PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Embracing cohousing: advancing socio-ecologicalhousing models for the future

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Znaczenie cohousing-u: rozwijanie społeczno-ekologicznych modeli mieszkaniowych przyszłości
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The existing challenges posed by sustainability, population aging, and social disconnection demand comprehensive actions from policymakers, organizations, and individuals. Cohousing offers a promising solution as an intelligent, sustainable, and socially oriented housing model that addresses these challenges simultaneously. This study aims to enhance our understanding of the successful creation, development, and management of cohousing communities. Through 19 in-depth interviews with representatives from nine communities across six countries, the data was analyzed using content analysis and the Atlas TI software. The findings stress the importance of raising public awareness, collaborating with policymakers and financial institutions, and involving skilled professionals. Additionally, the study highlights the pivotal role of management in the entire process of establishing and maintaining cohousing communities, as well as shaping their overall strategy.
PL
Istniejące wyzwania związane ze zrównoważonym rozwojem, starzeniem się społeczeństwa i wykluczeniem społecznym wymagają kompleksowych działań ze strony ustawodawców, organizacji i osób prywatnych. Cohousing oferuje obiecujące rozwiązanie jako inteligentny, zrównoważony i zorientowany społecznie model mieszkaniowy, który jednocześnie odpowiada na te wyzwania. Badanie to ma na celu lepsze zrozumienie skutecznego tworzenia, rozwoju i zarządzania społecznościami cohousingowymi. Na podstawie 19 dogłębnych wywiadów z przedstawicielami dziewięciu społeczności z sześciu krajów dane zostały przeanalizowane przy użyciu analizy treści i oprogramowania Atlas TI. Wyniki podkreślają znaczenie podnoszenia świadomości społecznej, współpracy z ustawodawcami i instytucjami finansowymi oraz angażowania wykwalifikowanych specjalistów. Ponadto badanie podkreśla kluczową rolę zarządzania w całym procesie tworzenia i utrzymywania wspólnot cohousingowych, a także kształtowania ich ogólnej strategii.
Rocznik
Strony
57--74
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr.47 poz.
Twórcy
Bibliografia
  • 1. ABF. (n.d.). Om os. https://www.abf-rep.dk/om-os/ ATLAS.TI., (2022). Turn your data into qualitative insights, faster and easier. https://atlasti.com/
  • 2. Azevedo, A. B., (2020). Como vivem os portugueses — população e famílias, alojamentos e habitação. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
  • 3. Bárrios, M. J., Marques, R. and Fernandes, A. A., (2020). Envelhecer com saúde: estratégias de ageing in place de uma população portuguesa com 65 anos ou mais. Revista de Saúde Pública, 54(129), 1–11.
  • 4. Beattie, A., (2021, February 23). Limited Liability Partnership (LLP): The https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/090214/limited-liability-partnership-llp-basics.asp
  • 5. Blomberg, I., Kärnekull, K., (2019). Do-it-yourself: the stony road to cohousing in Sweden. Built Environment, 45(3), 280-295.
  • 6. Braun, V., Clarke, V., (2013). Successfull qualitative research: a pratical guide for begginers. SAGE.
  • 7. Brysch, S., (2018). Por uma habitação colaborativa em Portugal. Revista Punkto. https://www.revistapunkto.com/2018/03/por-uma-habitacao-colaborativa-em.html
  • 8. Burgess, G., Karampour, K., (2020). Leasehold and freehold charges. Summary of research findings. Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research. Christian, D. L., Herson, D., Butcher, A. and Bates, A., (2016). Legal structures for intentional communities in USA. Communities, 173, 46-55.
  • 9. Czischke, D., (2017). Collaborative housing and housing providers: Towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1-27.
  • 10. Czischke, D., Carriou, C. and Lang, R., (2020). Collaborative housing in Europe: Conceptualizing the field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 1-9.
  • 11. Durrett, C., (2009). The senior cohousing handbook: a community approach to independent living (2nd ed.). New Society Publisher.
  • 12. Durrett, C., (2010). Cohousing as a building block to the ecovillage: case study of Yarrow Ecovillage, Canada. In D. U. Vestbro (Ed.), Living together: Cohousing ideas and realities around the world. Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5-9 May 2010 (pp. 56-70). Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
  • 13. Egerö, B., (2010). Cohousing: issues and challenges. In D. U. Vestbro (Ed.), Living together:cohousing ideas and realities around the world. Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 (pp. 11-20). Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
  • 14. Evans, I. E. M., Martyr, A., Collins, R., Brayne, C. and Clare, L., (2019). Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 70(s1), S119-S144.
  • 15. Fonseca, A. M., (2018). Boas práticas de ageing in place. Divulgar para valorizar. Guia de boas práticas. (Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian and Faculdade de Educação e Psicologia-Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Eds.).
  • 16. Fonseca, A. M., (2021). Ageing in place. Envelhecimento em casa e na comunidade. (Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian and Faculdade de Educação e Psicologia Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Eds.)).
  • 17. Foundation for Intentional Community. (2021). What is an intentional community? https://www.ic.org/foundation-for-intentional-community/
  • 18. Freitas, F., Ribeiro, J., Brandão, C., Souza, F. N. de, and Costa, A. P., (2017). Experiência de utilizador em pacotes de software de análise qualitativa: da usabilidade à (auto)aprendizagem. In A. P. Costa, M. C. Sánchez-Gómez, and M. V. M. Cilleros (Eds.), A prática na investigação qualitativa: exemplos de estudos (pp. 138-163). Ludomedia. https://iconline.ipleiria.pt/bitstream/10400.8/4885/1/ebook_Pratica_Investigacao_Qualit ativa_PT Capitulo 6.pdf
  • 19. Fromm, D., (1991). Collaborative communities. cohousing, central living and other new forms of housing with shared facilities. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • 20. Gómez, D. L., Canal, M. E. and Montalà, L. F., (2020). Havens and heavens of ageing-in- community: home, care and age in senior co-housing. In B. Pasveer, O. Synnes, and I. Moser (Eds.), Ways of Home Making in Care for Later Life (pp. 159-181). Health, Technology and Society.
  • 21. Hayes, A., (2020, December 24). Limited Company (LC). Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/limited_company.asp
  • 22. Hopwood, H., Mann, F., (2018). A novel cohousing project for older women and implications for loneliness. GM. https://www.gmjournal.co.uk/a-novel-cohousing-project-for-older- women-and-implications-for-loneliness-part-2
  • 23. Hunt, S. S., (2007). Cohousing for stages of an aging Britain. ENHR 2007 International Conference ‘Sustainable Urban Areas’. Workshop: housing and Social Theory, 1-12. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/17300527.pdf
  • 24. IBABC., (2020). Strata insurance. What you need to know to protect your strata property investment. Chuck Byrne.
  • 25. Jakobsen, P., Larsen, H. G., (2019). An alternative for whom? The evolution and socio-economy of Danish cohousing. Urban Research and Practice, 12(4), 414-430.
  • 26. Kang, M., Lyon, M. and Kramp, J., (2015). Senior cohousing residential design features for perceived autonomy well-being. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 258-265.
  • 27. Vestbro (Ed.), Living together: cohousing ideas and realities around the world.Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5-9 May 2010 (pp. 124–132). Division of Urban and Regional Studies, KTH, and Kollektivhus NU.
  • 28. Kristensen, H., (2007). Housing in Denmark. Centre for Housing and Welfare – Realdania Research. Lang, R., Carriou, C. and Czischke, D., (2020). Collaborative housing research (19902-017): a systematic review and thematic analysis of the field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 10-39.
  • 29. Lara, E., Martín-María, N., De la Torre-Luque, A., Koyanagi, A., Vancampfort, D., Izquierdo, A. and Miret, M., (2019). Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Research Reviews, 52, 7-16.
  • 30. Lietaert, M., (2010). Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 576-580.
  • 31. Lubik, A., Kosatsky, T., (2019). Public health should promote co-operative housing and cohousing. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 110(2), 121-126.
  • 32. McCamant, K., Durrett, C., (2011). Creating cohousing. Building sustainable communities. New Society Publishers.
  • 33. OECD., (2021). Brick by brick: bulding better housing policies.
  • 34. Priest, I., (2015). Different kind of living. RIBA Journal, 122(10), 54. https://www.ribaj.com/intelligence/different-kind-of-living
  • 35. Puplampu, V., Matthews, E., Puplampu, G., Gross, M., Pathak, S. and Peters, S., (2019). The impact of cohousing on older adults’ quality of life. Canadian Journal on Aging, 39(3),406-420.
  • 36. Rašticová, M., Birčiaková, N., Bédiová, M. and Mikušová, J., (2019). Older workers economic activity and the health status: the implication of age management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 322-337.
  • 37. Realdania., (2020). 10 examples of new Danish cohousing communities for seniors. Realdania.
  • 38. Rosa, M. J. V., (2020). Um tempo sem idades: ensaio sobre envelhecimento da população. Tinta da China.
  • 39. Ruiu, M. L., (2016). The social capital of cohousing communities. Sociology, 50(2), 400-415.
  • 40. Scanlon, K., Arrigoitia, M. F., (2015). Development of new cohousing: lessons from a London scheme for the over-50s. Urban Research and Practice, 8(1), 106-121.
  • 41. ScottHanson, C., ScottHanson, K., (2005). The cohousing handbook. Building a place for community. New Society Publishers.
  • 42. Tsai, S. Y., Ou, C. H., (2017). A research of the senior cognition on the co-housing building type. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 865, 275-281.
  • 43. Tummers, L., (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how? Urban Research and Practice, 8(1), 64-78.
  • 44. UK Cohousing Network., (2021). Cohousing in the UK and worldwide. https://cohousing.org.uk/cohousing-in-the-uk-and-worldwide/
  • 45. Vestbro, D. U., (2010). Concepts and terminology. In D. U. Vestbro (Ed.), Living together: cohousing ideas and realities around the world. Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 (pp. 21-29). Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
  • 46. Wang, J., Hadjri, K., (2017). The role of co-housing in building sustainable communities: case studies from the UK. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6), 255-265.
  • 47. Zając-Jendryczka, A., (2013). Sketch to the picture of a Pole in the retirement age in the period of entering the euro zone: aspirations and threads. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 1(2), 88-97.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9d97ad42-b60d-4df2-b904-beb4e7a95acf
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.