Using the theory of constraints thinking process tools to solve critical problems in the organization

• Autorzy: Knop Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.197.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The article aims to practically use the tools of the Theory of Constraints thinking process to eliminate critical problems in a selected subsystem of an enterprise in the automotive industry and, based on practical experience, to determine the strengths and weaknesses resulting from their use as well as external opportunities and threats, to indicate appropriate remedial actions that will enable managers of any organization to use thinking tools effectively. Design/methodology/approach: The goals of the article were achieved through the practical application of selected thinking process tools from the Theory of Constraints to solve critical problems in the R&D department of the selected company from the automotive industry. Identifying the goals of the subsystem of the studied company, identifying key problems, solving an important conflict in the subsystem, determining ways to solve key problems, and practically applying one of the solutions using the whole TOC toolkits constituted the scope of the research. The research tools were the TOC thinking process tools, such as the Goal Tree, the Current Reality Tree, the Evaporating Cloud, the Future Reality Tree, the Prerequisite Tree, and the Transition Tree. An active SWOT analysis was used to indicate the strengths and weaknesses of thinking tools, based on the experience gained, and external opportunities and threats related to their use were identified. The research methodology was based on the use of qualitative analysis to develop thinking process tools through interviews and brainstorming with the key stakeholders of the studied organizational subsystem, interested in achieving specific goals for the analyzed subsystem and assessing the practical application of the thinking process tools. Findings: It has been proven that the use of the Theory of Constraints thought process tools allows you to effectively solve critical problems in the subsystem of an automotive company. Using the tools of the thought process, key problems were identified in the analyzed organizational subsystem and actions were proposed to eliminate them. It will also identify the strengths and weaknesses of these improvement tools, as well as the opportunities and threats associated with their use by the organization. Research findings indicate that TOC thinking process tools enable a systematic approach to solving complex problems. Thanks to these tools, the analyzed company can combat internal constraints that limit its effectiveness, efficiency and competitiveness on the market. The condition for the effective use of thinking process tools is support from management, employees' knowledge of how to use them, using individual tools at a given time, the most important ones in the context of problem-solving, and effectively struggling with the weaknesses of these tools. Research limitations/implications: The study concerned a single company from the automotive industry, which makes it impossible to generalize the results to the entire industry. The qualitative nature of the research methodology introduces subjectivity into the analysis. Future research will focus on conducting comparative studies to evaluate the effectiveness of thinking process tools in identifying the root cause of complex problems compared to other methods used to solve problems. Practical implications: The research results indicate the effectiveness of the Theory of Constraints thinking process tools in solving critical problems. Other organizations can use this approach to streamline their processes, eliminate difficult systemic constraints, and more effectively achieve business goals. Thanks to thinking tools, companies can identify the root causes of their problems and indicate ways to solve them. By involving managers and employees from the organization interested in achieving the established goals in the process of creating thinking process tools and using their knowledge and experience, it is easier to properly identify the root causes of critical problems and then implement appropriate remedial actions. The SWOT analysis, based on the research and experience obtained, establishes the conditions for the effective use of TOC thinking process tools by other enterprises. Originality/value: The article has cognitive and practical values. The research results can serve as a reference point, and benchmark for managers of various organizations in terms of the approach to eliminating critical problems in the organization and how to effectively use TOC thought process tools by empowering their strengths, eliminating their weaknesses, taking advantage of opportunities, and counteracting threats.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

constraints; constraints management; theory of constraints; thinking process tools; root cause analysis; active swot analysis; improvement

PL

ograniczenia; zarządzanie ograniczeniami; teoria ograniczeń; narzędzia procesu myślenia; analiza przyczyn źródłowych; aktywna analiza swot; doskonalenie

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 197
• Strony: 305--331
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Knop Krzysztof

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0842-9584

Bibliografia

• 1. Atwater, J.B., Chakravorty, S. (1995). Using the theory of constraints to guide the implementation of quality improvement projects in manufacturing operations. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1761-1784, doi: 10.1080/00207549508930240
• 2. Azaria, S., Ronen, B., Shamir, N. (2023). Justice in time: A theory of constraints approach. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 69, No. 7, pp. 1202-1208, doi: 10.1002/joom.1234
• 3. Banerjee, A., Mukhopadhyay, S.K. (2016). A Contemporary TOC Innovative Thinking Process in the Backdrop of Leagile Supply Chain. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 400-431, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-08-2014-0086
• 4. Blackstone, J.H. (2001). Theory of constraints – A status report. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1053-1080, doi: 10.1080/00207540010028119
• 5. Cattaneo, C., Bassani, G. (2016). The TOC Thinking Process: The Viability of Change. Human Systems Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 301-323, doi: 10.3233/HSM-161616
• 6. Cooper, M.J., Loe, T.W. (2000). Using the Theory of Constraints’ Thinking Processes to Improve Problem-Solving Skills in Marketing, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 137-146, doi: 10.1177/0273475300222008
• 7. Cox III, J.F., Schleier, J.G. (2010). Theory of Constraints Handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• 8. Cox, J.F., Blackstone, J.H., Schleier, J.G. (2003). Managing operations: A focus on excellence. Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.
• 9. Cox, J.F., Spencer, M.S. (1998). The Constraints Management Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: The St Lucie Press/APICS Series on Constraints Management.
• 10. Dalci, I., Kosan, L. (2012). Theory of Constraints Thinking-Process Tools Facilitate Goal Achievement for Hotel Management: A Case Study of Improving Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 541-568, doi: 10.1080/19368623.2012.626751
• 11. Datt, M., Gupta, A., Misra, S.K., Gupta, M. (2024). Theory of constraints in healthcare: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2022-0056
• 12. Dettmer, H.W. (1995). Quality and the Theory of Constraints. Quality Progress, April, pp. 77-81.
• 13. Dettmer, H.W. (1997). Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints: A Systems Approach to Continuous Improvement. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
• 14. Dettmer, H.W. (2007). The Logical Thinking Process: A Systems Approach to Complex Problem Solving. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
• 15. Ehie, I., Sheu, C. (2005). Integrating Six Sigma and Theory of Constraints for Continuous Improvement: A Case Study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 542-553, doi:10.1108/17410380510600518
• 16. Fredendall, L.D., Patterson, J.W., Lenhartz, C., Mitchell, B.C. (2002). What Should be Changed? Quality Progress, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 50-59.
• 17. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R., Grebski, W. (2024). Changes in the steel chain in Industry 4.0. Some results of survey on the Polish steel market. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.30657/pea.2024.30.1
• 18. Gupta, M. (2003). Constraints Management – Recent Advances and Practices. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 647-659, doi:10.1080/0020754031000065458.
• 19. Gupta, M., Boyd, L.H. (2008). Theory of Constraints: A Theory for Operations Management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 991-1012, doi:10.1108/01443570810903122
• 20. Gupta, M., Digalwar, A., Gupta, A., Goyal, A. (2022). Integrating Theory of Constraints, Lean and Six Sigma: a framework development and its application. Production Planning & Control, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 238-261, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2022.2071351
• 21. Gupta, M.L., Boyd, H., Kuzmits, F. (2011). The Evaporating Cloud: A Tool for Resolving Workplace Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 394-412, doi: 10.1108/10444061111171387
• 22. Hunink, M.M. (2001). In Search of Tools to Aid Logical Thinking and Communicating About Medical Decision Making. Medical Decision Making, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 267-277, doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100402
• 23. Ikeziri, L.M., Souza, F.B. de, Gupta, M.C., de Camargo Fiorini, P. (2019). Theory of constraints: review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57, No. 15-16, pp. 5068-5102, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1518602
• 24. Kim, S., Mabin, V.J., Davies, J. (2008). The Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes: Retrospect and Prospect. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 155-184, doi:10.1108/01443570810846883
• 25. Lacerda, D.P., Cassel, R.A., Rodrigues, L.H. (2010). Service Process Analysis Using Process Engineering and the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 264-281, doi: 10.1108/14637151011035598
• 26. Mabin, V.J., Balderstone, S.J. (1999). The World of the Theory of Constraints. A Review of the International Literature. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• 27. Marszowski, R., Michalska, A. (2023). The importance of leadership styles in stimulating the development of organisations from the mining industry. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 180, pp. 427-442, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.180.21
• 28. Pacheco, D.A. de J., Antunes Junior, J.A.V., de Matos, C.A. (2021). The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy? International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 235, 107955, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107955
• 29. Pawlak, Sz., Nowacki, K., Kania, H. (2023). Analysis of the impact of the 5S tool and Standardization on the duration of the production process - case study. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 421-427, doi: 10.30657/pea.2023.29.47
• 30. Prerequisite Tree. (2021). Theory of Constraints Institute. https://www.tocinstitute.org/prerequisite-tree.html
• 31. Putra, I.B.U., Kot, S., Ibrahim, A.H.H., Rajiani, I. (2024). Human Resource Productivity: Integrating Resilience Engineering, Motivation, and Health Safety. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 105-114, doi: 10.30657/pea.2024.30.10
• 32. Rahman, S. (1998). Theory of constraints: a review of the philosophy and its applications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 336-355.
• 33. Reid, R.A. (2007). Applying the TOC five-step focusing process in the service sector. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 209-234, doi: 10.1108/09604520710735209
• 34. Scheinkopf, L. (2010). Thinking Process Including S&T Trees. In: J.F. Cox III, J.G. Schleier (Eds.), Theory of Constraints Handbook (pp. 729-786). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• 35. Scheinkopf, L.J. (1999). Thinking for a change: Putting the TOC thinking processes to use. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
• 36. Shoemaker, T.E., Reid, R.A. (2005). Applying the TOC Thinking Process: A Case Study in the Government Sector. Human Systems Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 21-37, doi: 10.3233/HSM-2005-24104
• 37. Szmyd, K. (2024). The role of training in motivating employees in public administration. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 194, pp. 505-521, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2024.194.30
• 38. Taylor III, L.J., Poyner, I. (2008). Goldratt’s Thinking Process Applied to the Problems Associated with Trained Employee Retention in a Highly Competitive Labor Market. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 594-608, doi: 10.1108/03090590810899847
• 39. Ulewicz, R., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2023). A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements. Energies, Vol. 16, Iss. 11, pp. 1-22, doi: 10.3390/en16114378
• 40. Watson, K.J., Blackstone, J.H., Gardiner, S.C. (2007). The evolution of a management philosophy: the theory of constraints. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 387-402, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.004
• 41. Wolniak, R., Gajdzik, B., Grebski, W. (2023). The usage of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) in Industry 4.0 conditions. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 190, pp. 223-235, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.190.15
• 42. Wolniak, R., Grebski, W. (2023). The usage of 5 Why in Industry 4.0 conditions. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 189, pp. 735-745, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.189.46
• 43. Wolniak, R., Grebski, W. (2023). The usage of Kaizen in Industry 4.0 conditions. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 188, pp. 677-686, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.188.41