PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparison Study of Water Quality Produced from a Conventional Water Treatment Plant and a Number of Compact Units

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Water is very plentiful through the planet in general. Nevertheless, clean drinking water is not always accessible in the proper time or place for sufficient public or ecological use. The water significance is emphasized by the fact that in the past, great cultures have arisen near and along water bodies. Water quality of some purification complexes (compact units) in the Babylon Province (13 compact unit) as compared with Al-Hillah Al Mouahad Project (water treatment plant) was assessed by the Water Quality Index (WQI) methodology. WQI offers a particular number that states the overall water quality at a definite place and period based on many parameters concerning the quality of water. The water produced from the compact units was classified as "good water" according to the WQI classification with the values ranging from 85.4 in Bermana unit to 99.17 in Al-Muamera compact unit. Moreover, the research results showed that the water purification complexes work with efficiency, very close to the performance of large water purification projects and stations, and this means that it is possible to rely on them to obtain good drinking water quality, especially in small or remote areas.
Rocznik
Strony
258--262
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 9 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Iraq
Bibliografia
  • 1. Al-Mansori N.J. 2017. Develop and Apply Water Quality Index to Evaluate Water Quality of ShattAl-Hilla River. Journal of Babylon University/Engineering Sciences, 25(2), 368-374.
  • 2. Al Saleh Hadeel A. 2014. Assessment of Water Quality Index for Euphrates River Within Babylon Province, Iraq During the Period 2007-2013. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 5(5), pp. 41-50.
  • 3. Ali M.H.H., Al-Qahtani K.M., Alturiqi A.S., Albedair L.A., Alibrahim K.A. 2012. Estimation of Water Quality Index and Assessment of Some Heavy Metals in potable water at Kingdom Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(7), 3206-3210.
  • 4. Rahi K.A. and Halihan T. 2010. Changes in the Salinity of the Euphrates River System in Iraq. Regional Environment Change, 10(1), 27-35.
  • 5. Ramakrishnaiah C.R., Sadashivaiah C., Ranganna G. 2009. Assessment of Water Quality Index for The Groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. E-Journal of Chemistry, 6(2), 523-530.
  • 6. Simoes F.S., Moreira A.B., Bisinoti M.C., Gimenez S.M.N., Yabe M.J.S. 2008. Water Quality Index as a Simple Indicator of Aquaculture Effects on Aquatic Bodies. Ecological Indicators, 8(5), 476 484.
  • 7. Toma J. J. 2013. Evaluating Raw and treated water quality of Greater Zab River within Erbil city by index analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Computational and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 147-154.
  • 8. Tyagi S., Sharma B., Singh P., Dobhal R. 2013. Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. American Journal of Water Resources, 1(3), 34-38.
  • 9. US EPA, 2009. Environmental impact and benefits assessment for final effluent guidelines and standards for the construction and development category. Office of Water, Washington, DC. EPA821-R-09-0
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a543ecda-b3f3-4d2b-817d-554dbaf47fe1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.