Benefits and limitations of implementing the ISO 9004:2018 standard

• Autorzy: Brajer-Marczak Renata , Gębczyńska Alicja

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.194.2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The paper's main objective is to indicate the current state of knowledge regarding the results of implementing the ISO 9004:2018 standard, with a particular focus on identifying the potential benefits and limitations of its implementation. The study is in line with the research stream on improving quality management systems and striving for sustainable market success. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on a narrative literature review through analysis of the publications available in scientific databases. It was then combined with the method of scientific reflection. Findings: The paper highlights the opportunities that the implementation of the ISO 9004:2018 standard and its integrated self-assessment model offer to organisations. The analysis also revealed limitations associated with the implementation of the standard's recommendations. Practical implications: The research contributes to the development of knowledge in the practical application of the standard and the self-assessment model. It can serve as a reference point for practitioners and scholars interested in the aforementioned subject matter. Originality/value: The originality of the paper lies in its comprehensive analysis of the requirements of the ISO 9004:2018 standard, addressing significant issues both for the academic environment and practitioners in the field of quality management. The study highlights the benefits of applying the self-assessment model, and outlines the challenges associated with its implementation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ISO 9004; 2018 standard; self-assessment model; quality improvement; sustainable success

PL

ISO 9004; norma 2018; model samooceny; polepszanie jakości; trwały sukces

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 194
• Strony: 35--48
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Brajer-Marczak Renata

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-2016

autor

Gębczyńska Alicja

• Uniwersytet WSB Merito we Wrocławiu

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-8778

Bibliografia

• 1. Anttila, J., Jussila, K. (2021). ISO 9004 - A stimulating quality management standard for the creative leaders of contemporary sustainable organizations. Production Engineering Archives, 27(2), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2021.27.19.
• 2. Asif, M. (2020). Are QM models aligned with Industry 4.0? A perspective on current practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120820.
• 3. Bravi, L., Murmura, F. (2022). Evidences about ISO 9001: 2015 and ISO 9004: 2018 implementation in different-size organisations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(11-12), 1366-1386. https:// doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2016-0097.
• 4. Castka, P., Corbett, C.J. (2015). Management systems standards: Diffusion, impact and governance of ISO 9000, ISO 14000, and other management standards. Information and Operations Management, 7(3-4), 161-379. https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000042.
• 5. Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57-61.
• 6. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical writing, 4(4), 230235. https://doi.org/ 10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
• 7. Glogovac, M., Ruso, J., Milica, M. (2020). ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 33(5-6), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1865793.
• 8. Glogovac, M., Ruso, J., Arsic, S., Rakić, A., Milošević, I. (2022). Leadership for Quality 4.0 Improvement, Learning, and Innovation. Engineering Management Journal, 35(3), 313329. 10.1080/10429247.2022.2108668.
• 9. Horvat, A., Filipovic, J. (2018). Service quality and maturity of health care organizations through the lens of complexity leadership theory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(1), 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12789.
• 10. Hoyle, D. (2018). ISO 9000 Quality Management System. Taylor & Francis.
• 11. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/70397/d62feac7c8b741a0927de13b1a76ead7/ISO-9004-2018.pdf pdf, 2.02.2023.
• 12. Implementation of an information platform system (2017). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1093-1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2017-0048.
• 13. Jarvis, A., Palmes, P.C. (2018). Business sustainability: Going beyond ISO 9004:2018. ASQ Quality Press.
• 14. Krajcsák, Z. (2019). Implementing open innovation using quality management systems: The role of organizational commitment and customer loyalty. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040090.
• 15. Kuo, T., Tsai, G.Y. (2019). The effects of employee perceived organisational culture on perform- ance: The moderating effects of management maturity. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(3-4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1302327
• 16. Łańcucki, J. (ed.) (2019). Systemy zarządzania w znormalizowanym świecie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
• 17. Negron, L.A. (2020). Relationship between quality management practices, performance and maturity quality management, a contingency approach. Quality Management Journal, 27(4), 215-228. http://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1809582.
• 18. Pare, G., Trudel, M.C., Jaana, M., Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008.
• 19. Pautasso, M. (2019). The Structure and Conduct of a Narrative Literature Review. In: A Guide to the Scientific Career (pp. 299-310). New York: Wiley. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch31.
• 20. Rogala, P. (2020). Nurt normalizacyjny w zarządzaniu jakością. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
• 21. Soare, I., Rusu, M., Militaru, C. (2019). Model for self-assessment of an organization’s ability to achieve sustained success. INCAS Bulletin, 11(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.20.
• 22. Tsai, G.Y., Kuo, T., Lin, L-C. (2017). The moderating effect of management maturity.
• 23. Wolniak, R. (2019). The level of maturity of quality management systems in Poland - results of empirical research. Sustainability, 11(15), 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154239.
• 24. Żuchowski, J., Łagowski, E. (2019). Standard Solutions in Realisation of Sustainable Development Objectives. Towaroznawcze Problemy Jakości, 2, 15-24.
• 25. Żuchowski, J., Łagowski, E. (2021). Normalizacja w realizacji celów jakościowych koncepcji European Green Deal. Problemy Jakości, 7-8, 11-17.