Composite anti-disturbance switched H2 control design for switched systems

• Autorzy: Kemer Emre , Başak Hakan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ama-2025-0015

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article addresses the challenge of integrated switched H2 control with disturbance rejection capabilities for switched systems, particularly when external disturbances are present. A novel anti-disturbance switched H2 control strategy is formulated, leveraging estimated disturbance values. The formulation is given in Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs), establishing sufficient conditions to ensure H2 performance while maintaining closed-loop stability. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, it is applied to a practical aero-engine model. Through simulations, it is demonstrated that the closed-loop aero-engine model exhibits remarkable transient performance even in the face of external disturbances. These results underscore the efficacy of the developed approach in enhancing the robustness and perfor-mance of switched systems subjected to disturbances. The integration of anti-disturbance capabilities within the H2 control framework offers a promising avenue for addressing real-world control challenges, particularly in systems characterized by switching dynamics and external perturbations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

composite anti-disturbance control; switched systems; dwell time; H2 switched control; aero-engine model

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Acta Mechanica et Automatica
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 1
• Strony: 126--135
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kemer Emre

• Engineering and Natural sciences, Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Uşak University, Uşak, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-1971

autor

Başak Hakan

• Engineering, Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-6819

Bibliografia

• 1. Wei X, Guo L. Composite disturbance‐observer‐based control and 𝐻∞ control for complex continuous models. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control: IFAC‐Affiliated Journal. 2010; 20(1): 106-118.
• 2. Yao X, Guo L. Composite anti-disturbance control for Markovian jump nonlinear systems via disturbance observer. Automatica. 2013; 49(8): 2538-2545.
• 3. Sun H, Hou L, Zong G, et al. Composite anti‐disturbance attitude and vibration control for flexible spacecraft. IET Control Theory & Applications. 2017; 11(14): 2383-2390.
• 4. Li Y, Chen M, Ge SS, et al. Anti-disturbance control for attitude and altitude systems of the helicopter under random disturbances. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2020; 96: 105561.
• 5. Li T, Yang H, Tian J, et al. Improved disturbance rejection control based on 𝐻∞ synthesis and equivalent-input-disturbance for aircraft longitudinal autopilot design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2018; 233(9): 3323-3335.
• 6. Gao F, Wu M, She J, et al. Disturbance rejection in nonlinear systems based on equivalent-input-disturbance approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2016; 282: 244-253.
• 7. Li T, Zhang S, Yang H, et al. Robust missile longitudinal autopilot design based on equivalent-input-disturbance and generalized extended state observer approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2016; 229(6): 1025-1042.
• 8. Aboudonia A, Rashad R, El-Badawy A. Composite hierarchical anti-disturbance control of a quadrotor UAV in the presence of matched and mismatched disturbances. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2018; 90(1): 201-216.
• 9. Zengbo L, Yukai Z, JianzhongnQ. Composite anti-disturbance position and attitude control for spacecraft with parametric uncertainty and flexible vibration. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2022; 35(12): 242-252.
• 10. Liu L, Chen M, Li T, et al. Composite Anti-Disturbance Reference Model 𝐿2−𝐿∞ Control for Helicopter Slung Load System. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2021; 102(1): 1-21.
• 11. Cao S, Guo L, Ding Z. Event‐triggered anti‐disturbance attitude control for rigid spacecrafts with multiple disturbances. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 2021; 31(2): 344-357.
• 12. Yao X, Wen X. Composite hierarchical hybrid anti-disturbance control for Markovian jump systems with event-triggered disturbance. Sys-tems & Control Letters. 2024;185:105734.
• 13. Sakthivel R, Elayabharath VT, Satheesh T, et al.Design of anti-dis-turbance reliable control for fuzzy networked control systems with multiple disturbances. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2024; 26(1): 105-120.
• 14. Sun H, Liu Y, Jiao T, et al. Distributed extended state observer design and dual-side dynamic event-triggered output feedback anti-disturb-ance control for nonlinear interconnected systems with quantization. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 2024; 106847.
• 15. Lin H, Antsaklis PJ. Stability and stabilizability of switched linear systems: a survey of recent results. IEEE Transactions on Automatic control. 2009; 54(2): 308-322.
• 16. Liberzon D, Morse AS. Basic problems in stability and design of switched systems. IEEE control systems magazine. 1999; 19(5): 59-70.
• 17. Geromel JC, Colaneri P. Stability and stabilization of continuous-time switched linear systems. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. 2006; 45(5): 1915-1930.
• 18. Allerhand LI, Shaked U. Robust control of linear systems via switching. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 2012; 58(2): 506-512.
• 19. Liu F, Chen M, Li T. Resilient 𝐻∞ control for uncertain turbofan linear switched systems with hybrid switching mechanism and disturbance observer. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2022; 413: 126597.
• 20. Deaecto GS, Souza M, Geromel JC. Chattering free control of continuous‐time switched linear systems. IET Control Theory & Applications. 2014; 8(5): 348-354.
• 21. Gershon E, Shaked U. Robust State-Dependent Switching of Linear Systems with Dwell Time. In Advances in 𝐻∞ Control Theory. Springer Cham. 2019; 27-41.
• 22. Wang J, Huang Z, Wu Z, et al. Extended dissipative control for singularly perturbed PDT switched systems and its application. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers. 2020; 67(12): 5281-5289.
• 23. Xiang W. Stabilization for continuous-time switched linear systems: A mixed switching scheme. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems. 2020; 36:100872.
• 24. Zhang S, Zhao J. Dwell-Time-Dependent 𝐻∞ Bumpless Transfer Con-trol for Discrete-Time Switched Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2021; 30(70: 2426-2437.
• 25. Zhang S, Zhao J. Membership-function-dependent H∞ bumpless transfer control for switched interval type-2 fuzzy systems with time-delay. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems. 2024; 52: 101457.
• 26. Priyanka S, Sakthivel R, Mohanapriya S, et al. Composite fault-toler-ant and anti-disturbance control for switched fuzzy stochastic systems. ISA transactions. 2022;125: 99-109.
• 27. Scherer C, Weiland S. Linear matrix inequalities in control. Lecture Notes in Dutch Institute for Systems and Control. Delft. The Netherlands. 2000; 3.
• 28. Kemer E, Başak H, Prempain E. Switched 𝐻2-state-feedback control with application to a fighter aircraft. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2019; 233(14): 5428-5437.
• 29. Richter H. Advanced control of turbofan engines. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
• 30. Jaw L, Mattingly J. Aircraft engine controls: Design, System Analysis and Health Monitoring. Reston VA. USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2009.