Research on the phenomenon of self-afforestation of agricultural lands in Ukraine

Stoiko, Nataliia

doi:10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.2.139

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Research on the phenomenon of self-afforestation of agricultural lands in Ukraine

Autorzy

Stoiko Nataliia

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.2.139

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Extension of the forest area in Ukraine is one of the indicators confirming achievement of the goals of sustainable development. Therefore, the issue of protection, restoration and rational use of forest ecosystems is rather actual. The process of self- afforestation taking place on agricultural land, which are not used according to their intention because of their investment unattractiveness, due to lack of funds or other reasons, and thus, they are self-sown with forest plants, is one of the ways of the forest- covered area extension in Ukraine. There is no reliable information on the number of land plots with self-sown forests on agricultural land. Therefore, it is expedient to make inventory of them by using the tools of satellite remote sensing and field surveys. The author of the work suggests a conceptual model of planning the use of agricultural land with self-sown forests on the base of the inventory data. To make the best-possible decisions on the use of the land plots with self-sown forests, at the local level it is important to determine the rational direction of the self-sown forest use in the process of spatial planning on the base of the data of analysis of the soil and plant cover layer quality. Therefore, it is recommended to make zoning of the land by the kinds of land use (agricultural, forestry, recreational, nature protection). Basing on the zoning data and considering the potential ecosystem benefits from forests, it is necessary to develop measures on the self-sown forest use and protection.

Słowa kluczowe

self-sown forest agricultural land ecosystem services inventory planning zoning

las samosiewny grunty rolne usługi ekosystemowe inwentaryzacja planowanie zagospodarowanie przestrzenne

Wydawca

SILGIS Association
Croatian-Polish Scientific Network

Czasopismo

GIS Odyssey Journal

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 1, no. 2

Strony

139--149

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Stoiko Nataliia

StojkoNJ@lnau.edu.ua

Lviv National Agrarian University, Department of Land Organization, Lviv, Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8851-9821

Bibliografia

1. Altieri M.A. (1989). Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 27, no. 1–4, pp. 37–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(89)90070-4
2. Birch J.C., Newton A.C., Aquino C.A., Cantarello E., Echeverría C., Kitzberger T., Schiappacasse I., Garavito N.T. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. PNAS, vol. 107, no. 50, pp. 21925–21930, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003369107
3. Cunningham S.C., Mac Nally R., Baker P.J., Cavagnaro T.R., Beringer J., Thomson J.R., Thompson R.M. (2015). Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, vol. 17(4), pp. 301–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2015.06.001
4. Ecosystem restoration for people, nature and climate (2021). United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/36251/ERPNC.pdf [access: 15.12.2021].
5. Geographical Encyclopedia of Ukraine (1993). In 3 Volumes. K. Vol. 3: 480 p. ISBN 5- 88500-020-4.
6. GISFile. https://gisfile.com/map/ [access: 17.12.2021].
7. Grodzinsky M.D. (1995). Resistance of geosystems to anthropogenic loads. K.: Likei, 233 p.
8. Holl K.D., Aide T.M. (2011). When and where to actively restore ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 261, no. 10, pp. 1558–1563, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004
9. Hummel D., Jahn T., Schramm E. (2011). Social-ecological analysis of climate induced changes in biodiversity – outline of a research concept. BiK-F Knowledge. Flow Paper 11, Frankfurt/Main.
10. Izakovičová Z., Špulerová J., Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated Approach to Sustainable Land Use Management. Environments. 5(3), 37, https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5030037
11. Land directory of Ukraine (2020), https://agropolit.com/storage/2020/Zemelniy_dovidnyk_2020.pdf?utm_source=ma ilchimp&utm_campaign=0300ccc2e1f0&utm_medium=page [access: 18.12.2021].
12. Mehring M., Bernard B., Hummel D., Liehr S., Lux A. (2017). Halting biodiversity loss: how social-ecological biodiversity research makes a difference. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, vol. 13, no. 1, рр. 172–180, https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1289246
13. Mesquita S., Capelo J., Gama I., Marta-Pedroso C., Reis M., Domingos T. (2021). Using Geobotanical Tools to Operationalize Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services (MAES) in Southern Portugal. In: F. Pedrotti, E.O. Box (ed.), Tools for Landscape-Scale Geobotany and Conservation. Geobotany Studies (Basics, Methods and Case Studies). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74950-7_7
14. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis.
15. Murray H., Catanzaro P., Markowski-Lindsay M., Butler B.J., Eichman H. (2021). Economic Contributions from Conserved Forests: Four Case Studies of the USDA Forest Service Forest Legacy Program. Forest Science, vol. 67, no. 6, рр. 629–632, https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxab039
16. Nordman C., Faber-Langendoen D., Baggs J. (2021). Rapid Ecological Integrity Assessment Metrics to Restore Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity for Shortleaf Pine- Oak Ecosystems. Forests, 12(12): 1739, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121739
17. On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Land Use Planning: Law of 17.06.2020 № 711-IX (Legislation of Ukraine: Database) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/711-20/card2#Card [access: 19.12.2021].
18. Public cadastral map of Ukraine, https://map.land.gov.ua/ [access: 17.12.2021].
19. Schiere, J.B., Grasman, J. (1997). Agro-ecosystem health: aggregation of systems in time and space. In: J. van Bruchem (ed.), Agro-ecosystem health. Proc. of Seminar, Wageningen 1996, NRLO-rapport 97/31, pp. 23–36.
20. Soils and soil resources. National Atlas of Ukraine. Online, http://wdc.org.ua/atlas/4100100.html [access: 17.12.2021].
21. Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. (2017). National report. file:///D:/Library/Owner/Downloads/SDGs_NationalReportUA_Web.pdf [access: 15.12.2021].
22. The order of land inventory: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 05.06.2019 № 476 (Legislation of Ukraine: Database), https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/476-2019-%D0%BF/card2#Card [access: 16.12.2021].
23. Unaccounted forests of Ukraine, 2020, http://epl.org.ua/en/eco-analytics/neoblikovani- lisy-ukrayiny-analitychna-zapyska/ [access: 17.12.2021].

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-9d0eae9b-3341-46eb-819a-ce2737c9b8b1