Results or relationship orientations of a team manager in perspective of using artificial intelligence in management

• Autorzy: Flak Olaf , Kożusznik Barbara

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.202.4

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of this paper is present a solution to the research problem can concerning the dilemma of which of the extreme management styles - results orientation or relationship orientation - provides greater efficiency and effectiveness of the manager’s actions in perspective of artificial management. Design/methodology/approach: There are answers to two research questions: (RQ1) to what extent does the results or relationship orientation of a team manager affect efficiency? (RQ2) To what extent does the results or relation orientation of a team manager affect effectiveness? The answers were formulated on foundation of the original concept of methodology in management reality and research on human managers’ behavior using online management tools as research tools (TransistorsHead.com). Findings: First, (RQ1) there was no relationship between the leadership style adopted - either results orientation or relationship orientation - and the efficiency of team manager. Second, (RQ2) there was no relationship between the leadership style adopted - either results orientation or relationship orientation - and the effectiveness of team manager. Research limitations/implications: The study involved in 12 virtual team and every team consisted of team managers and 3-4 members. All the team members could take managerial actions and use all online management tools, however the study concerns only team managers. Practical implications: The last 20 years there has been a rapid development of information technology, robotics and replacing people’s work with machines or algorithms. Therefore the area of team management automation and its consequences seem to be dominant area of research in the nearest future as well as practical implementation of this research. Social implications: In the literature and in the public domain an important discussion has started how artificial intelligence will change our social life. It seems that the same implications consider the artificial management. Originality/value: The system of organizational terms used to represent managerial competences as managerial actions, recorded by online management tools (TransistorsHead.com).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

results orientation; relationship orientation; team management; artificial management; artificial intelligence

PL

orientacja na wyniki; orientacja na relacje; zarządzanie zespołem; zarządzanie sztuczne; sztuczna inteligencja

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 202
• Strony: 59--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Flak Olaf

• Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-1185

autor

Kożusznik Barbara

• University of Silesia in Katowice

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-8742

Bibliografia

• 1. Antonescu, M. (2018). Are Business Leaders Prepared to Handle the Upcoming Revolution in Business Artificial Intelligence? Quality-Access To Success, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 15-19.
• 2. Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 60, pp. 421-449.
• 3. Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Huston: Gulf Publishing Company.
• 4. Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S. (1965). International managerial Grids. Training Directors Journal, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 8-23.
• 5. Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S. (1981). Management by Grid Principles or Situationalism: Which? Group and Organizational Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 439-455.
• 6. Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S. (1981). The New Managerial Grid. Huston: Gulf Publishing Company.
• 7. Bowers, D., Seashore, S. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 238-263.
• 8. Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J., Higgs, A.C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 823-850.
• 9. Cheng, J.L.C., Bolon, D.S., (1993). The management of multinational R&D: a neglected topic in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1-18.
• 10. Cohen, S.G., Ledford, G.E., Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness. Human Relations, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 643-676.
• 11. Costa, A.C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 605-622.
• 12. Courtney, J.F. (2001). Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: Toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31, pp. 17-38.
• 13. Drucker, P.F. (1967). The Manager and the Moron. McKinsey Quarterly, December, http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-manager-and- the-moron
• 14. Fiedler, F. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 15. Fiedler, F. (1979). A field experiment validating contingency model leadership training. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 247-259.
• 16. Flak, O. (2020). System of organizational terms as a methodological concept in replacing human managers with robots. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer, pp. 471- 500.
• 17. Flak, O., Kożusznik, B. (2023). Knowledge representation of managerial competences in virtual teams aimed at artificial management. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology - Organization and Management Series, Vol. 177, pp. 175-190.
• 18. Flak, O., Pyszka, A. (2022). Pomiar stylów kierowania według Blake'a i Mouton w zespołach wirtualnych za pomocą układu wielkości organizacyjnych i narzędzi menedżerskich online. In: R. Knosala (Ed.), Inżynieria zarządzania. Cyfryzacja produkcji. Aktualności badawcze, 4 (pp. 415-428). Warszawa: PWE.
• 19. Franken, S., Wattenberg, M. (2019). The Impact of AI on Employment and Organisation in the Industrial Working Environment of the Future. In: P. Griffiths, M.N. Kabir (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (ECIAIR) (pp. 141-148).
• 20. Geisler, E. (1986). Artificial management and the artificial manager. Business Horizons, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 17-21.
• 21. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 451-482.
• 22. Goldmann, S., Knörzer, M. (2023). Technology advancement propels work productivity: Empirical efficiency potential determination in marketing and sales. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 1962-1977.
• 23. Guzma, J.G., Ramos, J.S., Seco, A.A., Esteban, A.S. (2010). How to get mature global virtual teams: a framework to improve team process management in distributed software teams. SQL, Vol. 18, pp. 409-435.
• 24. Halliday, R.M., Stacey, M.J. (2009). Observation: the lost and found managerial skill. Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings, pp. 380-385.
• 25. Henri, J.F. (2004). Performance Measurement and Organizational Effectiveness: Bridging the Gap. Managerial Finance, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 93-123.
• 26. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H. (1977). The management of organizational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• 27. Hines, G.H. (1974). Sociocultural influences on employee expectancy and participative. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 334-339.
• 28. Jago, G. (2017). A contrarian view: Culture and participative management. European Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 645-650.
• 29. Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 765-780.
• 30. Karakitapoglu-Aygün, Z., Gumusluoglu, J. (2013). The bright and dark sides of leadership: transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context. Leadership, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 107-133.
• 31. Katz, R.L. (1974). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 90-102.
• 32. Kożusznik, B. (1985). Style kierowania. Uwarunkowania sytuacyjne i psychologiczne. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
• 33. Kożusznik, B. (2014). Zachowania pracownika w organizacji. Warszawa: PWE.
• 34. March, J.G., Sutton, R.I. (1997). Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable. Organization Science, Vol. 8, pp. 697-706.
• 35. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future. Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 410-476.
• 36. McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Human work in the robotic future: Policy for the age of automation. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 139-150.
• 37. Mintzberg, H. (1980). The nature of managerial work. New York: Prentice-Hall.
• 38. Morris, T., Pavett, M.C. (1992). Management style and productivity in two cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 169-179.
• 39. Peifer, Y., Jeske, T., Hille, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on Leaders and Leadership. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 200, pp. 1024-1030.
• 40. Schein, E. (1988). Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.
• 41. Scott-Young, Ch., Samson, D. (2009). Team management for fast projects: an empirical study of process industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 612-635.
• 42. Stogdill, R.M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 35-71.
• 43. Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
• 44. Stogdill, R.M., Shartle, C.L. (1948). Methods for determining patterns of leadership behavior in relation to organization structure and objectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 286-291.
• 45. Talebnia, G., Dehkordi, B.B. (2012). Study of Relation between Effectiveness Audit and Management Audit. GSTF Business Review, Vol. 8, pp. 92-97.
• 46. Tannenbaum, A. (1975). Organizational Psychology. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
• 47. Tannenbaum, A., Schmidt, W.H. (1958). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, pp. 95-101.
• 48. Teddy-Ang, S., Toh, A. (2020). AI Singapore Empowering a Smart Nation. Communications Of The ACM, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 60-63.
• 49. van der Vecht, B., van Diggelen, J., Peeters, M., Barnhoorn, J., van der Waa, J. (2018). Social Artificial Intelligence Layer for Human-Machine Teaming. In: Y. Demazeau, J. Bajo, A.F. Caballero (Eds.), Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Complexity (pp. 262-274). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 10978.
• 50. Vroom, V., Jago, A.C. (1978). On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 151-162.
• 51. Vroom, V.H., Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• 52. Webber, S.S., Detjen, J., MacLean, T.L., Thomas, D. (2019). Team challenges: Is artificial intelligence the solution? Business Horizons, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 741-750.
• 53. Yang, C., Flak, O., Grzegorzek, M. (2018). Representation and Matching of Team Managers: An Experimental Research. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 311-323.
• 54. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• 55. Yukl, G.A. (1990). Skills for managers and leaders: Text, cases, and exercises. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• 56. Zimmermanna, A., Schmidtb, R., Sandkuhlc, K., Jugela, D. (2019). Intelligent Decision Management for Architecting Service-Dominant Digital Products. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 159, pp. 2120-2129.