Earthquake ground motion scenarios in urban areas: the case of the city of Thessaloniki (Northern Greece)

• Autorzy: Roumelioti Z. , Kiratzi A. , Theodulidis N. , Panou A. , Savvaidis A. , Benetatos C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

earthquake; seismic risk; Balkan Peninsula

PL

trzęsienia ziemi; ryzyko sejsmiczne; Półwysep Bałkański

• Wydawca: Wydział Geodezji i Kartografii Politechniki Warszawskiej
• Czasopismo: Reports on Geodesy
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: z. 5/80
• Strony: 303--317
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Roumelioti Z.

• Department of Geophysics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 352-1, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

autor

Kiratzi A.

• Department of Geophysics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 352-1, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

autor

Theodulidis N.

• Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering

autor

Panou A.

• Department of Geophysics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

autor

Savvaidis A.

• Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering

autor

Benetatos C.

• Department of Geophysics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Bibliografia

• 1. Anastasiadis, A., Raptakis, D. and K. Pitilakis, 2001. Thessaloniki’s Detailed Microzoning: Subsurface Structure as basis for Site Response Analysis, PAGEOPH 158(12), 2597 - 2633.
• 2. Beresnev, I. A. and G. M. Atkinson, 1997. Modelling finite-fault radiation from the ωn spectrum, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 67 – 84.
• 3. Beresnev, I. A. and G. M. Atkinson, 1998. FINSIM – a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults, Seism. Res. Lett. 69, 27 – 32.
• 4. Beresnev, I. A. and G. M. Atkinson, 1999. Generic finite-fault model for ground-motion prediction in eastern North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 608 – 625.
• 5. Beresnev, I. and G. Atkinson, 2001a. Subevent structure of large earthquakes –
• 6. A ground motion perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 53 – 56.
• 7. Beresnev, I. and G. Atkinson, 2001b. Correction to “Subevent structure of large earthquakes – A ground motion perspective”, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4663.
• 8. Beresnev, I. A., and G. M. Atkinson, 2002. Source parameters of earthquakes in eastern and western North America based on finite-fault modeling, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 695-710.
• 9. Boore, D. M., 1983. Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1865 – 1894.
• 10. Boore, D. M., 2003. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 635 – 676.
• 11. Castro, R. R., Rovelli, A., Cocco, M., Di Bona, M., and F. Pacor, 2001. Stochastic simulation of strong-motion records from the 26 September 1997 (Mw 6), Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 27-39.
• 12. Hanks, T. C., 1979. b values and ω-γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high-frequency strong ground motion, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2235 – 2242.
• 13. Hanks, T. C. and R. K. McGuire, 1981. The character of high-frequency strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 2071 – 2095.
• 14. Hartzell, S., Harmsen, S., Frankel, A., S. Larsen, 1999. Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1484-1504.
• 15. Hatzidimitriou, P. M., 1993. Attenuation of coda waves in Northern Greece, Pure and Appl. Geophys. 140, 63 – 78.
• 16. Hatzidimitriou, P. M., 1995. S-wave attenuation in the crust in Northern Greece, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1381 – 1387.
• 17. Hough, S. E., Martin, S., Bilham, R., and G. M. Atkinson, 2002. The January 26, 2001 M7.6 Bhuj, India earthquake: Observed and predicted ground motions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92(6), 2061 - 2079.
• 18. Kanamori, H. and D. L. Anderson, 1975. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1073 – 1095.
• 19. Kiratzi, A., 2002. Stress tensor inversions along the westernmost North Anatolian Fault Zone and its continuation into the North Aegean Sea. Geophysical Journal International, 151, 360-376.
• 20. Margaris, B. N., B. C. Papazachos, 1994. Seismic Hazard Simulation of Strong Motion Based on Source Parameters in the Area of Greece, Proc. XXIV Gen. Ass. ESC, Sept. 19–24, 1994, Athens, III, 1389 – 1397.
• 21. Margaris, B. N., D. M. Boore, 1998. Determination of Δσ and κ0 from response spectra of large earthquakes in Greece, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 170 – 182.
• 22. McGuire, R. K., T. C. Hanks, 1980. Rms accelerations and spectral amplitudes of strong ground motion during the San Fernando, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 70, 1907 – 1919.
• 23. Mercier, J.-L., Carey-Gailhardis E., Mouyaris N., Simeakis K., Roundoyanis T. and C. Anghelidis, 1983. Structural analysis of recent and active faults and regional state of stress in the epicentral area of the 1978 Thessaloniki earthquakes (Northern Greece), Tectonics 2, 577 – 600.
• 24. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings, 1994, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, D.C.
• 25. Papastamatiou, D., Margaris, V., N. Theodoulidis, 1993. Estimation of the parameters controlling strong ground motion from shallow earthquakes in Greece, Proc. 2nd Hell. Geoph. Congr., May 5–7, 1993, Florina, I, 192 – 201.
• 26. Papazachos B. C., C. Papazachou, 2003. The earthquakes of Greece. Ziti Publ. Co., Thessaloniki, Greece, 286 pp (in Greek).
• 27. Papazachos, B., Mountrakis, D., Psilovikos, A., G. Leventakis, 1979. Surface fault traces and fault plane solutions of the May-June 1978 shocks in the Thessaloniki area, North Greece, Tectonophysics 53, 171 – 183.
• 28. Papazachos, B, Scordilis, E., Panagiotopoulos, D., Papazachos, C., G. Karakaisis, 2004. Global relations between seismic fault parameters and earthquakes moment, Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece, 36, 1482 – 1489.
• 29. Pavlides, S., A. Kilias, 1987. Neotectonic and active faults along the Serbomacedonian zone (SE Chalkidiki, Northern Greece), Ann. Tectonicae 1, 97 – 104.
• 30. Roumelioti, Z., A. Kiratzi, 2002. Stochastic simulation of strong-motion records from the 15 April 1979 (M 7.1) Montenegro earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1095-1101.
• 31. Roumelioti, Z., Kiratzi, A., Theodoulidis, N., Ch. Papaioannou, 2000. A comparative study of a stochastic and deterministic simulation of strong ground motion applied to the Kozani-Grevena (NW Greece) 1995 sequence, Annali di Geofisica, 43, 951 – 966.
• 32. Roumelioti, Z., Kiratzi, A., Theodoulidis, N., Kalogeras, I., G. Stavrakakis, 2003. Rupture directivity during the September 7, 1999 (Mw 5.9) Athens (Greece) earthquake obtained from strong-motion records, Pure and Appl. Geophys., 160 (12), 2301 - 2318.
• 33. Roumelioti, Z., Kiratzi, A., N. Theodoulidis, 2004. Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of the 7 September 1999 Athens (Greece) earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 94(3), 1036 - 1052.
• 34. Roumelioti, Z., Theodulidis, N.,A. Kiratzi, 2005. Slip distribution and forward modeling of geodetic and seismological observations of the 20 June 1978 Thessaloniki (Northern Greece) earthquake, submitted.
• 35. Soufleris, C., G. Stewart, 1981. A source study of the Thessaloniki (northern Greece) 1978 earthquake sequence, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 67, 343 – 358.
• 36. Stiros, S. C., A. Drakos, 2000. Geodetic constraints on the fault pattern of the 1978 Thessaloniki (Northern Greece) earthquake (MS=6.4), Geophys. J. Int. 143, 679 – 688.
• 37. Theodulidis, N., Roumelioti, Z., Panou, A., Savvaidis, A., Kiratzi, A., Grigoriadis, V., Dimitriou, P., T. Chatzigogos, 2005. Retrospective prediction of macroseismic intensities using strong ground motion simulation: the case of the 1978 Thessaloniki (Greece) earthquake (M6.5), submitted for publication.
• 38. Tranos, M. D., Papadimitriou, E. E., A. A. Kilias, 2003. Thessaloniki – Gerakarou Fault Zone (TGFZ): the western extension of the 1978 Thessaloniki earthquake fault (Northern Greece) and seismic hazard assessment, J. Struct. Geol., 25(12), 2109 – 2123.
• 39. Wells, D. L., K. J. Coppersmith, 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 974-1002.
• 40. Wessel, P., W. H. F. Smith, 1998. New improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU 79, 579