PL
 |
EN

PL EN

Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Remote study and deconsumption – sustainable mobility versus (un)necessary university commuting

Autorzy
Paradowska Monika
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
paradowska_remote_3_21.pdf
Identyfikatory
DOI
10.34659/2021/3/20
Warianty tytułu
PL
Studiowanie zdalne i dekonsumpcja – zrównoważona mobilność versus (nie)zbędne podróżowanie na uczelnię
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Remote study was one of the many restrictions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. It resulted in a deconsumption of university commuting which, together with telecommuting, could be considered as a means to implement a sustainable mobility policy. Within this context, this paper investigates student's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of daily travel before the online learning started with focus on the resultant satisfaction from the use of given means of transport. In this context, we examined the potential for developing more sustainable mobility and possibilities for further deconsumption of transport processes. This was based on the results of a pre-liminary survey the author conducted online among students of two public universities in Poland. The results obtained, revealed that the respondents associated commuting to university with more advan-tages than disadvantages. However, these perceptions differed dependent on the most frequently used transport mode. Car users hardly benefited from commuting compared to other transport users and were the group least likely to resign from individual motorisation. Pedestrians and cyclists per-ceived most benefits and were most satisfied. In general, students expected to continue commuting using the transport modes they used prior to the pandemic. Nevertheless, when students were asked about their “dream transport mode” which enabled the possibility for deconsumption of commuting by way of a cheap and commonly available teleportation, private car turned out to be a better option than teleportation among students commuting either by car or by urban public transport. In such a hypo-thetical situation, only car users and active commuters were not prepared to change their transport behaviour.
PL
Jednym ze skutków pandemii był przymus zdalnego studiowania. Skutkował on obligatoryjną dekonsumpcją podróżowania na uczelnię, która, wraz z nauką zdalną, mogą być traktowane jako narzędzia polityki zrównoważonej mobilności. Na tym tle głównym celem artykułu jest określenie percepcji studentów co do korzyści i niekorzyści związanych z codziennym podróżowaniem na uniwersytet przed rozpoczęciem nauki online, ze szczególną uwagą poświęconą satysfakcji wynikającej z podróżowania poszczególnymi środkami transportu. W tym kontekście określono skłonność zarówno do bardziej zrównoważonej mobilności, jak też do potencjalnej, teoretycznej, dalszej dekonsumpcji procesów transportowych. Autorka przeprowadziła wstępne badania ankietowe online pośród studentów dwóch uczelni publicznych w Polsce. Uzyskane wyniki wykazały, że studenci w większym stopniu kojarzyli podróżowanie na uczelnię z korzyściami aniżeli niekorzyściami. Opinie różniły się jednak w zależności od najczęściej stosowanego środka transportu. Użytkownicy samochodu w niewielkim stopniu postrzegali korzyści z dojazdów i byli najmniej skłonni do rezygnacji z motoryzacji indywidualnej. Piesi i rowerzyści dostrzegali najwięcej korzyści i byli najbardziej zadowoleni. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, po zakończeniu pandemii respondenci kontynuowaliby podróżowanie na uczelnię swoim poprzednim środkiem transportu. Niemniej jednak, kiedy zapytano studentów o wymarzony sposób dotarcia na uczelnię, uwzględniając możliwość dekonsumpcji procesu transportowego w formie taniej, ogólnodostępnej teleportacji , samochód okazał się lepszą opcją niż teleportacja wśród studentów dojeżdżających samochodem oraz miejskim transportem zbiorowym. W takiej hipotetycznej sytuacji, jedynie użytkownicy samochodu i studenci preferujący aktywną mobilność nie zmieniliby swojego zachowania transportowego. Wyniki badań stanowią podstawę do rekomendacji dla polityki zrównoważonej mobilności. Kluczową kwestię stanowi zrozumienie powiązań pomiędzy znaczeniem oraz satysfakcją z podróżowania na uczelnię różnymi środkami transportu, prospołecznymi i prośrodowiskowymi postawami transportowymi, a także elastycznością popytu na podróżowanie samochodem. Dlatego też niniejsze badanie dostarcza nowych spostrzeżeń dla rozwoju teorii dotyczącej zrównoważonych zachowań transportowych młodych osób.
Słowa kluczowe
EN
PL
Wydawca
Fundacja Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
Czasopismo
Ekonomia i Środowisko
Rocznik
2021
Tom
nr 3
Strony
44--72
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 124 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
Paradowska Monika
monika.paradowska@uwr.edu.pl
  • University of Wroclaw, Koszarowa Street 3, 51-149, Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Acheampong, R.A. et al., 2021. Can autonomous vehicles enable sustainable mobility in future cities? Insights and policy challenges from user preferences over different urban transport options. Cities, 112, 103134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103134.
  • Ackoff, R.L., 1953. The Design of Social Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Ahvenniemi, H. et al., 2017. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234-245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009.
  • Azzahra, N.F., 2020. Addressing Distance Learning Barriers in Indonesia Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Center for Indonesian Policy Studies, https://doi.org/10.35497/309162.
  • Beirão, G., Sarsfield Cabral, J.A., 2007. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478-489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009.
  • Belzunegui-Eraso, A., Erro Garcés, A., 2020. Teleworking in the Context of the Covid19 Crisis. Sustainability, 12(9), 3662, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093662.
  • Bernardes, J.P. et al., 2018. “Do as I say, not as I do” – a systematic literature review on the attitude-behaviour gap towards sustainable consumption of Generation Y. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 459, 459 012089.
  • Berri, A., 2009. A cross-country comparison of household, car ownership: A Cohort Analysis. IATSS Research, 33(2), 21-38, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0386-1112 (14)60242-9.
  • Bieser, J.C.T. et al., 2021. Impacts of telecommuting on time use and travel: A case study of a neighborhood telecommuting center in Stockholm. Travel Behaviour and Society, 23, 157-165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.001.
  • Bojovic, D. et al., 2020. What we can learn from birdsong: Mainstreaming teleworking in a post-pandemic world. Earth System Governance, 5, 100074, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100074. Burgiel, A., 2020. Luka między postawami a zachowaniami konsumentów i jej konsekwencje dla upowszechnienia zrównoważonej konsumpcji. Prace Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach “Zrównoważona konsumpcja w polskich gospodarstwach domowych – postawy, zachowania, determinanty”, 222-248.
  • Burgiel, A., Zrałek, J., 2015. Is Sustainable Consumption Possible in Poland? An Examination of Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Deconsumption Practices. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 14(2), 15-25.
  • Bylok, F., 2017. Intricacies of modern consumption: Consumerism vs. deconsumption. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 20(8), 61-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.8.06.
  • Bywalec, C., Rudnicki, L., 2002. Konsumpcja. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
  • Camilleri, M.A., 2021. Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: a systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook. International Journal of Quality and Service, 13(2), 268-281, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS03-2020-0034.
  • Cattaneo, M. et al., 2018. Students’ mobility attitudes and sustainable transport mode choice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(5), 942-962. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0134.
  • Chappell, A. et al., 2020. The Experiences of Undergraduate Commuter Students. Brunel University London, https://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/administration/access -and-participation/documents/pdf/The-Experiences-of-Undergraduate-Commuter-Students-Report.pdf [12.06.2021].
  • Chee, W.L., Fernandez J.L., 2013. Factors that Influence the Choice of Mode of Transport in Penang: A Preliminary Analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91, 120-127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.409.
  • Cherrier, H. et al., 2011. Intentional non-consumption for Sustainability. Consumer resistance and/or anti-consumption? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11), 1757-1767, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111167397.
  • Christiansen, L.B. et al., 2016. International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN adult study. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(4), 467-478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.02.010.
  • Conway, M.W. et al., 2020. How Will the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect the Future of Urban Life? Early Evidence from Highly-Educated Respondents in the United States. Urban Science, 4(4), 50, https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4040050.
  • Cornagoi, E. et al., 2019. Evaluating the Impact of Urban Road Pricing on the Use of Green Transport Modes: The Case of Milan. OECD Environment Working Papers, 143, https://doi.org/10.1787/ddaa6b25-en.
  • Davis, D., 2005. Business Research for Decision Making. Thomson South-Western, Australia.
  • De Jong, G., Van de Riet, O., 2008. The driving factors of passenger transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 8(3), 227–250.
  • De Vos, J. et al., 2016. Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation, 43(5), 771-796, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9.
  • De Vos, J. et al., 2019.Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(3), 180-196, https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1456580.
  • De Vos, J., 2018. Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 261-274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.034.
  • Dedele, A., Miskinyte, A., 2021. Promoting Sustainable Mobility: A Perspective from Car and Public Transport Users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4715, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094715.
  • dell’Olio, L. et al., 2019. A methodology based on parking policy to promote sustainable mobility in college campuses. Transport Policy, 80, 148-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.012.
  • Devi, M.K., 2017. Potential to increase active commuting level in university area (case study: Universitas Gadjah Mada). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 70, 012022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012022.
  • Dong, J. et al., 2012. Analysis of Automobile Travel Demand Elasticities With Respect To Travel Cost. Report prepared for Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy Information, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/ pubs/hpl-15-014/TCElasticities.pdf [15.07.2021].
  • EIA (The U.S. Energy Information Administration), 2014. Gasoline prices tend to have little effect on demand for car travel. U.S. Energy Information Administration, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=19191 [2.07.2021].
  • Encyklopedia PWN, https://encyklopedia.pwn.pl [5.07.2021].
  • Enochsson, L. et al., 2021. Impacts of the Sharing Economy on Urban Sustainability: The Perceptions of Municipal Governments and Sharing Organisations. Sustainability, 13(8), 4213, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084213.
  • European Commission, 2019. Handbook on the external costs of transport. Version 2019 – 1.1, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9781f65f8448-11ea-bf12-01aa75ed71a1 [15.06.2021].
  • European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, 2019a. Guidelines for Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (Second Edition). European Commission, https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/guidelines_for_developing_and_implementing_a_sustainable_urban_mobility_plan_2nd_edition.pdf [12.06.2021].
  • European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, 2019b. Sustainable urban mobility planning in metropolitan regions. Sustainable urban mobility planning and governance models in EU metropolitan regions, European Commission, https://sumps-up.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Tools_and_Resources/Publications_and_reports/Topic_Guides/sump_metropolitan_region_guide_v2.pdf [12.06.2021].
  • European Union, 2017. Sustainable Urban Mobility: European Policy, Practice and Solutions, https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/default/files/2017-sustainable-urban-mobility-european-policy-practice-and-solutions.pdf [15.06.2021].
  • European Union, 2020. Sustainable Urban Mobility in the EU: No substantial improvement is possible without Member States’ commitment. Special Report, https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR20_06/SR_Sustainable_Urban_ Mobility_EN.pdf [15.06.2021].
  • Ferri, F. et al., 2020. Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations. Societies, 10(4), 86, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/soc10040086.
  • Fonseca, F. et al., 2021. Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793.
  • Globalization and World Cities Research Network, 2020. The World According to GaWC 2020, https://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2020t.html [2.07.2021].
  • Grison, E. et al., 2016. Exploring factors related to users’ experience of public transport route choice: influence of context and users profiles. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(2), 287-301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0359-6.
  • Hartman, R. et al., 1991. An Investigation of Selected Variables Affecting Telecommuting Productivity and Satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(2), 207-225.
  • Harvey, A.S., Taylor, M.E., 2000. Activity settings and travel behavior: a social contact perspective. Transportation, 27(1), 53-73, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005207320044.
  • Ho, I.M.K. et al., 2021. Predicting student satisfaction of emergency remote learning in higher education during COVID-19 using machine learning techniques. Plos One, 16(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249423.
  • Hopkins, J.L., McKay, J., 2019. Investigating ‘anywhere working’ as a mechanism for alleviating traffic congestion in smart cities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142, 258–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.032.
  • Irwin, F., 2004. Gaining the Air Quality and Climate Benefit from Telework. Environmental Protection Agency and the AT&T Foundation, http://pdf.wri.org/teleworkguide.pdf [20.06.2021].
  • Ismail, F.D. et al., 2016. Factors Influencing the Stated Preference of University Employees towards Telecommuting in International Islamic University Malaysia. Transportation Research Procedia, 17, 478-487, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.097.
  • Jin et al., 2021. Zoom in the attitude-behaviour gap: low carbon travel behaviour. E3S Web of Conferences, 275, 02016, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2021 27502016.
  • Kisanga, D., Ireson, G., 2015. Barriers and strategies on adoption of e-learning in Tanzanian higher learning institutions: Lessons for adopters. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(2), 126-137.
  • Kuppam, A. et al., 1999. Analysis of the role of traveller attitudes and perceptions in explaining mode-choice behaviour. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1676, 68-76.
  • Lades, L.K. et al., 2020. Why is active travel more satisfying than motorized travel? Evidence from Dublin. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 136, 318-333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.007.
  • Lavery, T.A. et al., 2013. Driving out of choices: An investigation of transport modality in a university sample. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 57, 37–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.010.
  • Lee, M.S.W. et al., 2009. Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda. Editorial. Journal of Business Research 62, 145-147.
  • Leonard, A., Conrad, A., 2011. The story of stuff: The impact of overconsumption on the planet, our communities, and our health – and how we can make it better. Free Press, New York.
  • Lier van, T. et al., 2012. The impact of telework on transport externalities: the case of Brussels Capital Region. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 240-250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.743.
  • Litman, T., 2008. Valuing Transit Service Quality Improvements. Journal of Public Transportation, 11(2), 43-63, https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.11.2.3.
  • Luchs, M.G. et al., 2015. Exploring consumer responsibility for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 31 (13-14), 1449-1471, https://doi.org /10.1080/0267257X.2015.1061584.
  • Łuczka, W., Smoluk-Sikorska, J., 2017. Sustainable consumption – between theory and practice. In: Raupelienė, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 1161- 1166, https://doi.org/10.15544/RD.2017.134.
  • Maguire, D., Morris, D., 2018. Homeward Bound: Defining, understanding and aiding ‘commuter students’. HEPI Report 114. Higher Education Policy Institute,
  • https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/HEPI-HomewardBound-Defining-understanding-and-aiding-%E2%80%98commuterstudents%E2%80%99-Report-11429_11_18Web.pdf [20.05.2021].
  • Marszałek, S., 2001. Ekonomika, organizacja i zarządzanie w transporcie (Economics, organisation and management in transport). Wydawnictwo Śląskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania, Katowice.
  • Mayes, M. et al., 1996. A qualitative assessment of attitudes to cycling. Transport policy and its implementation, London.
  • McCarthy, P.S., 1996. Market Price and Income Elasticities of New Vehicle Demands. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 543-547.
  • Meijer, L.L.J. et al., 2017. The roles of business models in sustainability transitions: Car sharing in Sydney. In: R. Rauter et al. (Eds.), Exploring a changing view on organizing value creation: developing new business models: contributions to the 2nd international conference on new business models (Institute of Systems Science, Innovation and Sustainability Reports, Vol. 8), Graz, 72-76.
  • Meng, M. et al., 2017. Impact of traveller information on mode choice behaviour. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 171(TR1), 11-19, https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.16.00058.
  • Mokhtarian, P.L. et al., 2015.What makes travel pleasant and/or tiring? An investigation based on the French National Travel Survey. Transportation, 42(6), 1103- 1128, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9557-y.
  • Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 1995. Modeling the Preference for Telecommuting: Measuring Attitudes and Other Variables. Research Report Number UCD-rr$-RR-95-17. Institute of Transportation Studies. University of Cafifornia, https:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.294.4294&rep=rep1&type=pdf [20.05.2021].
  • Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 1997. Modeling the desire to telecommute: the importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 31(1), 35-50.
  • Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 2001. How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 35(8), 695-719.
  • Morfoulaki, M., Papathanasiou, J., 2021. Use of the Sustainable Mobility Efficiency Index (SMEI) for Enhancing the Sustainable Urban Mobility in Greek Cities. Sustainability, 13(4), 1709, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041709.
  • Moslem, S., 2020. Best–Worst Method for Modelling Mobility Choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy. Sustainability, 12(17), 6824, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176824.
  • Nilles, J., 1976. Telecommuting - an alternative to urban transportation congestion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 6(2), 77-84.
  • OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1996. OECD Proceedings. Towards Sustainable Transportation. The Vancouver Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, 24-27 March 1996, https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-transport/2396815.pdf [15.07.2021].
  • OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002. Implementing Sustainable Urban Travel Policies. ECMT – OECD, https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/02urbfinal.pdf [20.06.2021].
  • Páez, A., Scott, D.M., 2007. Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environment and Planning A, 39, 647-665, DOI:10.1068/a37424.
  • Páez, A., Whalen, K., 2010. Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(7), 537–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.003.
  • Paradowska, M., 2011. Rozwój zrównoważonych systemów transportowych polskich miast i aglomeracji w procesie integracji z Unią Europejską - przykład aglomeracji wrocławskiej (The Development of Sustainable Transport Systems in Polish Cities and Agglomerations in the Context of European Integration – the Case of the Wroclaw Agglomeration). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole.
  • Paradowska, M., 2014. The creation of instruments for sustainable transport behaviour. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu, 39, 255-275.
  • Paradowska, M., 2019a. The impact of rivalry and excludability on transport choices: a preliminary research. Ekonomia i Środowisko. Economics and Environment, 69(2), 160-178, https://doi.org/10.34659/2019/2/28.
  • Paradowska, M., 2019b. Rivalry, excludability and positive transport externalities - case study of a private university in Poland. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(7), 1290-1312, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10- 2018-0187.
  • Paradowska, M., 2020. Postrzegana dostępność i postulaty transportowe jako wyznaczniki miejskiej i regionalnej polityki transportowej – badania pilotażowe dwóch wrocławskich uczelni wyższych (Perceived accessibility and transport demands as determinants of the urban and regional transport policy – pilot research of two Wrocław universities). Studia Miejskie, 39, 2020, 29-59. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm.1965.
  • Patrzałek, W., 2019. Dekonsumpcja. Motywy. Cele. Funkcje (Deconsumption. Motives. Goals. Functions). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.
  • Platje, J. et al., 2018. Ekonomika transportu: teoria dla praktyki (Transport Economics: theory for practice). Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.
  • Popuri, Y. et al., 2011. Importance of traveller attitudes in the choice of public transportation to work: findings from the Regional Transportation Authority Attitudinal Survey. Transportation, 38(4), 643-661, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9336-y.
  • Prillwitz, J., Barr, S., 2011. Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1590- 1600, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.011.
  • Rahiem, M.D.H., 2020. Technological Barriers and Challenges in the Use of ICT during the COVID-19 Emergency Remote Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(11B), 6124-6133, https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082248.
  • Ramezani, S. et al., 2018. An integrated assessment of factors affecting modal choice: towards a better understanding of the causal effects of built environment. Transportation, 45, 1351–1387, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9767-1.
  • Razami, H.H., Ibrahim, R., 2021. Distance Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Perceptions and Preference of University Students in Malaysia Towards Online Learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 12(4), 118-126, https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120416.
  • Regulation of the Minister of National Education of March 11, 2020 on the temporary limitation of the functioning of the units of education system regarding the prevention, countermeasure and combating of COVID-19 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 410).
  • Ricardo-AEA, 2014. Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport. Final Report for the European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/default/files/themes/sustainable/studies/doc/2014-handbook-external-coststransport.pdf [15.06.2021].
  • Rissel, C. et al., 2016. Satisfaction with transport and enjoyment of the commute by commuting mode in inner Sydney. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 27, 80–83, https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15044.
  • Romanowska, A. et al., 2019. A study of transport behaviour of academic communities. Sustainability, 11(13), 3519, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133519
  • Rotaris, L., Danielis, R., 2014. The impact of transportation demand management policies on commuting to college facilities: A case study at the University of Trieste, Italy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 127-140, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.011.
  • Rotaris, L., Danielis, R., 2015. Commuting to college: The effectiveness and social efficiency of transportation demand management policies. Transport Policy, 44(C), 158-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.001.
  • Scheepers, C.E. et al., 2016. Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice — Results from the AVENUE project. Journal of Transport & Health, 3, 96–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.01.003.
  • Schneider, R. J., 2011. Understanding sustainable transportation choices: shifting routine automobile travel to walking and bicycling, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., 2011. Understanding auto motives. In: Lucas, K., Blumenberg, E., Weinberger, R., (Eds.), Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours, Bradford, 3-38.
  • Searcy, S. E. et al., 2018. Effect of residential proximity on university student trip frequency by mode. Travel Behaviour and Society, 12, 115-121, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.12.007.
  • Setiawan, R. et al., 2015. Effect of habit and car access on student behavior using cars for travelling to campus. Procedia Engineering, 125, 571-578, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.063.
  • Shannon, T. et al., 2006. Active commuting in a university setting: assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change. Transport Policy, 13(3), 240–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.002.
  • Shaw, F.A. et al., 2019. It’s not all fun and games: An investigation of the reported benefits and disadvantages of conducting activities while commuting. UC Davis, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.008.
  • Singleton, P. A., 2018. How useful is travel-based multitasking? Evidence from commuters in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(50),11-22, https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118776151.
  • Souza, G.H.S. et al., 2020. Brazilian students’ expectations regarding distance learning and remote classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(4), 65-80, https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.4.005.
  • Steg, L. et al., 2001a. The effects of motivational factors on car use: a multidisciplinary modelling approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 789-806.
  • Steg, L. et al., 2001b. Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4, 151-169.
  • Steg, L., 2003, Can public transport compete with the private car? IATSS Research, 27(2), 27-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60141-2.
  • Steg, L., 2005. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001.
  • Szul, E., 2012. Dekonsumpcja – moda czy sposób na kryzys. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 24, 316-328.
  • Taherdoost, H., 2016. Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18-27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
  • Terlau, W., Hirsch, D., 2015. Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-BehaviourGap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development. Journal on Food System Dynamics, 6(3), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.18461/ ijfsd.v6i3.634.
  • Trela, M., 2017. Electric road transport in Poland – an analysis of external costs. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 63(4), 156-165, https://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/journal/ article/view/340 [20.06.2021].
  • UNECE (The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe), 2020. A Handbook on Sustainable Urban Mobility and Spatial Planning Promoting Active Mobility, https://thepep.unece.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Handbook%20on%20Sustainable%20Urban%20Mobility%20and%20Spatial%20Planning.pdf [12.06.2021].
  • UN-Habitat, 2013. Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility. Global report on human settlements 2013, Routledge, Oxon, New York.
  • Vale, D. S. et al., 2018. Different destination, different commuting pattern? Analyzing the influence of the campus location on commuting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 1-18, https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.893.
  • Vincent, L., 2019. The Attitude-Behaviour Gap of Academia: Exploring the Paradox of Hypermobility and Environmental Concerns. A Research Paper presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of Master of Arts in Development Studies. International Institute of Social Sciences. The Hague, The Netherlands, https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/51335/Vincent-Lara_MA-_2018_19_AFES.pdf [14.07.2021].
  • Werland, S., 2020. Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU. Sustainability, 12, 8436, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208436.
  • WHO (World Health Organization) Regional Office for Europe, 2017. Towards more physical activity: Transforming public spaces to promote physical activity – a key contributor to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Europe, https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/353043/2017_WHO_Report_FINAL_WEB.pdf [20.06.2021].
  • WHO (World Health Organization), 2020. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020, https://www.who.int/ director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-atthe-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 [15.05.2021].
  • Ye, R., Titheridge H., 2017. Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, Part B, 535-547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016. 06.011.
  • Yen, J.R. et al., 1994. Employer Attitudes and Stated Preferences Toward Telecommuting: An Exploratory Analysis. Transportation Research Record, 1463, 15-25.
  • Zawadka, J. et al., 2021. Remote learning among students with and without reading difficulties during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10559-3.
  • Zhou, J. et al., 2018. Mode choice of commuter students in a college town: An exploratory study from the United States. Sustainability, 10(9), 1-18, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su10093316.
  • Zhou, J., 2012. Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(7), 1013-1029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.001.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a3e80c32-9fd5-487b-9a87-9fb1e053427f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.