Content and uptake of selected trace elements by weeds in potato to cultivation under different conditions of soil tillage and weed control methods

• Autorzy: Zarzecka K. , Gugała M. , Baranowska A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993.1125467

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study utilized data from a field experiment carried out at the Experimental Station in Zawady owned by the University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce in the years 2005–2007. The experimental factors included two soil tillage systems and seven weed control methods in potato. Iron, copper and zinc in weeds were deter- mined with the AAS method. The trace element content in weed dry matter before row closure of potato depended significantly on soil tillage methods (excluding Cu), weed control methods and weather conditions, and, prior to tuber harvest, on soil tillage and weather conditions during the growing season. The uptake of Fe, Cu, and Zn by weeds from the area of 1 hectare depended on the experimental factors, weed biomass and weed chemical composition.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

weeds; trace elements; content; uptake; potato

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 15, nr 4
• Strony: 131--136
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Zarzecka K.

• Chair of Plant Cultivation, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Gugała M.

• Chair of Plant Cultivation, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Baranowska A.

• Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska, Sidorska 95/97, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ali M.F., Heng L.Y., Ratman W., Nais J., Ripin R. 2006. The content and accumulation of arsenic and heavy metals in medicinal plants near mamut river contaminated by copper-mining in Sabah, Malaysia. Fresenius Envir. Bull., 15(10), 1316–1321.
• 2. Baćmaga M., Kucharski J., Wyszkowska J. 2007. Impact of crop protection chemicals on plants and animals. J. Elementol., 12(2), 135–148.
• 3. Boligłowa E., Gleń K. 2003. Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage method. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, S. Agronomy Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 1–8. www.ejpau.media.pl/series/ volumne 6/issue1/agronomy/art-03.html
• 4. Boydston R.A., Vaughin S.F. 2002. Alternative weed management systems control weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technology, 16(1), 23–28.
• 5. Czuba R. and Wróbel S. 1983. Ocena roli chwastów jako konkurentów w pobieraniu składników pokarmowych przez rośliny uprawne. Roczniki Gleboznawcze, 34(3), 175–184.
• 6. Domańska H. 1980. Chwasty i ich zwalczanie. PWRiL Warszawa.
• 7. Dorado J., Lopez-Fando C. 2006. The effect of tillage system use of a paraplow on weed flora in a semiarid soil from central Spain. Weed Research, 46(5), 424–431.
• 8. Dziekanowski A., Ciećko Z., Nowak G. 1992. Zawartość podstawowych makro- i mikroskładników w bulwach ziemniaka w zależności od poziomu nawożenia potasem Acta Acad. Agricult. Tech. Olst., Agricultura, 54, 117–126.
• 9. Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Sikorska A. 2013. Ocena skuteczności działania herbicydów i ich wpływ na plon handlowy ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR, 270, 75–84.
• 10. Guttieri M.J., Eberlein C.V. 1997. Preemergence weed control in potatoes with rimsulfuron mixtures. Weed Technology, 11(4), 755–761.
• 11. Hashim S. 2003. Chemical weed control efficiency in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Weed Science Research, 9(1–2), 105–110.
• 12. Jaiswal V.P., Lal S.S. 1996. Efficacy of cultural and chemical weed control methods in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Indian J. Agronomy, 41(3), 454–456.
• 13. Johansen A., Bakken A. K., Synnes O.M. 2005. Green fodder crop and dicotyledonous weeds as sources for micronutrients in ruminant diet, in: NJF Sem. No. 370 “Essential trace elements for plants, animals and humans”, Reykjavik, Iceland, 15–17 August: pp. 61–63.
• 14. Kalny P., Fijałek Z., Daszczuk A., Ostapczuk P. 2007. Determination of selected microelements in polish herbs and their infusions. Science of the Total Environment, 381(1–3), 99–104.
• 15. Kirchmann H., Thorvaldsson G., Björnsson H., Mattson L. 2005. Trace elements in crop from Swedish and Icelandic long-term experiment, in: NJF Sem. No. 370 “Essential trace elements for plants, animals and humans”, Reykjavik, Iceland, 15–17 August: pp. 30–33.
• 16. Knezevic M., Durkic M. and Samota D. 1995. Chemical and mechanical weed control in potatoes. Fragmenta Phytomedica et Herbologica, 23(2), 61–67.
• 17. Królak E. 2003. Accumulation of Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd by Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Web.) in Environments with Various Degrees of Metalic Contamination. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 12(6), 713–721.
• 18. Lehoczky É., Dobozi M., Gyüre K. 2003. Competition between weeds and potato with special regard to competition for nutrients. Magyar Gyomkutatás és Technológia, 4(1), 19–30.
• 19. Łozowicka B., Konecki R. 2011. Selected aspects of chemical protection of agricultural crop in northern-eastern Poland. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura, 10(4), 107–119.
• 20. Mirabelli C.,Colla A., Fiorill A., Cardarelli M., Rouphael Y., Paolini R. 2005. The effect of mechanical weed control technique and irrigation method on yield, tuber quality and wed suppression in organic potato. Acta Horticulturae, 684, 127–134.
• 21. Mišovic M.M., Brocic Z. A., Momirovic N.M., Šinzar B.C. 1997. Herbicide combination efficacy and potato yield in agro-ecological conditions of Dragacevo. Acta Horticulturae, 462, 363–368.
• 22. Parylak D. 1994. Pobieranie składników pokarmowych przez chwasty i pszenżyto ozime w różnych okresach jego rozwoju. Zeszyty Naukowe AR w Szczecinie, Rolnictwo, LVIII, 162, 185–188.
• 23. Shah N.H., Hassan G., Khan I.A., Azim A. 2003. Management of grassy and broadleaf weeds in potato in the hills of Hazara, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Weed Science Research, 9 (1–2), 111–116.
• 24. Trąba Cz. 2001. Konkurencyjność chwastów wobec owsa w warunkach nawożenia mineralnego i organicznego. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, 41(2), 941–944.
• 25. Trąba Cz., Wiater J. 2000. Pobranie niektórych mikroelementów przez chwasty w uprawie lędźwianu siewnego, w warunkach nawożenia mineralnego i odpadami organicznymi. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 471, 803–809.
• 26. Zarzecka K., Ceglarek F., Gąsiorowska B., Grużewska A. 1999. Impact of weed control on potato infestation and yielding. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, S. Agronomy Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 1–8. www.ejpau.media.pl/series/volumne2/ issue2/agronomy/art-07.html
• 27. Żurawski, H., Sienkiewicz, J. 1981. Wpływ uproszczeń w uprawie roli i zróżnicowanego nawożenia na plony roślin i pobranie składników pokarmowych. Pamiętnik Puławski, 74, 73–84.