Predication of violations in road transportation system

• Autorzy: Chaali-Djelassi A. , Vanderhaegen F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Risk analysis in Human-Machine System has to take into account intentional Human Errors in order to reduce their occurrences and/or their consequences. After an introduction of the barrier removal concept and the BCD model, the article presents a comparative prediction study between a first human behaviour prediction method based on the barrier removal utility and the Iterative Learning Control and a second one based on the BCD model and the Artificial Neural Networks. Its interest is illustrated by the presentation of the results of an experimental study realized with a car driving simulator.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Artificial Neural Networks; prediction; human error; violation; barrier removal; human-machine system; decision making; decision utility; iterative learning control

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONBiN
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: No. 2
• Strony: 57--68
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Chaali-Djelassi A.

• Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d‟Informatique Industrielles et Humaines (LAMIH) Université of Valenciennes - UMR 8530 CNRS

autor

Vanderhaegen F.

Bibliografia

• [1] Amalberti, R., The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems, Safety Science, Volume 37, Issues 2-3, Pages 109-126. March 2001.
• [2] Chaali Djelassi, A., Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F. Human behaviour prediction method based on the Barrier Removal Utility: application to the car driving. 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 22-27 July. Las Vegas. Nevada. 2005.
• [3] Swain, A. D. and Guttmann H. E. Handbook of Reliability Analysis with emphasis on Nuclear Plant Applications. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-1278, Washington D.C. 1983.
• [4] Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., Millot, P, Wieringa, P. Barrier and risk analysis. 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Kassel, Germany. 2001.
• [5] Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., Wieringa, P. Theory of safety related violation of system barriers. Cognition Technology & Work. 2002.
• [6] Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., & MILLOT, P. Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Theme: Impacts of Emerging Cybernetics and Human Machine System. The Hague, Netherlands. October 10-13 2004.
• [7] Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., and Amelberti, R., Modeling Border-line Tolerated Conditions of Use (BCTUs) and associated risks, Safety Science, Vol. 4, pp 171-179. 2002
• [8] Chaali Djelassi, A. Polet. P & Vanderhaegen. F. 2005. Decision weight function in car driving. Qualita. Bordeaux, 16 – 17 – 18 mars 2005.
• [9] Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, Third edition, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001.
• [10] Z. Zhang, P. Polet, F. Vanderhaegen, and P. Millot, “Artificial Neural Network for Violation Analysis”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol 84, issue 1, pp. 3-18, 2004.
• [11] Z. Zhang, and F. Vanderhaegen, A method integrating Self-Organizing Maps to predict the probability of Barrier Removal, Chapter 30 in H. Bozdogan (ed.), Statistical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, CRC Press, New York, July 2003.
• [12] Zhicheng zhang, Frederic Vanderhaegen, Patrick Millot. “Case study on human reliability using artificial neural networks“. International conference on machine learning and cybernetics, august 18-21, guangzou, china, 2005.