Integrated assessment of urban land carrying capacity (ULCC) for reducing earthquake risk disaster in Palu City

• Autorzy: Jossi Erwindy , Chay Asdak , Bombom Rahmat , Mohamad Sapari

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22630/PNIKS.2021.30.4.44

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Assessment of the carrying capacity of urban land is very important to evaluate and obtain an overview of the level of land capability through the classification of the carrying capacity of the area so that it becomes the basis for future urban development. This research was conducted in Palu City, which is national city in Indonesia with limited urban development due to its prone to earthquakes. For urban development, it is necessary to study the carrying capacity of land to reduce the risk of earthquake disasters, through three stages of analysis, namely mapping of earthquake-prone areas using the earthquake hazard mapping with seismic micro-zonation; land capability assessment; and integration of land suitability with planning and spatial planning of Palu City. Based on the findings of this study, 74.56% of Palu City is an earthquake-prone area dominated by land capability Classes A to B, namely low to very low land capability classes (55.43%), implying that they have urban physical constraints. However, if it is integrated with the Palu City spatial plan until 2030, most (78.79%) are already in accordance with the carrying capacity of their land, especially in protected areas, but there are still land developments that are not suitable for carrying capacity (21.21%), especially in cultivation areas with risks earthquake disaster. Land use plans that are not in accordance with their carrying capacity must be managed strictly as a tool for disaster mitigation that is urgently needed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

land carrying capacity; urban area; earthquake disaster; Palu City

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 30, No. 4
• Strony: 525--536
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., mapy, rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jossi Erwindy

• University of Padjadjaran, Graduate School, Department of Environmental Studies, Jl. Dipati Ukur 35, Bandung City, West Java, Indonesia, 40132

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-5911

autor

Chay Asdak

• University of Padjadjaran, Graduate School

autor

Bombom Rahmat

• University of Padjadjaran, Graduate School

autor

Mohamad Sapari

• University of Padjadjaran, Graduate School

Bibliografia

• Akıncı, H., Özalp, A.Y. & Turgut, B. (2013). Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 97, 71-82.
• Ansal, A., Erdik, M., Studer, J., Springman, S., Laue, J., Buchheister, J., Giardini, D., Faeh, D. & Koksal, D. (2004). Seismic microzonation for earthquake risk mitigation in Turkey. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Vancouver 1-6 August [on-line, Paper 1428].
• Atlas Powder Company (1987). Explosives and rock blasting. Dallas: Atlas Powder Company.
• Bellier, O., Sébrier, M., Beaudouin, T., Villeneuve, M., Braucher, R., Bourles, D., Siame, L., Putranto, E. & Pratomo, I. (2001). High slip rate for a low seismicity along the Palu‐Koro active fault in central Sulawesi (Indonesia). Terra Nova, 13(6), 463-470.
• Boix, L.R. & Zinck, J.A. (2008). Land-use planning in the Chaco plain (Burruyacu, Argentina). Part 1: Evaluating land-use options to support crop diversification in an agricultural frontier area using physical land evaluation. Environmental Management, 42(6), 1043.
• Chang, I.S. & Wu, J. (2011). Review on natural resources utilization in China. Management Science and Engineering, 5(2), 16-21.
• Chávez-García, F.J. & Cuenca, J. (1998). Site effects and microzonation in Acapulco. Earthquake Spectra, 14(1), 75-93.
• Dougill, A.J., Twyman, C., Thomas, D.S. & Sporton, D. (2002). Soil degradation assessment in mixed farming systems of southern Africa: use of nutrient balance studies for participatory degradation monitoring. Geographical Journal, 168(3), 195-210.
• Erdik, M., Durukal, E., Aydinoglu, N., Fahjan, Y. & Siyahi, B. (2006). Urban earthquake loss assessment. In Geohazards – Technical, Economicial and Social Risk Evaluation: Lillehammer, 18-21 June 2006 [on-line]. Retrieved from: http://dc.engconfintl.org/geohazards/17
• Faccioli, E. & Pessina, V. (2001). The Catania Project: earthquake damage scenarios for a high risk area in the Mediterranean. Retrieved from: https://www.earth-prints.org/bitstream/2122/12181/1/FACTCP_99.pdf
• Fäh, D., Kind, F., Lang, K. & Giardini, D. (2001). Earthquake scenarios for the city of Basel. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(5), 405-413.
• Feizizadeh, B. & Blaschke, T. (2012). Uncertainty analysis of GIS-based ordered weighted averaging method for landslide susceptibility mapping in Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. In Seventh International Geographic Information Science Conference (pp. 18-21). [s.l.]: Springer.
• Feng, Z.M. (1994). Land bearing capacity research of past, present, and future. China Land Science, 8, 1–9.
• Goldshleger, N., Ben-Dor, E., Lugassi, R. & Eshel, G. (2010). Soil degradation monitoring by remote sensing: examples with three degradation processes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74(5), 1433-1445.
• Gupta, A.K. & Nair, S.S. (2010). Flood risk and context of land-uses: Chennai city case. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 3(12), 365-372.
• Gupta, S. & Sharma, R.K. (2010). Dynamics of land utilisation, land degradation and factors determining land degradation in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(2), 245-260.
• Lungu, D., Aldea, A., Cornea, T. & Arion, C. (2000). Seismic micro-zonation of the City of Bucharest. In 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation. Oakland: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
• Marcellini, A., Daminelli, R., Pagani, M., Riva, F., Crespellani, T., Madiai, C., Vannucchi, G., Frassineti, G., Martelli, L., Palumbo, D. & Viel, G. (1998). Seismic micro-zonation of some municipalities of The Rubicone Area (Emilia-Romagna Region). In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering: 6-11 September 1998, Paris, France (pp. 339-350). Rotterdam: Balkema Retrieved from: https://geotecnica. dicea.unifi.it/parigi98.pdf
• Munasinghe, M. (1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development. Washington: World Bank.
• Nakamura, Y. (2000, January). Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its applications. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2656, 1-8.
• Onishi, T. (1994). A capacity approach for sustainable urban development: an empirical study. Regional studies, 28(1), 39-51.
• Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2008 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 48, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4833 [Government Regulation No 26 of 2008 regarding National Territorial Layout Plan. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2008 Number 48, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4833].
• Pilvere, I., Nipers, A. & Upite, I. (2014). Agricultural land utilization efficiency: the case of Latvia. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 5(1), 65-71.
• Sarma, A.K., Mahanta, C., Bhattacharya, R., Dutta, S., Kartha, S., Kumar, B. & Sreeja, P. (2012). Urban carrying capacity: concept and calculation. Assam: Centre of Excellence.
• Sharififar, A., Ghorbani, H. & Karimi, H. (2013). Integrated land evaluation for sustainable agricultural production by using analytical hierarchy process. Agriculture, 59(3), 131-140.
• Shi, L.Y. & Chen, B.M. (1991). Production capacity of land resources and population bearing capacity study in China. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.
• Singer, M.J. (2014). Land capability analysis. In Y. Wang (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Natural Resources: Land. Vol. 1 (pp. 295-298). New York: Taylor and Francis.
• Slob, S., Hack, R., Scarpas, T., Bemmelen, B. van & Duque, A. (2002). A methodology for seismic microzonation using GIS and SHAKE a case study from Armenia, Colombia. In Engineering Geology for Developing Countries-Proceedings of 9th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment: Durban 16-20 September 2002 (pp. 2843-2852). Pretoria: South African Institute of Engineering and Environmental Geologists.
• Smardon, R. (2008). A comparison of Local Agenda 21 Implementation in North American, European, and Indian Cities. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 19(1), 118-137.
• Stocking, M.A. & Murnaghan, N. (2002). Field assessment of land degradation. London: Earthscan.
• Sudershan, I. (2003). Environmental damage to land resources – need to improve land use data base. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(34), 3596-3604.
• Symeonakis, E., Calvo-Cases, A. & Arnau- -Rosalen, E. (2007). Land use change and land degradation in southeastern Mediterranean Spain. Environmental Management, 40(1), 80-94.
• Tian, Y. & Sun, C. (2018). A spatial differentiation study on comprehensive carrying capacity of the urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 68(1), 11-22.
• Xiao, H.B., Shi, Z.H., Li, Z.W., Chen, J., Huang, B., Yue, Z.J. & Zhan, Y.M. (2021). The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types. Ecological Indicators, 127, 107787. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107787

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)