In-vitro Digestibility Organic Materials–Relation with Field Mass Loss Litter Bag Method

Sousa, João Ricardo; Singh, Abhishek; Ghazaryan, Karen; Singh, Rupesh Kumar; Trindade, Henrique; Coutinho, João

doi:10.12911/22998993/189947

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

In-vitro Digestibility Organic Materials–Relation with Field Mass Loss Litter Bag Method

Autorzy

Sousa João Ricardo , Singh Abhishek , Ghazaryan Karen , Singh Rupesh Kumar , Trindade Henrique , Coutinho João

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/189947

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Decomposition and litterfall are the primary mechanisms by which plants release their organic matter and nutrients into the soil, which helps prepare the stage for beneficial pathways in the restoration of damaged ecosystems. Species selection and allocation for the successful use of litter in ecological agricultural fields relies on knowing the mechanisms of plant litter decomposition and its influence on soil nutrients, which are crucial aspects of the ecosystem material cycle. In current study, in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) used for evaluating quality animal feed reveals some potential in the decomposition of organic matter estimated. Nevertheless, some consensual advantages as laboratory incubation, this methodology demands a validation procedure. Therefore, the present work aimed to validate the IVDMD methodology by comparison with field buried litter bag mass loss, for 27 organic materials with different origins and chemical quality. The results reveal significant differences among the organic materials studied, reflecting their chemical quality variation, with digestibility values varying between 10.1g·kg^-1 in composted sewage sludge and 982.0 g·kg^-1 in pig meat meal. IVDMD presented high accuracy results for all studied periods, with best results observed for 28 days incubation period (r²adj=0.959***). Taking the chemical fractions that participated in initial decomposition process the IVDMD is a potential indicator of a labile decomposable pool of organic materials. Considering the high accuracy, repeatability (CV=4.6%) and practicability, the IVDMD is a reliable alternative to the litter bag method in field mass loss availability.

Słowa kluczowe

in-vitro digestibility mass loss litter-bag decomposition

Wydawca

Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Journal of Ecological Engineering

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 25, nr 8

Strony

253--263

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 54 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sousa João Ricardo

jricardo@utad.pt

Centro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal

autor

Singh Abhishek

sinxabishik@ysu.am

Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan 0025, Armenia

autor

Ghazaryan Karen

kghazaryan@ysu.am

Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan 0025, Armenia

autor

Singh Rupesh Kumar

rupesh@utad.pt

Centro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal
Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-1967

autor

Trindade Henrique

htrindad@utad.pt

Centro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal

autor

Coutinho João

j_coutin@utad.pt

Centro de Química da Vila Real (CQ-VR), UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal

Bibliografia

1. Almagro, M., Martínez-Mena, M., 2012. Exploring short-term leaf-litter decomposition dynamics in a Mediterranean ecosystem: Dependence on litter type and site conditions. Plant and Soil 358, 323335. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-012-1187-6/METRICS
2. Álvarez, C.R., Álvarez, R., Sarquis, A., 2008. residue decomposition and fate of nitrogen – 15 in a wheat crop under different previous crops and tillage systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39, 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701826886
3. Apráez Guerrero, J.E., 2020. Análisis químico de alimentos para animales. Análisis Químico De Alimentos Para Animales. https://doi.org/10.22267/ LIB.UDN.012
4. Arisawa, K., 1998. Ecologic studies. Modern Epidemiology 56, 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1265/JJH.56.463
5. Barnes, R., Schall, E.D., Marten, G.C., 1979. Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems.
6. Berg, B., 2014. Decomposition patterns for foliar litter – A theory for influencing factors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 78, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2014.08.005
7. Berg, B., Laskowski, R., 2006. Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover.
8. Berg, B., McClaugherty, C., 2014. Plant litter. Plant Litter. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38821-7
9. Berg, B., McClaugherty, C., 2008. Plant litter: Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration 1–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74923-3/COVER
10. Bradford, M.A., Ciska, G.F., Bonis, A., Bradford, E.M., Classen, A.T., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Crowther, T.W., De Long, J.R., Freschet, G.T., Kardol, P., Manrubia-Freixa, M., Maynard, D.S., Newman, G.S., Logtestijn, R.S.P., Viketoft, M., Wardle, D.A., Wieder, W.R., Wood, S.A., Van Der Putten, W.H., 2017. A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 1836–1845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0367-4
11. Brandt, L.A., King, J.Y., Milchunas, D.G., 2007. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Global Change Biology 13, 2193–2205. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2486.2007.01428.X
12. Calderón, F.J., McCarty, G.W., Kessel, J.A.S. Van, Reeves, J.B., 2004. Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics During Incubation of Manured Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1592–1599. https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2004.1592
13. Clark, K.W., Mott, G.O., 2011. The dry matter digestion in vitro of forage crops. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps60014 40, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS60-014
14. Cobo, J.G., Barrios, E., Kass, D.C.L., Thomas, R.J., 2002. Decomposition and nutrient release by green manures in a tropical hillside agroecosystem. Plant and Soil 240, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015720324392/METRICS
15. Cornelissen, J.H.C., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Grime, J.P., Marzano, B., Cabido, M., Vendramini, F., Cerabolini, B., 1999. Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents. New Phytologist 143, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1469-8137.1999.00430.X
16. Cotrufo, M.E., Miller, M., Zeller, B., 2000. Litter Decomposition 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57219-7_13
17. Cou ̂teaux, M.M., Bottner, P., Berg, B., 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88978-8
18. do Rosário G. Oliveira, M., van Noordwijk, M., Gaze, S.R., Brouwer, G., Bona, S., Mosca, G., Hairiah, K., 2000. Auger sampling, ingrowth cores and pinboard methods. Root Methods 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_6
19. García-Palacios, P., Maestre, F.T., Kattge, J., Wall, D.H., 2013. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecology Letters 16, 10451053. https://doi.org/10.1111/ELE.12137
20. Getachew, G., Blümmel, M., Makkar, H.P.S., Becker, K., 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72, 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2
21. Heim, A., Frey, B., 2004. Early stage litter decomposition rates for swiss forests. Biogeochemistry 70, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10533-003-0844-5/METRICS
22. Herrmann, A., Witter, E., 2002. Sources of C and N contributing to the flush in mineralization upon freeze–thaw cycles in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34, 1495–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00121-9
23. Hobbie, S.E., 2015. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30, 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2015.03.015
24. Huang, W.Z., Schoenau, J.J., 1997. Mass loss measurements and statistical models to predict decomposition of leaf litter in a boreal aspen forest. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 28, 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629709369838
25. Jalota, R., Dalal, R., Harms, B., Page, K., Mathers, N., Wang, W., 2006. Effects of litter and fine root composition on their decomposition in a rhodic paleustalf under different land uses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37, 18591875. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620600767108
26. Jarvis, S.C., Stockdale, E.A., Shepherd, M.A., Powlson, D.S., 1996. Nitrogen Mineralization in Temperate Agricultural Soils: Processes and Measurement. Advances in Agronomy 57, 187–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60925-6
27. Jensen, L.S., Salo, T., Palmason, F., Breland, T.A., Henriksen, T.M., Stenberg, B., Pedersen, A., Lundström, C., Esala, M., 2005. Influence of biochemical quality on C and N mineralisation from a broad variety of plant materials in soil. Plant and Soil 273, 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-004-8128-Y/METRICS
28. Kraus, T.E.C., Zasoski, R.J., Dahlgren, R.A., Horwath, W.R., Preston, C.M., 2004. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a forest soil amended with purified tannins from different plant species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2003.10.006
29. Kumar, K., Goh, K.M., 2003. Nitrogen release from crop residues and organic amendments as affected by biochemical composition. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 34, 2441–2460. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120024778
30. Lee, H., Rahn, T., Throop, H., 2012. An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Global Change Biology 18, 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2486.2011.02579.X
31. Mafongoya, P.L., Giller, K.E., Palm, C.A., 1997. Decomposition and nitrogen release patterns of tree prunings and litter. Agroforestry Systems 38, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005978101429/METRICS
32. Nahavandinejad, M., Seidavi, A., Asadpour, L., 2012. Temperature treatment of soybean meal on intestinal microbial flora in broilers. African Journal of Microbiology Research 6. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1594
33. Olk, D.C., Cassman, K.G., Schmidt-Rohr, K., Anders, M.M., Mao, J.D., Deenik, J.L., 2006. Chemical stabilization of soil organic nitrogen by phenolic lignin residues in anaerobic agroecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38, 3303–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2006.04.009
34. Osono, T., Takeda, H., 2005. Limit values for decomposition and convergence process of lignocellulose fraction in decomposing leaf litter of 14 tree species in a cool temperate forest. Ecological Research 20, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11284-004-0011-Z
35. Parton, W., Silver, W.L., Burke, I.C., Grassens, L., Harmon, M.E., Currie, W.S., King, J.Y., Adair, E.C., Brandt, L.A., Hart, S.C., Fasth, B., 2007. Globalscale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315, 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1134853/SUPPL_FILE/PARTON.SOM.REVISED.PDF
36. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Vendramini, F., Cabido, M., Castellanos, A., 2000. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant and Soil 218, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014981715532/METRICS
37. Reichstein, M., Bednorz, F., Broll, G., Kätterer, T., 2000. Temperature dependence of carbon mineralisation: conclusions from a long-term incubation of subalpine soil samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 947–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0038-0717(00)00002-X
38. Laurance W.F., 1996. Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Environmental Conservation, 23(1), 90-91.
39. Tipton M., Pandolf K., M. Sawka M., Werner J., Taylor N. 2008. Physiological adaptation to hot and cold environments. In: N. Taylor, H. Groeller, P. McLennan (Eds.), Physiological bases of human performance during work and exercis. Churchill Livingstone, 379-400.
40. Setia, R., Smith, P., Marschner, P., Gottschalk, P., Baldock, J., Verma, V., Setia, D., Smith, J., 2012. Simulation of salinity effects on past, present, and future soil organic carbon stocks. Environmental Science and Technology 46, 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES2027345/SUPPL_FILE/ES2027345_SI_001.PDF
41. Shepherd, K.D., Vanlauwe, B., Gachengo, C.N., Palm, C.A., 2005. Decomposition and mineralization of organic residues predicted using near infrared spectroscopy. Plant and Soil 277, 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-005-7929-Y/METRICS
42. Smith, L.W., Goering, H.K., Waldo, D.R., Gordon, C.H., 1971. In vitro digestion rate of forage cell wall components. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(71)85780-6
43. Sousa, J.R., Cabral, F., Coutinho, J., 2016. Assessment of N Mineralization and N Leaching in Soil Using a New in situ Incubation Method. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 47, 2157–2167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1208751
44. Rhodes, C.M.S.L., Stryer, L., Tasker, R., & Freeman, W.H. 1995. Biochemistry.
45. Tian, G., Kang, B., Lambourne, L.J., 1996. Ruminant assay for rapidly estimating plant residue decomposability in the field.
46. Tilley, J.M.A., Terry, R.A., 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science 18, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2494.1963.TB00335.X
47. Tingyu, Z., Yang, X., Qingyang, H., Chen, X., You, L., 2022. Forest litter decomposition: research progress and prospect. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 38, 44. https://doi.org/10.11924/J.ISSN.1000-6850.CASB2021-1133
48. Torres, P.A., Abril, A.B., Bucher, E.H., 2005. Microbial succession in litter decomposition in the semi-arid Chaco woodland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 4954. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.04.042
49. Tscherning, K., Barrios, E., Lascano, C., Peters, M., Schultze-Kraft, R., 2005. Effects of sample post harvest treatment on aerobic decomposition and anaerobic in-vitro digestion of tropical legumes with contrasting quality. Plant and Soil 269, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-004-0398-X/METRICS
50. Vaieretti, M.V., Harguindeguy, N.P., Gurvich, D.E., Cingolani, A.M., Cabido, M., 2005. Decomposition dynamics and physico-chemical leaf quality of abundant species in a montane woodland in central Argentina. Plant and Soil 278, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-005-8432-1/METRICS
51. Wardle, D.A., Bonner, K.I., Barker, G.M., 2002. Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores. Functional Ecology 16, 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2435.2002.00659.X
52. Wienhold, B.J., Varvel, G.E., Wilhelm, W.W., 2009. Container and installation time effects on soil moisture, temperature, and inorganic nitrogen retention for an in situ nitrogen mineralization method. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40, 2044–2057. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620902960575
53. Wright, D.A., Welbourn, P., 2002. Environmental Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805998
54. Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., 2008. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. Journal of Plant Ecology 1, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/JPE/RTN002

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-9ff6ee00-0025-4e52-b9ec-68707bdab5fd