Synthesis system models of choice the priorities at realization of national foresight-researches

• Autorzy: Shostak I. , Danova M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The analysis of implementation technology foresight in various countries is carried out which showed that for today foresight is used as the system instrument of formation the future allowing to consider changes in All spheres of public life: science and technologies, economy, social, public relations, culture. Types and structural elements of technology foresight are separated. The necessity of further research the problem associated with increasing the efficiency of foresight-projects through its informatization is shown. The aim of the article is to describe process of synthesis the model of informatization as technologies foresight in general, and its specific variants (foresight-project). Informative and formal statements of problems synthesis system model (SM) choice of priorities in the implementation of national foresight-researches are given. Approach to construction of SM technology foresight in the form of the two-level hierarchical system consisting of the functional and methodical levels is offered. At that the functional level includes a set of types and purposes of technology foresight, and methodical - reflects a transition way from input elements to output. For a further concretization of SM, taking into account the selected properties of discrecity and determinancy, the mathematical apparatus of the automata theory is used. In this case the system is represented in the form of automaton chich processes the discrete information and changes its internal states only in admissible timepoints. For computer implementation of model technology foresight is supposed to use network models which, in general, provide adequacy of the formal representation of foresight-researches. Reasonability of use the apparatus of Joiner-networks (JN) defines a connectivity and directivity of transmission of output results as input alphabets is shown.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

technology foresight; scientific and technical development; system model; national foresightresearches; types of foresight; structural elements of foresight

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 4, No 3
• Strony: 19--24
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., wz.

Twórcy

autor

Shostak I.

• National Aerospace University named after N. Ye. Zhykovsky "Kharkіv Aviation Institute"

autor

Danova M.

• National Aerospace University named after N. Ye. Zhykovsky "Kharkіv Aviation Institute"

Bibliografia

• 1. Kalna-Dubinyuk T. 2012. The development of electronic extension service in Ukraine on the international platform. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal. Vol.1, №3, 29-34.
• 2. Kharchuk V. and Matviyishyn V. 2012. Modelling techniques for rational management decisions considering innovative risk. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal. Vol.1, №3, 25-38.
• 3. Dalkey N.C. and Helmer-Hirschberg O. 1962. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts: Rand report No. RM-727-PR. California: Rand Corporation, 16.
• 4. Johnston R. and Sripaipan C. 2008. Foresight in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: concepts and practice, 237-255.
• 5. Salim'yanova I. G. 2011. Foresight as a tool to determine the priority areas of science and technology. Modern high technologies. n. 1, 95 - 97. (in Russian).
• 6. Sokolov A. 2004. Long-term forecasting trends of development the education by methods of foresight. Education, n. 3, 66 - 76. (in Russian).
• 7. International Practice in Technology Foresight. 2002. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 303.
• 8. Martin B.R. 1995. Foresight in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. Vol. 7. Nr 2, 139 - 168.
• 9. Becker R. 2003. Corporate Foresight in Europe: A First Overview. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 25.
• 10. Popper R. 2008. Foresight Methodology. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: concepts and practice, 44 - 88.
• 11. Shostak I. V. and Danova M.A. 2012. Approach to automating the process of forecasting of scientific and technological development of the region based on technology foresight. Collection research works. Military Institute Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. 38, 151-154. (in Russian).
• 12. Danova M. A. 2013. Methods of selection priorities for forecasting the scientific and technical development of large-scale objects on the basis of technology foresight. Aerospace technics and technology. 7(104), 227 – 231. (in Russian).
• 13. Shostak I. V. and Danova M.A. 2014. Approach to complex automation national foresight projects. Aerospace technics and technology. 8(115), 179 – 188. (in Russian).
• 14. Saritas O. 2004. A systems analysis of British, Irish and Turkish foresight programmes. Proceedings of Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods. Seville ,44 - 64.
• 15.Malaga-Toboła U. 2012. Influence of technical infrastructure on economic efficiency of farms with various production trends. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal. Vol.1, №2, 25-30.
• 16. Loveridge D., Georghiou L. and Nedeva M. 1995. United Kingdom Foresight Programme. Manchester, UK: PREST, University of Manchester, 200.
• 17. Shelyubskaya N. V. 2004. "Foresight" - a new mechanism for determining the priorities of the state science and technology policy. Problems of the theory and practice of management. n. 2, 60 - 65. (in Russian).
• 18. About approval of the actions plan on implementation of fundamentals of policy of the Russian Federation in the field of development of science and technologies for the period till 2010 and further prospect. Act 2002 (Pr-576). Available online at: <http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/22.html>
• 19. Cuhls K. 2008. Foresight in Germany. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: concepts and practice, 131 - 153.
• 20. Johnston R and Sripaipa C. 2008. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: concepts and practice, 237 - 255.
• 21. Keenan M. and Popper R. 2008. Comparing Foresight 'Style' in Six World Regions. Foresight. 10(6), 16 - 38.
• 22. Popper R. and Medina Vásquez J. 2008. Foresight in Latin America. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: concepts and practice, 256 - 286.
• 23. Kuwahara T. 2001. Technology Foresight in Japan - The Potential and Implications of DELPHI Available online at: <http://www.nistep.go.jp/achiev/ftx/eng/mat077e/html/mat077ee.html>
• 24. Toth S. 2001. Technology Foresight in Hungary. Available online at: <http://www.nistep.go.jp/achiev/ftx/eng/mat077e/html/mat077ke.html>
• 25. FUTUR - German Research Dialogue. A New perspectives into the existing BMBF research. Available online at: <http://www.futur.de>
• 26. Malіtsky B.A., Popovich, A.S. and Soloviev, V.P. 2004. Guidelines for predictive and analytical research under the State program of forecasting scientific, technological and innovative development of Ukraine. Kiev, Ukraine:Phoenix, 52. (in Ukrainian).
• 27. Technology Foresight Manual. 2005. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 261.
• 28. Gaponenko N. V. 2012. Foresight. Theory. Methodology. Experience. Moscow, Russia: Yuniti-Dana, 238. (in Russian).
• 29. What is Foresight? Available online at: <http://foresight.hse.ru>
• 30. Volkov V. I. and Denisov A. A. 1997. Fundamentals of the theory of systems and system analysis. St. Petersburg, Russia: SPbGTU, 510. (in Russian).
• 31. Quaid E. 2001. Analysis of complex systems. Moscow, Russia: Progress, 520. (in Russian).
• 32. Gorbatov V. A., Gorbatov A. V. and Gorbatova M. V. 2008. Automata Theory: a textbook for university students. Мoscow: Astrel', 559. (in Russian).
• 33. Stolyarov L. N. 2004. Joiner–network to simulate the interaction of parallel processes. Modelling of managerial processes. 81 – 97. (in Russian).
• 34. Arshinskiy V. L. and Fartyshev D. A. 2008. Simulation of situations with use of cognitive maps and Joiner networks. Modern technologies. System analysis. Simulation. 4(20), 148 – 151. (in Russian).