba prognozy sejsmicznej. Przegląd Geologiczny 49(10): 885–893.
• Dar R.A., Romshoo S.A., Chandra R., Ahmad I., 2014. Tectono-geomorphic study of the Karewa Basin of Kashmir Valley. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 92: 143–156, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seaes.2014.06.018.
• Daxberger H., Dalumpines R., Scott D.M., Riller U., 2014. The ValleyMorph Tool: An automated extraction tool for transverse topographic symmetry (T–) factor and valley width to valley height (Vf–) ratio. Computers & Geosciences 70: 154–163, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.05.015.
• Dehbozorgi M., Pourkermani M., Arian M., Matkan A.A., Motamedi H., Hosseiniasl A., 2010. Quantitative analysis of relative tectonic activity in the Sarvestan area, central Zagros, Iran. Geomorphology 121: 329–341, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.05.002.
• Delcaillau B., Amrhar M., Namous M., Laville E., 2008. Transpressional tectonics in the Marrakech High Atlas: Insight by the geomorphic evolution of drainage basins. Geomorphology 134: 344–362, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.07.010.
• Duvall A., Kirby E., Burbank D., 2004. Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in costal California. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000086.
• El Hamdouni R., Irigaray C., Fernandez T., Chacón J., Keller E. A., 2008. Assessment of relative active tectonics, southwest border of Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). Geomorphology 96: 150–173, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.004.
• Engstrom W.N., 1989. Morphometric analysis of mountain drainage basins in the Basin and Range Province, USA. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F. 33: 443–453.
• Figueroa A.M., Knott J.R., 2010. Tectonic geomorphology of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains (California): Evidence for uplift and basin formation. Geomorphology 123: 34–45, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.06.009.
• Flores-Prieto E., Quénéhervé G., Bachofer F., Shahzad F., Maerker M., 2015. Morphotectonic interpretation of the Makuyuni catchment in the Northern Tanzania using DEM and SAR data. Geomorphology 248: 427–439, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.049.
• Forestier G., Wemmert C., Gancarski P., 2008. Collaborative multi-strategical clustering for object-oriented image analysis. W: O.Okun, G.Valentini (red.), Supervised and unsupervised ensemble methods and their applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: 71–90.
• Forma A., Zuchiewicz W., 2002. Morphotectonics of the Gorce Mountains, Western Outer Carpathians. Folia Quaternaria 73: 69–78.
• Gao M., Zeilinger G., Xu X., Wang Q., Hao M., 2013. DEM and GIS analysis of geomorphic indices for evaluating recent uplift of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Geomorphology 190: 61–72, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.02.008.
• García-Tortosa F.J., Alfaro P., Galindo-Zaldívar J., Gibert L., López-Garrido A.C., Sanz de Galdeano C., Ureña M., 2008. Geomorphologic evidence of the active Baza Fault (Betic Cordillera, South Spain).
• Geomorphology 97: 374–391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.007.
• Guarnieri P., Pirrotta C., 2008. The response of drainage basins to the late Quaternary tectonics in the Sicilian side of the Messina Strait (NE Sicily). Geomorphology 95: 260–273, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.013.
• Gürbüz A., Gürer Ö. F., 2008. Tectonic geomorphology of the North Anatolian Fault Zone in the Lake Sapanca basin (aastern Marmara region, Turkey). Geosciences Journal 12(3): 215–225, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12303-008-0022-9.
• Hack J.T., 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index. U. S. Geological Survey Journal of Research 1: 421–429.
• Hare P.W., Gardner T.W., 1985. Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. W: M.Morisawa, J.T.Hack (red.), Tectonic Geomorphology. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium, September 1984, Boston: 76–104.
• Horton R.E., 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 13(1): 350–361.
• Horton R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56: 275–370.
• Hovius N., 1996. Regular spacing of drainage outlets from linear mountain belts. Basin Research 8:29–44.
• Jami M., Mousavi E.J., Hadizadeh A., Pourkermani M., 2013. The evaluation of Saravan Fault Activities in Iran on the Basis of Geomorphologic Evidences. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 6(4): 4362–4367.
• Jamieson S.S.R., Sinclair H.D., Kirstein L.A., Purves R.S., 2004. Tectonic forcing of longitudinal valleys in the Himalaya: morphological analysis of the Ladakh Batholith, North India. Geomorphology 58: 49–65, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00185-5.
• Jayappa K.S., Markose V.J., Nagaraju M., 2012. Identification of geomorphic signatures of neotectonics activity using DEM in the Precambrian terrain of Western Ghats, India. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 39–B8, XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August – 01 September, Melbourne, Australia.
• Jordan G., 2003. Morphometric analysis and tectonic interpretation of digital terrain data: a case study. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28(8): 807–822, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.469.
• Jordan G., Csillag G., Szucs A., Qvarfort U., 2003. Application of digital terrain modelling and GIS methods for the morphotectonic investigation of the Kali Basin, Hungary. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F. 47: 145–169.
• Kale V. S., Shejwalkar N., 2008. Uplift along the western margin of the Deccan Basalt Province: Is there any geomorphometric evidence? Journal of Earth System Science 117: 959–971.
• Keller E., Pinter N., 1996. Active Tectonics. Earthquake, Uplift, and Landscape. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
• Keller E., Pinter N., 2002. Active Tectonics. Earthquake, Uplift, and Landscape (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
• Khadri S.F.R., Kharbadkar V.S., 2013. Morphometric Analysis of the Vidarbha River Basin, Amravati District, Maharashtra with Reference to Watershed Management. Golden Research Thoughts 3(3).
• Khalaj M., 2015. Morphotectonic Analysis of Burkh Anticline, North of Bastak (Iran). Open Journal of Geology 5: 387–393, DOI: http://dx.doi,org/10.4236/ojg.2015.56036.
• Kirby E., Whipple K., 2001. Quantifying differential rock-uplift rates via stream profile analysis. Geology 29(5): 415–418.
• Kouli M., Vallianatos F., Soupios P., Alexakis D., 2006. A GIS example of morphometric analysis in tectonic structures of Western Crete, Greece. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Environment, Ecosystems and Development, Venice, Italy, November 20–22: 229–234.
• Krzyszkowski D., Migoń P., Sroka W., 1995. Neotectonics Quaternary history of the Sudetic Marginal Fault, SW Poland. Folia Quaternaria 66: 73–98.
• Lykoudi E., Angelaki M., 2004. The contribution of the morphometric parameters of an hydrographic network to the investigation of the neotectonics activity: an application to the upper Acheloos river. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress, Thessaloniki: 1084–1092.
• Mahmood S.A., Gloaguen R., 2012. Appraisal of active tectonics in Hindu Kush: Insights from DEM derived geomorphic indices and drainage analysis. Geoscience Frontiers 3: 407–428., DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.12.002.
• Malik J.N., Mohanty C., 2007. Active tectonic infl uence on the evolution of drainage and landscape: Geomorphic signatures from frontal and hinterland areas along the Northwestern Himalaya, India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 29: 604–618, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.03.010.
• Matsuda I., 2004. River morphology and channel processes. W: J. C. I. Dooge (red.), Fresh Surface Water, Encyklopedia of Life Suport Systems, Eolss Publishers, Oxford, Online: http://www.eolss.net/ebooks/Sample%20Chapters/C07/E2-07-02-01.pdf – 26.07.2015.
• Mayer L., 1986. Tectonic geomorphology of escarpments and mountain fronts. W: Active Tectonics. National Academy Press, Washington: 125–135.
• Melosh B.L., Keller E.A., 2013. Effects of active folding and reverse faulting on stream channel evolution, Santa Barbara Fold Belt, California. Geomorphology 186: 119–135, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.027.
• Melton M.A., 1957. An analysis of the relation among elements of climate, surface properties and Geomorphology. ONR Technical Report 11. Columbia University, New York.
• Melton M.A., 1958. Correlation structure of morphometric properties of drainage systems and their controlling agents. Journal of Geology 66: 442–460.
• Migoń P., Zwiernik M., 2006. Strukturalne uwarunkowania rzeźby północno-wschodniego progu Gór Stołowych. Przegląd Geograficzny 78(3): 319–338.
• Miller V.C., 1953. Quantitative geomorphological study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. ONR Technical Report 3. Columbia University, New York.
• Neumann L., 1900. Die Dichte des Flussnetzes im Schwarzwalde. Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik 4(3): 219–240.
• Omidali M., Arian M., Sorbi A., 2015. Neotectonics of Boroujerd Area, SW Iran by Index of Active Tectonics. Open Journal of Geology 5: 309–324, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2015.55028.
• Pánek T., 2004. The use of morphometric parameters in tectonic geomorphology (of the example of the Western Beskidy Mts). Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica 1: 111–126.
• Pedrera A., Pérez-Peña J. V., Galindo-Zaldívar J., Azañón J. M., Azor A., 2009. Testing the sensitivity of geomorphic indices in areas of low-rate active folding (eastern Betic Cordillera, Spain). Geomorphology 105: 218–231, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.09.026.
• Pérez-Peña J.V, Azañón J.M., Azor A., Delgado J., González-Lodeiro F., 2009. Spatial analysis of stream power using GIS: SLk anomaly maps. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34(1): 16–25, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1684.
• Pérez-Peña J.V., Azor A., Azañón J. M., Keller E. A., 2010. Active tectonics in the Sierra Nevada (Betic Cordillera, SE Spain): Insights from geomorphic indexes and drainage pattern analysis. Geomorphology 119: 74–87, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.020.
• Peters G., van Balen R.T., 2007. Tectonic geomorphology of the northern Upper Rhine Graben, Germany. Global and Planetary Change 58: 310 – 334, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.041.
• Raj R., 2012. Active tectonics of the Gujarat (India) by morphometric and morphostructural studies of Vatrak River basin. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 50: 66–78, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.01.010.
• Ramesth M.H., Mohammadabadi T.M., Pourkhosravani M., Mousavi S.H., 2011. Assessment of morphotectonic properties of Mahan Tigrani watershed. Management Science Letters 1: 503–510, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2011.06.013.
• Ramírez-Herrera M.T., 1998. Geomorphic assessment of active tectonics in the Acambay graben, Mexican Volcanic Belt. Earth Surface Processess and Landforms 23: 317–332.
• Ranoszek W., 2001. Krawędzie morfologiczne o genezie tektonicznej w Sudetach w świetle pomiarów ilościowych. Uniwersytet Wrocławski, rozprawa doktorska.
• Rockwell T.K., Keller E.A., Johnson D.L., 1985. Tectonic geomorphology of alluvial fans and mountain fronts near Ventura, California. W: M. Morisawa, T. J. Hack (red.), Tectonic Geomorphology, Proceedings of the 15th Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium, September 1984, Boston: 183–207.
• Saberi M.R., Pourkermani M., Nadimi A., Ghorashi M., Asadi A., 2014. Geomorphic Assessment of Active Tectonics in Tozlogol Basin, Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, Iran. Current Trends in Technology and Science 3(3): 146–154.
• Sahebari S.S., Ghorashi M., Nazari H., Sattarzadeh Y., 2015. Evaluation of Active Tectonics of “Talkheh Rud” Basin Using Geomorphological Indices. Advances in Environmental Biology 9: 424–433.
• Samadi H.R., 2014. Tectonics Movements Fault System of Central Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal 32(9): 1835–1840, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.32.09.86.
• Sarp G., Gecen R., Toprak V., Duzgun S., 2011. Morphotectonic Properties of Yenicaga Basin Area in Turkey. 34th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ISRSE34), Online: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/ISRSE-34/211104015Final00629.pdf – 26.07.2015.
• Schumm S.A., 1954. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. ONR Technical Report 8. Columbia University, New York.
• Schumm S.A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin 67(5): 597–646.
• Shahzad F., Gloaguen R., 2011a. TecDEM: A MATLAB based toolbox for tectonic geomorphology, Part 1: Drainage network processing and stream profile analysis. Computers & Geosciences 37(2): 250–260, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.06.008.
• Shahzad F., Gloaguen R., 2011a. TecDEM: A MATLAB based toolbox for tectonic geomorphology, Part 2: Surface dynamics and basin analysis. Computers & Geosciences 37(2): 261–271, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.06.009.
• Shtober-Zisu N., Greenbaum N., Inbar M., Flexer A., 2008. Morphometric and geomorphic approaches for assessment of tectonic activity, Dead Sea Rift (Israel). Geomorphology 102: 93–104, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.017.
• Shukla D.P., Dubey C.S., Ningreichon A.S., Singh R.P., Mishra B.K., Singh S.K., 2014. GIS-based morpho-tectonic studies of Alaknanda river basin: a precursor for hazard zonation. Natural Hazards 71: 1433–1452, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0953-y.
• Silva P.G., Goy J.L., Zazo C., Bardají T., 2003. Fault-generated mountain fronts in southeast Spain: geomorphologic assessment of tectonic and seismic activity. Geomorphology 50: 203–225.
• Simoni A., Elmi C., Picotti V., 2003. Late Quaternary uplift and valley evolution in the Northern Apennines: Lamone catchment. Quaternary International 101–102: 253–267.
• Singh V.P., 1988. Hydrologic Systems: Vol. 1. Rainfall-runoff Modeling. Prentice Hall.
• Singh T., Virdi N.S., 2007. Tectonic activity classes along the Nahan Thrust (NT) in NW Sub-Himalaya. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 35(3): 229–238, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03013490.
• Snyder N.P., Whipple K.X., Tucker G.E., Merritts D.J., 2000. Landscape response to tectonic forcing: Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 112(8): 1250–1263.
• Sroka W., 1997. Ewolucja morfotektoniczna Sudetów w rejonie Kotliny Kłodzkiej w świetle analizy morfometryczno-statystycznej. Prace Geologiczno-Mineralogiczne LVIII, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
• Štěpančíková P., Stemberk J., Vilímek V., Košťák B., 2008. Neotectonic development of drainage network in the East Sudeten and monitoring of recent displacements on tectonic structures (Czech Republic). Geomorphology 102: 68–80, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.016.
• Strahler A.N., 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 63(11): 1117–1142.
• Talling P.J., Steward M.D., Stark C.P., Gupta S., Vincent S. J., 1997. Regular spacing of drainage outlets from linear fault blocks. Basin Research 9: 275–302.
• Toudeshki V.H., Arian M., 2011. Morphotectonic analysis in the Ghezel Ozan river basin, NW Iran. Journal of Geography and Geology 3(1): 258–265, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v3n1p258.
• Troiani F., Dell Seta M., 2008. The use of the Stream-Gradient index in morphotectonic analysis of small catchments: A case study from Central Italy. Geomorphology 102: 159–168, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.020.
• Tsodoulos I.M., Koukouvelas I.K., Pavlides S., 2008. Tectonic geomorphology of the easternmost extension of the Gulf of Corinth (Beotia, Central Greece). Tectonophysics 453: 211–232, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.06.015.
• VanLaningham S., Meigs A., Goldfinger C., 2006. The effects of rock uplift and rock resistance on river morphology in a subduction zone forearc, Oregon, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31(10): 1257–1279, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1326.
• Verrios S., Zygouri V., Kokkalas S., 2004. Morphotectonic analysis in the Eliki fault zone (Gulf of Corinth, Greece). Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress, Thessaloniki: 1706–1715.
• Vojtko R., Beták J., Hók J., Marko F., Gajdoš V., Rozimant K., Mojzeš A., 2011a. Pliocene to Quaternary tectonics in the Horná Nitra Depression (Western Carpathians). Geologica Carpathica 62(4): 381–393, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10096-011-0028-5.
• Vojtko R., Marko F., Preusser F., Madras J., Kováčová M., 2011b. Late Quaternary fault activity in the Western Carpathians: evidence from Vikartovce Fault (Slovakia). Geologica Carpathica 62(6): 563–574, DOI: 10.2478/v10096-011-0040-9.
• Wallace R.E., 1978. Geometry and rates of change of fault-generated range front, north-central Nevada. Journal of Research of the United States Geological Survey 6: 637–650.
• Wobus C., Whipple K.X., Kirby E., Snyder N., Johnson J., Spyropolou K., Crosby B., Sheehan D., 2006a. Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls. W: S.D.Willet, N.Hovius, M.T.Brandon, D.Fisher (red.), Tectonics, Climate and Landscape Evolution. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 398: 55–74.
• Wobus C., Crosby B.T., Whipple K.X., 2006b. Hanging valleys in fluvial systems: Controls on occurrence and implications for landscape evolution. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, F02017, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1019/2005JF000406.
• Wells S.G., Bullard T.F., Menges C.M., Drake P.G., Karas P.A., Kelson K.I., Ritter J.B., Wesling J.R., 1988. Regional variations in tectonic geomorphology along a segmented convergent plate boundary pacific coast of Costa Rica. Geomorphology 1: 239–265.
• Whipple K.X., 2004. Bedrock rivers and the geomorphology of active orogens. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 32: 151–185. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120356
• Wieczorek M., Żyszkowska W., 2011. Geomorfometria – parametry morfometryczne w charakterystyce rzeźby terenu. Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny 43 (2): 130–144.
• Wiwegwin W., Sugiyama Y., Hisada K., Charusiri P., 2011. Re-evaluation of the activity of the Thoen Fault in the Lampang Basin, northern Thailand, based on geomorphology and geochronology. Earth, Planets and Space 63: 975–990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.018.
• Zăvoianu I., 1985. Morphometry of Drainage Basin. Developments in Water Science 20, Elsevier, Bukareszt.
• Zavoili E., Konstantinidi E., Koukouvelas I. K., 2004. Tectonic geomorphology of escarpments: the cases of Kompotades and Nea Anchialos faults. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 36: 1716–1725.
• Zuchiewicz W., 1980. Analiza morfometryczno-statystyczna małych zlewni w obszarach mobilnych tektonicznie. Czasopismo Geograficzne 51: 171–185.
• Zuchiewicz W., 1989. Morphotectonic phenomena in the Polish Flysch Carpathians: a case study of the Eastern Beskid Niski Mountains. Quaestiones Geographicae, Special Issue 2: 155–167.
• Zuchiewicz W., 1995. Neotectonic tendencies in the Polish Outer Carpathians in the light of some river valley parameters. Studia Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica 29: 55–76.
• Zuchiewicz W., 2000. Morphotectonics of the Outer East Carpathians of Poland in the light of cartometric studies. Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica 34: 5–26.
• Zuchiewicz W., 2010. Neotektonika Karpat polskich i zapadliska przedkarpackiego. Wydawnictwa AGH, Kraków.
• Zuchiewicz W., McCalpin J. P., 2000. Geometry of faceted spurt on an active normal fault: case study of the central Wasatch fault, Utah, U.S.A. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae 70: 231–249.
• Zwoliński Z., 2010. O homologiczności polskiej terminologii geoinformacyjnej. W: Z. Zwoliński (red.), GIS – woda w środowisku. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań: 21–30.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.