PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Sociology and Sustainable Development. The Most Important Areas of Interdisciplinary Research

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Socjologia i rozwój zrównoważony. Najważniejsze obszary badań interdyscyplinarnych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Sociology and sustainable development share many interesting areas of inquiry that offer the potential for closer cooperation between these two disciplines. The aim of the article is to examine the connections between them. The article considers the most promising areas; i.e, environmental issues (environmental sociology), quality of life (which is the key issue for the social pillar of sustainable development), and poverty (poverty eradication is the primary goal of the UN sustainable development agenda). It seems, however, that the cooperation between sociology and sustainable development has stopped at the stage of potential interdisciplinarity.
PL
Między socjologią i zrównoważonym rozwojem istnieje wiele ciekawych wspólnych obszarów badań potencjalnie nadających się do ściślejszej współpracy. Celem artykułu jest pokazanie tych powiązań. W tekście wzięto pod uwagę obszary najbardziej obiecujące: sprawy związane ze środowiskiem (socjologię środowiskową), problematykę jakości życia (kluczowe zagadnienie dla społecznego filaru zrównoważonego rozwoju) i problematykę ubóstwa (likwidacja ubóstwa to podstawowy cel ONZ-owskich planów zrównoważonego rozwoju). Wydaje się jednak, że jak do tej pory współpraca między socjologią i zrównoważonym rozwojem zatrzymała się na stadium potencjalnej interdyscyplinarności.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
123--131
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 56 poz.
Twórcy
  • Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. ASPE C., MARIE J., 2013, French Environmental Sociology Facing Interdisciplinary Research Across Social and Natural Sciences, 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, 24-26 April, Azores, Portugal, p. 315-321.
  • 2. ATKINSON R., SWANSTROM T., 2012, Poverty and Social Exclusion, in:, The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics, eds. John P., Mossberger K., Clarke S.E., Oxford University Press, p. 1-18.
  • 3. BARRETO TORRES L.D., ASMUS G.F., DA CALSEIXAS S.R., 2019, Quality of Life and Sustainable Development, in: Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education, eds. Leal Filho W., Springer, Cham.
  • 4. BARTRAM D., 2012, Elements of a Sociological Contribution to Happiness Studies, in: Sociology Compass 6/8, p. 644-656.
  • 5. BOSTRÖM M., DAVIDSON D.J. (eds.), 2018, Environment and Society. Concepts and Challenges, Palgrave Macmillan, p. 1-394.
  • 6. BREMER J., 2016, Nauka o zrównoważeniu – w poszukiwaniu transdyscyplinarnej metodologii, in: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 1(207), p. 15- 33.
  • 7. CAMPBELL A., 1976, Subjective Measures of Wellbeing, in: American Psychologist, 31(2), p.117-124.
  • 8. CATTON W. R., DUNLAP R. E., 1980, A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology, in: American Behavioral Scientist, 24, p.15-47.
  • 9. CUMMINS R., 1996, The Domains of Life Satisfaction. An Attempt to Order Chaos, in: Social Indicators Research, 38, p. 303-328.
  • 10. CZIBERE I., 2014, The sociological context of poverty, in: Metszetek – Journal of Social Sciences, 1, p. 151-168.
  • 11. DEMPSEY N., BRAMLEY G., POWERS S., BROWN C., 2011, The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability, in: Sustainable Development, 19(5), p. 289- 300.
  • 12. DUNLAP R. E., CATTON W. R., 1979, Environmental Sociology, in: Annual Review of Sociology, 5, p. 243-273.
  • 13. DUNLAP R. E., CATTON W. R., 1994, Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalization of Environmental Sociology, in: American Sociologist, 25, p. 5-30.
  • 14. DUNLAP R. E., MARSHALL B. K., 2007, Environmental Sociology, in 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, vol. 2, eds. Bryant C.D., Peck D.L., Thousand Oaks, Sage, p. 329-340.
  • 15. DUNLAP R. E., MARTIN K. E., 1983, Bringing Environment into the Study of Agriculture, in: Rural Sociology, 48, p. 201-218.
  • 16. FERRISS A. L., 2004, The Quality of Life Concept in Sociology, in: The American Sociologist, 35, p. 37- 51.
  • 17. GLATZER W., L. CAMFIELD V., MØLLER M. (eds.), 2015, Global Handbook of Quality of Life. Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents, Springer.
  • 18. GRAHAM C., 2018, Subjective Well-Being in Economics, in: Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, eds. Adler M.D., Fleurbaey M., The Oxford University Press, p. 1-30.
  • 19. GROSS M., HEINRICHS H. (eds.), 2009, Environmental Sociology European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges, Dordrecht, Springer.
  • 20. HANNINGAN J., 2006, Environmental Sociology, New York, Routledge.
  • 21. HEINRICHS H., GROSS M., 2010, Introduction: New Trends and Interdisciplinary Challenges in Environmental Sociology, in: Environmental Sociology. European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges, eds Gross M., Heinrichs H., Springer, p. 1- 16.
  • 22. KASPER D., 2016, Re-conceptualizing (environmental) sociology, in: Environmental Sociology, 2(4), p. 322-332.
  • 23. LAND K.C., MICHALAOS A.C., SIRGY M.J. (eds.), 2012, Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research, Springer, p. 1-593.
  • 24. LEAL FILHO W., MARANS R.W., CALLEWAERT J. (eds.), 2018, Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research, Springer, p. 1-485.
  • 25. LIDSKOG R., MOL A., OOSTERVEER P., 2015, Towards a Global Environmental Sociology? Legacies, Trends and Future Directions, in: Current Sociology, 63(3), p. 339-368.
  • 26. LITTIG B., GRIESSLER E., 2005, Social Sustainability: Catchword between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory, in: International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(l-2), p. 65-79.
  • 27. LIU Q-Q., YU M., WANG X.-L., 2015, Poverty reduction within the framework of SDGs and Post-2015 Development Agenda, in: Advances in Climate Change Research, 6, p. 67-73.
  • 28. LOCKIE S., 2016, Sustainability and the Future of Environmental Sociology, in: Environmental Sociology, 2(1), p. 1-4.
  • 29. MARCINKOWSKI T., REID A., 2019, Reviews of Research on the Attitude–Behavior Relationship and Their Implications for Future Environmental Education Research, in: Environmental Education Research, 25(4), p. 459-471.
  • 30. MURPHY K., 2012, The Social Pillar of Sustainable Development: Literature Review and Framework for Policy Analysis, in: Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), p. 15-29.
  • 31. NECKEL S., (2017), The Sustainability Society: A Sociological Perspective, Culture, Practice & Europeanization, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 46-52.
  • 32. NOVACEK P., MEDERLY P., 2015, How to Measure Progress towards Quality of Life and Sustainability of Life, in: Ekologia, 34(1), p. 7-18.
  • 33. OUAHYB SUNDSBØ A., RUNKLE B.R.K., McMONAGLE S., JANTKE K., LOTTERMOSER F., GOTTSCHICK M., HASELER S., LOPEZ J. M. R., SCHEELE M., 2015, One Metaphor – Several Meanings: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainable Development, in: Integrating Sustainability Thinking in Science and Engineering Curricula, eds. Filho Leal W. et al., World Sustainability Series, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, p. 197-213.
  • 34. PELLLOW D.N., BREHM H. N., 2013, An Environmental Sociology for the Twenty-First Century, in: Annual Review of Sociology, 39, p. 229-250.
  • 35. PETELEWICZ M., DRABOWICZ T., 2016, Jakość życia – globalnie i lokalnie. Pomiar i wizualizacja, Uniwersytet Łódzki.
  • 36. REDMOND G., 2014, Poverty and Social Exclusion, in: Handbook of Child Well-Being, eds. Ben-Arieh A. et al., Dordrecht, Springer Science, p. 1387-1426.
  • 37. SAUVÉ S., BERNARD S., SLOAN P., 2016, Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Development and Circular Economy: Alternative Concepts for TransDisciplinary Research, in: Environmental Development, 17, p. 48-56.
  • 38. SCHMITTER HEISLER B., 1991, A Comparative Perspective on the Underclass, Questions of Urban Poverty, Race, and Citizenship, in: Theory and Society, 20(4), p. 455-483.
  • 39. SCHUESSLER K. F., FISHER G. A., 1985, Quality of Life Research and Sociology, in: Annual Review of Sociology, 11, p. 129-149.
  • 40. SHILDRICK T., MACDONALD R., 2013, Poverty talk: how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’, in: The Sociological Review, 61(2), p. 285-303.
  • 41. SHILDRICK T., RUCELL J., 2015, Sociological Perspectives on Poverty, Report, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Cambridge.
  • 42. SMEEDING T. M., 2002, Sociology of Poverty, LIS Working Paper Series, No. 315, Luxembourg Income Study, Luxembourg.
  • 43. SOBOL A., 2019, Quality of Life in Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, in: Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 140, p. 351-364.
  • 44. SØRAKER J.H., VAN DER RIJT J.-W., DE BOER J., WONG P.-H., BREY P. (eds.), 2015, Well-Being in Contemporary Society, Springer, p. 1-236.
  • 45. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019, (2019), New York, United Nations, p. 1-62.
  • 46. TRZEBIATOWSKI J., 2011, Jakość życia w perspektywie nauk społecznych i medycznych – systematyzacja ujęć definicyjnych, in: Hygeia Public Health, 46(1), p. 25-31.
  • 47. TUTTLE R.C., 1989, Poverty Over the Family Life Cycle, in: Family and Economic Issues, 10(4), p. 267- 291.
  • 48. UNITED NATIONS, 2012, The Future We Want, Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, 20-22 June 2012, p. 1- 72.
  • 49. UNITED NATIONS, 2014a, Report of the Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals, p. 1-24.
  • 50. UNITED NATIONS, 2014b, The Road to Dignity by 2030: Ending Poverty, Transforming All Lives and Protecting the Planet, Synthesis Report of the Secretary-General On the Post-2015 Agenda, New York, p. 1-47.
  • 51. UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, New York, p. 1-73.
  • 52. WHOQOL Group, 1995, The WHO Quality of Life Assessment: Position Paper of the WHO, in: Social Science and Medicine, 4(10), p. 1403-1409.
  • 53. WIERZCHOSŁAWSKI S., 1996, Wielodyscyplinowość i interdyscyplinarność statystycznych badań zjawisk społecznych, in: Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 85(1), p. 85-101.
  • 54. VAVIK T., KEITSCH M., 2010, Exploring Relationships between Universal Design and Social Sustainable Development: Some Methodological Aspects to the Debate on the Sciences of Sustainability, in: Sustainable Development, 18(5), p. 295-305.
  • 55. VEENHOVEN R., 2007, Quality of Life Research, in: 21st. Century Sociology, A Reference Handbook, eds. Bryant C.D., Peck D.L., Sage, Thousand Oaks, p. 54-62.
  • 56. ZIELIŃSKI T., SAGAN I., SUROSZ W. (eds.), 2018, Interdisciplinary Approaches for Sustainable Development Goals. Economic Growth, Social Inclusion and Environmental Protection, Springer, p. 1-245.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a2eae720-8b3d-4e06-a3bd-cccc744d31de
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.