Przestrzenie szans rozwojowych i odporność a zróżnicowanie regionalne

• Autorzy: Łaźniewska Ewa

Warianty tytułu

EN

Opportunity Space for Regional Economic Growth and Economic Re-silience. Diversification of Polish Regional Space

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The problem of regional diversity is the subject of a broad scientific discourse. The dynamics of territory development is connected with many factors. Among them, the so-called spaces for development opportunities of individual units and resiliance issues for external factors of regions. The author discusses the diversity of individuals from the point of view of these two factors. It indicates future directions of regional research, which will show why regions at the start with potentially the same structure are developing completely differently and why in most cases resistance is associated with innovation and in the case of Polish regions it is not.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

odporność gospodarcza; dywersyfikacja regionalna; innowacje; rozwój gospodarczy; miejski

EN

economic resilience; regional diversification; innovation; economic development; urban

• Wydawca: Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN ; Towarzystwo Urbanistów Polskich
• Czasopismo: Biuletyn Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: No 273
• Strony: 29--43
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., ryc.

Twórcy

autor

Łaźniewska Ewa

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Wydział Ekonomii,Katedra Polityki Gospodarczej i Samorządowej;Al. Niepodległości 10, 60-967 Poznań

Bibliografia

• 1. Bristow G., Healy A., 2015, Crisis Response, Choice and Resilience: Insights from omplexity Thinking. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2): 241-256, [https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv002].
• 2. Bristow G., Healy A., 2017a, Innovation and Regional Economic Resilience: an Exploratory Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6].
• 3. Bristow G., Healy A., 2017b, Innovation and Regional Economic Resilience: an Exploratory analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6].
• 4. Camagni R., Capello R., 2013, Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform.Toward Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44: 355-389, [https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12012].
• 5. Christopherson S., Michie P. T., 2010, Regional Resilience: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3: 11-25.
• 6. Dominiak J., Hauke J. A. N., Herodowicz T., Perdał R., Woźniak M., 2018, Współczesne przemiany czynników rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego. June, Studia KPZK PAN, t. CLXXXIII, Warszawa.
• 7. Foray D., 2014, From Smart Specialisation to Smart Specialisation Policy. Routledge 17: 492-507, [https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096].
• 8. Gorynia M., 2018, Współczesne nauki ekonomiczne – tożsamość, ewolucja, klasyfikacje. Referat wygłoszony na inauguracji roku akdemickiego 2018/19.
• 9. Grillitsch M., 2016, Institutions, Smart Specialisation Dynamics and Policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34: 22-37, [https://doi.or-g/10.1177/0263774X15614694].
• 10. Grillitsch M., Markus S., 2018, Following or Breaking Regional Development Paths: on the Role and Capability of the Innovative Entrepreneur. Regional Studies (Mai) 3404: 1-11
• 11. Grillitsch M., Sotarauta M., 2018, Regional Growth Paths: From Structure to Agency and Back. Papers in Innovation Studies, (February), [https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12661.06888].
• 12. Kopczewska K., Churski P., Ochojski A., 2017, Measuring Regional Specialisation: A New Approach. Springer US.
• 13. Kopczewska K., Churski P., Ochojski A., Polko A., 2017a, Measuring Regional Specialisation: A New Approach. (September): 1-466, [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51505-2].
• 14. Martin R., 2015, On the Notion of Regional Economic Resilience: Conceptualisation and Explanation. J Econ Geogr, 15(1): 1–42.
• 15. Martin R., Sunley P., 2010, The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 438(4): 62-93, [https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012].
• 16. Steen M., Faller F., Fyhn Ullern E., 2018, Fostering Renewable Energy with Smart Specialisation? Insights into European Innovation Policy. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, (January), [https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1554696].
• 17. Trippl M., Grillitsch M., Isaksen A., 2017, Exogenous Sources of Regional Indutrial Change. Progress in Human Geography, 030913251770098, [https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982].
• 18. Uyarra E., Flanagan K., Magro E., Wilson J. R., Sotarauta M., 2017, Understanding Regional Innovation Policy Dynamics: Actors, Agency and Learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4): 559-568, [https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417705914].
• 19. Weber KM, R. H., 2012, Legitimising Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change. Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-level Perspectives in a Comprehensive ‘Failures’ Framework. Res Policy, 41: 1037-1047

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).