Input data of scenarios for the implementation of ergonomic projects in a manufacturing company

• Autorzy: Czernecka Wiktoria

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.159.6

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main aim of the research undertaken within this article is to identify the factors that are important for the successful implementation of ergonomic projects, which can be used to effectively manage such projects. Design/methodology/approach: As part of the research undertaken in this article, a literature review was carried out on the success factors of ergonomic projects. Then they were assessed using an expert opinion survey method in order to establish their importance according to the experts involved (participants of the ergonomic commissions operating in production companies). The results of the research can be used to develop scenarios for the implementation of such projects, which was shown on the example of an ergonomic project undertaken in a selected company. Findings: The result of the research is identification of the success factors of an ergonomic project presented in five categories: factors related to the implementation of projects in the enterprise, factors related to stakeholder requirements, factors related to the specificity of ergonomic assessment, factors related to the internal environment of the enterprise, factors related to the external environment of the enterprise. Taking into account the factors assessed by experts as the most important may contribute to their effective shaping in order to conduct an ergonomic project with success, as shown in a practical example. Research limitations/implications: The presented findings are limited by showing them only on one practical example. The further direction of the research development may be the presentation of decision models for managing ergonomic projects based on the identified success factors. Practical implications: The results of the conducted research can be used in practice in the implementation of ergonomic projects in various production companies. Originality/value: This article presents a new approach to the identification of success factors of ergonomic projects and presents the possibilities of including them in the implementation of ergonomic projects in manufacturing companies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ergonomic project success criteria; proergonomic approach in project management; ergonomic interventions; ergonomic project management

PL

ergonomiczne kryteria sukcesu projektu; proergonomiczne podejście w zarządzaniu projektami; interwencje ergonomiczne; ergonomiczne zarządzanie projektami

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 159
• Strony: 81--90
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Czernecka Wiktoria

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznań

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-4488

Bibliografia

• 1. Alarabiat, S., Ramos, I. (2019). The Delphi Method in Information Systems Research (2004-2017). The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, no. 17(2), pp. 86-99, doi: 10.34190/JBRM.17.2.04.
• 2. Bukłaha, E. (2012). Sukces, skuteczność i efektywność w zarządzaniu projektami. Studia i prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, Zeszyt naukowy 113, pp. 24-35.
• 3. DeRango, K. (2003). The Productivity Consequences of Two Ergonomic Interventions. Upjohn Institute Working Paper, no. 03-95, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI.
• 4. Dezdar, S., Ainin, S. (2012). Investigating the Impact of Organizational Culture on Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Projects. World Applied Sciences Journal, no. 17(9), pp. 1125-1133.
• 5. Dul, J. et al. (2004). Combining economic and social goals in the design of production system by using ergonomics standard. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 47, Iss. 2-3, pp. 207-222, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.07.005.
• 6. Dutier, J., Guennoc, F., Escouteloup, J. (2015). The Ergonomist: a full design actor. Procedia Manufacturing, no. 3, pp. 5830-5837, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.837.
• 7. Górny, A., Sadłowska-Wrzesińska, J. (2016). Ergonomics aspects in occupational risk management. In: P. Arezez et al. (Eds.), Occupational Safety and Hygiene SHO2016 – Proceedings book (pp. 102-104). Portuguese Society of Occupational Safety and Hygiene (SPOSHO).
• 8. Hendrick, H. (2003). Determining the cost – benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success. Applied Ergonomics, vol. 34, pp. 419-427, doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00062-0.
• 9. Hendrick, H. (2008). Applying ergonomics to systems: Some documented „lessons learned”. Applied Ergonomics, no. 39, pp. 418-426, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.006.
• 10. Hernandez, N. et al. (2019). Prospective analysis of public management scenarios modeled by the Fuzzy Delphi method. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 113-119.
• 11. Hignett, S., Wilson, J., Morris, W. (2005). Finding ergonomic solutions – participatory approaches. Occupational Medicine, no. 55, pp. 200-207, doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi084.
• 12. Jugdev, K., Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, no. 36, pp. 19-31, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280503600403.
• 13. Karaman, E., Kurt, M. (2015). Comparison of project management methodologies: Prince 2 versus PMBOK for it projects. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, Vol. 4, pp. 572-579.
• 14. Karsh, B.T. (2006). Theories of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Implications for ergonomic interventions. In: BT. Karsh, MJ. Smith (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 7, Iss. 1 (pp. 71-88), doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220512331335160.
• 15. Kleiner, B. (2006). Macroergonomics: Analysis and design of work systems. Applied Ergonomics, no. 37, pp. 81-89, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.006.
• 16. Pikaar, R. (2007). New Challenges: Ergonomics in Engineering Projects. In: R. Pikaar (Ed.), Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics (pp. 2-38). Koningsveld and Settels, Elsevier Ltd.
• 17. Realyvásquez, A., Garcia-Alcaraz, J., Maldonado, A. (2018). Macroergonomics for Manufacturing Systems: An Evaluation Approach. Springer International Publishing.
• 18. Somers, T., Nelson, K. (2001). The Impact of Critical Success Factors across the Stages of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-10.
• 19. Stare, A. (2011). The impact of the organisational structure and project organisational culture on project performance in slovenian enterprises. Management, Vol. 16, pp. 1-22.
• 20. Stuster, J. (2006). The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Stories from the first 50 years. Retrieved from: https://tiny.pl/whf6r, 13.04.2022.
• 21. Yang, J., Su, J., Song, L. (2019). Selection of Manufacturing Enterprise Innovation Design Project Based on Consumer’s Green Preferences, Sustainability, no. 11(5), pp. 1-16, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051375, Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1375/htm, 24.04.2022.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).