Effects of shear panel dampers on seismic response mitigation of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under far-field and near-field ground motions

Jiang, Liqiang; Yu, Kai; Jiang, Lizhong; Wen, Tianxing; Hu, Yi; Pang, Lin

doi:10.1007/s43452-023-00632-8

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Effects of shear panel dampers on seismic response mitigation of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under far-field and near-field ground motions

Autorzy

Jiang Liqiang , Yu Kai , Jiang Lizhong , Wen Tianxing , Hu Yi , Pang Lin

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://www.springer.com/journal/43452

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-023-00632-8

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

High-speed railway lines always have to cross the seismic zone with great earthquake risks leading to serious consequences. A replaceable steel panel damper (SPD) is proposed as an energy-dissipation device to mitigate the structural seismic responses. It is simulated as a simplified nonlinear spring embedded in structural system with the force-displacement behavior derived by plate-beam theory. To investigate the effect of SPD, a typical 5-span high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system (HSRSBTS) validated by a shaking table test is established by ANSYS. A novel damage measure, the system relative damage ratio (γ_SRD), is proposed to quantify the effect of SPD in the system and consider the potential component-level damage modes of both bending and shear. The structural system is investigated undergoing two ground motions suites in DBE- and MCE-level intensity, including both far-field and near-field records in transverse direction. The result indicates that a significant reduce (roughly 50%) of seismic response in rail and girder are contributed by SPD, while the system damage decreases about 10-15%, especially for near-field pulse-like ground motions with high intensity. The energy-dissipation capacity of SPDs with various configurations is examined to optimize the properties of SPD. It generally decreases with the increase in the elastic stiffness ratio r of the SPD to the fixed support, and the r = 2-2.5 are recommended in engineering practice. SPD is an effective and efficient device of structure to be adopted as an energy-dissipation component and the first defense line under far-field and near-field ground motions.

Słowa kluczowe

railway bridge track system shear panel damper seismic response mitigation energy dissipation

kolej szybkich prędkości reakcja sejsmiczna rozpraszanie energii

Wydawca

Springer
Wrocław University of Science and Technology

Czasopismo

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 23, no. 2

Strony

art. no. e93, 2023

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jiang Liqiang

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
National Engineering Research Center of High-Speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha 410075, China

autor

Yu Kai

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

autor

Jiang Lizhong

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
National Engineering Research Center of High-Speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha 410075, China

autor

Wen Tianxing

wentx20@csu.edu.cn

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-530X

autor

Hu Yi

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

autor

Pang Lin

China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group CO. LTD, Chengdu 610031, China

Bibliografia

1. Montenegro PA, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, Calcada R, Tokunaga M, Tanabe M, Zhai WM. Assessment of train running safety on bridges: a literature review. Eng Struct. 2021;241: 112425.
2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Emergency Release: Investigation of Typical Bridge Earthquake Damage and Site Liquefaction in the Menyuan Earthquake., (2022). https://www.iem.ac.cn/detail.html?id=2340 (accessed 22 Jan 2022).
3. Piras S, Palermo A, Saiid Saiidi M. State-of-the-art of post-tensioned rocking bridge substructure systems. J Bridge Eng. 2022;27:03122001.
4. Xiang N, Goto Y, Obata M, Alam MS. Passive seismic unseating prevention strategies implemented in highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct. 2019;194:77-93.
5. Zou S, Wenliuhan H, Zhou F. Shaking table test of a high-speed railway bridge with a new isolation system. Eng Struct. 2019;196: 109315.
6. Hong X, Guo W, Wang Z. Seismic analysis of coupled high-speed train-bridge with the isolation of friction pendulum bearing. Adv Civ Eng. 2020;2020:1-15.
7. Kang X, Lizhong Jiang Yu, Bai CC. Caprani, Seismic damage evaluation of high-speed railway bridge components under different intensities of earthquake excitations. Eng Struct. 2017;152:116-28.
8. Wei B, Wang W-H, Wang P, Yang T-H, Jiang L-Z, Wang T. Seismic responses of a high-speed railway (HSR) bridge and track simulation under longitudinal earthquakes. J Earthq Eng. 2020;26:4449.
9. Yan B, Li Z, Liu S, Xie H-R. Seismic response of CRTS II ballastless track-bridge system considering the damage of track structure. Sci Prog. 2021;104:003685042110352.
10. Zhang Y, Jiang L, Zhou W, Feng Y, Tan Z, Chai X. Study of bridge-subgrade longitudinal constraint range for high-speed railway simply-supported beam bridge with CRTSII ballastless track under earthquake excitation. Constr Build Mater. 2020;241: 118026.
11. Meng D, Yang M, Yang Z, Chouw N. Effect of earthquake-induced transverse poundings on a 32 m span railway bridge isolated by friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct. 2022;251: 113538.
12. Chan RWK, Albermani F. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation. Eng Struct. 2008;30:1058-66.
13. Feng D, Li A, Guo T. Seismic control of a single-tower extradosed railway bridge using the E-Shaped steel damping bearing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;136: 106249.
14. Maleki S, Mahjoubi S. Dual-pipe damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;85:81-91.
15. Naeem A, Kim J. Seismic performance evaluation of a multi-slit damper. Eng Struct. 2019;189:332-46.
16. Zhao B, Lu B, Zeng X, Gu Q. Experimental and numerical study of hysteretic performance of new brace type damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2021;183: 106717.
17. Guo W, Zeng C, Gou H, Hu Y, Xu H, Guo L. Rotational friction damper’s performance for controlling seismic response of high speed railway bridge-track system. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2019;120:491-515.
18. Li A, Gao R, Sun M, Zhang J (2016) Research on hysteretic behaviors of a saparated shock absorber applied in railway bridge. In: Proc. VII Eur. Congr. Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. Eng. ECCOMAS Congr., Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil Engineering National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece, Crete Island, Greece, 2016: pp. 8597-8605.
19. Nakashima M, Iwai S, Iwata M, Takeuchi T, Konomi S, Akazawa T, Saburi K. Energy dissipation behaviour of shear panels made of low yield steel. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1994;23:1299-313.
20. Abebe DY, Jeong SJ, Getahune BM, Segu DZ, Choi JH (2015) Hysteretic characteristics of shear panel damper made of low yield point steel. Mater Res Innov. 19:S5-902-S5-910.
21. Chen Z, Ge H, Usami T. Hysteretic model of stiffened shear panel dampers. J Struct Eng. 2006;132:478-83.
22. Chan RWK, Albermani F, Kitipornchai S. Experimental study of perforated yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;91:14-25.
23. Sahoo DR, Singhal T, Taraithia SS, Saini A. Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. J Constr Steel Res. 2015;114:247-57.
24. Basler K. Strength of plate girders in shear. J Struct Div. 1961;87:151-80.
25. Wei B, Hu Z, Zuo C, Wang W, Jiang L. Effects of horizontal ground motion incident angle on the seismic risk assessment of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2021;21:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00169-0.
26. Lai Z, Jiang L, Zhou W, Yu J, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhou W. Lateral girder displacement effect on the safety and comfortability of the high-speed rail train operation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2021.1942507.
27. Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Benisi Ghadim H, Hanif MU. State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: testing, development and implementation. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2020;27:455-78.
28. Ozcelik Y. Strip model for steel plate shear walls with beam-connected web plates. Eng Struct. 2017;11:369.
29. Yu J, Jiang L, Zhou W, Lu J, Zhong T, Peng K. Study on the influence of trains on the seismic response of high-speed railway structure under lateral uncertain earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. 2021;19:2971-92.
30. Zhu Z, Gong W, Wang L, Li Q, Bai Y, Yu Z, Harik IE. An efficient multi-time-step method for train-track-bridge interaction. Comput Struct. 2018;196:36-48.
31. Yan B, Liu S, Pu H, Dai G, Cai X. Elastic-plastic seismic response of CRTS II slab ballastless track system on high-speed railway bridges. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60:865-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0222-6.
32. Dai G, Tang Y, Liang J, Yang L, Chen YF. Temperature monitoring of high-speed railway bridges in mountainous areas. Struct Eng Int. 2018;28:288-95.
33. Jiang L, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Zhou W, Tan Z. Simplified calculation modeling method of multi-span bridges on high-speed railways under earthquake condition. Bull Earthq Eng. 2020;18:2303-28.
34. Zhu Z, Gong W, Wang L, Bai Y, Yu Z, Zhang L. Efficient assessment of 3D train-track-bridge interaction combining multitime-step method and moving track technique. Eng Struct. 2019;183:290-302.
35. Wang L, Zhu Z, Bai Y, Li Q, Costa PA, Yu Z. A fast random method for three-dimensional analysis of train-track-soil dynamic interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2018;115:252-62.
36. Jiang L, Yu J, Zhou W, Yan W, Lai Z, Feng Y. Applicability analysis of high-speed railway system under the action of near-fault ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;139: 106289.
37. Ministry of Railways of the People’s Republic of China (2006) Code for seismic design of railway engineering of China.
38. Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Silva WJ, Chiou BS-J, Wooddell KE, Graves RW, Kottke AR, Boore DM, Kishida T, Donahue JL. NGA-West2 database. Earthq Spectra. 2014;30:989-1005.
39. Wen T, Jiang L-Z, Jiang L, Zhou W, Du Y. Interlayer area damage modeling and damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridge and track system. Eng Struct. 2022;272: 114989.
40. Wei B, Yang T, Jiang L, He X. Effects of friction-based fixed bearings on the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Adv Struct Eng. 2018;21:643-57.
41. China Academy of Railway Sciences (2013) Spherical bearings for railway bridges.
42. Huang Z, Li R, Liu F, Li A. Research on mechanical performance of improved buckling restrained shear panel damper. J Build Struct. 2016;37:85-92.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-a4c7b651-4a59-482d-a095-2f7363779502