Achievements to date and existing research gaps in project management in the light of literature studies

Mindur, Dariusz

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2020.142.5

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Achievements to date and existing research gaps in project management in the light of literature studies

Autorzy

Mindur Dariusz

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.142.5

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to identify current development directions and potential research gaps in project management. Design/methodology/approach: The method of systematic review of articles published in the Elsevier - Science Direct database in the years 2000-2019 was used, where the search phrase was “project management” and the type of articles was “research articles”. In order to answer the research questions posed, an additional method of analysis and criticism of the literature was used. Findings: The following conclusions were drawn from the analysis of the articles: a) almost a third of them concerned the practical application of PM issues in one clearly defined sector of the economy, with the most common reference being to the building sector and IS/IT, b) most articles were created in English-speaking countries (47%), c) the largest number of articles concerned the area of human resource (HR) management, including many subjects of qualifications and leadership, d) of the ten areas of knowledge specified in PMBoK, “HR” and “scheduling/time” were the most popular, followed by risk-related issues. Practical implications: The findings of this article would contribute to building a strong and coherent theory and identify best practices in project management. Originality/value: The most important achievement is the recognition of two areas of knowledge - lean management and game theory - where little research has been done so far, and whose solutions and methods could be successfully implemented inside PM.

Słowa kluczowe

project management research trends literature review

zarządzanie projektami trendy badawcze przegląd literatury

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2020

Tom

z. 142

Strony

59--82

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 94 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mindur Dariusz

dariusz.mindur@polsl.pl

Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Organization and Management, Poland

Bibliografia

1. Ahn, M.J., Zwikael, O., and Bednarek, R. (2010). Technological invention to product innovation: A project management approach. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), pp. 559-568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.001.
2. Al-Harbi, K.M.A.-S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), pp. 19-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1.
3. Almarri, K., and Gardiner, P. (2014). Application of Resource-based View to Project Management Research: Supporters and Opponents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp. 437-445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.049.
4. Archibald, R. (2004.06.24). State of the Art of Project Management: 2004. 2º Simposio di PM, Project Manager Role Evolution. Roma, Italia: Castlegandolfo.
5. Artto, K.A., and Wikstom K. (2005). What is project business? International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), pp. 343-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.03.005.
6. Åsgård, T. (2018). Health, safety and environment in the teaching of project management. The case of bachelor education in construction engineering in Norway. Procedia Computer Science, 138, pp. 688-696. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.091.
7. Badri, A., Gbodossou, A., and Nadeau, S. (2012). Occupational health and safety risks: Towards the integration into project management. Safety Science, 50(2), pp. 190-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.008.
8. Biedenbach, T., and Müller, R. (2011). Paradigms in project management research: examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), pp. 82-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111096908.
9. Bilgin, G., Eken, G., Ozyurt, B., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M.T., and Ozorhon, B. (2017). Handling project dependencies in portfolio management. Procedia Computer Science, 121, pp. 356-363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.048.
10. Bindera, J., Aillaud, L.IV, and Schilli. L. (2014). The Project Management Cocktail Model: An Approach for Balancing Agile and ISO 21500. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp. 182-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.022.
11. Bočková, K.H. (2015). What Game Theory and Poker can Teach us in Project Management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, pp. 97-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01606-8.
12. Bočková, K.H., Sláviková, G., and Gabrhel, J. (2015). Game Theory as a Tool of Project Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 709-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.491.
13. Bredillet C. (2006). The future of project management: mapping the dynamics of project management field in action. In: D.I. Cleland, and R. Gareis (Eds.), Global project management handbook: planning, organizing, and controlling international projects. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Brown, A.W., Adams, J.D., and Amjad, A.A. (2007). The relationship between human capital and time performance in project management: A path analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), pp. 77-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.011.
15. Calabrese, G., and Mastroberardino, P. (2015). Professionalization and Dissemination of Project Management in Italy. Structuring an Organizational Field. Procedia Computer Science, 64, pp. 63-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.464.
16. Chang, Y.-F., and Ishii, H. (2013). Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach to Assess the Project Quality Management in Project. Procedia Computer Science, 22, pp. 928-936. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.176.
17. Chen, Z., Lan, Y., and Ma, N. (2018). Career incentive contract design in project management under companies’ competition and asymmetric information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118, pp. 210-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.024.
18. Chmielarz, W., and Zborowski, M. (2018). Determinants of Using Project Management in the Implementation of Information Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 126, pp. 1224-1236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.064.
19. Cicmil, S., and Hodgson, D. (2006). Making projects critical: An introduction. In: D. Hodgson, and S. Cicmil (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 1-25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J., and Hodgson, D. (2006). Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), pp. 675-686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006.
21. Cooke-Davies, T.J., and Arzymanow, A. (2003). The maturity of project management in different industries: An investigation into variations between project management models. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), pp. 471-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00084-4.
22. Crawford, L., Pollack, J., and England, D. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management, 24(2), pp. 175-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.005.
23. De Magalhães, S.T., Magalhães, M.J., and Sá, V.J. (2015). Establishment ofAutomatization as a Requirement for Time Management Input Modules in Project Management Information Systems for Academic Activities - A Game Theory Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 64, pp. 1157-1162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.596.
24. Do Carmo Silva, M., and Simoes Gomes, C.F. (2015). Practices in Project Management According to Charles Handy's Organizational Culture Typologies. Procedia Computer Science, 55, pp. 678-687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.074.
25. Doloi, H.K. (2011). Understanding stakeholders' perspective of cost estimation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(5), pp. 622-636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.001.
26. Ekrot, B., Kock, A., and Gemünden, H.G. (2016). Retaining project management competence - Antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), pp. 145-157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.010.
27. Engwall, M. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32(5), pp. 789-808. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4.
28. Eriksson, P.E., Larsson, J., and Pesämaa, O. (2017). Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector - A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), pp. 1512-1523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.015.
29. Fallah-Mehdipour, E., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Tabari, M.M.R., and Marino, M.A. (2012). Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects: Application and adaptation of NSGA-II and MOPSO. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), pp. 2794-2803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.139.
30. Gareis, R., and Huemann, M. (2007). Maturity models for the project oriented company. In: J.R. Turner (Eds.), The Gower Handbook of Project Management (pp. 183-208). Aldershot: Gower.
31. Geraldi, J., Turner, J.R., Maylor, H., Söderholm, A., Hobday, M., and Brady, T. (2008). Innovation in project management: Voices of researchers. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), pp. 586-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.011.
32. Gomes, J., and Romão, M. (2016). Improving Project Success: A Case Study Using Benefits and Project Management. Procedia Computer Science, 100, pp. 489-497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.187. [46, 072].
33. Hall, N.G. (2012). Project management: recent developments and research opportunities. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(2), pp. 129-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5190-5.
34. Heigermoser, D., García de Soto, B., Abbott, E.L.S., and Chua, D.K.H. (2019). BIM-based Last Planner System tool for improving construction project management. Automation in Construction, 104, pp. 246-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.01.
35. Hodgson, D., and Cicmil, S. (2006). Are projects real? The PMBoK and the legitimation of project management knowledge. In: D. Hodgson, and S. Cicmil (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 29-50). New York: Palgrave.
36. Hodgson, D., and Cicmil, S. (2008). The other side of projects: the case for critical project studies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), pp. 142-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370810846487.
37. Hyväri, I. (2006). Project management effectiveness in project-oriented business organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 24(3), pp. 216-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.09.001.
38. Hyväri, I. (2016). Roles of Top Management and Organizational Project Management in the Effective Company Strategy Implementation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 108-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.168.
39. Ingasona, H.Th., and Shepherd, M.M. (2014). Mapping the Future for Project Management as a Discipline - For more Focused Research Efforts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp. 288-294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.033.
40. Jugdev, K., Mathur, G., and Fung, T.S. (2007). Project management assets and their relationship with the project management capability of the firm. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), pp. 560-568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.009.
41. Jugdev, K., Thomas, J., and Delisle, C. L. (2001). Rethinking project management: old truths and new insights. International Journal of Project Management, 7(1), pp. 36-43.
42. Khameneh, A.H., Taheri, A., and Ershadi, M. (2016). Offering a Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Project Risk Management System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 82-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.165.
43. Kolltveita, B.J., Karlsena, J.T., and Grønhaug, K. (2007). Perspectives on project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), pp. 3-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.12.002.
44. Koskela, L., and Howell, G.A. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. Proceedings of the PMI Conference, July 2002, Seattle, PMI, pp. 293-302.
45. Kwak, Y.H., and Anbari, F.T. (2009). Analyzing project management research: perspectives from top management journals. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), pp. 435-446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.004.
46. Lachhab, M., Béler, C., Solano-Charris, E.L., and Coudert, T. (2017). Towards an Integration of Systems Engineering and Project Management Processes for a Decision Aiding Purpose. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), pp. 7266-7271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1379.
47. Legault, M.-J., and Chasserio, S. (2012). Professionalization, risk transfer, and the effect on gender gap in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), pp. 697-707. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.004.
48. Liang, T.-F. (2009). Fuzzy multi-objective project management decisions using two-phase fuzzy goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(4), pp. 1407-1416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.010.
49. Liang, T.-F. (2010). Applying fuzzy goal programming to project management decisions with multiple goals in uncertain environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), pp. 8499-8507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.026.
50. Lim, A., Ma, H., Rodrigues, B., Teck Tan, S., and Xiao, F. (2011). New concepts for activity float in resource-constrained project management. Computers & Operations Research, 38(6), pp. 917-930. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.10.004.
51. Lückmann, P., and Färber, K. (2016). The Impact of Cultural Differences on Project Stakeholder Engagement: A Review of Case Study Research in International Project Management. Procedia Computer Science, 100, pp. 85-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.127.
52. Marquès, G., Gourc, D., and Lauras, M. (2011). Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), pp. 1057-1069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.10.002.
53. Martin, A. (2000). A simulation engine for custom project management education. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), pp. 201-213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00014-9.
54. Masár, M., Hudáková, M., Šimák, L., and Brezina, D. (2019). The current state of project risk management in the transport sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, pp. 1119-1126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.156.
55. Maylor, H. (2001). Beyond the Gantt chart - Project management moving on. European Management Journal, 19(1), pp. 92-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00074-8.
56. Morris, P.W.G., Crawford, L., Hodgson, D., Shepherd, M., and Thomas, J. (2006). Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession - The case of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), pp. 710-721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.012.
57. Morris, P.W.G., Jamieson, A., and Shepherd, M.M. (2006b). Research updating the APM Body of Knowledge 4th edition. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), pp. 461-473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.002.
58. Morris, P.W.G., Patel, M.B., and Wearne, S.H. (2000). Research into revising the APM project management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), pp. 155-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00068-X.
59. Morris, P.W.G., Pinto, J.K., and Söderlund, J. (2011). Introduction: towards the third wave of project management. In: P.W.G. Morris, J.K. Pinto, and J. Söderlund (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 1-11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Mossalama, A., and Arafab, M. (2017). Governance model for integrating organizational project management (OPM) with corporate practices. HBRC Journal, 13(3), pp. 302-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.08.003.
61. Okoro, T. (2016). Diverse Talent: Enhancing Gender Participation in Project Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 170-175, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.176.
62. Padalkar, M., and Gopinath, S. (2016). Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), pp. 1305-1321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.006.
63. Pheng, L.S., and Leong, C.H.Y. (2000). Cross-cultural project management for international construction in China. International Journal of Project Management, 18(5), pp. 307-316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00027-7.
64. Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), pp. 266-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2006.08.002.
65. Pollack, J., and Adler, D. (2015). Emergent trends and passing fads in project management research: a scientometric analysis of changes in the field. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), pp. 236-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.011.
66. Ponsteen, A., and Kusters, R.J. (2015). Classification of Human- and Automated Resource Allocation Approaches in Multi-Project Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 194, 165-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.130.
67. Project Management Institute (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). USA, Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
68. Rehor, P., and Vrchota, J. (2018). Remuneration in small and middle-sized enterprises with project management. Procedia Computer Science, 138, pp. 829-834. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.108.
69. Rivera, A., and Kashiwagi, J. (2016). Identifying the State of the Project Management Profession. Procedia Engineering, 145, pp. 1386-1393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.204.
70. Saidoun, A. (2016). Successful Project Management in North Africa with Intercultural Competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 218-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.182.
71. Sanchez, O.P., Terlizzi, M.A., and de Moraes, H.R.D.O.C. (2017). Cost and time project management success factors for information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), pp. 1608-1626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.007.
72. Shenhar, A.J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), pp. 394-414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772.
73. Smyth, H.J., and Morris, P.W. (2007). An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), pp. 423-436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.006.
74. Söderlund, J. (2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: a review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), pp. 655-667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011.
75. Söderlund, J., (2004b). Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management, 22, pp. 183-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00070-X.
76. Söderlund, J., and Maylor, H. (2012). Project management scholarship: Relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools. International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), pp. 686-696. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.007.
77. Sohi, A.J., Hertogh, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., and Blom, R. (2016). Does Lean & Agile Project Management Help Coping with Project Complexity? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 252-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.186.
78. Svejvig, P., and Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: a structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp. 278-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.004.
79. Teller, J., and Kock, A. (2013). An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), pp. 817-829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.012.
80. Tenera, A., and Pinto, L.C. (2014). A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Project Management Improvement Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp. 912-920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.102.
81. Themistocleous, G., and Wearne, S. (2000). Project management topic coverage in journals. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), pp. 7-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00030-7.
82. Turner, J.R., Anbari, F., and Bredillet, C. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: the nine schools. Glob Bus Perspect, 1(1), pp. 3-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196-012-0001-4.
83. Turner, J.R., Ledwith, A., and Kelly, J. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), pp. 744-755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2010.06.005.
84. Uchitpe, M., Uddin, S., and Lynn, C. (2016). Predicting the Future of Project Management Research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 27-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.158.
85. Van Der Velde, R.R., and Van Donk, D.P. (2002). Understanding bi-project management: engineering complex industrial construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(7), pp. 525-533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00053-9.
86. Vicente-Oliva, S., Martínez-Sánchez, Á., and Berges-Muro, L. (2015). Research and development project management best practices and absorptive capacity: Empirical evidence from Spanish firms. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp. 1704-1716. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.001.
87. Viglioni, T.G.A., Cunha, J.A.O.G., and Moura, H.P. (2016). A Performance Evaluation Model for Project Management Office Based on a Multicriteria Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 100, pp. 955-962. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.257.
88. Vilhelmsdottir, A.S., Kristjansdottir E., and Ingason H.T. (2016). What can be Learnt from the Icelandic National Team's Managers, in Project Management and in Shaping Group Dynamics? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 278-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.189.
89. Vlahov, R.D., Mišić, S., and Radujković, M. (2016). The Influence of Cultural Diversity on Project Management Competence Development - The Mediterranean Experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 463-469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2016.06.212.
90. Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P., and Cicmil, S. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), pp. 638-649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.009.
91. Yan, Y., Kuphal, T., and Bode, J. (2000). Application of multiagent systems in project management. International Journal of Production Economics, 68(2), pp. 185-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00082-7.
92. Yang, M.-F., and Lin, Y. (2013). Applying fuzzy multi-objective linear programming to project management decisions with the interactive two-phase method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(4), pp. 1061-1069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.08.009.
93. Žarković, N., Vrečko, I., and Barilović, Z. (2014). Creating Holistic Project-knowledge Society through Project Management Education in Research and Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp. 210-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.025.
94. Zwikael, O., Shimizu, K., and Globerson, S. (2005). Cultural differences in project management capabilities: A field study. International Journal of Project Management, 23(6), pp. 454-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.04.003.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-a4b005be-a73e-4937-b773-c234d20c81b2