Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Wilanów Park: A benefit transfer study

• Autorzy: Zawojska E. , Szkop Z. , Czajkowski M. , Żylicz T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ekonomiczna wycena usług ekosystemowych świadczonych przez park w Wilanowie. Badanie metodą transferu korzyści

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

King Jan III Sobieski (1629–1696), known as an excellent military commander who defeated the Turkish army near Vienna in 1683, was a profound nature lover. Unhappy with living in a castle in the capital city, he bought Wilanów near Warsaw, where he established his suburban residence with a beautiful baroque palace and gardens. After the World War II, the estate was nationalised, restored and turned into a museum. There are probably no trees planted by king Jan III Sobieski himself, but the Park is remarkable. It comprises gardens in various styles (baroque, neo-Renaissance, English and English-Chinese) and a nature reserve Morysin with valuable habitats of meadows and forests. Woodlands, grasslands and ponds constitute three main ecosystems in the Park. Tourists and Warsaw inhabitants appreciate the nature of the gardens and of the Morysin reserve. In addition to their unquestioned historical and cultural value, the Park ecosystems provide multiple environmental benefits. In this paper, we estimate the economic value of these benefits.

PL

Rezydencja królewska w Wilanowie to unikalne połączenie zdumiewającej architektury, historii i przyrody. Park w Wilanowie dostarcza wielu korzyści zarówno odwiedzającym go turystom, jak i mieszkańcom Warszawy. W niniejszym badaniu podjęto się oszacowania wartości ekonomicznej tych z korzyści, które mają związek z przyrodą, to jest wartości usług ekosystemowych świadczonych przez park. W oparciu o metodę transferu korzyści wartość usług ekosystemowych dostarczanych przez park w Wilanowie oszacowano na 500 tys. euro rocznie. Choć liczba wydaje się duża, jest znacznie niższa niż wartość innych świadczeń dostarczanych przez zasoby rezydencji.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

economic valuation; ecosystem services; benefits transfer method; Park in Wilanow

PL

wycena wartości; usługi ekosystemowe; metoda transferu korzyści; Park w Wilanowie

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 143--153
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zawojska E.

• University of Warsaw, Poland Department of Economics Długa 44/50, 00–241 Warsaw

autor

Szkop Z.

• University of Warsaw, Poland Department of Economics Długa 44/50, 00–241 Warsaw

autor

Czajkowski M.

• University of Warsaw, Poland Department of Economics Długa 44/50, 00–241 Warsaw

autor

Żylicz T.

• University of Warsaw, Poland Department of Economics Długa 44/50, 00–241 Warsaw

Bibliografia

• Ahtiainen H. et al., Performance of different approaches in international benefit transfer: Insights from a nine country experiment, Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics of the University of Warsaw 2015 no. 28(176)
• Barreiro J. et al., How much are people willing to pay for silence? A contingent valuation study, “Applied Economics” 2005 vol. 37(11), p. 1233–1246
• Bateman I.J. et al., Making benefit transfers work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe, “Environmental and Resource Economics” 2011 vol. 50(3), p. 365–387
• Bjørner T.B., Combining socio-acoustic and contingent valuation surveys to value noise reduction, “Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment” 2004 vol. 9(5), p. 341–356
• Bjørner T.B., Comparing the value of quiet from contingent valuation and hedonic pricing methods, paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Budapest, Hungary 2004, June 25–28
• Chau C.K. et al., A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes, “Building and Environment” 2010 vol. 45(11), p. 2553–2561
• Chen W.Y., Jim C.Y., Assessment and valuation of the ecosystem services provided by urban forests, in: M.M. Carreiro, Y.-C. Song, J. Wu (eds), Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests, New York 2008
• CICES 2015 Towards a common classification of ecosystem services, cices.eu
• Costanza R. et al., Changes in the global value of ecosystem services, “Global Environmental Change” 2014 vol. 26, p. 152–158
• Costanza R. et al., The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, “Nature” 1997 vol. 387, p. 253–260
• Czajkowski M., Ščasný M., Study on benefit transfer in an international setting. How to improve welfare estimates in the case of the countries’ income heterogeneity? “Ecological Economics” 2010 vol. 69(12), p. 2409–2416
• Dawe N.D., Sprinting toward sustainability, “American Forests” 1996 vol. 102(2), p. 22–30, 45
• Day B. et al., Beyond implicit prices: Recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model, “Environmental and resource economics” 2007 vol. 37(1), p. 211–232
• de Groot R. et al., Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units, “Ecosystem services” 2012 vol. 1(1), p. 50–61
• Fosgerau M., Bjørner T.B., Joint models for noise annoyance and willingness to pay for road noise reduction, “Transportation Research Part B: Methodological” 2006 vol. 40(2), p. 164–178
• Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y., Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China, “Cities” 2009 vol. 26(4), p. 187–194
• Johnston R.J. et al., Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values: A guide for researchers and practitioners, Dordrecht 2015
• Kroeger T., The economic value of ecosystem services in four counties in Northeastern Florida, Conservation Economics Working Paper 2005 no. 2
• Lindhjem H., Navrud S., How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? “Ecological Economics” 2008 vol. 66(2–3), p. 425–435
• Lindhjem H., Navrud S., Reliability of meta-analytic benefit transfers of international value of statistical life estimates: Tests and illustrations, in: R. J. Johnston et al. (eds), Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values: A guide for researchers and practitioners, Dordrecht 2015
• Londoño L.M., Johnston R.J., Enhancing the reliability of benefit transfer over heterogeneous sites: A meta-analysis of international coral reef values, “Ecological Economics” 2012 vol. 78, p. 80–89
• MacMullan E., Reich S., Economic arguments for protecting the natural resources of the east buttes area in southeast Portland, Eugene, OR 2009
• Martín-López B. et al., The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain), “Ecological Economics” 2011 vol. 70(8), p. 1481–1491
• McPherson E.G. et al., Northeast community tree guide: Benefits, costs, and strategic planting, Albany, CA 2007
• Millward A.A., Sabir S., Benefits of a forested urban park: What is the value of Allan Gardens to the city of Toronto, Canada? “Landscape and urban planning” 2011 vol. 100(3), p. 177–188
• Navrud S., Economic benefits of a program to reduce transportation and community noise – A contingent valuation survey, in: Proceedings of Internoise 2000 vol. 5, p. 3395–3400
• Navrud S., Economic valuation of transportation noise in Europe, “Revista italiana di Acustica” 2010 vol. 34(3), p. 15–25
• Noel J.E. et al., A benefit transfer estimation of agro-ecosystems services, “Western Economics Forum” 2009 vol. 8(1), p. 18–28
• Nowak D.J., Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest, in: McPherson et al. (eds), Climate urban forest ecosystem: Results of the Chicago urban forest climate project, Chicago 1994
• Olewiler N., The value of natural capital in settled areas of Canada, Ducks Unlimited and the Nature Conservancy of Canada, Manitoba 2004
• Pauleit S., Duhme F., GIS assessment of Munich’s urban forest structure for urban planning, “Journal of Arboriculture” 2000 vol. 26(3), p. 133–141
• Peper P.J. et al., New York municipal forest resource analysis. Technical report, New York 2007
• Pimentel D. et al., Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity, “BioScience” 1997 vol. 47(11), p. 747–757
• Preiss P. et al., Report on the procedure and data to generate averaged/ aggregated data, NEEDS project, Stuttgart 2008
• Rosenzweig C. et al., Green roofs in the New York metropolitan region: Research report, Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2006
• Troy A., Bagstad K., Estimating ecosystem services in southern Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario 2009
• Wilson S.J., Canada’s wealth of natural capital: Rouge National Park, David Suzuki Foundation, 2012
• Wilson S.J., Lake Simcoe basin’s natural capital: The value of the watershed’s ecosystem services, David Suzuki Foundation, Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper Series 2008, June
• Wilson S.J., Natural capital in BC’s Lower Mainland: Valuing the benefits from nature, David Suzuki Foundation 2010
• Wilson S.J., Ontario’s wealth, Canada’s future: appreciating the value of the Greenbelt’s eco-services, David Suzuki Foundation 2008
• Xu H. et al., Assessment of indirect use values of forest biodiversity in Yaoluoping national nature reserve, Anhui province, “Chinese Geographical Science” 2003 vol. 13(3), p. 277–283
• Xue D., Tisdell C., Valuing ecological functions of biodiversity in Changbaishan Mountain Biosphere Reserve in northeast China, “Biodiversity and Conservation” 2001 vol. 10(3), p. 467–481

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).