PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Poglądy Bogdana Suchodolskiego na kwestię upowszechniania historii nauki

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Outlooks of Bogdan Suchodolski on the issue of popularizing the history of science
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
The author of the present article proves the veracity of the postulate, which was formulated by Bogdan Suchodolski and concerned the necessity of popularizing the history of science. The stipulation is still greatly important for many fields of human activity. Bogdan Suchodolski was not the first and the only thinker, who revealed the unquestionable significance of disseminating the history of science as scientific branch: For the first time the problem was noticed in 1900 during International Congress of Comparative History in Paris and in 1903 during International Congress of Historical Sciences in Rome, when the idea of universalizing the history of science was put forward, among others, by: Paul Tannery, Carre de Vaux, Gino Ioria and Karl Sudhoff. All the mentioned participants declared then the necessity of teaching the history of science both, in the secondary schools and in the universities. In the article was also included a detailed description of conceptions formulated by Paul Tannery and Michel Lheritier in the inter-war period that concerned popularizing the history of science, and differed much from each other. Unlike Paul Tannery, Michel Lheritier advised against separating history of science from the whole of history. On the occasion of describing the inter-war period the author is paying a special attention to the role, which was played by International Conference of Teaching History in Hague in 1932. In that time a representative of International Committee on the History of Sciences and International Academy of the History of Sciences -Aldo Mieli - presented the idea of disseminating the history of science, which resulted in a resolution saying that the discussed branch should be taught in the primary and secondary schools, and in the universities as well. Further, the paper includes the description of the detailed conceptions that were put forward after World War II by the members of Committee on Teaching within International Academy of the History of Science and the participants of International Congress of the History of Science in 1965 and in 1968, and concerned the idea of introducing compulsory lectures on the history of science for prospective teachers and lecturers, and the ways of universalizing the discussed branch. The author is also presenting American conceptions of popularizing the history of science that were created by George Sarton, Derek J. de Solla Price and by Committee on University Education that was established in the 1970s. In the article one can find a specific reflection of Bogdan Suchodolski on popularizing the history of science through admitting its social role, making it the main element of educating 'the modern man' and teaching the branch in Poland. The author describes the above-mentioned stipulations in detail. At the same time, the last part of the paper reveals Polish thought in the field of disseminating the history of science in the inter-war period, so in times, when Bogdan Suchodolski was on the point of building his own idea. The author makes an attempt at showing to what extent Bogdan Suchodolski was inspired by one of the most famous Polish originators and precursors of a new branch 'science of science' - Florian Znaniecki. On this occasion the author draws definite conclusions concerning similarities and differences between the conception created by Bogdan Suchodolski, and the ideas that were put forward by his predecessor.
Twórcy
autor
  • Instytut Historii Nauki PAN, Warszawa
Bibliografia
  • B. Suchodolski: Rola historii nauki w szkolnictwie wyższym. „Życie Szkoły Wyższej” 1955 nr 5.
  • B. Suchodolski: O społeczną rolę historii nauki. KHNiT 1959 nr 1.
  • W. Osińska: O nauczaniu historii nauki. T. XCVI, Wrocław 1974.
  • D. J. de Solla Price: Węzłowe problemy historii nauki. Warszawa 1965.
  • H. I. Sharlin: Report on Undergraduate Education in the History of Science. Iowa 1975.
  • M. i St. Ossowscy: Nauka o nauce. „Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój” 1935 t. 20.
  • F. Znaniecki: Przedmiot i zadania nauki o wiedzy. „Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój” 1925 r. V.
  • B. Suchodolski: Model wykształconego Polaka (program studiów nad powszechnym kształceniem ogólnym - w perspektywie) [w:] Tenże: Model wykształconego Polaka. Wrocław 1980.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9dd5b2e6-c897-4a43-a4d1-5d21c9ee0235
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.