PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Sustainable project management concept development and research directions review

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The dynamic economic changes in recent years have made the principles of sustainable development gain more and more importance and there is a great need to maintain a balance in the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. This has also been observed in project management, whereby the concept of sustainable project management plays an important role in both practice and science. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in scientific publications on the concept of sustainable project management. The article presents the assumptions of sustainability in a project and the identification of research directions in this area. The study aims to present the results of the literature review and answer the two research questions: which research areas related to sustainable project management dominate the literature and what are the further research directions in the field of sustainable project management? Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted based on a literature review in the field of sustainable project management and sustainability in project management. Scientific articles indexed in the Scopus database, published before 2022, were used. A keyword analysis was carried out, on the basis of which subject areas related to sustainable project management were distinguished, and the most cited articles were reviewed to extract recommendations for the directions of future research. Findings: The literature review, taking into account sustainable project management, show that project lifecycle, project success, and risk management are dominated research topic in the articles. Further research directions suggested in the literature indicate, inter alia, to extend the scope of research on sustainable project management to different countries and sectors. Originality/value: The literature review is based on the most recent publications. Moreover, in addition to the traditional literature review, keywords were analyzed and other research directions were analyzed, which was rarely seen in publications that focused mainly on the synthesis of conclusions.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
699--721
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz.
Bibliografia
  • 1. Adamowicz, M., Dresler, E. (2006). Zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich na przykładzie wybranych gmin województwa lubelskiego. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu, 540, 17-24.
  • 2. Armenia, S., Dangelico, R.M., Nonino, F., & Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies. Sustainability, 11(9), 2664. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11092664.
  • 3. Brzozowska, A., Pabian, A., & Pabian, B. (2021). Sustainability in Project Management: A Functional Approach. CRC Press.
  • 4. Carboni, J., Duncan, W.R., González, M., Milsom, P., & Young, M. (2018). Sustainable Project Management. The GPM Reference Guide.
  • 5. Chow, T.C., Zailani, S., Rahman, M.K., Qiannan, Z., Bhuiyan, M.A., Patwary, A.K. (2021). Impact of sustainable project management on project plan and project success of the manufacturing firm: Structural model assessment. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0259819.
  • 6. Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., Gençay, E. (2019). Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010010.
  • 7. Fuentes-Bargues, J.L., Bastante-Ceca, M.J., Ferrer-Gisbert, P.S., & González-Cruz, M.C. (2020). Study of major-accident risk assessment techniques in the environmental impact assessment process. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 1-16. doi:10.3390/su12145770.
  • 8. Gasiński, T., & Piskalski, G. (2009). Zrównoważony biznes. Podręcznik dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Ministerstwo Gospodarki.
  • 9. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Guidance on social responsibility (ISO Standard No. ISO 26000:2010). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html.
  • 10. International Project Management Association (2016). In Project Excellence Baseline for Achieving Excellence in Projects and Programmes.
  • 11. Jang, Y., Son, J., & Yi, J. (2021). Classifying the level of bid price volatility based on machine learning with parameters from bid documents as risk factors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). doi:10.3390/su13073886.
  • 12. Jarosz, S., Sołtysik, M., Zakrzewska, M. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Light of Social and Competence Changes. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXIII, Special Issue 1, 530-548.
  • 13. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
  • 14. Klaus-Rosińska, A., Iwko, J. (2021). Stakeholder Management – One of the Clues of Sustainable Project Management – As an Underestimated Factor of Project Success in Small Construction Companies. Sustainability, 13, 9877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179877.
  • 15. McKinlay, M. (2008). Where is Project Management Running to…? International Project Management Association, 22 26 nd World Congres, Rome.
  • 16. Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka, J., Stanek, S., Kuchta, D. (2021). Defining a Successful Project in Sustainable Project Management through Simulation—A Case Study. Sustainability, 13, 8556. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158556.
  • 17. Płachciak, A. (2011). Geneza idei rozwoju zrównoważonego, 5(17), 231-248.
  • 18. Silvius, A.J.G., & Schipper, R.P.J. (2014). Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63-96. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814X13948909253866.
  • 19. Silvius, A.J.G., Schipper, R., Planko, J., van den Brink, J., & Köhler, A. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management. Farnham: Gower Publishing.
  • 20. Smurfit Kappa (2020). Sustainable development shapes the business landscape for good. Global Report.
  • 21. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
  • 22. Trzeciak, M. (2021). Sustainable Risk Management in IT Enterprises. Risks, 9, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9070135.
  • 23. Trzepacz, P. (2012). Geneza i istota koncepcji rozwoju zrównoważonego.In: Zrównoważony rozwój – Wyzwania globalne (pp. 11–36). Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • 24. Turner, J.R., Anbari, F. & Bredillet, C. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: the nine schools. Glob. Bus. Perspect. 1, 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196-012-0001-4.
  • 25. Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View. Sustainability, 3(10), 1637-1661. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su3101637.
  • 26. Wang, H., Cheng, Z., & Li, H. (2020). Predictive model of effective sustainable operation for sustainable development of enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, 214, 02044. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021402044.
  • 27. Watfa, M.K., Abdelrehim, A., Shahin, N., & Jaafar, K. (2021). A structural equation model to assess the impact of sustainability management on the success of construction projects.International Journal of Construction Management, doi:10.1080/15623599.2021.1998302.
  • 28. Xiaolong, T., Gull, N., Iqbal, S., Asghar, M., Nawaz, A., Albasher, G., Hameed, J. and Maqsoom, A. (2021). Exploring and Validating the Effects of Mega Projects on Infrastructure Development Influencing Sustainable Environment and Project Management. Front. Psychol., 12, 663199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663199.
  • 29. Zighan, S., Abualqumboz, M. (2021). A Project Life-Cycle Readiness Approach to Manage Construction Waste in Jordan. Construction Economics and Building, 21, 3, 58-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB. v21i3.7628.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a7a572f4-d800-43a5-8b03-146d497462c0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.