PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Assessing the Ecological Function Effectiveness of Urban Parks in Surakarta City, Indonesia

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Urban parks are vital for ecological sustainability within city landscapes, offering services that range from biodiversity preservation to climate regulation. This study evaluates the ecological function effectiveness of urban parks in Surakarta City, providing a quantifiable assessment of their contribution to environmental health and urban biodiversity. Through a systematic analysis of various parks within the Jebres sub-district, ecological function indicators such as green open space ratios, oxygen production, microclimate regulation, air pollution absorption, and biodiversity were measured. The findings indicate that Lansia Park holds the highest effectiveness rate at 78.80%, signifying its exemplary management and ecological value. Contrarily, Gendon ISI Park and Tegalharjo Park presented lower effectiveness rates of 70.40% and 71.00%, respectively, suggesting areas for potential improvement. The average ecological function effectiveness rate across all studied parks stands at 74.03%, reflecting the overall positive impact of Surakarta’s green spaces on urban ecology. This research underscores the imperative role of urban parks in enhancing ecosystem services and provides a framework for future urban planning and conservation strategies, emphasizing the enhancement of carbon sequestration capabilities within urban green spaces.
Twórcy
  • Environmental Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
  • Environmental Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
  • Environmental Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
  • Environmental Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
  • Environmental Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
  • Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Universitas Pertamina, Jakarta Selatan 12220, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Apfelbeck B., Snep R.P.H., Hauck T.E., Ferguson J., Holy M., Jakoby C., Scott MacIvor J., Schär L., Taylor M., Weisser W.W. 2020. Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, 103817.
  • 2. Aronson M.F.J., Piana M.R., MacIvor J.S., Pregitzer C.C. 2017. Management of plant diversity in urban green spaces. Urban Biodiversity, 101–120.
  • 3. Ayeni A.O., Aborisade A.G., Onuminya T.O., Soneye A.S.O., Ogundipe O.T. 2023. Urban Development in Africa and Impact on Biodiversity. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 8(2), 73–89.
  • 4. Callaghan C.T., Benedetti Y., Wilshire J.H., Morelli F. 2020. Avian trait specialization is negatively associated with urban tolerance. Oikos, 129(10), 1541–1551.
  • 5. Chang C.-R., Chen M.-C., Su M.-H. 2021. Natural versus human drivers of plant diversity in urban parks and the anthropogenic species-area hypotheses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 208, 104023.
  • 6. Chen W.Y., Li X. 2021. Urban forests’ recreation and habitat potentials in China: A nationwide synthesis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127376.
  • 7. Dade M.C., Mitchell M.G.E., Brown G., Rhodes J.R. 2020. The effects of urban greenspace characteristics and socio-demographics vary among cultural ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126641.
  • 8. Elliott H., Eon C., Breadsell J.K. 2020. Improving City Vitality through Urban Heat Reduction with Green Infrastructure and Design Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings, 10(12).
  • 9. Feng H., Kang P., Deng Z., Zhao W., Hua M., Zhu X., Wang Z. 2023. The impact of climate change and human activities to vegetation carbon sequestration variation in Sichuan and Chongqing. Environmental Research, 238, 117138.
  • 10. Fournier B., Frey D., Moretti M. 2020. The origin of urban communities: From the regional species pool to community assemblages in city. Journal of Biogeography, 47(3), 615–629.
  • 11. Hwang Y.H., Jain A. 2021. Landscape design approaches to enhance human–wildlife interactions in a compact tropical city. Journal of Urban Ecology, 7(1), juab007.
  • 12. Klaus V.H., Kiehl K. 2021. A conceptual framework for urban ecological restoration and rehabilitation. Basic and Applied Ecology, 52, 82–94.
  • 13. Kotze D.J., Lowe E.C., MacIvor J.S., Ossola A., Norton B.A., Hochuli D.F., Mata L., Moretti M., Gagné S.A., Handa I.T., Jones T.M., Threlfall C.G., Hahs A.K. 2022. Urban forest invertebrates: how they shape and respond to the urban environment. Urban Ecosystems, 25(6), 1589–1609.
  • 14. Krause P., Forbes B., Barajas-Ritchie A., Clark M., Disney M., Wilkes P., Bentley L.P. 2023. Using terrestrial laser scanning to evaluate non-destructive aboveground biomass allometries in diverse Northern California forests. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 4.
  • 15. Kwiatkowski R.E. 1980. The use of the Shannon-Wiener diversity index to delineate the horizontal distribution of crustacean zooplankton communities in Lake Superior, 1973. Hydrobiologia, 68, 247–256.
  • 16. Lin S.-H., Zhao X., Wu J., Liang F., Li J.-H., Lai R.-J., Hsieh J.-C., Tzeng G.-H. 2021. An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100909.
  • 17. Mendez Q. R., Creutzig F., Fuss S., Lück S. 2023. Towards carbon-neutral cities: an assessment of urban CO2 removal and albedo management. Research Square.
  • 18. Pérez del Hoyo R., Visvizi A., Mora H. 2021. Chapter 2 - Inclusiveness, safety, resilience, and sustainability in the smart city context (A. Visvizi & R. B. T.-S. C. and the un Sdg. Pérez del Hoyo (Eds.). Elsevier, 15–28.
  • 19. Reyes-Riveros R., Altamirano A., De La Barrera F., Rozas-Vásquez D., Vieli L., Meli P. 2021. Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127105.
  • 20. Semeraro T., Scarano A., Buccolieri R., Santino A., Aarrevaara E. 2021. Planning of Urban Green Spaces: An Ecological Perspective on Human Benefits. Land 10(2).
  • 21. Shin Y., Midgley G.F., Archer E.R.M., Arneth A., Barnes D.K.A., Chan L., Hashimoto S., Hoegh‐ Guldberg O., Insarov G., Leadley P. 2022. Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate. Global Change Biology, 28(9), 2846–2874.
  • 22. Singh N., Singh S., Mall R. K. 2020. Chapter 17 - Urban ecology and human health: implications of urban heat island, air pollution and climate change nexus (P. Verma, P. Singh, R. Singh, & A.S.B.T.- U.E. Raghubanshi (Eds.). Elsevier, 317–334.
  • 23. Suhardono S., Hermawan B., Aulia A.N.A., Restanti A.D., Ramadhan A.W.W., Septiariva I.Y., Sari M. M., Suryawan I.W.K. 2024. Carbon Sequestration and Environmental Service Assessment in the Special Purpose Forest Area of Mount Bromo, Indonesia. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(4).
  • 24. Suhardono S., Septiariva I.Y., Mulyana R., Sari M.M., Ulhasanah N., Prayogo W., Suryawan I.W.K. 2024. Human activities and forest fires in Indonesia : An analysis of the Bromo incident and implications for conservation tourism. Trees, Forests and People, 15.
  • 25. Suryawan I.W.K., Lee C.-H. 2023. Community preferences in carbon reduction: Unveiling the importance of adaptive capacity for solid waste management. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111226.
  • 26. Suryawan I.W.K., Mulyana R., Yenis Septiariva I., Prayogo W., Suhardono S., Sari M.M., Ulhasanah N. 2024. Smart urbanism, citizen-centric approaches and integrated environmental services in transit-oriented development in Jakarta, Indonesia. Research in Globalization, 8, 100181.
  • 27. Tibesigwa B., Ntuli H., Lokina R. 2020. Valuing recreational ecosystem services in developing cities: The case of urban parks in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Cities, 106, 102853.
  • 28. Tiwari D., Singh A. 2023. Exploring the Role of Municipalities in Promoting Sustainable Development with Special Reference to Green Bonds in India. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 9(2).
  • 29. Vázquez-Alonso M., Lentz D.L., Dunning N.P., Carr C., Anaya Hernández A., Reese-Taylor K. 2022. Lidar-Based Aboveground Biomass Estimations for the Maya Archaeological Site of Yaxnohcah, Campeche, Mexico. Remote Sensing, 14(14).
  • 30. Wang Y., Chang Q., Li X. 2021. Promoting sustainable carbon sequestration of plants in urban greenspace by planting design: A case study in parks of Beijing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127291.
  • 31. Zhang A., Deng R. 2022. Spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of net carbon sink efficiency in Chinese cities under the background of carbon neutrality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132547.
  • 32. Zhang J., Yu Z., Zhao B., Sun R., Vejre H. 2020. Links between green space and public health: a bibliometric review of global research trends and future prospects from 1901 to 2019. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 63001.
  • 33. Zhou J., Gao Y., Wang Y., Zhao Y. J. 2021. The effect of different afforestation tree species on plant diversity after 50 years on mount TAI, CHINA. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, 19(6).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a621fca6-0dcd-4883-b39a-87e19cf98137
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.