PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Environmental benefits of catch crops cultivation

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The role of catch crops in modern agriculture has increased in recent years. In addition to a production of animal feed, they have a positive impact on quality of soil. This study determined the suitability of selected stubble catch crops (white mustard, lacy phacelia, and a mixture of faba bean + spring vetch) to improve production, economic and energy effects of spring wheat grown in 3-year monoculture relative to the control treatment (without catch crops). Two tillage systems were used: conventional tillage and no-tillage (conservation tillage). A field study was conducted over the period 2014-2016 at the Czeslawice Experimental Farm, Lubelskie Voivodeship, Poland. The study proved the high suitability of catch crops to increase the spring wheat yields (under both tillage systems). Regardless of the catch crops, the productivity of wheat was higher under conventional tillage. The catch crops (in particular white mustard) and the conservation tillage system contributed to an improved energy efficiency index of production. The white mustard catch crop also had the most beneficial effect on the economic profitability of spring wheat production. This was due to the low cost of cultivation of this catch crop and its beneficial impact on obtaining high yields of spring wheat.
Rocznik
Strony
109--121
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
  • Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Hansen EM, Kristensen K, Djurhuus J. Yield parameters as affected by introduction or discontinuation of catch crop use. Agron J. 2000;92:909-14. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2000.925909x.
  • [2] Brant V, Neckar K, Pivec J, Duchoslav M, Holec J, Fuksa P, Competition of some summer catch crops and volunteer cereals in the areas with limited precipitation. Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(1):17-24. DOI: 10.17221/378-PSE.
  • [3] Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E, Pawłowski L. Can catch crops be an important factor in carbon dioxide sequestration? Int J Cons Sci. 2020;11(4):1005-18. Available from: http://ijcs.ro/public/IJCS-20-74_Kwiatkowski.pdf.
  • [4] Haramoto ER, Gallandt ER. Brassica cover: I. Effects on weed and crop astablishment. Weed Sci. 2005;53(5):695-701. DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-162R.1.
  • [5] Harasim E, Antonkiewicz J, Kwiatkowski CA. The effects of catch crops and tillage systems on selected physical properties and enzymatic activity of loess soil in a spring wheat monoculture. Agronomy. 2020;10:334. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10030334.
  • [6] Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E, Wesołowski M. Effects of catch crops and tillage system on weed infestation and health of spring wheat. J Agr Sci Tech. 2016;18:999-1012. Available from: https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-515-en.pdf.
  • [7] Cantero-Martinez C, Angas P, Lampurlanes J. Growth, yield and water productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) affected by tillage and N fertilisation in Mediterranean semiarid, rainfed conditions of Spain. Field Crops Res. 2003;84:341-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00101-1
  • [8] Berner A, Hildermann I, Fliessbach A, Pfiffner L, Niggli U, Mader P. Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil Till Res. 2008;101(1-2):89-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.07.012.
  • [9] Woźniak A, Kwiatkowski CA. Effect of long-term reduced tillage on yield and weeds of spring barley. J Agr Sci Tech. 2012;15:1335-42. Available from: https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-926-en.pdf.
  • [10] Ozpinar S. Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil Till Res. 2006;108:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.024.
  • [11] Vogeler I, Rogasik J, Funder U, Panten K, Schung E. Effect of tillage systems and P-fertilization on soil physical and chemical properties, crop yield and nutrient uptake. Soil Till Res. 2009;103(1):137-43. DOI: 10.1016/J.STILL.2008.10.004
  • [12] Kassam A, Friedrich T, Shaxson F, Pretty J. The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. Int J Agricult Sust. 2009;7(4):292-320. DOI: 10.3763/ijas.2009.0477.
  • [13] Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsh R. Conservation agriculture in the 21st century: a paradigm of sustainable agriculture. Materials of European Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Madrid-Spain, October 2010, pp. 19-68. Available from: https://taa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Paper5%20CA_Madrid_final[1].pdf.
  • [14] Hansen EM, Kristensen K, Djurhuus J. Yield parameters as affected by introduction or discontinuation of catch crop use. Agron J. 2000;92:909-14. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2000.925909x.
  • [15] Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E, Haliniarz M, Gawęda D, Misztal-Majewska B, Chojnacka S. Chemical composition of stubble catch crop biomass depending on a crop plant species and tillage system. J Elementology. 2019;24(4):1371-81. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2019.24.2.1797.
  • [16] Kraska P. Content of some elements in grain of spring wheat cv. Zebra depending on soil tillage systems and catch crops. J Elementology. 2011;16(3):407-19. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2011.16.3.06.
  • [17] Włodek S, Biskupski A, Sekutowski T, Smagacz J. Effects of the long-term application of tillage simplifications on some soil properties and yield of chosen spring plants. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura. 2012;11(2):85-95. Available from: http://old-agricultura.acta.utp.edu.pl/uploads/pliki/11(2)2012_8.pdf.
  • [18] Kraska P, Andruszczak S, Kwiecińska-Poppe E, Pałys E. The effect of tillage systems and catch crops on the yield, grain quality and health of spring wheat. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura. 2014;13(1):21-38. Available from: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-1d1407b0-4738-477e-b650-5e8afdea7f86.
  • [19] Khan S, Khan MA, Latif N. Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat, rice and barley production in Australia. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;21(1):61-8. Available from: www.se.org.pk.
  • [20] Skarżyńska A. Cropping intensity vs. profitability of selected plant production activities in Poland. Stud Agric Econ. 2012;114:33. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122446.
  • [21] Wysokiński M, Klepacki B, Gradziuk P, Golonko M, Gołasa P, Bieńkowska-Gołasa W, et al. Economic and energy efficiency of farms in Poland. Energies. 2021;14:5586. DOI: 10.3390/en14175586.
  • [22] Nieróbca P, Grabiński J, Szeleźniak E. Influence of production technology intensity of grain species planted in cereal crop rotation on productive and economic effectiveness. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura. 2008;7(3):73-80. Available from: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-50d20a52-1c1b-452a-8e13-c184ccabaed7.
  • [23] Bielski S. Economic efficiency of winter triticale grain production. Acta Sci Pol Oecon. 2014;13:18. Available from: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-6af83edb-f129-4809-bb32-19cfa5750976/c/17-23.pdf.
  • [24] Zargar M, Polityko P, Pakina E, Bayat M, Vandyshev V, Kavhiza N, et al. Productivity, quality and economics of four spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars as affected by three cultivation technologies. Agronomy Res. 2018;16(5). DOI: 10.15159/AR.18.204.
  • [25] Pawłowski L, Pawłowska M, Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E. The role of agriculture in climate change mitigation - A Polish example. Energies. 2021;14:3657. DOI: 10.3390/en14123657.
  • [26] Konieczna A, Roman K, Roman M, Śliwiński D, Roman M. Energy efficiency of maize production technology: Evidence from Polish farms. Energies. 2021;14:170. DOI: 10.3390/en14010170.
  • [27] Mao Y, Li N. Suitability of rural living & work facilities, spatial behavior of farmers and family income. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):71-83. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.07.
  • [28] Cao Y, You J, Shi Y, Hu W. Studies on improving the performance of small and micro enterprises through green innovation. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):151-61. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.14.
  • [29] Ospanova A, Popovychenko I, Chuprina E. Green economy - vector of sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):171-81. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.16.
  • [30] Morkunas M, Žičkienė A, Baležentis T, Volkov A, Štreimikienė D, Ribašauskienė E. Challenges for improving agricultural resilience in the context of sustainability and rural development. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):182-95. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.17.
  • [31] Thai Hung N. Time-frequency co-movements between biomass energy consumption and human development in brics countries. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):196-210. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.18.
  • [32] Ochuba O, Ahuru RR, Ashraf J. Trade openness, foreign direct investment and sustainable agriculture in Africa. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2022;17(1):246-55. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.22.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a4dc7210-8f0f-44c1-a764-29f6efb55454
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.