PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Difficult-to-measure integration measurement method for designing processes in a chain-like structure of conflicted cells in a supply chain.

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper presents an approach for integrating conflicted cells in a chain-like structure based on a measurement of the level of integration of this structure. The authors’ prior experience suggests an assumption that conflicts always arise when cells are connected by a flow of materials, information, and money, although at different intensity levels. Usually, the intensity levels of said conflicts depend on the cooperation culture within a supply chain. This is a highly multidimensional problem, reflected by the literature referred to in this paper and related to this subject matter. The proposed approach treats technological processes between conflicted cells as an area of potential integration of these cells. Then, the integration becomes a problem of selecting the appropriate variant of realizing a technological process conducted in an area common for potentially conflicted cells of a company. The same approach may be used for cells belonging to separate production and distribution companies operating within a mutual supply chain. The paper proposes a method for measuring the integration level of neighboring cells, as a difficult-to-measure feature, by determining an integration loss index. Also, the paper presents a multi-criteria method based on the fuzzy set theory for selecting a preferred variant of a technological process. A presented example uses this method in a supply chain to maximize the integration level between Shipping and Recipient cells/links. It has been assumed that the preferred realization variant of the flow process will be based on the following criteria: 1) shipping cost; 2) shipping quality; 3) shipping time. Also, an algorithm is shown for applying the presented methodology, which is helpful for managers interested in increasing the integration level of a supply chain. The methodology allows for increasing the integrity of conflicted cells both in newly designed supply chains as well as in existing ones when remodeled or reorganized. Moreover, the paper indicates some problems associated with the efficient implementation of the proposed method.
Rocznik
Strony
27--43
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 51 poz., rys., tab., wykr., wzory
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
  • Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Ambroziak, T., Tkaczyk, S., (2015). The selection of transportation means for technological processes. Archives of Transport. 36. 7-20. DOI: 10.5604/08669546.1185195.
  • [2] Alfalla-Luque, R., Marin-Garcia, J. A., Medina-Lopez, C. (2015). An analysis of the direct and mediated effects of employee commitment and supply chain integration on organisational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 242-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.004.
  • [3] Basnet, C. (2013). The measurement of internal supply chain integration. Management Research Review, 36(2), 153-172. DOI: 10.1108/01409171311292252.
  • [4] Basole, R. C., Nowak, M. (2018). Assimilation of tracking technology in the supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 114, 350-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.08.003.
  • [5] Bautista-Santos, H., Martinez-Flores, J.L., Bernabé-Loranca, M.B., Sanchez-Partida, D., Sanchez-Galvan, F.. (2016). A fuzzy expert system for the integration of collaborative supply chains. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(2), 234-250. DOI: 10.7166/27-2-1241.
  • [6] Bhagwat, R., Sharma, M. K. (2009). An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management. Production Planning and Control, 20(8), 678-690. DOI: 10.1080/09537.280903069897.
  • [7] Boon-Itt, S., Paul, H. (2005). Measuring supply chain integration-Using the Q-sort technique. Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management: In Collaboration with Magnus Westhaus, 47-58. DOI: 10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_4.
  • [8] Bruque-Cámara, S., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira-Marín, J. M. (2016). Supply chain integration through community cloud: Effects on operational performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 141-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2016.04.003.
  • [9] Chen, P.-K., Lu, Y. Y. (2020). Development of a Revised Taxonomic Approach for Improving Supply Chain Integration and Collaboration. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(4), 945-966. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2020.12427.
  • [10] Cigolini, R., Rossi, T. (2008). Evaluating supply chain integration: A case study using fuzzy logic. Production Planning and Control, 19(3), 242-255. DOI: 10.1080/09537280801916249.
  • [11] Danese, P., Molinaro, M., Romano, P. (2020). Investigating fit in supply chain integration: A systematic literature review on context, practices, performance links. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(5), 100634. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100634.
  • [12] Danese, P., Romano, P., Formentini, M. (2013). The impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an international supplier network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1), 125-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.002.
  • [13] Durach, C. F., Wiengarten, F. (2020). Supply chain integration and national collectivism. International Journal of Production Economics, 224(June 2018), 107543. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107543.
  • [14] Eksoz, C., Mansouri, S. A., Bourlakis, M., Önkal, D. (2019). Judgmental adjustments through supply integration for strategic partnerships in food chains. Omega (United Kingdom), 87, 20-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.11.007.
  • [15] Eriksson, P. E. (2015). Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(1), 38-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.08.003.
  • [16] Fattahi, M., Govindan, K., Keyvanshokooh, E. (2017). Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 101, 176-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.02.004.
  • [17] Freije, I., de la Calle, A., Ugarte, J. V. (2021). Role of supply chain integration in the product innovation capability of servitized manufacturing companies. Technovation, xxxx. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102216.
  • [18] Golpîra, H. (2020). Optimal integration of the facility location problem into the multi-project multi-supplier multi-resource Construction Supply Chain network design under the vendor managed inventory strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 139. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112841.
  • [19] Hajek, P. (1998) Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer.
  • [20] Han, C. hwan. (2018). Assessing the impacts of port supply chain integration on port performance. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 129-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.009.
  • [21] Heydari, J., Rafiei, P. (2020). Integration of environmental and social responsibilities in managing supply chains: A mathematical modeling approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 145 (August 2019), 106495. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106495.
  • [22] Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125(February), 285-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001.
  • [23] Jachimowski, R., Gołębiowski, P., Izdebski, M., Pyza, D., Szczepański, E. (2017). Designing and efficiency of database for simulation of processes in systems. Case study for the simulation of warehouse processes. Archives of Transport. 41. 31-42. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.7380.
  • [24] Jacobs, M. A., Yu, W., Chavez, R. (2016). The effect of internal communication and employee satisfaction on supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.015.
  • [25] Jacyna, M., Wasiak, M., Bobiński, A. (2017). SIMMAG3D as a tool for designing of storage facilities in 3D. Archives of Transport, 42(2), 25-38. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010. 0525.
  • [26] Kache, F., Seuring, S. (2014). Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews. Supply Chain Management, 19(June), 664-682. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0478.
  • [27] Kłodawski, M., Lewczuk, K., Jacyna-Gołda, I., Żak, J. (2017). Decision making strategies for warehouse operations. Archives of Transport, 1(41), 43–53. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.7384.
  • [28] Lee, P. D. (2005). Measuring Supply Chain Integration: A Social Network Approach. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 6(2), 58-67. DOI: 10.1080/16258312.2005.11517148.
  • [29] Li, W., Chen, J. (2018). Backward integration strategy in a retailer Stackelberg supply chain. Omega (United Kingdom), 75, 1339-1351. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.03.002.
  • [30] Li, W., Chen, J. (2020). Manufacturer’s vertical integration strategies in a three-tier supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 135(February), 101884. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101884.
  • [31] Machado, M. C., Telles, R., Sampaio, P., Queiroz, M. M., Fernandes, A. C. (2019). Performance measurement for supply chain management and quality management integration: A systematic literature review. Benchmarking, 27(7), 2130-2147. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2018-0365.
  • [32] Panayides, P. M., Song, D. W. (2008). Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(7), 562–584. DOI: 10.1108/096000,30810900969.
  • [33] Pekkanen, P., Niemi, P., Puolakka, T., Pirttilä, T., Huiskonen, J. (2020). Building integration skills in supply chain and operations management study programs. International Journal of Production Economics, 225(October 2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107593.
  • [34] Peng, X., Prybutok, V., Xie, H. (2020). Integration of supply chain management and quality management within a quality focused organizational framework. International Journal of Production Research, 58(2), 448-466. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1593548.
  • [35] Pham, T., Pham, H. (2021). Improving green performance of construction projects through supply chain integration: The role of environmental knowledge. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 933-942. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.004.
  • [36] Ratkiewicz, A. Lewczuk, K. (2018). Method for determining material flow variant between distribution warehouse and recipient, in: R. Kersys (eds.), Proceedings of 22nd International Scientific Conference Transport Means 2018, Kaunas University of Technology, 889-902.
  • [37] Ratkiewicz, A. Metodyka projektowania i oceny procesów magazynowania w szeregowo zintegrowanych łańcuchach logistycznych. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa 2019. ISBN: 978-83-7814-916-3.
  • [38] Rencher A.C. (2003). Methods of multivariate analysis, Wiley,. SBN: 978-0-471-46172-2.
  • [39] Sendek-Matysiak, E., Pyza, D., 2018. The assigment of vehicle assesment based on multi criteria decision making. Archives of Transport, 48(4), 77-85. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8367.
  • [40] Seuring, S. (2004). Integrated chain management and supply chain management comparative analysis and illustrative cases. Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (8-10), 1059-1071.
  • [41] Shah, S. A. A., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., Farooq, S. (2020). Servitization and supply chain integration: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 229 (April), 107765. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107765.
  • [42] Shou, Y., Zhao, X., Dai, J., Xu, D. (2021). Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 145(April 2020), 102181. DOI:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102181.
  • [43] Van Hoek, R. I. (1998). "Measuring the immeasurable" - Measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 3(4), 187-192. DOI: 10.1108/13598549810244232.
  • [44] Van Staden, T., Niemann, W., Meyer, A. (2020). Interpersonal and inter-organisational relationships in supply chain integration: An exploration of third-party logistics providers in South Africa. Acta Commercii, 20(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.4102/ac.v20i1.867.
  • [45] Wasiak, M., Jacyna-Gołda, I., Izdebski, M. (2016). Multi-criteria warehouses location problem in the logistics network, International Conference on Industrial Logistics Conference Proceedings, 352-364.
  • [46] Wei, S., Ke, W., Lado, A. A., Liu, H., Wei, K. K. (2020). The Effects of Justice and Top Management Beliefs and Participation: An Exploratory Study in the Context of Digital Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 51-71. DOI: 10.1007/ s10551-018-04100-9.
  • [47] Vitasek, K. (2003). Supply Chain Visions Supply Chain Visions. Logistics Terms and Glossary. Washington, Bellevue.
  • [48] Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., Beresford, A. K. c. (2013). An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a structural equation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 235-252. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-09-2011-0264.
  • [49] Yuen, K. F., Van Thai, V. (2017). The influence of supply chain integration on operational performance: A comparison between product and service supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 444-463. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-12-2015-0241.
  • [50] Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Wong, Y. D., Zhou, Q. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of sustainable shipping practices: The integration of stakeholder and behavioural theories. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 108(October), 18-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.10.002.
  • [51] Zhou, G., Yang, Y., Cao, J. (2012). Competition and Integration in Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network with Variational Inequality. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 524809. DOI: 10.1155/2012/524809.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9e1dd61c-5ff0-49bc-9394-a59fc8160dde
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.