Crane selection problem in assembly works planning – criteria relevance and methods

• Autorzy: Marcinkowski R. , Banach M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2020.134403

Warianty tytułu

PL

Kryteria i metody wyboru rodzaju żurawi budowalnych w planowaniu robót montażowych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Crane selection is an important issue in assembly works planning. Tower and telescopic, stationary and mobile cranes used in construction have essentially different properties. Assembly planning begins in analyzing the possibilities of assembly with a given crane. This is called technical aspect of crane selection. Cranes that meet the technical criteria are then analyzed in terms of other criteria related to the effectiveness of their use on the construction site. The article presents the assessment of the selection criteria and the method of crane selection itself. Surveys conducted among construction managers and planners in Polish companies dealing with assembly works allowed to determine the significance of the selection criteria. For this purpose, an example using SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) and FSAW (Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting) methods was presented. They also allowed to propose a technique for determining preferences in the use of selected construction cranes. The aim of the research was to increase the usability of computer applications supporting assembly planning by acquiring expert knowledge for the initial selection of organizational solutions.

PL

Przedmiotem artykułu jest problem wyboru maszyn do wykonania robót montażowych. Wybór ten realizowany jest metodami MCDA, do których stosowania wykorzystuje się oceny rozwiązań przez pryzmat istotnych kryteriów z określeniem ich wag. W pracy przedstawiono wyniki badań ankietowych i ich analizę ustalające istotność i wagi kryteriów. Przeprowadzono badania wśród kierowników robót oraz planistów w polskich przedsiębiorstwach zajmujących się prowadzeniem robót montażowych, ustalając istotność 14 kryteriów - 9 technologicznych i 5 związanych z preferencjami wykonawców lub czynnikami ekonomiczno-rynkowymi. Celem badań ankietowych było ustalenie miar istotności kryteriów decydujących o wyborze rodzaju żurawi budowlanych, oraz ocena żurawi względem tych kryteriów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

assembly; assembly planning; construction crane; MCDA; multi-criteria decision analysis; criteria relevance

PL

montaż; planowanie montażu; dźwig budowlany; MCDA; kryterium wyboru; analiza wielokryterialna decyzji

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 66, nr 3
• Strony: 377--390
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Marcinkowski R.

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Mechanics and Petrochemistry, Płock

autor

Banach M.

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Mechanics and Petrochemistry, Płock

Bibliografia

• 1. M. Banach, „Interaktywna metoda planowania robót montażowych w budownictwie prefabrykowanym”, PhD Thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, 2019.
• 2. R. Marcinkowski, M. Banach, “Optimization of the location of a car crane for performing the installation of the structure”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. LXI, no. 4, pp 187–198, 2015.
• 3. A.S. Hanna, W.B. Lotfallah, “A fuzzy logic approach to the selection of cranes”, Autom. Constr., No. 8 (5), pp 597–608, 1999.
• 4. A. Sawhney, A. Mund, “Adaptive probabilistic neural network-based crane type selection system”, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., No. 128(3), pp 265–273, 2002.
• 5. C.M. Tam, T.K.L. Tong, W.K.W. Chan, “Genetic algorithm for optimizing supply locations around tower crane”, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., No. 127 (4), pp 315–321, 2001.
• 6. A. Shapira, F. ASCE, M. Goldenberg, “Soft” Considerations in Equipment Selection for Building Construction Projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE, 2007.
• 7. D. Dalalah, F. AL-Oqla, M. Hayajneh, “Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes”, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, vol 4, no. 5, November, pp 567-578, 2010.
• 8. E. Szafranko, “Evaluation of data obtained from expert opinions in multi-criteria analyses of construction investment variants”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. LXII, no. 2, pp 205–216, 2016.
• 9. E. Radziszewska-Zielina, “The application of multi-criteria analysis in the evaluation of partnering relations and the selection of a construction company for the purposes of cooperation”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. LXII, no. 2, pp 167–182, 2016.
• 10. V. Podvezko, “Comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS”, Inžinerinė ekonomika, 22 (2), p. 134-146. ISSN 1392-2785, 2011.
• 11. J. Rosłoń, M. Seroka, “Multicriteria selection of water insulation technology for foundation walls in an existing building”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. LXII, no. 3, pp 167–176, 2016.
• 12. P. Nowak, M. Skłodkowski, “Multicriteria analysis of selected building thermal insulation solutions”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. LXII, no. 3, pp 137–148, 2016.
• 13. F. Dell'Anna, M. Bottero, C. Becchio, S. Corgnati, G. Mondini, "Designing a decision support system to evaluate the environmental and extra-economic performances of a nearly zero-energy building", Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2019-0121, 2020.
• 14. R. Marcinkowski, M. Banach, “Computer Aided Assembly of Buildings”. Buidlings, vol. 20, no. 2, pp 1-20, 2020, DOI:10.3390/buildings10020028
• 15. E. Roszkowska, “Rank ordering criteria weighting methods – a comparative overview”, Optimum, Studia Ekonomiczne, Nr 5(65), pp 14-31, 2013.
• 16. L. Hongjiu, H. Yanrong, “An evaluating method with combined assigning-weight based on maximizing variance”, Journal Scientific Programming Volume, No. 3, 2015.
• 17. A. Krawczyńska-Piechna, “An analysis of the decisive criteria in formwork selection problem”, Archives of civil engineering, Vol. LXII Issue 1, 2016.
• 18. N. Deepa, K. Ganesan, B. Sethuramasamyraja, “Predictive mathematical model for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Neural Computing and Applications, No. 4, pp 1-14, 2018.
• 19. N. Ibadov, J. Rosłon, “Technology selection for construction project, with the use of fuzzy preference relation”, Archives of civil engineering, Vol. LXI Issue 3, 2015