Acoustic and laser bathymetry systems

• Autorzy: Gupta S. D. , Zielinski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discusses acoustic and lasers based bathymetric systems in terms of their applicability in diverse circumstances. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are compared in terms of capabilities, cost and accuracy. None of these systems can provide full bottom coverage in all circumstances but could be supplementary to each other. Information has been presented in support of this conclusion. Acoustic bathymetry is suitable at deeper waters whereas laser bathymetry may be used in shallow clear coastal waters. A hybrid option has been suggested with the mix of these systems for higher survey efficiency and lesser costs. This paper is of interest to persons involved in ocean acoustics study and survey projects planners as well as to the developers of laser instruments for study ocean water and bottom properties and object detection such as wracks, boulders and other objects.

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Akustyczne. Oddział Gdański
• Czasopismo: Hydroacoustics
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 16
• Strony: 77--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gupta S. D.

• Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria,, 3800 Finnerty Road, Saanich, BC, V8N 1M5, Canada

autor

Zielinski A.

• Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria,, 3800 Finnerty Road, Saanich, BC, V8N 1M5, Canada

Bibliografia

• [1] UN, 1989. Status of hydrographic surveying and nautical charting world-wide, 4th United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for the Americas, January 23-27, 81/INF/9.
• [2] Pim Kuus, MSc Thesis, 2008, The University Of New Brunswick. Bottom Tracking Issues And Recognition Thereof Using Shoals-3000 Green Laser Beam Indense Fields Of Zostera Marina And Laminaria Sp.
• [3] Estep, L., 1993. A review of airborne lidar hydrographic (ALH) systems, The HydrographicJournal, 67(1): 25-42.
• [4] Jyun-Yi Wu, Peter Tian-Yuan Shih, Jie-Chung Chen, and Jia-Hsun Chen, The Display and Analysis of Bathymetric Lidar Waveform, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2010.
• [5] Wang, C., K., W.D. Philpot, 2007. Using airborne bathymetric lidar to detect bottom type variation in shallow waters, Remote Sensing & Environment, 106:123-135.
• [6] Guenther, G.C., P.E. LaRocque, and W.J. Lillycrop, 1994. Multiple surface channels in SHOALS airborne lidar, Proc. SPIE Ocean Optics XII, Vol. 2258, 422-430.
• [7] Iho Standards For Hydrographic Surveys 5th. Edition, February 2008, Special Publication No. 44, published by the International Hydrographic Bureau, MONACO. Website: www.iho.int.
• [8] Sinclair, M., 1999. Laser hydrography - commercial survey operations, Proc. U.S. Hydrographic Conference, April 26-29, Mobile, AL, (paper 9-2 on CD), 10 pp.
• [9] Haneberg W.C., Creighton, A.L., Medley, E.W., and Jonas, D.A., 2005, Use of LiDAR to assess slope hazards at the Lihir gold mine, Papua New Guinea, in Hungr, O., Fell, R., Couture, R., and Ebert, E., eds., Landslide risk management: Proceedings of the International Conference on Landslide Risk Management, Vancouver, Canada, May 31– June 3.
• [10] Downing J.B., Konsoer, K.M., and Kite, J.S., 2007, LiDAR based surficial geology mapping in comparison to more traditional methods in the heavily vegetated Appalachian Mountains: Paper No. 58-2, Geological Society of America annual meeting, Denver, CO, Oct. 28-31.
• [11] Graham, T., K. Smith, J. Spittal, and G.R. West, 1999. Improving the efficiency, safety and economy of the New Zealand national nautical charting program through the integrated use of the SHOALS system in a multi-sensor survey, Proc. U.S. Hydrographic Conference, April 26-29, Mobile, AL, (paper 9-5 on CD), 11 pp.
• [12] Todd, B.J., Fader, G.B.J., Courtney, R.C., Pickrill, R.A., 1999. Qua-ternary geology and surficial sediment processes, Browns Bank, Scotian Shelf, based on multibeam bathymetry. Mar. Geol. 162, 167–216.
• [13] Courtney, R.C., Shaw, J. (2000) Multibeam bathymetry and backscatter imaging of the Canadian continental shelf. Geosci Can, 27, 31–42.
• [14] Kostylev, V.E., Todd, B.J., Longva, O., and Valentine P.C. (2005) Characterization of benthic habitat on northeastern Georges Bank, Canada. In: Benthic habitats and theeffects of fishing. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.141-152.
• [15] Gary C. Guenther, A. Grant Cunningham, Paul E. Larocque, David J. Reid. Meeting The Accuracy Challenge in Airborne Lidar Bathymetry, Proceedings of earsel-SIGWorkshop LIDAR, Dresden/FRG, June 16 – 17, 2000.
• [16] Miller, J., Hughes Clarke, J.E. andPatterson, J.(1997) How Effectively Have YouCovered Your Bottom? Hydrographic Journal,83, 3-10.
• [17] Ebrite, S., R.W. Pope, W.J. Lillycrop, 2001. A multi-agency solution for coastal surveys –SHOALS in the Pacific, Proc. Oceans 2001, MTS/IEEE, Honolulu, Hawaii.
• [18] Wang, C., K., W.D. Philpot, 2007. Using airborne bathymetric lidar to detect bottom type variation in shallow waters, RemoteSensing & Environment, 106:123-135.
• [19] Perry, G.J., 1999. Post-processing in laser airborne bathymetry systems, Proc. ROPME/PERSGA/IHB Workshop on Hydrographic Activities in the ROPME Sea Area and Red Sea, October 24-27, Kuwait, 13 pp.
• [20] Lillycrop, W.J., L.E. Parson, L.L. Estep, P.E. LaRocque, G.C. Guenther, M.D. Reed, and C.L. Truitt, 1994. Field testing of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers airborne lidar hydrographic survey System, Proc. U.S. Hydro. Conf. ‘94, The Hydrographic Society, April 18-23, Norfolk, VA, Special Pub. No. 32, 144-151.
• [21] Lillycrop, W.J., L.L. Estep, J.L. Irish, and L.E. Parson, 1995. Determination of areas in coastal United States waters that are appropriate for airborne lidar hydrographic surveying, MiscellaneousPaper CERC-94, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 171 pp.
• [22] Riley, J.L., 1995. Evaluating SHOALS bathymetry using NOAA hydrographic survey data, Proc.24th Joint Meeting of UJNR Sea-Bottom Surveys Panel, November 13-17, Tokyo, Japan.
• [23] Lockhart, C., D. Arumugam, and D. Millar, 2005. Meeting hydrographic charting specifications with the SHOALS-1000T airborne lidarbathymeter, Proc. U.S. Hydro 2005, The Hydrographic Society of America, March 29-31, San Diego, CA, paper 7-3, 8 pp.
• [24] Enabnit, D.B., L.R. Goodman, G.K.Young, and W.J. Shaughnessy, 1978. The cost effectiveness of airborne laser hydrography, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS 26, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, MD, 56 pp.
• [25] Golaszewski, R., D. Barol, J. Phillips, W. Zyskowski, and E. Maillett, 1990. Economic evaluation of proposed helicopter lidarbathymeter system, Contract Report CERC-90-1, Gellman Research Associates Inc., Jenkintown, PA, 304 pp.
• [26] Featherstone, S., 2001. NOAA is sinking, Boating, 74(2): 150-155.
• [27] Axelsson, R. and M. Alfredsson, 1999. Capacity and capability for hydrographic missions, Proc. U.S. Hydrographic Conference, April 26-29, Mobile, AL, (paper 9-4 on CD), 9 pp.
• [28] Eric Yang, Michael Sitar, Wendbo Pan, Karen Francis, Bridging the land/water boundary using SHOALS bathymetric lidar. Optech Incorporated, Ontario, Canada.
• [29] Hamitouche-Djabou, C., Togni, S., Lecornu, L., Derrode, S., 1999. SBIViewer: 3Dfish schools and sea bottom analy-sis and visualisation software. User’s guide, AVITISContract FAIR CT 96–1717, Development release3-10 June, 1999 Dpt ITI, ENSTBretagne, Brest, France.
• [30] Sinclair, M., 2004. Hydrographic lidar operations in Alaska, Sea Technology, 45, 10.
• [31] Sinclair, M., 2005. Hydrographic lidar survey – Experiences from Long Island Sound, Proc. U.S. Hydro 2005, The Hydrographic Society of America, March 29-31, San Diego, CA, paper 7-4, 27 pp.
• [32] Jones, A.F., Brewer, P.A., Johnstone, A., and Macklin, M.G., 2007, High resolution interpretive geomorphological mapping of river valley environments using airborne LiDAR data: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 32, p. 1574-1592.
• [33] Skogvik, J. and R. Axelsson, 2001. Experience and results from Swedish laser surveys and post-processing of laser bathymetry data, Proc. Hydro 2001, The Hydrographic Society, Special Pub. 42, March 27-29, Norwich, England, Paper 20, 13 pp.
• [34] Guenther, G.C., R.W.L. Thomas, and P.E. LaRocque, 1996. Design considerations for achieving high accuracy with the SHOALS bathymetric lidar system, Laser remote sensing of natural waters: From theory to practice, V.I. Feigels, Y.I. Kopilevich, SPIE, Vol. 2964, 54-71.
• [35] Hughes Clarke, J.E., L. Mayer, J. Shaw, R. Parrott, M. Lamplugh, J. and Bradford, 1999. Data handling methods and target detection results for multibeam and side-scan data collected as part of the search for Swiss Air Flight 111, Proc. Shallow Survey-99, Australian Defence Science and Technology Organization, Oct 18-20, Sydney, Australia, Paper 6-2, 11 pp.
• [36] Steinvall, O., K. Koppari, and U. Karlsson, 1994. Airborne laser depth sounding: system aspects and performance, Proc. SPIE Ocean Optics XII, Vol. 2258, 392-412.
• [37] SEA BEAM 2100 Multibeam Bathymetric Survey Mapping System External Interface Specifications, 141 Washington Street East Walpole, MA 02032-1155, USA, Copyright © 1999 L3 Communications SeaBeam Instruments.
• [38] Nordstrom, G., 2000. The Swedish Hydrographic Service on the eve of a new millennium, Inte-grated coastal zone management, Spring Edition, 37-40.
• [39] Lockhart, C., D. Arumugam, and D. Millar, 2005. Meeting hydrographic charting specifications with the SHOALS-1000T airborne lidarbathymeter, Proc. U.S. Hydro 2005, The Hydrographic Society of America, March 29-31, San Diego, CA, paper 7-3, 8 pp.
• [40] Iwamoto, H., T. Ono, H. Shirana, H. Yajima, and G. Cunningham, 2004. Field testing results for the Japan Coast Guard SHOALS-1000 system, Proc. 5th Annual Coastal Mapping and Charting Workshop, Joint Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Technical Center of Expertise, June 9-10, St. Petersburg, FL, CD Cunningham.”
• [41] Steinvall, O and K. Koppari, 1996. Depth sounding lidar — an overview of Swedish activities and future prospects, Laser Remote Sensing of Natural Waters: From Theory to Practice, V. I. Feigels, Y. I. Kopilevich, Editors, SPIE, Vol. 2964, 2-25.
• [42] Gary C. Guenther, A. Grant Cunningham, Paul E. LaRocque, and David J. Reid, Meeting The Accuracy Challenge In Airborne Lidar Bathymetry. Proceedings of EARSeL-SIG-Workshop LIDAR, Dresden/FRG, June 16 – 17, 2000.
• [43] Guenther, G.C., P.E. LaRocque, and W.J. Lillycrop, 1994. Multiple surface channels in SHOALS airborne lidar, Proc. SPIE Ocean Optics XII, Vol. 2258, 422-430.