Badanie geosiatek dwu- i trójosiowych. Czy można porównywać między sobą geosiatki o różnych kształtach żeber i oczek

• Autorzy: Wrigley N. E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Tests of biaxial and triaxial geogrids – is it possible to compare geogrids with different shapes of the ribs and the eyelets

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Porównanie parametrów geosiatek o oczkach trójkątnych z parametrami geosiatek o oczkach kwadratowych lub prostokątnych. Opis adekwatnych metod badania wytrzymałości na rozciąganie. Sposoby porównania oparte na kształtach żeber geosiatek. Uszkodzenia zachodzące podczas instalowania geosiatek w gruncie.

EN

Comparison of parameters of triaxial geogrids with geogrids with a mesh of square or rectangular. Description of adequate methods for testing the tensile strength. Methods based on the comparison of the geogrids shaped ribs. Damage occurring during the installation of geogrids in the soil.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

geosyntetyki; geosiatki; wytrzymałość geosiatek

EN

geosynthetics; geogrids; geogrids strength

• Wydawca: IMOGEOR, Spółka z o. o.
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 305--310
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wrigley N. E.

• NewGrids Ltd, Poole, Wielka Brytania

Bibliografia

• 1. ASTM D5617: Standard Test Method for Multi-Axial Tension Test for Geosynthetics. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
• 2. ASTM D5818: Standard Practice for Retrieval of Samples to Evaluate Installation Damage of Geosynthetics. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
• 3. ASTM D6637, Standard Test Method for Determinind Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
• 4. BS 8006: Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soil and others fills, BSI, London, England Berg R R, Christopher B R, Perkins S, (2000). Geosynthetics reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase courses of pavement structures. GMA White Paper II, Published for the Geosynthetic Materials Association by: Ryan R Berg & Associates, Woodbury, MN, USA.
• 5. DIN 61551 Geosynthetics – Determination of burst strength. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin, Germany.
• 6. Webster S. L.: Geogrid reinforced base courses for flexible pavements for light aircraft: Test construction, behaviour under traffic, laboratory test, and design criteria. DOT/FAA/RD-92/25, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, USA, 1992.
• 7. Wrigley N. E., Zheng H.: The Confinement Effect of Different Geogrids, EuroGeo 4, IGS, Edinburgh, Scotland, Paper 243, 2008.
• 8. Wrigley N. E.: A comparision of the Index Properties of Different Geogrids, Geosynthetics Middle East, SKZ, Dubai, UAE, 2009.
• 9. Wrigley N. E., Zheng H., Liu X. J., Sama S. R.: The Confinement Effect of Different Geogrids – 2, 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, IGS, Guaruja, Brazil, Paper 316, 2011.
• 10. Wrigley N. E., Zheng H., Yuan S. P.: The Confinement Effect of Different Geogrids – 3: The development of an index test for the omniaxial testing of the tensile properties of geogrids, GeoFrontiers 2011, IFAI, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, Paper 1050, 2011.
• 11. Wrigley N. E., Zheng H., Yuan S.: The Confinement Effect of different geogrids: 4: the development of an index test, IGS, Valencia, Spain, 2012.