Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
A comparative study was conducted for differentiating between attached and suspended growth, represented by a lab-scale biotrickling filter and bio-scrubber under anoxic conditions, respectively. However, malodorous ethanethiol gas (ET) that was categorized as one of the volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) was studied using a variety of settings and parameters. In contrast, NO3− can be used as an electron acceptor in the bioconversion of ET gas to elemental sulfur and/or sulfate when no oxygen is available. Empty bed residence times (EBRTs), gas to liquid ratios (G/Ls) (40, 60, 80, 100, 150), and inlet concentrations (150, 300, 800, and 1500 mg/m3) were all investigated in relation to ET removal efficiency (RE) (30, 60, 90, and 120 s). While the G/L ratio of 80 resulted in efficient ET removal (more than 90.8% for 150 mg/m3 of inlet concentration), it could only achieve the extraction of 80.6% for 1500 mg/m3 of inlet concentration at a fixed EBRT of 60 s. These results were based on the performance of a lab-scale anoxic biotrickling filter. Even though mass transfer constraints and poor solubility of ET were factors, the performance of the biotrickling filter under anoxic settings was superior to that of the bioscrubber and improved the low oxidation rates of ET.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
255--268
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Mosul, 41001, Mosul, Iraq
- Department of Environmental Technology, College of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Mosul, 41001, Mosul, Iraq
autor
- Department of Mining Engineering, College of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, University of Mosul, 41001, Mosul, Iraq
autor
- Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Mosul, 41001, Mosul, Iraq
autor
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey
Bibliografia
- 1. Abawi, S.A., Hassan, M.S. 1984. practical engineering of the environment - water tests. Dar alkutub wa altebaa wa alnasher, University of Mosul, in Arabic.
- 2. Abdehagh, N., Namini, M., Heydarian, S., Bonakdarpour, B., Zare, D. 2011. Performance of a biotrickling filter employing Thiobacillus thioparus immobilized on polyurethane foam for hydrogen sulfide removal. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 8(3), 245-254.
- 3. Akmirza, I., Carvajal, A., Muñoz, R., Lebrero, R. 2016. Interactions between BTEX compounds during their anoxic degradation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 54, 115-120.
- 4. Akmirza, I., Pascual, C., Carvajal, A., Pérez, R., Muñoz, R., Lebrero, R. 2017. Anoxic biodegradation of BTEX in a biotrickling filter. J Science of the Total Environment, 587, 457-465.
- 5. An, T., Wan, S., Li, G., Sun, L., Guo, B. 2010. Comparison of the removal of ethanethiol in twin-biotrickling filters inoculated with strain RG-1 and B350 mixed microorganisms. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183(1), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.035
- 6. APHA, AWWA and WEF. 1999. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, 20th ed., 15-16. Retrieved from, http://www.standardmethods.org/
- 7. Arellano‐García, L., González‐Sánchez, A., Baquerizo, G., Hernández‐Jiménez, S., Revah, S. 2010. Treatment of carbon disulfide and ethanethiol vapors in alkaline biotrickling filters using an alkaliphilic sulfo‐oxidizing bacterial consortium. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 85(3), 328-335.
- 8. Baspinar, A., Turker, M., Hocalar, A., Ozturk, I. 2011. Biogas desulphurization at technical scale by lithotrophic denitrification: Integration of sulphide and nitrogen removal. Process Biochemistry, 46(4), 916-922.
- 9. Chen, J., Jiang, L., Sha, H. 2006. Removal efficiency of high-concentration H2S in a pilot-scale biotrickling filter. Environmental technology, 27(7), 759-766.
- 10. Demeestere, K., Dewulf, J., De Witte, B., Van Langenhove, H. 2005. Titanium dioxide mediated heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of gaseous dimethyl sulfide: Parameter study and reaction pathways. J Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 60(1-2), 93-106.
- 11. Doğan, E.C., Türker, M., Dağaşan, L., Arslan, A. 2012. Simultaneous sulfide and nitrite removal from industrial wastewaters under denitrifying conditions. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering, 17(3), 661-668.
- 12. Dumont, E. 2015. H2S removal from biogas using bioreactors: a review. J International Journal of Energy Environnement, 6(5), 479-498.
- 13. Fortuny, M., Gamisans, X., Deshusses, M.A., Lafuente, J., Casas, C., Gabriel, D. 2011. Operational aspects of the desulfurization process of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters. water research, 45(17), 5665-5674.
- 14. Giri, B.S., Kim, K.H., Pandey, R., Cho, J., Song, H., Kim, Y.S. 2014. Review of biotreatment techniques for volatile sulfur compounds with an emphasis on dimethyl sulfide. J Process Biochemistry, 49(9), 1543-1554.
- 15. Hernández, J., Lafuente, J., Prado, Ó., Gabriel, D. 2012. Simultaneous removal of H2S, NH3, and ethyl mercaptan in biotrickling filters packed with poplar wood and polyurethane foam: impact of pH during startup and crossed effects evaluation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(6), 3485-3497.
- 16. Janssen, A., van den Bosch, P.L., van Leerdam, R.C., de Graaff, M. 2013. Bioprocesses for the removal of volatile sulfur compounds from gas streams. J Air pollution prevention control: bioreactors bioenergy, 247-274.
- 17. Kennes, C., Thalasso, F. 1998. Waste gas biotreatment technology. J Journal of Chemical Technology Biotechnolog, 72(4), 303-319.
- 18. Kraakman, N.J., Rocha-Rios, J., van Loosdrecht, M.C. 2011. Review of mass transfer aspects for biological gas treatment. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 91(4), 873.
- 19. Li, X., Jiang, X., Zhou, Q., Jiang, W. 2016. Effect of S/N ratio on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas in anoxic bioreactors. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 180(5), 930-944.
- 20. Mahmood, Q., Zheng, P., Cai, J., Wu, D., Hu, B., Li, J. 2007. Anoxic sulfide biooxidation using nitrite as electron acceptor. J Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147(1-2), 249-256.
- 21. Mhemid, R.K.S., Akmirza, I., Shihab, M.S., Turker, M., Alp, K. 2019. Ethanethiol gas removal in an anoxic bio-scrubber. Journal of environmental management, 233, 612-625.
- 22. Mundy, A. 1991. The determination of dimethyl sulphide in beer by headspace gas chromatography – a collaborative investigation of precision. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 97(1), 45-46.
- 23. Muñoz, R., Souza, T.S., Glittmann, L., Pérez, R., Quijano, G. 2013. Biological anoxic treatment of O2-free VOC emissions from the petrochemical industry: A proof of concept study. J Journal of hazardous materials, 260, 442-450.
- 24. Pagella, C., Silvestri, P., De Faveri, D. 1996. Hydrogen sulphide removal with a biochemical process: the biological step. J Chemical biochemical engineering quarterly, 10.
- 25. Pokorna, D., Carceller, J.M., Paclik, L., Zabranska, J. 2015. Biogas cleaning by hydrogen sulfide scrubbing and bio-oxidation of captured sulfides. Energy & Fuels, 29(7), 4058-4065.
- 26. Potivichayanon, S., Pokethitiyook, P., Kruatrachue, M. 2006. Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system. Process Biochemistry, 41(3), 708-715.
- 27. Rappert, S., Müller, R. 2005. Odor compounds in waste gas emissions from agricultural operations and food industries. Waste Management, 25(9), 887-907.
- 28. Salamanca, D., Dobslaw, D., Engesser, K.-H. 2017. Removal of cyclohexane gaseous emissions using a biotrickling filter system. Chemosphere, 176, 97-107.
- 29. Shihab, M.S., Alp, K., Türker, M., Akmirza, I., Mhemid, R.K. 2018. Removal of ethanethiol using a biotrickling filter with nitrate as an electron acceptor. Environmental technology, 1-15.
- 30. Sun, Y., Qiu, J., Chen, D., Ye, J., Chen, J. 2016. Characterization of the novel dimethyl sulfide-degrading bacterium Alcaligenes sp. SY1 and its biochemical degradation pathway. J Journal of hazardous materials, 304, 543-552.
- 31. Tangerman, A. 2009. Measurement and biological significance of the volatile sulfur compounds hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol and dimethyl sulfide in various biological matrices. Journal of Chromatography B, 877(28), 3366-3377.
- 32. Turker, M., Baspinar, A.B., Hocalar, A. 2012. Monitoring and control of biogas desulphurization using oxidation reduction potential under denitrifiying conditions. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 87(5), 682-688.
- 33. Wan, S., Li, G., An, T., Guo, B. 2011. Co-treatment of single, binary and ternary mixture gas of ethanethiol, dimethyl disulfide and thioanisole in a biotrickling filter seeded with Lysinibacillus sphaericus RG-1. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186(2-3), 1050-1057.
- 34. Wang, P., Peng, S., Zhu, C., Zhang, X., Teng, F. 2015. Removal of ethanethiol gas by iron oxide porous ceramsite biotrickling filter. Journal of Chemistry. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/414237
- 35. Yavuz, B., Türker, M., Engin, G.Ö. 2007. Autotrophic removal of sulphide from industrial wastewaters using oxygen and nitrate as electron acceptors. J Environmental Engineering Science, 24(4), 457-470.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9d14f9de-1102-4c87-8703-d8ea1b1fff5d