PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Measuring transport-related social exclusion at the meso-level using the concept of isolated islands in the big cities

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Using the notion of isolated urban islands, this paper discusses, from a theoretical point of view, three important but controversial issues related to the measurement of social exclusion in the big cities: (i) the extent to which social exclusion is likely to occur, (ii) accessibility indicators that are sensitive and relevant for the evaluation of social exclusion, and (iii) the geographical scale for evaluation. From an urban island point of view, two important issues have been raised: the distribution of jobs, basic facilities, and services within an urban island and the travels of people between urban islands. Therefore, social exclusion can be determined either by the affordability/acceptability of travel time/cost to access the minimum requirement of facilities/services or the number of facilities/services in reach of the individuals within acceptable/affordable travel time and cost. A person will be at risk of social exclusion if they belong to a minority group as opposed to the majority in the same society. Some levels of social exclusion risk have been proposed. The evaluation should be implemented at the meso-level (urban island). From the view of the urban islands, the issues of transportrelated social exclusion are clearly understood, and measurements of social exclusion should be solved. We feel that a detailed survey/interview is needed for areas at high risk of social exclusion, followed by an evaluation at the micro-level to identify excluded people and the causes for their exclusion. It is expected that this paper will attract researchers to pay more attention to this issue.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
5--18
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz.
Twórcy
  • Hanoi Architectural University; Km 10 Nguyen Trai Road, Thanh Xuan District, Ha Noi City, Vietnam
  • University of Transport and Communications; No. 3 Cau Giay street, Dong Da District, Hanoi City, Vietnam
Bibliografia
  • 1. Cerevo, R. Accessible Cities and Regions: A Framework for Sustainable Transport and Urbanism in the 21st Century. Working paper-UC Berkeley Centre for Future Urban Transport-A Volvo Center of Excellence. Institute of Transportation studies. University of California, Berkeley. 2005.
  • 2. Efroymson, D. & Rahman, M. & Shama, R. Liveable Cities: Ideas and Action. Dhaka, Bangladesh: HealthBridge-WBB Trust. 2009.
  • 3. El-Geneidy, A.M. & Levinson, D.M. Access to Destinations : Development of Accessibility Measures. Final report. Report No. 1, MN/RC-2006-16. In the series: Access to Destinations Study, University of Minnesota. USA, 2006.
  • 4. Geertman, S.C. & Van-Eck, J.R. GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: an Application in Planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 1995. Vol. 9(1). P. 67-80.
  • 5. Geurs, K. Accessibility, Land-use and Transport. PhD. Thesis at Utrecht University: Eburon Publisher. 2006.
  • 6. Godefrooij, T. & Jong, H.D. & Rouwette, A. From Car-based to People-centred Cities. In: Godefrooij, T. & Pardo, C. & Sagaris L. (Eds.), Cycling-Inclusive Policy Development : A Handbook (Vol. Division 4). Utrecht, The Netherlnads: GTZ (Transport Policy Advisory Services). 2009.
  • 7. Gutiérrez, W. Journal of Transport and Accessibility. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 2009. Vol. 6. P. 410–417.
  • 8. Ha, P.T.H. & Bosch, F. Van-den & Quang, N.N. & Zuidgeest, M. Urban Form and Accessibility to Jobs: A Comparison of Hanoi and Randstad Metropolitan Areas. Journal of Environment and Urbanization Asia. 2011. Vol. 2(2). P. 265-285.
  • 9. JICA. The Comprehensive Urban Development Programme in Ha Noi Capital City of The Socialist Republic of Vietnam (HAIDEP). Final Report. Ha Noi-Vietnam. 2007.
  • 10. Krizek, K.J. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land-use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research. SAGE publisher. 2003. Vol. 22. P. 270-287.
  • 11. Lucas, K. Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now? Journal of Transport Policy. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 105-113.
  • 12. Metz, D. A Delicate Balance: Mobility and Access Needs, Expectations and Costs. (OECD, Ed.) Discussion Paper 2011-07. International Transport Forum. Paris. 2011.
  • 13. Meurs, H. & Haaijer, R. Spatial Structure and Mobility. Journal of Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2001. Vol. 6(6). P. 429-446.
  • 14. Phuc, H. Removal of Pedestrian Bridges Inside of Cities. VnExpress of Vietnam. 2012.
  • 15. Scott, D. M. & Horner, M.W. The Role of Urban Form in Shaping Access to Opportunities. Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies. 2008. Vol. 2(2). P. 89-119.
  • 16. Wee, B. Rietveld, P. & Meurs, H. Is Average Daily Travel Time Expenditure Constant? In Search of Explanations for an Increase in Average Travel Time. Journal of Transport Geography. 2006. Vol. 14(2). P. 109-122.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a5446378-ee31-470e-aba5-fc675c92a3d6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.