Architectural interior design for durability of interior components. Material and intangible contexts of selected durability-supportive design schemes

• Autorzy: Celadyn Magdalena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24427/aea-2024-vol16-05

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The problem of durability is mostly situated in theoretical and practical dimensions within the discipline of architecture in the context of environmental sustainability. Technical durability covers the subject of forming new buildings through embodied energy in building technologies, building materials, and products. The second identified durability framework, defined as emotional durability, concerns the enhancement of the relationship between consumers and products. The paper discusses the interior architectural design for the durability of interior components. The article identifies the supportive design methods to shape interior components while enhancing their durability placed within the two frameworks mentioned above, and analysed in material and intangible aspects, both reflecting the necessity for inclusion of the postulates of environmental sustainability. The research paper recognizes the interior architectural design for adaptive reuse and responsivenessoriented scheme of biophilic design as supportive schemes for the interior architectural design given the durability of interior components within the material, as well as intangible aspects. The results of the study reveal that the intangibility-related factors dominate in the analysis of responsiveness and adaptive reuse as design schemes to support the durability of constitutive interior components. In particular, the user’s emotional engagement, gained through the experience of natural building materials or secondary products introduced into the component’s structure, is noticeable in both models. The cultural connotations are among the intangible factors common for the discussed models as well. The quotations from the past engage the users and enclosed within the component’s volume, complement and enrich further satisfactory use of components, thus influencing the longevity of spatial objects featuring the inner spaces.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

interior architectural design; technical durability; emotional durability; adaptive reuse; responsive biophilic design; product longevity

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Architecturae et Artibus
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 16, no. 3
• Strony: 1--11
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Celadyn Magdalena

• Academy of Fine Arts in Kraków, Faculty of Interior Design, Syrokomli 21, 30-102 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-2280

Bibliografia

• 1. Browning W.D. et al. (2014), 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design, Terrapin Bright Green, LLC: New York.
• 2. Browning W.D., Ryan C. (2020), Nature Inside, a Biophilic Design Guide, Royal Institute of British Architects: London.
• 3. Celadyn M. (2018), Environmental activation of inner space components in sustainable interior design, „Sustainability”, Vol. 10(6), DOI: 10.3390/ su10061945.
• 4. Celadyn W. (2014), Durability of buildings and sustainable architecture, „Technical Transactions. Architecture”, Vol. 7A, p. 17–26.
• 5. Chapman J. (2009), Design for (Emotional) Durability, „Design Issues”, Vol. 25(4), p. 29–35.
• 6. Chapman J. (2015), Emotionally Durable Design. Objects, Experiences & Empathy, 2nd ed., Routledge, London–New York.
• 7. Cooper T. (ed.), (2016), Longer Lasting Products. Alternative to the Throwaway Society, Routledge, London–New York.
• 8. Haines-Gadd M. et al. (2018), Emotional Durability Design Nine – A Tool for Product Longevity, „Sustainability”, Vol. 10, DOI:10.3390/su10061948.
• 9. Heerwagen J.H., Hase B. (2001), Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature, „Environmental Design and Construction”, Vol. 4, p. 30–34.
• 10. Kellert S.R. (2005), Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection, Island Press, Washington.
• 11. Kellert S.R. et al. (eds.), (2008), Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.
• 12. Ko K. et al. (2011), Long-Term Product Attachment: A Sustainable Design Approach for Optimising the Relationship Between Users and Products, in: Proceedings of the Tao of Sustainability, International Conference on Sustainable Design Strategies in a Globalization Context, Beijing, China, 27–29 October 2011; p. 580–587.
• 13. Mugge R. et al. (2006), Product Attachment and Product Lifetime: The Role of Personality Congruity and Fashion, „European Advances in Consumer Research”, Vol. 7, p. 460–466.
• 14. Mugge R. et al. (2009), Emotional bonding with personalised products, „Journal of Engineering Design”, Vol. 20, No. 5, p. 467–476.
• 15. Norman D.A. (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
• 16. Page T. (2014), Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainability design, „International Journal of Sustainable Design”, Vol. 2, No. 3(2).
• 17. Salingaros N.A, Masden K.G. (2008), Neuroscience, the Natural Environment, and Building Design, in: Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life, eds. S.R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, M. Mador, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.
• 18. Stone S. (2019), Undoing Buildings. Adaptive Reuse and Cultural Memory, Routledge, New York– London.
• 19. Stone S. (2023), Notes towards a Definition of Adaptive Reuse, „Architecture”, Vol. 3(3), p. 477–489.
• 20. Świątek L. (2009), “Evergreen”. Durability in Architecture, „Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura”, Vol. 106, iss. 1-A, p. 533–539.
• 21. Walker S. (2006), Sustainable by design. Explorations in Theory and Practice, Earthscan from Routledge, New York.
• 22. Walker S. (2010), Temporal Objects – Design, Change and Sustainability, „Sustainability”, Vol. 2, p. 812–832.