Impact point prediction guidance parametric study for 155 mm rocket assisted artillery projectile with lateral thrusters

• Autorzy: Szklarski Adrian , Głębocki Robert , Jacewicz Mariusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ame.2020.131682

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The modified configuration of the 155 mm rocket assisted projectile equipped with lateral thrusters was proposed. Six degree of freedom mathematical model was used to investigate the quality of the considered projectile. Impact point prediction guidance scheme intended for low control authority projectile was developed to minimize the dispersion radius. Simple point mass model was applied to calculate the impact point coordinates during the flight. Main motor time delay impact on range characteristics was investigated. Miss distance errors and Circular Error Probable for various lateral thruster total impulse were obtained. Monte-Carlo simulations proved that the impact point dispersion could be reduced significantly when the circular array of 15 solid propellant lateral thrusters was used. Single motor operation time was set to be 0.025 s. Finally, the warhead radii of destruction were analyzed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

lateral thruster; Monte-Carlo; impact point prediction

PL

Monte Carlo; przewidywanie punktu uderzenia

• Wydawca: Komitet Budowy Maszyn PAN
• Czasopismo: Archive of Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: LXVII, nr 1
• Strony: 31--56
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Szklarski Adrian

• Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warszaw University of Technology, Poland.

autor

Głębocki Robert

• Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warszaw University of Technology, Poland.

autor

Jacewicz Mariusz

• Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warszaw University of Technology, Poland.

Bibliografia

• [1] Z. Guodong. The Study of the Modeling simulation for the Rocket-Assisted Cartridge. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757- 899X/439/4/042038.
• [2] F.R. Gantmakher and L.M. Levin. The Flight of Uncontrolled Rockets. Pergamon Press Ltd., 1964.
• [3] E. Gagnon and M. Lauzon. Low cost guidance and control solution for in-service unguided 155 mm artillery shell. Technical Report 2008-333, DRDC Valcaltier, Canada, 2009.
• [4] E. Gagnon and A. Vachon. Efficiency analysis of Canards-based course correction fuze for a 155-mm spin-stabilized projectile. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 29(6):04016055, 2016. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000634.
• [5] B. Pavkovic, M. Pavic, and D. Cuk. Frequency-modulated pulse-jet control of an artillery rocket. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 49(2):286–294, 2012. doi: 10.2514/1.57432.
• [6] B. Pavkovic, M. Pavic and D. Cuk. Enhancing the precision of artillery rockets using pulsejet control systems with active damping. Scientific Technical Review, 62(2):10–19, 2012.
• [7] T. Jitpraphai, B. Burchett, and M. Costello. A comparison of different guidance schemes for a direct fire rocket with a pulse jet control mechanism. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 6-9 August, 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-4326.
• [8] N. Slegers. Model predictive control of a low speed munition. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Hilton Head, South Carolina, 20-23 August, 2007. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-6583.
• [9] D. Corriveau, P. Wey, and C. Berner. Thrusters pairing guidelines for trajectory corrections of projectiles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(4):1120–1128, 2011. doi: 10.2514/1.51811.
• [10] D. Corriveau, C. Berner, and V. Fleck. Trajectory correction using impulse thrusters for conventional artillery projectiles. Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 639–646, Tarragona, Spain, 16-20 April, 2007.
• [11] C. Kwiecień. A concept of the air drag law for spherical fragments prepared on the basis of AASTP-1 allied publication data. Issues of Armament Technology, 146(2):73–91, 2018.
• [12] A. Faryński, A. Długoł ˛ecki and Z. Ziółkowski. Measurements of characteristics of warhead fragments of the 70-mm air-to-ground unguided missile. Bulletin of the Military University of Technology, 57(3):173–180, 2008 (in Polish).
• [13] Military Handbook. Missile Flight Simulation. Part One. Surface-to-Air Missiles. Department of Defense, USA, 1995.
• [14] F. Fresconi and M. Ilg. Model predictive control of agile projectiles. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Minneapolis, USA, 13-16 August 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-4860.
• [15] P. Lichota and J. Szulczyk. Output error method for tiltrotor unstable in hover. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 64(1):23–36, 2017. doi: 10.1515/meceng-2017-0002.
• [16] P. Lichota, J. Szulczyk, M.B. Tischler, and T. Berger. Frequency responses identification from multi-axis maneuver with simultaneous multisine inputs. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 42(11):2550–2556, 2019. doi: 10.2514/1.G004346.
• [17] T. Jitpraphai and M. Costello. Dispersion reduction of a direct-fire rocket using lateral pulse jets. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 38(6):929–936, 2001. doi: 10.2514/2.3765.
• [18] EDePro. 155 mm Hybrid Rocket Assist – Base Bleed Artillery Projectile [Online]. Available: www.edepro.com/files/RABB_catalogue.pdf [20 08 2019].
• [19] U.S. Standard Atmosphere. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., USA, 1976.
• [20] F. Fresconi, G. Cooper, and M. Costello. Practical assessment of real-time impact point estimators for smart weapons. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 24(1):1–11, 2011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000044.
• [21] A. Elsaadany and Yi Wen-jun. Accurate trajectory prediction for typical artillery projectile. Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, pages 6368–6374, Nanjing, China, 28– 30 July, 2014. doi: 10.1109/ChiCC.2014.6896037.
• [22] R. McCoy. Modern Exterior Ballistics. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
• [23] B. Burchett and M. Costello. Model predictive lateral pulse jet control of an atmospheric rocket. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 25(5):860–867, 2002. doi: 10.2514/2.4979.
• [24] L. Hainz III and M. Costello. Modified projectile linear theory for rapid trajectory prediction. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 28(5):1006–1014, 2005. doi: 10.2514/1.8027.
• [25] F. Fresconi. Guidance and control of a projectile with reduced sensor and actuator requirements. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(6):1757–1766, 2011. doi: 10.2514/1.53584.
• [26] A. Calise and H. El-Shirbiny. An analysis of aerodynamic control for direct fire spinning projectiles. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-4217.
• [27] Y. Zhang, M. Gao, S. Yang, and D. Fang. Optimization of trajectory correction scheme for guided mortar projectiles. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015:ID618458, 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/618458.
• [28] W. Park, J. Yun, C.-K. Ryoo, and Y. Kim. Guidance law for a modern munition. International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems 2010, pages 2376–2379, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, 27-30 October, 2010.
• [29] M. Gross and M. Costello. Impact point model predictive control of a spin-stabilized projectile with instability protection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 228(12):2215–2225, 2014. doi: 10.1177/0954410013514743.
• [30] J. Rogers. Stochastic model predictive control for guided projectiles under impact area constraints. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 137(3):034503, 2015. doi: 10.1115/1.4028084.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).