PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Spatial analysis of b-value variability in Elazig city and the surrounding area (Eastern Turkey)

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Frequency-magnitude distribution was investigated in Elazig city and the surrounding area (coordinates ranging from 38.1° N to 39° N for latitudes and 39° E to 40° E for longitude) to reveal the present-day crustal stress within the region. For this study, a complete set of 5603 earthquakes of Md≥1 from 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2020 were localized from the Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center (KOERI) catalogue. For the whole study region, spatial mapping of the frequency-magnitude distribution was thus produced. The frequency-magnitude distribution (b-value) for seismicity within the study area was not homogeneous. Outstanding variations in the b-value were detected with b ranging from b≈slightly more than 0.3–2. In this region, low b-values are mostly dominant in the region except for a few local areas. This study also shows that accumulated stresses are high particularly at the Pütürge segment in contrast to the fault drawn in the south, which represents the main thrust belt that runs through Hani-Lice and stretches to Çüngüş. As expected, stress accumulation in reverse faults is fairly higher. However, the sharing of the tension formed in the compression zone of the Arabian Plate and the Anatolian plate (i.e. stress partitioning in a sense), results in a low share in the reverse fault belt.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
15--25
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 62 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Yeditepe University, 26 Ağustos Yerleşkesi, Kayışdağı Cad., 34755 Istanbul, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a − bM and its confidence limits. Tokyo Univ Bull Earthq Res Inst 43:237–239
  • 2. Aki K (1981) A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena. In: Simpson DW, Richards PG (eds) Earthquake prediction: an international review, Maurice Ewing Series 4. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp 566–574
  • 3. Akinci A, Antonioli A (2013) Observations and stochastic modeling of strong ground motions for the 2011 October 23 Mw 7.1 Van, Turkey, earthquake. Geophys J Int 192(3):1217–1239
  • 4. Aksoy E, İnceöz M, Koçyiğit A (2007) Lake Hazar basin: a negative fower structure on the east Anatolian fault system (EAFS), SE Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci 16:319–338
  • 5. Al-Lazki A, Seber D, Sandvol E, Türkelli N, Mohamad R, Barazangi M (2003) Tomographic Pn velocity and anisotropy structure beneath the Anatolian plateau (eastern Turkey) and the surrounding regions. Geophys Res Lett 30:24
  • 6. Allen JRL (1986) Earthquake magnitude-frequency, epicentral distance and soft sediment deformation in sedimentary basins. Sed Geol 46:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(86)90006-
  • 7. Bayrak E, Yilmaz Ş, Softa M, Türker T, Bayrak Y (2015) Earthquake hazard analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Nat Hazards 76:1063–1077
  • 8. Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center (KOERI), from http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr
  • 9. Bora DK, Borah K, Mahanta R, Borgohain JM (2018) Seismic b-values and its correlation with the seismic moment and Bouguer gravity anomaly over Indo-Burma ranges of northeast India: tectonic implications. Tectonophysics 728–729:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.001 (ISSN 0040-1951)
  • 10. Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14:3–30
  • 11. Büyüksaraç A (2007) Investigation into the regional wrench tectonics of inner East Anatolia (Turkey) using potential field data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 160:86–95
  • 12. Cambaz MD, Turhan F, Yılmazer M, Kekovalı K, Necmioğlu Ö, Kalafat D (2019) A review on kandilli observatory and earthquake research institute (KOERI) seismic network and earthquake catalog: 2008–2018. Adv Geosci 51:15–23. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-51-15-2019
  • 13. Çolak S, Aksoy E, Koçyiğit A, İnceöz M (2012) The Palu-Uluova strike-slip basin in the east Anatolian fault system, Turkey: its transition from the palaeotectonic to neotectonic stage. Turk J Earth Sci 21:1–24
  • 14. Dewey JF, Şengör AMC (1979) Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multi-plate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone. Geol Soc Am Bull 90:84–92
  • 15. Duman TY, Emre Ö (2013) The east Anatolian fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 372(1):495–529
  • 16. El-Isa ZH, Eaton DW (2014) Spatiotemporal variations in the b-value of earthquake magnitude-frequency. Tectonophysics 615:1–11
  • 17. Frohlich C, Davis SD (1993) Teleseismic b values; or, much ado about 1.0. J Geophys Res 98:631–644
  • 18. Göncüoğlu MC (2010) Introduction to the geology of Turkey: geodynamic evolution of the pre-alpine and alpine terranes. MTA Monographs Series 5 pp 66
  • 19. Gutenberg R, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 32:163–191. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0320030163
  • 20. Hempton MR (1987) Constraints on Arabian plate motion and extensional history of the Red Sea. Tectonics 6:687–705
  • 21. Hempton MR, Dunne LA (1984) Sedimentation in pullapart basins: active examples in Eastern Turkey. J Geol 92:513–530
  • 22. Hempton MR, Dunne LA, Dewey JF (1983) Sedimentation in an active strike- slip basin, south-eastern Turkey. J Geol 91:401–412
  • 23. Jackson J (1994) Active tectonics of the Aegean region. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 22(1):239–271
  • 24. Jiu X, Glacidogna G (2011) Spatial variation of seismic b-values distribution in China. Appl Mech Mater 71–78:4819–4822
  • 25. Kalafat D (2015) Türkiye ve Çevresi Faylanma Kaynak Parametreleri (MT) Kataloğu (1938–2015); A cataloque of source parameters of moderate and strong earthquakes for Turkey and its surrounding area (1938–2015), İstanbul
  • 26. Kalafat D (2016) Statistical evaluation of Turkey earthquake data (1900–2015): a case study. East Anatol J Sci 2:14–36
  • 27. Kalafat D, Suvarıklı M, Öğütcü Z, Kekovalı K, Güneş Y, Yılmazer M, Çomoğlu M, Tunç S, Çok Ö (2013) KRDAE Türkiye Deprem Ağının Gelişimi: Bütünleşik Sismik Ağ Tasarımı/Development of KOERI Turkey Seismic Network: Integrated Seismic Network Design, 2.Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı Özetler Kitabı/2nd Turkey Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference Abstracts Book, s. 32–33, 25–27 Eylül 2013, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Tayfur Sökmen Kampüsü, Hatay
  • 28. Katsumata K (2006) Imaging the high b-value anomalies within the subducting Pacific plate in the Hokkaido corner. Earth Planets Sp 58:49–52
  • 29. Ketin I (1966) Tectonic units of Anatolia. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Bulletin, pp 23–34
  • 30. Khan P, Chakraborty P (2007) The seismic b-value and its correlation with Bouguer gravity anomaly over the Shillong Plateau area: tectonic implications. J Asian Earth Sci 29:136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.02.007
  • 31. Koçyiğit A (1989) Suşehri basin: an active fault-wedge basin on the north Anatolian fault zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 167:11–29
  • 32. Koçyiğit A, Rojay B, Cihan M, Özacar A (2001) The June 6, 2000, Orta (Çankırı, Turkey) earthquake: sourced from a new antithetic sinistral strike-slip structure of the North Anatolian fault system, the Dodurga fault zone. Turk J Earth Sci 10:69–82
  • 33. Koçyiğit A, Aksoy E, İnceöz M (2003) Basic Neotectonic characteristics of the Sivrice fault zone in the Sivrice-Palu area, East Anatolian fault system (EAFS), Turkey. Excursion Guide Book, International Workshop on the North Anatolian, East Anatolian and Dead Sea Fault Systems: Recent Progress in Tectonics and Palaeosismology, METU, Ankara, Turkey
  • 34. Koeri data, the KOERI data is accessible via www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/2/tr/
  • 35. Le Pichon X, Chamot-Rooke N, Lallemant S, Noomen R, Veis G (1995) Geodetic determination of the kinematics of central Greece with respect to Europe: implications for eastern Mediterranean tectonics. J Geophys Res 100:12675–12690
  • 36. MATLAB (2019) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States
  • 37. McKenzie DP (1972) Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geophys J Royal Astronom Soc 30:109–185
  • 38. Mogi K (1967) Earthquakes and fractures. Tectonophysics 5:35–55
  • 39. Moreno DG, Hubert-Ferrari A, Moernaut J, Fraser JG, Boes X, Van Daele M, Avsar U, Çağatay N, De Batist M (2011) Structure and recent evolution of the Hazar Basin: a strike-slip basin on the East Anatolian Fault, Eastern Turkey. Basin Res 23:191–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2010.00476.x
  • 40. Mousavi SM (2017a) Mapping seismic moment and b-value within the continental collision orogenic-belt region of the Iranian Plateau. J Geodyn 103:26–41
  • 41. Mousavi SM (2017b) Spatial variation in the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakes under the tectonic framework in the Middle East. J Asian Earth Sci 147:193–209
  • 42. Mousavi SM, Ogwari PO, Horton SP, Langston CA (2017) Spatio-temporal evolution of frequency-magnitude distribution and seismogenic index during initiation of induced seismicity at Guy-Greenbrier, Arkansas. Phys Earth Planet Inter 267:53–66
  • 43. Okay AI (2008) Geology of Turkey: a synopsis. Anschnit 2:19–42
  • 44. Reilinger RE, McClusky SC, Oral MB, King RW, Toksoz MN (1997) Global positioning system measurements frequency-magnitude of present-day crustal movements in the Arabia–Africa–Eurasia plate collision zone. J Geophys Res 102(B5):9983–9999
  • 45. Sancar T, Akyüz H (2014) Kuzey Anadolu Fay Zonu, Ilıpınar Segmenti’nin (Karlıova, Bingöl) Paleosismolojisi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 57(2):35–52
  • 46. Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Kuşçu İ (1992) Active fault map of Turkey at Scale 1:1 000 000. Mineral Research and Explorations Institute of Turkey Publication, Ankara, 3 sheets
  • 47. Scholz CH (1968a) Microfracturing and the inelastic deformation of rock in compression. J Geophys Res 73(4):1417–1432
  • 48. Scholz CH (1968b) The relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:399–415
  • 49. Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S, Wyss M (2005) Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437:539–542
  • 50. Senatorski P (2019) Gutenberg–Richter’s b value and earthquake asperity models. Pure Appl Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02385-z
  • 51. Şengör AMC, Yılmaz Y (1981) Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75:181–241
  • 52. Tatar O, Piper JDA, Gürsoy H, Temiz H (1996) Regional significance of Neotectonic counter-clockwise rotation in central Turkey. Int Geol Rev 38:692–700
  • 53. Utsu T (1965) A method for determining the value of b in the formula logN=a-bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes. Geophys Bull Hokkaido Univ 13:99–103 (in Japanese with English abstract)
  • 54. Warren NW, Latham GV (1970) An experiment study of thermal induced microfracturing and its relation to volcanic seismicity. J Geophys Res 75:4455–4464
  • 55. Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis JF, Wobbe F (2013) Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Trans AGU 94:409–410
  • 56. Westaway R, Arger J (1996) The Gölbaşı basin, southeasternTurkey: a complex discontinuity in a major strike-slip fault zone. J Geol Soc Lond 153:729–744
  • 57. Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72:373–382
  • 58. Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency—magnitude distribution in asperities: an improved technique to calculate recurrence times? J Geophys Res 102:15115–15128
  • 59. Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western US and Japan. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:859–869
  • 60. Wiemer S, McNutt SR, Wyss M (1998) Temporal and three-dimensional spatial analyses of the frequency-magnitude distribution near Long Valley Caldera, California. Geophys J Int 134:409–421
  • 61. Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am. https://doi.org/10.1785/012040007
  • 62. Wyss M (1973) Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 31(4):34
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9bcf8967-8ca4-4c23-b941-d60e70981627
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.