Age and sex differences in ranges of motion and motion patterns

Hwang, J.; Jung, M.- C.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Age and sex differences in ranges of motion and motion patterns

Autorzy

Hwang J. , Jung M.- C.

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This study investigated the effects of age and sex on joint ranges of motion (ROMs) and motion patterns. Forty participants performed 18 motions using eight body segments at self-selected speeds. Older subjects showed smaller ROMs than younger subjects for 11 motions; the greatest difference in ROM was 44.9% for eversion/inversion of the foot. Older subjects also required more time than younger subjects to approach the peak angular velocity for six motions. In contrast, sex significantly affected ROMs but not motion patterns. Male subjects exhibited smaller ROMs than female subjects for four motions; the greatest sex-dependent difference in ROM was 29.7% for ulnar/radial deviation of the hand. The age and sex effects depended on the specific segments used and motions performed, possibly because of differences in anatomical structures and frequencies of use of the joints in habitual physical activities between the groups.

Słowa kluczowe

range of motion motion pattern age sex

ruch analiza ruchu wiek różnice związane z płcią

Wydawca

Taylor & Francis

Czasopismo

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Rocznik

2015

Tom

Vol. 21, No. 2

Strony

173--186

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 34 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Hwang J.

Ajou University, South Korea

autor

Jung M.- C.

mcjung@ajou.ac.kr

Ajou University, South Korea

Bibliografia

1. Stubbs NB, Fernandez JE, Glenn WM. Normative data on joint ranges of motion of 25- to 54-year-old males. Int J Ind Ergon. 1993;12:265-272. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(93)90096-V
2. Chung MJ, Wang MJJ. The effect of age and gender on joint range of motion of worker population in Taiwan. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39:596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.11.004
3. Gracovetsky SA. Range of normality versus range of motion: a functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.02.001
4. Gunal I, Kose N, Erdogan O, Gokturk E, Seber S. Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects, with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78:1401-1404.
5. Park W, Ramachandran J, Weisman P, Jung ES. Obesity effect on male active joint range of motion. Ergonomics. 2010;53:102-108. doi: 10.1080/00140130903311617
6. Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine. 1992;17:S393–S398. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00009
7. Hole DE, Cook JM, Bolton JE. Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender. Man Ther. 1995;1:36-42. doi: 10.1054/math.1995.0248
8. Trott PH, Pearcy MJ, Ruston SA, Fulton I, Brien C. Three-dimensional analysis of active cervical motion: the effect of age and gender. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:201-206. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00072-0
9. Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario V. Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:611-614. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00071-2
10. Malmstrom EM, Karlberg M, Fransson PA, Melander A, Magnusson M. Primary and coupled cervical movements: the effect of age, gender, and body mass index. A 3-dimensional movement analysis of a population without symptoms of neck disorders. Spine. 2006;31:E44-50. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194841.83419.0b
11. Lansade C, Laporte S, Thoreux P, Rousseau MA, Skalli W, Lavaste F. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects. Spine. 2009;34:2900–2906. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4f667
12. Barnes CJ, Van Steyn SJ, Fischer RA. The effects of age, gender, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:242–246. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.115270
13. Einkauf DK, Gohdes ML, Jensen GM, Jewell MJ. Changes in spinal mobility with increasing age in women. Phys Ther. 1987;67:370–375.
14. Sullivan MS, Dickinson CE, Troup JD. The influence of age and gender on lumbar spine sagittal plane range of motion. A study of 1126 healthy subjects. Spine. 1994;19:682-686. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00007
15. Intolo P, Milosavljevic S, Baxter DG, Carman AB, Pal P, Munn J. The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2009;14:596–604. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.08.006
16. Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 1991;71:656–65.
17. Nigg BM, Fisher V, Allinger TL, Ronsky JR, Engsberg JR. Range of motion of the foot as a function of age. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:336–343. doi: 10.1177/107110079201300608
18. Vandervoort AA, Chesworth BM, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH, Rechnitzer PA, Koval JJ. Age and gender effects on mobility of the human ankle. J Gerontol. 1992;47:M17-21. doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.1.M17
19. Grimston SK, Nigg BM, Hanley DA, Engsberg JR. Differences in ankle joint complex range of motion as a function of age. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:215-22. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400407
20. McGregor AH, Mccarthy ID, Dore CJ, Hughes SP. Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies of this motion. Eur Spine J. 1997;6:308–315. doi: 10.1007/BF01142676
21. Sjolander P, Michaelson P, Jaric S, Djupsjobacka M. Sensorimotor disturbances in chronic neck pain--range of motion, peak velocity, smoothness of movement, and repositioning acuity. Man Ther. 2008;13:122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.10.002
22. Garcia-Alsina J, Almazan CG, Mesquida JM, Cobo EP. Angular position, range of motion and velocity of arm elevation: a study of consistency of performance. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:932–938. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.005
23. Tsao CC, Mirbagheri MM. Upper limb impairments associated with spasticity in neurological disorders. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:45. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-45
24. Gomez T, Beach G, Cooke C, Hrudey W, Goyert P. Normative database for trunk range of motion, strength, velocity, and endurance with the isostation b-200 lumbar dynamometer. Spine. 1991;16:15–21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199101000-00003
25. Lea RD, Gerhardt JJ. Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;A77:784-798.
26. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristfolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35:543-548. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6
27. Wu G, Van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Roy PV, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang K, Werner FW, Buchholz B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38:981-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042
28. Reid SM, Graham RB, Costigan PA. Differentiation of young and older adult stair climbing gait using principal component analysis. Gait Posture. 2010;31:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.005
29. Doriot N, Wang X. Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints. Ergonomics. 2006;49:269–281. doi: 10.1080/00140130500489873
30. Lanza IR, Towse TF, Caldwell GE, Wigmore DM, Kent-Braun JA. Effects of age on human muscle torque, velocity, and power in two muscle groups. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:2361–2369. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00724.2002
31. Buckwalter JA. Decreased mobility in the elderly: the exercise antidote. Physician Sports Med. 1997;25:126-133. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500125
32. James B, Parker AW. Active and passive mobility of lower limb joints in elderly men and women. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 1989;68:162-167. doi: 10.1097/00002060-198908000-00002
33. Frost DM, Cronin JB, Newton RU. Have we underestimated the kinematic and kinetic benefits of non-ballistic motion? Sport Biomech. 2008;7:372-385. doi: 10.1080/14763140802273005
34. Timiras PS. Developmental physiology and aging. New York (NY): Macmillan; 1972.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-a219e62d-6e4f-40bc-bf10-8f96bdd89a49