A MCDM approach with fuzzy AHP method for occupational accidents on board

• Autorzy: Özdemir Ü , Altinpinar I. , Demirel F. B.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.12.01.10

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Occupational accidents on board criteria determining is a challenging procedure in shipping industry as the ideal safety ship management strategy depends on many factors involving in shipping transportation There are many legislations, agreements and practices to obtain series of security measures in order to ensure safety and security of seafarers. Causes of on-board occupational accidents need to be evaluated in a correct manner to regulate more functional practices and also to lower the on-board accident rates. However, causes of on-board accidents can be extremely complex. Therefore, scientific methods should be used to evaluate the causes and to determine the measures to be taken. The evaluation of the parameters is of great importance for the future of the maritime sector and in terms of development. In this study, factors have been identified that lead to seafarers? occupational accidents on board and we tried to present alternative solutions which can be applied on this issue. Severity of the reasons that led to the accidents and their relationships with each other are identified to be able to sort through the alternative solutions with a model using the fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method approach. Results of the study revealed that the most important criteria for the occupational accidents on board criteria selection are respectively; human factors, lack of management, ship-borne troubles, cargo troubles and environmental factors.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); fuzzy AHP; occupational accidents; safety at sea; Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (FMCDM); Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM); on-board accidents; MCDM model

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 1
• Strony: 93--98
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz. rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Özdemir Ü

• Mersin University, Mersin, Turke

autor

Altinpinar I.

• Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

autor

Demirel F. B.

• Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1.Abdelhamid, T. S., & Everett, J. G. (2000). Identifying root causes of construction accidents. Journal of construction engineering and management, 126(1), 52-60.
• 2.Accident prevention on board ship at sea and in port. An ILO code of practice. Geneva, International Labour Office, 2nd edition, 1996 ISBN 92-2-109450-2.
• 3.Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, pp. 233- 247.
• 4.Cooper Ph. D, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety science, 36(2), 111-136.
• 5.Cox, S., & Flin, R. (1998). Safety culture: philosopher's stone or man of straw?. Work & stress, 12(3), 189-201.
• 6.Dursun, S. (2013). İş güvenliği kültürünün çalışanların güvenli davranışları üzerine etkisi. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi (SGD), 3(2).
• 7.Grech, M., Horberry, T., & Koester, T. (2008). Human factors in the maritime domain. CRC Press.
• 8.Hansen, H. L. 1996. “Surveillance of Deaths on Board Danish Merchant Ships 1986-93.” Occupational & Environmental Medicine 53: 269–275.
• 9.Hansen, H. L., D. Nielsen, and M. Frydenberg. 2002. “Occupational Accidents aboard Merchant Ships.” Occupational&Environmental Medicine 59: 85–91.
• 10.Havold, J. I. (2000). Culture in maritime safety. Maritime Policy & Management, 27(1), 79-88.
• 11.Hetherington, C., R. Flin, and K. Mearns. 2006. ““Safety İn Shipping: The Human Element.” Journal of Safety Research 37 (4): 401–411. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007.
• 12.Kafalı, M., Özkök, M. and Çebi, S. (2014), “Evaluation of Pipe Cutting Technologies In Shipbuilding”, Brodogradnja, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 33-48.
• 13.Martins, M. R., and M. C. Maturana. 2010. “Human Error Contribution İn Collision and Grounding of Oil Tankers.” Risk Analysis 30 (4): 674–698. doi: 10.1111/risk.2010.30.issue-4.
• 14.O’Neil, W. A. 2003. “The Human Element İn Shipping.” Journal of Maritime Affairs 2 (2): 95–97. doi:10.1007/BF03195037.
• 15.Oldenburg, M., Baur, X., & Schlaich, C. (2010). Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. Journal of occupational health, 52(5), 249-256.
• 16.Özdemir, Ü. and Çetin, M.S. (2017). Investigation of An Quantitative Research on the Causes of Sea Piracy. 12th International Conference on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Gdynia, Poland, in progress.
• 17.Özdemir, Ü. and Güneroğlu, A. (2016), “Cargo Type Selection Procedure Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Techniques: “The Case of Dry Bulk Cargo Ships”, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics (in progress).
• 18.Özdemir, Ü. and Güneroğlu, A. (2017). Quantitative Analysis of the World Sea Piracy by Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodologies. International Journal of Transport Economics, in progress.
• 19.Özdemir, Ü and Güneroğlu, A. (2015). Strategic Approach Model For Investigating The Cause Of Maritime Accidents. Scientific Journal on Traffic and Transportation Research, 27(2), 113-123.
• 20.Portela, R. 2005. “Maritime Casualties Analysis as a Tool to Improve Research about Human Factors on Maritime Environment.” Journal of Maritime Research 2: 3–18.
• 21.Reiman, T., & Oedewald, P. (2002). The assessment of organizational culture: A methodological study. VTT Research Notes 2140. Espoo, Finland.
• 22.Roberts, S. 2000. “Occupational Mortality among British Merchant Seafarers (1986-1995).” Maritime Policy & Management 27 (3): 253–265. doi:10.1080/030888300411095.
• 23 Roberts, S. E. (2002). Hazardous occupations in Great Britain. The Lancet, 360(9332), 543-544.
• 24.Rothblum, A. M. (2000, October). Human error and marine safety. In National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando, FL.
• 25.Talley, W. K. 2009. “Determinants of the Probability of Ship Injuries.” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 25 (2): 171–188. doi:10.1016/S2092-5212(09)80001-1.
• 26.Toffoli, A., Lefevre, J.M., Bitner-Gregersen, E., Monbaliu, J., 2005. Towards the identi- fication of warning criteria: analysis of a ship accident database. Applied Ocean Research 27 (6), 281–291.
• 27.Uğurlu Ö. 2016. ʺA case study related to the improvement  of working and rest hours of oil tanker deck officersʺ,  MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, vol.43, pp.524539. 
• 28.Uğurlu  Ö.,  Köse  E.,  Yildirim  U.,  Yüksekyildiz  E.,  2015.  ʺMarine Accident Analysis for Collision and Grounding  In Oil Tanker Using Fta Methodʺ, MARITIME POLICY  & MANAGEMENT, no.2, pp.163‐185. 
• 29.Uğurlu  Ö.,  Kum  S.,  Aydoğdu  Y.V.,  2016. ʺAnalysis  of  Occupational Accidents Encountered by Deck Cadets in  Maritime  Transportationʺ,  Maritime  Policy & Management, vol.7, pp.1‐19. 
• 30.Uğurlu  Ö.,2015. ʺApplication  of  Fuzzy  Extended  AHP  Methodology for Selection of Ideal Ship for Oceangoing  Watchkeeping  Officersʺ,  International Journal  of  Industrial Ergonomics, vol.47, pp.132‐140. 
• 31.Xu, Z. and Yager, R. R. (2008), “Dynamic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 246–262.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).