Scientific aspects of organic soy production in Ukraine

• Autorzy: Petrychenko Vasyl , Lykhochvor Volodymyr , Didur Ihor , Pantsyreva Hanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/cdem-2024-0008

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Taking into account European experience, theoretical and methodological foundations of scientific aspects of organic soybean production in Ukraine have been implemented, aimed at the greening of agriculture, through the preservation of natural soil fertility and the rational use of bioecosystems. It has been established that soybean production, through the introduction of bioorganic technologies, contributes to the improvement of agricultural culture, the restoration of soil fertility, and an increase in the amount of protein products and nutritious feeds. Experimental studies have proven that soil organic matter is a key indicator of its fertility, since it actively affects plant nutrition and improves the physicochemical properties of the soil, as well as the migration of chemical elements. The most important soil processes are closely related to the greening of the agricultural sector. It has been proven that the main source of organic matter for increasing soil fertility is the development of organic models of soybean growing technologies. It is substantiated that the agrobiological potential of these technologies in sustainable production zones of non-irrigated lands will contribute to the creation of a “Soybean belt”. A new stage in soybean production is proposed, which will allow rational use of the region’s hydrothermal resources, increase the gross yield of soybean seeds, promote the biologisation of agriculture and the production of high-quality and environmentally friendly products.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soybean; organic farming; soil fertility; soybean belt; gross production

PL

soja; rolnictwo ekologiczne; żyzność gleby; produkcja brutto

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: R. 29, NR 1-2
• Strony: 111--122
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Petrychenko Vasyl

• Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine

autor

Lykhochvor Volodymyr

• Lviv National Environmental University, Vladimir the Great, 1 m. Dubliany Lviv region, Lviv, 80381 Ukraine

autor

Didur Ihor

• Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Sonyachna 3, 21002, Ukraine

autor

Pantsyreva Hanna

• Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Sonyachna 3, 21002, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-5211

Bibliografia

• [1] Alaru M, Talgre L, Eremeev V, Tein B, Luik A, Nemvalts A, et al. Crop yields and supply of nitrogen compared in conventional and organic farming systems. Agricult Food Sci. 2014;23(4):317-26. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.46422.
• [2] Dumpis J, Lagzdins A, Sics I. Delineation of catchment area for the lake Kisezers for environmental sustainability. Agron Res. 2021;19(4):1718-33. DOI: 10.15159/AR.21.137.
• [3] Peters HP. Scientists as public experts. In: Bucchi M, Trench B, editors. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge. 2014, p. 131-46. DOI: 10.4324/9780203483794.
• [4] Bakhmat M, Padalko T, Krachan T, Tkach O, Pantsyreva H, Tkach L. Formation of the yield of Matricaria recutita and indicators of food value of Sychorium intybus by technological methods of co-cultivation in the interrows of an orchard. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24(8):250-9. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/166553.
• [5] Mazur VA, Myalkovsky RO, Pantsyreva HV, Didur IM, Mazur KV, Alekseev OO. Photosynthetic productivity of potato plants depending on the location of rows placement in agrophytocenosis. Ecol Environ Conservation. 2020;2:536-45.
• [6] Hnatiuk TT, Zhitkevich NV, Petrychenko VF, Kalinichenko AV, Patyka VP. Soybean diseases caused by genus Pseudomonas phytopathenes bacteria. Microbiology. 2019;81(3):68-83. DOI: 10.15407/microbiolj81.03.068.
• [7] Battistini C, Gullón B, Ichimura ES, Gomes AMP, Ribeiro EP, Kunigk L, et al. Development and characterization of an innovative synbiotic fermented beverage based on vegetable soybean. Brazilian J Microbiology. 2017;49(2):303-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.08.006.
• [8] Puyu V, Bakhmat M, Khmelianchyshyn Y, Stepanchenko V, Bakhmat O, Pantsyreva H. Social-and-ecological aspects of forage production reform in Ukraine in the early 21st century. Eur J Sust Develop. 2021;10(1):221-8. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p221.
• [9] Pawlewicz A, Brodzinska K, Zvirbule A, Popluga D. Trends in the development of organic farming in Poland and Latvia compared to the EU. Rural Sust Res. 2020;43(388):1-8. DOI: 10.2478/plua-2020-0001.
• [10] Onufran, LI, Netis VI. Absorption and use of solar energy by soybean crops under different growing conditions. Bull Agrarian Sci Black Sea Coast. 2017;2(94):107-15. DOI: 10.31521/2313-092X.
• [11] Jansson T, Andersen HE, Gustafsson BG, Hasler B, Höglind L, Choi H. Baltic Sea eutrophication status is not improved by the first pillar of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy. Regional Environ Change. 2019;19(8):2465-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-019-01559-8.
• [12] Gorodiska I, Plaksyuk L, Gorodiska I, Chub A. Award for biopreparations for the minds of organic production of soy. Bull Agrarian Sci. 2018;9:73-8. DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201809-11.
• [13] Keres I, Alaru M, Eremeev V, Talgre L, Luik A, Loit E. Long-term effect of farming systems on the yield of crop rotation and soil nutrient content. Agricult Food Sci. 2020;29(3):210-21. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.85221.
• [14] Zhao J, Bindi M, Eitzinger J, Ferrise R, Gaile Z, Gobin A, et al. Priority for climate adaptation measures in European crop production systems. European J Agronomy. 2022;138:126516. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126516.
• [15] Ramakrishnan B, Maddel NR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Organic farming: Does it contribute to contaminant-free produce and ensure food safety? Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145079. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145079.
• [16] Jensen P, Kreimer P, Rouquier JB, Croissant Y. Scientists who engage with society perform better academically. Sci Public Policy. 2008;35(7):527-41. DOI: 10.3152/030234208X329130.
• [17] Hendriks F, Kienhues D, Bromme R. Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In: Blöbaum B, editor. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research. Springer; 2016;1:143-59. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8.
• [18] Weingart P, Joubert M. The conflation of motives of science communication - causes, consequences, remedies. J Sci Comm. 2019;18(3):Y01. DOI: 10.22323/2.18030401.
• [19] Mahmood N, Arshad M, Kächele H, Ma H, Ullah A, Müller K. Wheat yield response to input and socioeconomic factors under changing climate: Evidence from rainfed environments of Pakistan. Sci Total Environ. 2019;688:1275-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.266.
• [20] Pantsyreva H, Vovk V, Bronnicova L, Zabarna T. Efficiency of the use of lawn grasses for biology and soil conservation of agricultural systems under the conditions of the Ukraine’s Podillia. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24(11):249-56. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/171649.
• [21] Nicholas KA, Villemoes F, Lehsten EA, Brady MV. Scown MW. A harmonized and spatially explicit dataset from 16 million payments from the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy for 2015. Patterns. 2021;2(4):100236. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100236.
• [22] Ivanyshyn O, Khomina V, Pantsyreva H. Influence of fertilization on the formation of grain productivity in different-maturing maize hybrids. Ukr J Ecol. 2021;11(3):262-9. DOI: 10.15421/2021_170.
• [23] Marconi V, Raggi M, Viaggi D. Assessing the impact of RDP agri-environment measures on the use of nitrogen-based mineral fertilizers through spatial econometrics: The case study of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Ecol Indicators. 2015;59:27-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.037.
• [24] Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JEM. Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature. 2016;536(7615):143-145. DOI: 10.1038/536143a.
• [25] Young N, Matthews R. Experts’ understanding of the public: Knowledge control in a risk controversy. Public Underst Sci. 2007;16(2):123-44. DOI: 10.1177/0963662507060586.
• [26] Kramarova L, Prokša M. Pupils’ preconceptions about heat, temperature and energy. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):79-91. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0005.
• [27] González PA, Dans EP, Dacal ACA, Peña MZ, Luzardo OP. Differences in the levels of sulphites and pesticide residues in soils and wines and under organic and conventional production methods. J Food Composition Analysis. 2022;112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104714.
• [28] Pantsyreva H. Morphological and ecological-biological evaluation of the decorative species of the genus Lupinus L. Ukr J Ecol. 2021;9(3):74-7. DOI: 10.15421/2019_711.
• [29] Sirtori CR. Risks and benefits of soy phytoestrogens in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, climacteric symptoms and osteoporosis. Drug Saf. 2001;24:665-82. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124090-00003.
• [30] Calaf GM, Ponce-Cusi R, Aguayo F, Munoz JP, Bleak TC. Endocrine disruptors from the environment affecting breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:19-32. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11566.
• [31] Petrine JCP, Del Bianco-Borges B. The influence of phytoestrogens on different physiological and pathological processes: An overview. Phytother Res. 2021;35:180-97. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6816.
• [32] Krizova L, Dadakova K, Kasparovska J, Kasparovsky T. Isoflavones. Molecules. 2019;24:1076. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061076.
• [33] Sergiienko V, Shyta O, Khudolii A. The effect of fungicides on the development of diseases and soybean yield in the Forest steppe of Ukraine. Quarantine Plant Protection. 2021;(3):18-23. DOI: 10.36495/2312-0614.2021.3.18-23.
• [34] Bajwa SG, Rupe JC, Mason J. Soybean disease monitoring with leaf reflectance. Remote Sens. 2017;9(2):127. DOI: 10.3390/rs9020127.
• [35] Zhao J, Bindi M, Eitzinger J, Ferrise R, Gaile Z, Gobin A, et al. Priority for climate adaptation measures in European crop production systems. Europ J Agronomy. 2022;138:126516. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126516.
• [36] Giampieri F, Mazzoni L, Cianciosi D, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Regolo L, Sánchez González C, et al. Organic vs conventional plant-based foods: A review. Food Chem. 2022;383:13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132352.
• [37] Ramakrishnan B, Maddela NR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Organic farming: Does it contribute to contaminant-free produce and ensure food safety? Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145079. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145079.
• [38] Kuht J, Eremeev V, Talgre L, Madsen H, Toom M, Maeorg E. et al. Soil weed seed bank and factors influencing the number of weeds at the end of conversion period to organic production. Agronomy Res. 2016; 14(4):1372-9. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20173199282.