Interaction of irregularities in the standard of surveying and cartographic documentation with rail transport problems: a case study

• Autorzy: Kampczyk Arkadiusz , Rombalska Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2023.18.3.06

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Surveying (geodesy) and cartographic documentation, their types, and their flow (circulation) are the basis for the uniformity of the work carried out in the pre-design, design, and execution of construction works, ultimately having a representation in the operational (exploitation) and maintenance of railway infrastructure. The type and circulation of surveying and cartographic documentation constitute an important element for the transport sector. The aim of the present scientific research work was to define the state of irregularity of the standard of uniform surveying-cartographic documentation, their type, and their circulation (Ig-1) in interaction with rail transport problems. A case study method was used corresponding to a factual description, which aimed to analyze and evaluate the existing standard. This is important from a theoretical and, above all, a practical point of view. The results show an extensive space of irregularities occurring, violating legal regulations and professional ethics. At the same time, good practice solutions have been implemented to optimize the negative impact when interacting with rail transport problems. The authors’ position on the irregularities was forwarded to an infrastructure manager. The irregularities that occur significantly contribute to the limitations of surveying and cartographic documentation harmonization, and these have an impact on fully functional rail transport.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

irregularities; surveying; geodesy; cartography; railway areas; efficiency of railway infrastructure

PL

nieprawidłowości; pomiary; geodezja; kartografia; tereny kolejowe; efektywność infrastruktury kolejowej

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: T. 18, z. 3
• Strony: 65--76
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kampczyk Arkadiusz

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy, and Environmental Engineering, Department of Engineering Surveying and Civil Engineering; al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-9668

autor

Rombalska Katarzyna

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy, and Environmental Engineering, Department of Engineering Surveying and Civil Engineering; al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-0562

Bibliografia

• 1. Dybeł, K. & Kampczyk, A. Symbols and codes used in the cartographic documentation of railway areas. Railway Reports. 2019. Vol. 63. No. 182. P. 115-129.
• 2. Królikowski, K. & Hydzik, J. Wskazanie niespójności obowiązujących przepisów, instrukcji i innych aktów prawnych, które powodują brak uzyskania jednolitości wykonawstwa projektowego i realizacji robót budowlanych, a w efekcie skutków eksploatacyjnych i utrzymaniowych infrastruktury kolejowej. Zeszyty Naukowo-Techniczne Stowarzyszenia Inżynierów i Techników Komunikacji w Krakowie. Seria: Materiały Konferencyjne. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 110. P. 231-256. [In Polish: Indication of inconsistencies in existing regulations, instructions and other legislation that result in a failure to achieve uniformity in design execution and construction works and, consequently, in the operational and maintenance effects of the railway infrastructure].
• 3. Types and Circulation of Surveying-Cartographic Documentation in PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. Ig-1: 2015. Available at: https://www.plk-sa.pl/klienci-i-kontrahenci/akty-prawne-i- przepisy/instrukcje-pkp-polskich-linii-kolejowych-sa/geodezja-kolejowa.
• 4. Krusenvik, L. Using case studies as a scientific method: advantages and disadvantages. 2016. P. 1-11. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1054643&dswid=-9255.
• 5. Szaciłło, L. & Jacyna, M. & Szczepański, E. & Izdebski, M. Risk assessment for rail freight transport operations. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2021. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 476-488. DOI: 10.17531/ein.2021.3.8.
• 6. Babishin, V. & Taghipour, S. An algorithm for estimating the effect of maintenance on aggregated covariates with application to railway switch point machines. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2019. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 619-630. DOI: 10.17531/ein.2019.4.11.
• 7. Konowrocki, R. & Chojnacki, A. Analysis of rail vehicles’ operational reliability in the aspect of safety against derailment based on various methods of determining the assessment criterion. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 73-85. DOI: 10.17531/ein.2020.1.9.
• 8. Song, H. & Schnieder, E. Modeling of railway system maintenance and availability by means of Colored Petri nets. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 236-243. DOI: 10.17531/ein.2018.2.08.
• 9. Tosti, F. & Gagliardi, V. & D’Amico, F. & Alani, A. M. Transport infrastructure monitoring by data fusion of GPR and SAR imagery information. Transportation Research Procedia. 2020. Vol. 45. P. 771-778. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.097.
• 10. Soilán, M. & Sánchez-Rodríguez, A. & del Río-Barral, P. & Perez-Collazo, C. & Arias, P. & Riveiro, B. Review of laser scanning technologies and their applications for road and railway infrastructure monitoring. Infrastructures. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 4. Article ID 58. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures4040058.
• 11. Cai, B. & Wu, B. & Lu, D. Survey of performance evaluation standardization and research methods on GNSS‐based localization for railways. Chinese Journal of Electronics. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 22-33. DOI: 10.1049/cje.2019.09.003.
• 12. D’Amico, F. & Gagliardi, V. & Ciampoli, L. B. & Tosti, F. Integration of InSAR and GPR techniques for monitoring transition areas in railway bridges. NDT & E International. 2020. Vol. 115. Article ID 102291. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102291.
• 13. Yu, H. & Zhang, G. & Ran, Y. & Li, M. & Wang, Y. A comprehensive and practical reliability allocation method considering failure effects and reliability costs. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 244-251. DOI: 10.17531/ein.2018.2.09.
• 14. Restel, F.J. Impact of infrastructure type on reliability of railway transportation system. Journal of KONBiN. 2013. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 21-36. 10.2478/jok-2013-0065.
• 15. Niu, H. & Hou, T. Fast detection study of foreign object intrusion on railway track. Archives of Transport. 2018. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 79-89. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.6510.
• 16. Fiedukowicz, A. & Głażewski, A. & Kowalski, P.J. & Olszewski, R. & Pillich-Kolipińska A. Problematyka efektywności przekazu kartograficznego na przykładzie map topograficznych nowej generacji. Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny. 2014. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 129-139. [In Polish: Effectiveness of cartographic presentation in the new generation of topographic maps].
• 17. Wardziak, A. Kolej na geodezję. Magazyn Geoinformacyjny Geodeta. 2017. Vol. 271. No. 12. P. 18-22. [In Polish: It is the turn of geodesy].
• 18. Połoński, M. & Kowalski, J. The identification of hazards concerning the character of construction works on railway sites in Poland. Technical Transactions. 2017. Vol. 114. No. 5. P. 47-55. DOI: 10.4467/2353737XCT.17.068.6425.
• 19. Act of 17 May 1989 Geodetic and Cartographic Law (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 1990). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19890300163.
• 20. Regulation of the Minister of Development, Labour and Technology of 23 July 2021 on the Database of Topographic Objects and the Basic Map (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 1385). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19890300163.
• 21. Act of 28 March 2003 on Railway Transport (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 1984). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20030860789.
• 22. Gabara, G. & Mroczkowski, K. & Pomiankowska-Wronka, A. Analysis of kinematic measurement of railway track geometrical parameters. Logistyka. 2015. Vol. 4. P. 3273-3277.
• 23. Technical Standard, About Organization and Execution of Measurements in Railway Surveying’ GK-1. PKP S.A. 2015. Available at: https://www.pkp.pl/images/geodezja/dokumenty/Standard% 20techniczny%20%E2%80%9EO%20organizacji%20i%20wykonywaniu%20pomiar%C3%B3w %20w%20geodezji%20kolejowej%E2%80%9D%20GK-1.pdf.
• 24. Instruction on Drawing Up and Updating Schematic Plans Ig-10 (D-27). PKP PLK S.A. 2022. Available at: https://www.plk-sa.pl/klienci-i-kontrahenci/akty-prawne-i-przepisy/instrukcje-pkp- polskich-linii-kolejowych-sa/geodezja-kolejowa.
• 25. Grzechnik, B. Co się nie klei w obsłudze dróg i kolei. Magazyn Geoinformacyjny Geodeta. 2016. Vol. 257. No. 10. P. 26-29. [In Polish: What does not glue in the service of roads and railways].
• 26. Crowe, S. & Cresswell, K. & Robertson, A. & Huby, G. & Avery, A. & Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011. Vol. 11. Article ID 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
• 27. Vališ, D. & Koucky, M. & Zak, L. On approaches for non-direct determination of system deterioration. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2012. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 33-41.
• 28. Galar, D. & Gustafson, A. & Tormos, B. & Berges, L. Maintenance decision making based on different types of data fusion. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability. 2012. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 135-144.
• 29. Sztubecki, J. & Topoliński, S. & Mrówczyńska, M. & Bağrıaçık, B. & Beycioğlu, A. Experimental research of the structure condition using geodetic methods and crackmeter. Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 13. Article ID 6754. DOI: 10.3390/app12136754.
• 30. Act of 7 July 1994 Construction Law (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 2351). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu19940890414.
• 31. Regulation of the Minister of Development, Labour and Technology of 27 July 2021 on the Registration of Land and Buildings (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 1390). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210001390.
• 32. Technical Conditions for Maintaining Track Surface on Railway Lines Id-1 (D-1). PKP PLK S.A.: 2015. Available at: https://www.plk-sa.pl/klienci-i-kontrahenci/akty-prawne-i-przepisy/instrukcje- pkp-polskich-linii-kolejowych-sa/linie-kolejowe.
• 33. Instruction on the Organisation and Execution of Surveys in Railway Surveying D-19. Annex to Order No. 144 of the Management Board of PKP S.A. of 23 October 2000.
• 34. Regulation of the Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration of 9 November 2011 on the Technical Standards for Performing Land Surveying Situational and Altimetric Measurements and Developing and Transferring the Results of These Measurements to the National Geodetic and Cartographic Resource (Dz. U. 2011 nr 263, poz. 1572). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20112631572.
• 35. Regulation of the Minister of Administration and Digitisation of 5 September 2013 on the Organisation and Procedure for Maintaining the National Geodetic and Cartographic Resource (Dz. U. 2013, poz. 1183). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20130001183.
• 36. Regulation of the Minister of Spatial Planning and Construction of 21 February 1995 on the Type and Scope of Surveying-Cartographic Studies and Surveying Activities Applicable in the Construction Industry (Dz. U. 1995 r. Nr 25, poz.133). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu19950250133.
• 37. Chimhamhiwa, D. & Mutanga O. & Van der Molen P. Measuring quality performance of cadastral survey and deeds registration work processes. Land Use Policy. 2011. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.04.007.
• 38. Ruiz-Alarcon-Quintero, C. Harmonization of transport data sources according to INSPIRE data specification on transport networks. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016. Vol. 18. P. 320-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.043.
• 39. Balawejder, M. & Adamczyk, T. & Cygan, M. The problem of adjusting Polish spatial information resources to the standards of the INSPIRE. In: Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition ‘GIS ODYSSEY 2016’. 5th to 9th of September. Perugia, Italy, 2016. Conference proceedings.
• 40. Procházka, D. & Landa, J. & Procházková, J. & Klimánek, M. Geospatial infrastructure for European Union sustainable development. In: Huber, P. & Nerudová, D. & Rozmahel, P. (eds.) Competitiveness, Social Inclusion and Sustainability in a Diverse European Union. Springer, Cham, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17299-6_10.
• 41. Ogryzek, M. & Tarantino, E. & Rząsa, K. Infrastructure of the spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE) based on examples of Italy and Poland. ISPRS International Journal of Geo- Information. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 12. Article ID 755. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9120755.
• 42. Trembecka, A. Conditions for modifying the mode of land acquisition for road development. Advances in Geodesy and Geoinformation. 2022. Vol. 71. No. 2. Article ID e31. DOI: 10.24425/agg.2022.141918.
• 43. Wojtas, M. Analysis of the process of land acquisition for public roads from a segment of the A1 motorway. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Geodesia et Descriptio Terrarum. 2013. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 27-38.
• 44. Wojnar, G. & Irlik, M. Multicriteria train running model and simulator for railway capacity assessment. Transport Problems. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 199-212. DOI: 10.20858/tp.2022.17.2.17.
• 45. Kuhlmann, H. & Schwieger, V. & Wieser, A. & Niemeier, W. Engineering geodesy - definition and core competencies. Journal of Applied Geodesy. 2014. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 327-334. DOI: 10.1515/jag-2014-0020.