The comparison of the TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing & service sectors

• Autorzy: Wall William Philip

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.27

Warianty tytułu

PL

Porównanie praktyk TQM oraz wydajności jakości między sektorami produkcyjnymi i usługowymi

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper seeks to carry out an empirical comparison of the TQM Practices and Quality Performance between manufacturing and Service Sectors in Thailand. The research was conducted using primary data collected from the 525 respondents from the manufacturing and service sectors. The data was analyzed using MANOVA analysis, t-tests analysis and structural equation modelling (SEM), with SPSS and AMOS software. For RQ1, the study conducted MANOVA analysis and found out that there is a significant difference between the manufacturing and service sector, in terms of TQM and quality performance. An extended analysis of t-test revealed that TQM and quality performance of the manufacturing sector was different from that of the service sector for the 6 variables (leadership, strategic management, customer focus, information analysis, people management, and process management) but no significant difference between the two sectors for product quality variable. The structural equation modelling was applied to answer RQ2 and RQ3. The results revealed that both the manufacturing and service data effectively fit within the model, and that there was significant difference within the two groups of the model. The results also indicated there no significant difference between the strength of the relationship between TQM practices and quality performance between the manufacturing and service organization in Thailand. This study supports the application of the TQM in the organizations. The study observes that for effective performance, firms should consider adopting TQM practices and quality measures which are suitable to their sectors and organizations.

PL

Celem tego artykułu jest przeprowadzenie empirycznego porównania praktyk TQM i wyników w zakresie jakości między sektorami produkcyjnymi i usługowymi w Tajlandii. Badanie przeprowadzono na podstawie danych pierwotnych zebranych od 525 respondentów z sektora produkcyjnego i usługowego. Dane zostały przeanalizowane przy użyciu analizy MANOVA, analizy testów t i modelowania równań strukturalnych (SEM) przy użyciu oprogramowania SPSS i AMOS. W przypadku RQ1 badanie przeprowadziło analizę MANOVA i wykazało, że istnieje znacząca różnica między sektorem produkcyjnym i usługowym, jeśli chodzi o TQM i jakość wykonania. Rozszerzona analiza testu t wykazała, że TQM i wyniki jakościowe sektora produkcyjnego różniły się od wyników sektora usług dla 6 zmiennych (przywództwo, zarządzanie strategiczne, orientacja na klienta, analiza informacji, zarządzanie ludźmi i zarządzanie procesami), ale nie znaczna różnica między tymi dwoma sektorami pod względem zmiennej jakości produktu. Modelowanie równań strukturalnych zastosowano do odpowiedzi RQ2 i RQ3. Wyniki ujawniły, że zarówno dane produkcyjne, jak i usługowe skutecznie pasują do modelu oraz że istnieje znacząca różnica w obu grupach modelu. Wyniki wskazały również, że nie ma znaczącej różnicy między siłą związku między praktykami TQM a wynikami w zakresie jakości między organizacją produkcyjną i usługową w Tajlandii. Niniejsze badanie wspiera stosowanie TQM w organizacjach. W badaniu zauważono, że w celu skutecznego działania firmy powinny rozważyć przyjęcie praktyk TQM i środków jakości, które są odpowiednie dla ich sektorów i organizacji.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

quality performance; total quality management; organizational performance; process management

PL

wyniki jakościowe; TQM; wyniki organizacyjne; zarządzanie procesowe

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 1
• Strony: 436--452
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wall William Philip

• Stamford International University, Bangkok, Thailand

Bibliografia

• 1.Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y. and Waller, M. A., (1996). Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56.
• 2.Ahire, S. L., Landeros, R. and Golhar, D. Y., (1995). Total Quality Management: A Literature Review and an Agenda for Future Research. Production and Operations Management, 4(3), 277-306.
• 3.Alzoubi, H., Ahmed, G., (2019). Do TQM practices improve organisational success A case study of electronics industry in the UAE. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 17(4), 459.
• 4.Amin, M., Aldakhil, A. M., Wu, C., Rezaei, S. and Cobanoglu, C., (2017). The structural relationship between TQM, employee satisfaction and hotel performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(4), 1256-1278.
• 5.Biswakarma, G., (2017). Effectiveness of Total Quality Management in Nepal: A Case Study of Hospitality Sector. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 4(5), 32–40. https://www.ijrbsm.org/papers/v4-i5/4.pdf
• 6.Bouranta, N., Psomas, E. L. and Pantouvakis, A., (2017). Identifying the critical determinants of TQM and their impact on company performance. The TQM Journal, 29(1), 147-166.
• 7.Budaj, P., Klencová, J., Daňková, A. and Piteková, J., (2018). Economic aspects of the mining industry in the Slovak Republic. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 23(1), 1-9. https://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2018/n1/1budaj.pdf
• 8.Chung Woon, K., (2000). Assessment of TQM implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 6(4), 314-330.
• 9.Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B. T. and Roubaud, D., (2017). Examining top management commitment to TQM diffusion using institutional and upper echelon theories. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2988-3006.
• 10.Ershadi, M. J., Najafi, N. and Soleimani, P., (2019). Measuring the impact of soft and hard total quality management factors on customer behavior based on the role of innovation and continuous improvement. The TQM Journal, 31(6), 1093-1115.
• 11.Evans, J. R., Lindsay, W. M., (1995). The Management and Control of Quality (3rd ed.). West Publishing.
• 12.Haar, J. M., Spell, C. S., (2008a). Predicting total quality management adoption in New Zealand. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(2), 162-178.
• 13.Hafeez, M. H., Basheer, M. F., Rafique, M. and Siddiqui, S. H., (2018). Exploring the Links between TQM Practices, Business Innovativeness and Firm Performance: An Emerging Market Perspective, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences.38(2), 485-500. http://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/website/journal/article/5ecf924595cd4/page
• 14.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. & Babin, B. J., (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage.
• 15.Hilman, H., Ali, G. A. and Gorondutse, A. H., (2019). The relationship between TQM and SMEs’ performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(1), 61-84.
• 16.Huq, Z., Stolen, J. D., (1998). Total quality management contrasts in manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(2), 138-161.
• 17.Hussain, N., Bhatti, W. A. and Jilani, A., (2011). An Empirical Analysis of After Sales Service and Customer Satisfaction. Management & Marketing, 6(4), 561-572. http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/243.pdf
• 18.Hussain, N., Rigoni, U. and Orij, R. P., (2016). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432.
• 19.Iqbal, A., Asrar-ul-Haq, M., (2018). Establishing relationship between TQM practices and employee performance: The mediating role of change readiness. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 62-68.
• 20.Joiner, T. A., (2007). Total quality management and performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(6), 617-627.
• 21.Juran, J. M., (1995). A history of managing for quality: The evolution, trends, and future directions of managing for quality. ASQC Quality Press.
• 22.Haque, A.U., Sher, A. and Urbański, M. (2020). Is the role of authentic leadership effective in managing occupational stress and psychological capital? Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(2), 59-77.
• 23.Mahmood, S., Qadeer, F. and Ahmad, A., (2015). The Role of Organizational Learning in Understanding Relationship between Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(1), 282-302. http://jespk.net/paper.php?paperid=236
• 24.Mehralian, G., Nazari, J. A., Nooriparto, G. and Rasekh, H. R., (2017). TQM and organizational performance using the balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(1), 111-125.
• 25.Nunnally, J. C., (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, 97-146.
• 26.Ooi, K.-B., (2014). TQM practices and knowledge management: a multi-group analysis of constructs and structural invariance between the manufacturing and service sectors. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11-12), 1131-1145.
• 27.O’Rourke, V., Bennett, B., (2006). A study of Irish service SMEs, concerning quality management programmes. Management & Marketing, 4(1), 95-104. http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/40.pdf
• 28.Panuwatwanich, K., Nguyen, T. T., (2017). Influence of Total Quality Management on Performance of Vietnamese Construction Firms. Procedia Engineering, 182, 548-555.
• 29.Pattanayak, D., Koilakuntla, M. and Punyatoya, P., (2017). Investigating the influence of TQM, service quality and market orientation on customer satisfaction and loyalty in the Indian banking sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(3), 362-377.
• 30.Powell, T. C., (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15-37.
• 31.Pradhan, S., (2014). Total Quality Management in Service Sector: Case Study of Academic Libraries. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(3A), 29-32.
• 32.Prajogo, D. I., (2005a). The comparative analysis of TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3), 217-228.
• 33.Prajogo, D. I., (2005b). The comparative analysis of TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3), 217-228.
• 34.Rahman, S., Bullock, P., (2005). Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: an empirical investigation. Omega, 33(1), 73-83.
• 35.Sadikoglu, E., Olcay, H., (2014). The Effects of Total Quality Management Practices on Performance and the Reasons of and the Barriers to TQM Practices in Turkey. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2014, 1-17.
• 36.Saleh, R. A., Sweis, R. J. and Mahmoud Saleh, F. I. (2018). Investigating the impact of hard total quality management practices on operational performance in manufacturing organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(7), 2040-2064.
• 37.Samson, D., Terziovski, M., (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 393-409.
• 38.Smutná, J., Farana, R., (2010). Understanding the quality concept in the higher education. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 15(1), 54-57. https://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2010/n1/11smutna.pdf
• 39.Soltani, Z., Zareie, B., Milani, F. S. and Navimipour, N. J., (2018). The impact of the customer relationship management on the organization performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(2), 237-246.
• 40.Sutrisno, T. F. C. W., Ardyan, E., (2020). Achieving Organizational Performance in Food Companies: The Critical Role of Leadership and Continuous Improvement as Part of TQM Practice. Quality - Access to Success, 21(177), 133-138. https://www.srac.ro/calitatea/en/arhiva/2020/QAS_Vol.21_No.177_Aug.2020.pdf
• 41.Sweis, R. J., Ismaeil, A.’. S., I, A. and N, A.S., (2019). The Relationship between Total Quality Management (TQM) Implementation and Organisation Performance: Evidence from the Airlines Companies in UAE. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 11(1), 58-79.
• 42.Talib, F., Rahman, Z. and Qureshi, M. N., (2013). An empirical investigation of relationship between total quality management practices and quality performance in Indian service companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(3), 280-318.
• 43.Thaba, S. C., Mbohwa, C., (2015). Integrating values and principles of cooperative enterprises with TQM elements a conceptual framework for customer satisfaction. University of Johannesburg Institutional Repository, 1-5.
• 44.Tran, Y. T., Nguyen, N. P., (2020). The impact of the performance measurement system on the organizational performance of the public sector in a transition economy: Is public accountability a missing link? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1792669.
• 45.Trif, M. S., (2013). The Influence of Overall Satisfaction and Trust on Customer Loyalty. Management & Marketing, 8(1), 109-128.
• 46.Wong, C. H., Sim, J. J., Lam, C. H., Loke, S. P. and Darmawan, N., (2010). A linear structural equation modelling of TQM principles and its influence on quality performance. International Journal of Modelling in Operations Management, 1(1), 107.
• 47.Yang, J., Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.- and Ntoko, A. N., (2009). The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer-supplier relationship improvement. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 243-251.
• 48.Yuliansyah, Y., Gurd, B. and Mohamed, N., (2017). The significant of business strategy in improving organizational performance. Humanomics, 33(1), 56-74.
• 49.Yusr, M. M., Mokhtar, S. S. M., Othman, A. R. and Sulaiman, Y., (2017). Does interaction between TQM practices and knowledge management processes enhance the innovation performance? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 955-974.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).