Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
There are many scientific studies related to the functioning of safety management systems, but they often focus on situations within business entities. The area of safety, however, is also shaped by advisory institutions, publishers, universities and regulators. In this study, we described the interface between the railway safety regulator in one of the EU Member States and the business entities supervised by it. In order to achieve this, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with the regulator's employees responsible for performing inspections. It can be concluded that an inspection resembles a theatre stage where everyone plays their part. During an inspection, inspectors adopt the approach of an advisor or a guard, depending on their subjective feelings about the course of the inspection. The obtained results were discussed along with the regulator's management and used to assess the effectiveness of the activities undertaken by the regulator in the given area during the last few years.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
17--30
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- TechSolutions sp. z o. o.; Świętego Michała 43, 61-110 Poznań, Poland
autor
- Poznan University of Technology; pl. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
autor
- Poznan University of Technology; pl. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
autor
- Office of Rail Transport; Al. Jerozolimskie 134, 02-305 Warszawa, Poland
autor
- Office of Rail Transport; Al. Jerozolimskie 134, 02-305 Warszawa, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Almklov, P.G. & Rosness, R. & Størkersen, K. When safety science meets the practitioners: Does safety science contribute to marginalization of practical knowledge? Safety Science. 2014. No. 67. P. 25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.025.
- 2. Bruhn, A. The inspector’s dilemma under regulated self-regulation. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. 2006. Vol. 4(2). P. 3-23. DOI: 10.1080/14774003.2006.11667679.
- 3. Burdzik, R. & Nowak, B. & Rozmus, J. & Słowiñski, P. & et al. Safety in the railway industry. Archives of Transport. 2017. No. 44(4). P. 15-24. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.6158.
- 4. Ciuk, S. & Latusek-Jurczak, D. Etyka w badaniach jakościowych. In: Jemielniak, D. (Ed.) Badania Jakościowe. Tom 1: Podejścia i Teorie. [In Polish: Ethics in qualitative research. In: Jemielniak, D. (Ed.). Qualitative Research. Volume 1: Approaches and Theories]. PWN Scientific Publishing House. Warsaw. 2012. 252 p.
- 5. Le Coze, J.C. How safety culture can make us think. Safety Science. 2019. No. 118. P. 221-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.026.
- 6. Dekker, S. The safety anarchist: relying on human expertise and innovation, reducing bureaucracy and compliance. Routledge. New York, 2018. ISBN: 9781138300446.
- 7. Dekker, S.W.A. Foundations of Safety Science. A Century of Understanding Accidents and Disasters. Routledge. London, 2019. ISBN: 9781351059794.
- 8. Dekker, S.W.A. Just Culture: Restoring Trust and Accountability in Your Organization. CRC Press. 2016. ISBN: 978-1472475787.
- 9. Flick, U. Designing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. 2008. ISBN: 978-0761949763.
- 10. Forseth, U. & Rosness, R. Paradoxes of power: Dialogue as a regulatory strategy in the Norwegian oil and gas industry. Safety Science. 2021. No. 139. P. 105120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105120.
- 11. Gawande, A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right. Picador. 2010. ISBN: 978-0312430009.
- 12. Gill, A. Warstwowe modele systemów bezpieczeństwa do zastosowań w transporcie szynowym. [In Polish: Layered models of safety systems for applications in rail transport]. Poznań University of Technology Publishing House. Poznań. 2018. ISBN: 978-83-7775-517-4.
- 13. Glinka, B. & Hensel, P. Pułapki i dylematy w badaniach jakościowych. In: Jemielniak, D. (ed.). Badania Jakościowe. Tom 1: Podejścia i Teorie. [In Polish: Pitfalls and dilemmas in qualitative research. In: Jemielniak, D. (Ed.) Qualitative Research. Vol. 1: Approaches and Theories]. PWN Scientific Publishing House. Warsaw. 2012. P. 252.
- 14. Hale, A.R. & Heming, B.H.J. & Carthey, J. & Kirwan, B. Modelling of safety management systems. Safety Science 1997. No. 26(1-2). P. 121-140. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00034-9.
- 15. Hollnagel, E. Safety-I and safety-II: the past and future of safety management. CRC Press. 2014. ISBN: 9781472423085.
- 16. Høyland, S. & Aase, K. & Hollund, J.G. & Haugen, A.S. What is it about checklists? Exploring safe work practices in surgical teams. In: Bieder, C. & Bourrier, M. (Eds.). Trapping Safety into Rules: How Desirable or Avoidable Is Proceduralization? CRC Press. 2013. P. 121-138.
- 17. Hubbard, D.W. The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It. Wiley, 2020. ISBN: 978-1-119-52203-4.
- 18. International Civil Aviation Organization. Safety Management Manual. Ed. 4th. 2018. ISBN: 978-92-9258-552-5.
- 19. Jabłoński, A. & Jabłoński, M. Mechanizmy kształtowania kultury bezpieczeństwa w transporcie kolejowym. Czynnik ludzki i organizacyjny. [In Polish: Mechanisms for shaping safety culture in rail transport. Human and organizational factors]. CeDeWu. 2020. ISBN: 9788381023917.
- 20. Le Coze, J.-C. & Journé, B. The Regulator–Regulatee Relationship in High-Hazard Industry Sectors. Springer Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-49570-0.
- 21. Jeffcott, S. & Pidgeon, N. & Weyman, A. & Walls, J. Risk, trust, and safety culture in U.K. train operating companies. Risk Analysis. 2006. No. 26(5). P. 1105-1121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00819.x.
- 22. King, N. & Horrocks, C. & Brooks, J. Interviews in Qualitative Research. 2018. ISBN: 9781473987685.
- 23. Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications Ltd. 2008. ISBN: 978-0761925415.
- 24. Larouzee, J. & Le Coze, J.C. Good and bad reasons: The Swiss cheese model and its critics. Safety Science. 2020. No. 126 (February). Paper No. 104660. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104660.
- 25. Lindhout, P. & Reniers, G. Risk validation by the regulator in Seveso companies: Assessing the unknown. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2017. No. 49. P. 78-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.020.
- 26. Mortimore, S.E. & Wallace, C.A. HACCP: A food industry briefing. Wiley Blackwell. 2015. ISBN: 9781118427231.
- 27. Øyri, S.F. & Braut, G.S. & Macrae, C. & Wiig, S. Investigating hospital supervision: a case study of regulatory inspectors’ roles as potential co-creators of resilience. Journal of Patient Safety. 2021. Vol. 17(2). P. 122-130. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000814.
- 28. Power, M. The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press. Oxford, 1997.
- 29. Provan, D.J. & Dekker, S.W.A. & Rae, A.J. Benefactor or burden: Exploring the professional identity of safety professionals. Journal of Safety Research. 2018. No. 66. P. 21-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.05.005.
- 30. Rae, A.J. & Provan, D.J. & Weber, D.E. & Dekker, S.W.A. Safety clutter: the accumulation and persistence of ‘safety’ work that does not contribute to operational safety. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. 2018. No. 16(2). P. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/14773996.2018.1491147.
- 31. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society - A modelling problem. Safety Science. 1997. No. 27(2-3). P. 183-213.
- 32. Reason, J.T. Human error. Cambridge University Press. 1990. ISBN: 0521314194.
- 33. Smoczyński, P. & Gill, A. & Motyl, M. & Babiak, A. How to do it with sticky notes: a method for exploring expert knowledge to prepare guidelines for practice in railway vehicle maintenance. Transport Problems. 2021. No. 16(1). P. 153-164. DOI: 10.21307/tp-2021-013.
- 34. Størkersen, K. & Thorvaldsen, T. & Kongsvik, T. & Dekker, S. How deregulation can become overregulation: An empirical study into the growth of internal bureaucracy when governments take a step back. Safety Science. 2020. No. 128. P. 104772. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104772.
- 35. Symon, G. & Cassel, C. Qualitative organizational research. Core Methods and Current Challenges. SAGE Publications Ltd. 2012. ISBN: 9781446258279.
- 36. Szaciłło, L. & Krześniak, M. & Jasiński, D. & Valis, D. The use of the risk matrix method for assessing the risk of implementing rail freight services. Archives of Transport. 2022. No. 64(4). P. 89-106. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1185.
- 37. IEC 61508. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9d5425b6-553f-448b-aab0-7baba419b82e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.