Budownictwo przyszłości zakorzenione w tradycji: japońskie inspiracje dla budownictwa i architektury cyrkularnej XXI wieku

• Autorzy: Veverkowá Magdalena Daria , Sutkowska Maja

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0055.2523

Warianty tytułu

EN

Building the Future Rooted in Tradition: Japanese Inspiration for 21st-Century Construction and Circular Architecture

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule omówiono potencjał drewna jako materiału budowlanego XXI wieku w kontekście gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (GOZ) oraz projektowania dla demontażu (DfD). Na przykładzie Japonii, kraju o ograniczonych zasobach, lecz bogatej tradycji ciesielskiej, zaprezentowano rozwiązania łączące dziedzictwo kulturowe z innowacjami technologicznymi. Analizie poddano zarówno historyczne konstrukcje, takie jak Kiyomizu-dera czy brama torii w Miyajima, jak i nowoczesne realizacje, m.in. Visionary Commons, budynek edukacyjny na Uniwersytecie w Okayamie (OUX), oraz Grand Ring na Expo Osaka 2025. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono technikom nuki i filozofii mottainai, promującym trwałość, wielokrotność użycia i szacunek dla materiału. Przedstawione przykłady ilustrują uniwersalne wartości możliwe do wdrożenia w globalnej transformacji sektora budowlanego w kierunku zrównoważonego rozwoju.

EN

The article discusses the potential of wood as a 21st-century building material within the framework of the circular economy (GOZ) and design for disassembly (DfD). Using Japan as an example, the article presents solutions that combine cultural heritage with technological innovation. Japan is a country with limited resources but a rich carpentry tradition. Historical structures, such as the Kiyomizu-dera temple and the torii gate in Miyajima, as well as modern designs like the Visionary Commons (OUX) educational building at Okayama University and the Grand Ring for Expo Osaka 2025, were analyzed. Focus is given to nuki techniques and the mottainai philosophy, which promote durability, reuse, and respect for the material. These examples illustrate universal values that can be adopted globally to transform the construction sector towards sustainability.

• Wydawca: Fundacja Polskiego Związku Inżynierów i Techników Budownictwa
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria i Budownictwo
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: R. 81, nr 5
• Strony: 627--631
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Veverkowá Magdalena Daria

• Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Instytut Inżynierii Lądowej, Warszawa
• Mendel University, Faculty of AgriScience, Brno

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2384-6207

autor

Sutkowska Maja

• Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Instytut Inżynierii Lądowej, Warszawa

• https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4706-5029

Bibliografia

• [1] Ahmadi S.: From Efficiency to Sustainability: A Review of Low-Emission Glass. Advances in the Standards & Applied Sciences, 2025, 3(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.22034/asas.2025.495120.1071.
• [2] Starzyk A., et al.: New Zero-Carbon Wooden Building Concepts: A Review of Selected Criteria. Energies, 2024, 17(17), 4502. https://doi. org/ 10.3390/en17174502.
• [3] Orenuga O.S., Adebisi O., Adediran I.: Emerging trends in sustainable materials for green building constructions. Key Engineering Materials, 2024, 974, 13-22.
• [4] Kaewunruen S., et al.: Comparisons of stakeholders' influences, inter-relationships, and obstacles for circular economy implementation on existing building sectors. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1), 11046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61863-0.
• [5] Ma M., et al.: Challenges and opportunities in the global net-zero building sector. Cell Reports Sustainability, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2024.1 00154.
• [6] United Nations Environment Programme, & Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction (2025). Not just another brick in the wall: The solutions exist - Scaling them will build on progress and cut emissions fast, Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/2025. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/47214.
• [7] Amadi I.G., Mahachi J.: State-of-the-art review on construction and demolition waste: the South African context. Cleaner Waste Systems, 2025, 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100251.
• [8] AI-Numan B.S.O.: Construction Industry Role in Natural Resources Depletion and How to Reduce II. In Natural Resources Deterioration in MENA Region: Land Degradation, SoiI Erosion, and Desertification, 2024, pp. 93-109. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58315-5_6.
• [9] Tafesse S., Girma Y.E., Dessalegn E.: Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices. Heliyon, 2022, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09169.
• [10] HaitherAli H., Anjali G.: Circular economy in construction sector - a guideline for policy makers from global perspective. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2024, 4(2), 1285-1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00321-x.
• [11] Goldhahn C., Cabane E., Chanana M.: Sustainability in wood materials science: An opinion about current materiaI development techniques and the end of lifetime perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2021, 379(2206), 20200339. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0339.
• [12] Balasbaneh A.T., Sher W.: Comparative sustainability evaluation of two engineered wood-based construction materials: Life cycle analysis of CLT versus GLT Building and Environment, 2021, 204, 108112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108112.
• [13] Ostapska K., et al.: Design for Disassembly: A systematic scoping review and analysis of built structures Designed for Disassembly. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, 48, 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.014.
• [14] David M.N., Miguel R.S., Ignacio P.Z.: Timber Structures Designed for Disassembly: a Cornerstone for Sustainability in 21st Century Construction. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 110619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110619.
• [15] Blanchet P., Perez C., Cabral M.R: Wood building construction: trends and opportunities in structural and envelope systems. Current Forestry Reports, 2024, 10(1),21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-023-00196-z.
• [16] Ko K.: The Reciprocal Development of Craft and Industry in Twentieth-Century Japan Through the Lens of Plywood as a Material. In Building Technology and Culture in the Asia-Pacific Region: Construction, Materials, Encounters, 2024, pp. 73-85. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1794-1 5.
• [17] Zou M., Bahauddin A.: The Creation of "Sacred Place" through the "Sense of Place" of the Daci'en Wooden Buddhist Temple, Xi'an, China. Buildings, 2024, 14(2), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020481.
• [18] Dobrovolná N., Sutkowska M., Vaverková M.D.: Zen temple architecture and sustainability: Examining traditional designs and contemporary adaptations in Japan. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura, 2025. [Accepted paper].
• [19] Mei X., Liu C., Li Z.: Research progress on functional, structural and material design of plant-inspired green bionic buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2024, 114357. Japan.
• [20] Tokubuchi M., Amano H., Niimi A.: Expo 2025 Women's Pavilion in Collaboration with Cartier-A Showcase of Circular Economy. Structural Engineering International, 2025, 35(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2024.2443686.
• [21] Tanahashi H. 伝統的貫構法の構造特性についての考察-大阪・関西万博の大屋根(リング)の構造に関連して [Consideration on the mechanical characteristics of nuki joints of traditional timber structures: Related to the nuki structure of the Grand Roof (Ring) in Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai, Japan]. 歴史都市防災論文集 [Journal of Historical City Disaster Prevention], 2024,18,147-154.
• [22] Delgado R: Promotion of World Heritage Sites in Kyoto, Japan. In The International Conference on Cultural Sustainable Tourism, 2022, pp. 53-58. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49536-6_6.
• [23] Koshihara M.: Recent Developments in the Emerging Technology of CLT in Japan. Cross-Laminated Timber: Pioneering innovation in massive wood construction, 2021, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000501844.
• [24] van Nimwegen S.E., Latteur P.: A state-of-the-art review of carpentry connections: From traditional designs to emerging trends in wood-wood structural joints. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 78, 107089. Japan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107089.
• [25] Kurcjusz M.: Technology vs creativity in architecture: Striving for synergy. W: A. Mielnik (Red.), Definiowanie Przestrzeni Architektonicznej Architektura i Technika, 2024, T 4, s. 17-27. Oficyna Wydawnicza Atut, Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe. https://doi.org/10.23817/2024.defarch.4-2.
• [26] Vaverková M.D., fotografia własna, 2025.
• [27] Vaverková M.D., Matsui Y., Vaverka I.: Mottainai in Civil Engineering-A Message from Japan. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura. 2023. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPA.2023.22.20.
• [28] Kon W., et al.: The Hidden Lean: Lessons From Japan, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24928/2025/0140.
• [29] Bungsu A.P., Al Mahmudi F.: Japan and the Values of Inclusive Sustainability. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 2025, 2(1), 766-774. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v2i1.498.
• [30] Jimura T.: Sustainability of Japan's tangible cultural heritage. In Sustainability Management in Heritage and Tourism: The Concept and Practice of Mottainai in Japan, 2023, pp. 35-67. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40269-
• [31] Adhya R.: Mottainai: A holistic value stream approach to create sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Procurement, 2024, 6(4), 383-396.
• [32] Yunxuan W., Ruikai Y., Ibrahim N.L.B.N.: From Traditional to Modern: Cultural Integration and Innovation in Sustainable Architectural Design Education. Journal of Ecohumanism, 2025, 4(1), 2079-2093. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6030.