The use of the phytomonitoring method to control the irrigation of tomato plantations: A case study

• Autorzy: Shatkovskyi Andrii , Zhuravlov Olexandr , Vasiuta Volodymyr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2022.141551

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article is devoted to the current scientific and practical problems of planning irrigation with phytomonitoring methods. In particular, it focuses on the methodological approach to tomato irrigation planning. The field experiment was laid by the method of systematic placement of elementary plots in four replicates. The PM-11Z phytomonitor was used to determine changes in stem diameter, juice flow, leaf temperature, and fruit growth. On the basis of the experimental studies, parameters are defined for the start of watering with the positive, negative and zero water balance of the plant. It has been proved that when vegetative irrigation is planned with a positive plant water balance, the daily amplitude of stem contraction (DCA) and the trend of the sap flow rate should be analysed. A fall in two consecutive morning stem diameter peaks (MXSD) indicates a negative plant water balance, which is the starting point for watering. To assign watering with a zero water balance, it is necessary to use information from the fruit growth sensor and the juice flow rate. A decrease in their indications marks the need for the next watering.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fruit growth rate phytomonitoring; daily amplitude of stem contraction; maximum daily stem diameter; minimum daily stem diameter; sap flow; water balance of plant

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: no. 54
• Strony: 21--25
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Shatkovskyi Andrii

• Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation of NAAS, 37, Vasyl’kivs’ka str., Kyiv, 03022 Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-0397

autor

Zhuravlov Olexandr

• Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation of NAAS, 37, Vasyl’kivs’ka str., Kyiv, 03022 Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-219X

autor

Vasiuta Volodymyr

• Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation of NAAS, 37, Vasyl’kivs’ka str., Kyiv, 03022 Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-1843

Bibliografia

• BLANCO-CIPOLLONE F., LOURENÇO S., SILVESTRE J., CONCEIÇÃO N., MOÑINO M.J., VIVAS A., FERREIRA M.I. 2017. Plant water status indicators for irrigation scheduling associated with iso- and anisohydric behavior: Vine and plum trees. Horticulturae. Vol. 3(3), 47. DOI 10.3390/horticulturae3030047.
• GINESTAR C.Y., CASTEL J.R. 1998. Use of stem dendrometers as indicators of water stress in drip-irrigated citrus trees. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 421 p. 209–219 DOI 10.17660/actahortic.1998.421.22.
• GUROVICH L.A. 2006. El dendrómetro como indicador directo de la irrigación óptima de las vides entre envero y vendimia [The dendrometer as a direct indicator of the optimal irrigation of the vines between veraison and harvest]. Viticultura y Enología Profesional de España. Vol. 105 p. 13–21.
• GUROVICH L.A., ALVAREZ R. 2007. An expert system and decision support tool to interpret phytomonitoring information in fruit bearing woody plants [online]. In: EFITA/DSS/Models. Proceedings Glasgow (UK). [Access 06.04.2021]. Available at: http://www.efita.net/apps/accesbase/dbsommaire.asp?d=6177&t=0&uid=57305290&sid=57305290&idk=1
• GUROVICH L.A., GRATACOS E. 2002. Phytomonitoring applications in irrigation management. In: Proceedings of the World Congress of Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources. 13–15.03.2002 Iguacu Falls, Brazil p. 896–900. DOI 10.13031/2013.8426.
• GUROVICH L.A., SAGGÉ О. 2005. Fine tuning irrigation scheduling with phytomonitoring technology in Chile [online]. EFITA/WCCA Joint Congress on IT in Agriculture. Vila Real, Portugal p. 727–732. [Access 06.04.2021]. Available at: http://www.efita.net/apps/accesbase/dbsommaire.asp?d=5872&t=0&identobj=AKVi11I-q&uid=57305290&sid=57305290&idk=1
• GUROVICH L.A., VERGARA L.M., TON Y. 2006. Irrigation scheduling of avocado using phytomonotoring techniques. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. Vol. 33(2) p. 117–124.
• ILNITSKIY O.A., USHKARENKO V.A., FEDORCHUK M.I., RADCHENKO S.S., BONDARCHUK S.V. 2012. Metodologiya i pribornaya baza fitomonitoringa [Methodology and instrumental base of phytomonitoring]. Kherson. Kherson State Agrarian University. ISBN 978-966-630-070-8 pp. 124.
• ITIEL E., ZVIELI Y., OFFENBACH R., GOLAN R., BARDA A. 2002. Irrigation using a “phytomonitoring” system, experiment in pepper plants of Lorca and Parker [online]. [Access 06.04.2021]. Available at: https://www.agrisupportonline.com/Articles/capsicums_phyto_eng.htm
• KOVALEV M.S., PLUGATAR Y U.V., ILNITSKIY O.A. 2017. Vzaimosvyaz mezhdu zasukhoustoychivostyu Aucuba japonica Thunb. i faktorami vneshney sredy v usloviyakh Yuzhnogo berega Kryma [Relationship between drought tolerance of Aucuba japonica Thunb. and environmental factors in the conditions of the southern coast of Crimea] [online]. AgroEkoInfo. Vol. 3. [Access 06.04.2021]. Available at: http://agroecoinfo.narod.ru/journal/STATYI/2017/3/st_306.doc
• KOPYT M., TON Y., BEN-NER Z., BACHRACH A. 2001. A trial of the phytomonitoring technique for roses. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 547 p. 205–212. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.547.24.
• NIKOLAOU G., NEOCLEOUS D., KATSOULAS N., KITTAS C. 2019. Irrigation of greenhouse crops. Horticulturae. Vol. 5(1), 7. DOI 10.3390/horticulturae5010007.
• NILOV N.G. 2005. Fitomonitoring v vinogradarstve: sovremennyye vozmozhnosti i perspektivy [Phytomonitoring in viticulture: Modern opportunities and prospects] [online]. Institute of Grapes and Wine “Magarach” [Access 06.04.2021]. Available at: http://www.phyto.logrus.net.ua/st1.htm
• QUEZADA C., MERINO R., CHANDÍA A., CASSANOVA M. 2020. Use of phytomonitoring to evaluate the irrigation scheduling in vineyards (Vitis vinifera L.) of Itata Valley Chile. Horticulture International Journal. Vol. 4(5) p. 169–172. DOI 10.15406/hij.2020.04.00177.
• SELLES G., FERREYRA R., MUÑOZ I., SILVA H. 2004. Physiological indicators of plant water status as criteria for irrigation scheduling in table grapes cv. Crimson seedless, irrigated by drip. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 664 p. 599–605. DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2004.664.75.
• SHATKOVSKYI A.P., ZHURAVLOV O.V. 2016. Upravlinnya kraplynnym polyvom na osnovi vykorystannya internet-meteostantsiy iMETOS® [Drip irrigation management based on the use of iMETOS® internet weather stations]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrayiny. Kyyiv. NUBiP. Vol. 2(59). DOI 10.31548/dopovidi2016.02.007.
• SILVA-CONTRERAS C., SELLÉS VON SCHOUWEN G., FERREYRA-ESPADA R., SILVA-ROBLEDO H. 2012. Variation of water potential and trunk diameter answer as sensitivity to the water availability in table grapes. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 72(4) p. 459–469. DOI 10.4067/S0718-58392012000400001.
• SLEPTSOV Y., BOGDANOVA V., VOROBYEV M. 2020. Growth Dynamics of tomato fruits as a main indicator of a phytomonitor. E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 222, 01011. DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202022201011.
• TON Y., KOPYT M. 2003. Phytomonitoring: A bridge from sensors to information technology for greenhouse control. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 614 p. 639–644. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.614.95.
• TON Y., KOPYT M. 2004. Grapevine trunk and shoot diameter micro-variations and trends as indicators of water potential. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 652 p. 161–165. DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2004.652.19.
• TON Y., KOPYT M., NILOV N. 2004. Phytomonitoring technique for tuning irrigation of vineyards. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 646 p. 133–139. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.646.16.
• TON Y., NILOV N., KOPYT M. 2001. Phytomonitoring: The new information technology for improving crop production. Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 562 p. 257–262. DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2001.562.29.
• Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center 2021. Klimatychni dani po m. Askaniya-Nova za period z 1899 roku [Climate data for Askaniya-Nova for the period from 1899] [online]. [Access 06.04.2021]. Kiyv. Available at: https://meteo.gov.ua/en/33902/climate/climate_stations/159/24/
• USHKARENKO V.O., VOZHEHOVA R.A., HOLOBORODKO S.P., KOKOVIKHIN S.V. 2014. Metodyka polovoho doslidu (zroshuvane zemlerobstvo) [Methods of field experiment (irrigated agriculture)]. Kherson. Hrin D.S. ISBN 978-617-7243-02-0 рp. 448.
• USOLTSEV S.F., NESTYAK V.S 2018. Primenenie fitomonitoringa dlya otsenki indeksa vodnogo stressa [Application of phytomonitoring for estimating the water stress index]. Sibirskii vestnik sel’skokhozyaistvennoi nauki. Vol. 48(5) p. 77–85. DOI 10.26898/0370-8799-2018-5-10.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).