Digital leadership impacts on developing dynamic capability and strategic alliance based on market orientation

• Autorzy: Mihardjo Leonardus Wahyu Wasono , Sasmoko , Alamsjah Firdaus , Elidjen

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.24

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ cyfrowego przywództwa na rozwój dynamicznej zdolności i strategicznych sojuszy na podstawie orientacji rynkowej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In-depth study on the role of leadership, particularly digital leadership on the creation of strategic alliances and dynamic capabilities have not been explored. Hence, this paper examines the roles of digital leadership in developing strategic alliance and dynamic capability based on the market orientation. It is put forward that digital leadership behaviors have a stronger influence on the development of strategic alliance in order to drive dynamic capabilities based on market orientation. A quantitative method was used, comprising 88 senior leaders of Indonesian telecommunication companies. Purposive sampling method was used with the Smart PLS statistical tool. The findings confirm the direct and indirect significant effects between digital leadership and the development of strategic alliance and dynamic capabilities based on market orientation. The study has practical implications to take priority in developing digital leadership to enforce the transformation. The limitations of the study are identified to be the sample, time and statistical tool used, hence longitudinal study is suggested in the future with a more extended sample quantity and time frame.

PL

Dotychczas nie przeprowadzono dogłębnej analizy roli przywództwa, w szczególności cyfrowego przywództwa w tworzeniu strategicznych sojuszy i dynamicznych zdolności. Dlatego też niniejszy artykuł analizuje rolę przywództwa cyfrowego w rozwijaniu sojuszu strategicznego i zdolności dynamicznych w oparciu o orientację rynkową. Postuluje się, że cyfrowe zachowania przywódcze mają większy wpływ na rozwój sojuszu strategicznego w celu napędzania dynamicznych zdolności opartych na orientacji rynkowej. Zastosowano metodę ilościową obejmującą 88 starszych liderów indonezyjskich przedsiębiorstw telekomunikacyjnych. Zastosowano celową metodę próbkowania za pomocą narzędzia statystycznego Smart PLS. Odkrycia potwierdzają bezpośrednie i pośrednie znaczące skutki między przywództwem cyfrowym a rozwojem sojuszu strategicznego i zdolności dynamicznych opartych na orientacji rynkowej. Badanie ma praktyczne implikacje, aby priorytetowo traktować rozwój cyfrowego przywództwa w celu egzekwowania transformacji. Ograniczenia badania są określane jako przykładowe narzędzie czasowe i statystyczne, stąd w przyszłości sugerowane jest badanie podłużne z bardziej rozszerzoną ilością próbek i ramami czasowymi.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

digital leadership; dynamic capabilities; strategic alliances; market orientation

PL

przywództwo cyfrowe; możliwości dynamiczne; sojusze strategiczne; orientacja rynkowa

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 19, No. 2
• Strony: 285--297
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mihardjo Leonardus Wahyu Wasono

• School of Business Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

autor

Sasmoko

• School of Business Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

autor

Alamsjah Firdaus

• School of Business Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

autor

Elidjen

• School of Business Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Abi J., Arief M., 2017, Examining the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Dynamic Capability to the Adoption of Digital Marketing in Consumer Shopping Good Firms, “Int. Journal of Economics and Management”, 11(S2).
• 2. Amfo P., Cudjoe G., Acheampong G., Adams M., Boakye E., 2018, Market Orientation, Innovation and Business Performance: Insight from Womenpreneurs in the Fashion Industry in Ghana Market Orientation, “Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation”, 4.
• 3. Anand J., Oriani R., Vassolo R.S., 2010, Alliance Activity as a Dynamic Capability in the Face of a Discontinuous Technological Change, Organization Science, 21(6).
• 4. Cravens D.W., Piercy N.F., 2013, Strategic Marketing, 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
• 5. Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A., 2000, Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? “Strategic Management Journal”, 21(1).
• 6. Gaur S.S., Vasudevan H., Gaur A.S., 2011, Market orientation and manufacturing performance of Indian SMEs: Moderating role of firm resources and environmental factors, “European Journal of Marketing”, 45(7).
• 7. Goethals G.R., Sorenson G.J., Burns J.M., 2002, Leadership in the Digital Age in Encyclopedia of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• 8. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., Vinzi E., 2014, Editorial Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance, Long Range Planning, 46(1-2).
• 9. Hamada T., 2019, Determinants of Decision-Makers’ Attitudes toward Industry 4.0 Adaption, Social Science, 8(140).
• 10. Haseeb M., Hussain H.I., Slusarczyk B., Jermsittiparsert K., 2019, Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance, Social Sciences, 8(5).
• 11. Helfat C.E., Peteraf M.A., 2003, The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles, “Strategic Management Journal”, 24(10).
• 12. Hou J.J., 2008, Toward a Research Model of Market Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities, “Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal”, 36(9).
• 13. Judge W.Q., Ryman J.A., 2011, The shared leadership challenge in strategic alliances: Lessons from the U.S. healthcare industry, Academy of Management Executive, 15(2).
• 14. Kapmeier F., Struben J., 2017, Understanding the Dynamics of Alliance Capabilities, Proceeding on 35th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
• 15. Khan R.E.A., Adnan Hye Q.M., 2014, Foreign direct investment and liberalization policies in Pakistan: An empirical analysis, Cogent Economics & Finance, 2(1).
• 16. Khan S.N., Ali E.I.E., 2017, The moderating role of intellectual capital between enterprise risk management and firm performance: A conceptual review, “American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities”, 2(1).
• 17. Khan Y., Hassan T., Yi W.M., Gulzar R., 2018, A Comparative Analysis Based on Economic Factors of Students Emigration from South Asia, “Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research”, 5(2).
• 18. Kohli R., Johnson S., 2011, Digital Transformation in Latecomer Industries: CIO and CEO Leadership Lessons from Encana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4).
• 19. Lin Y., Wu L.Y., 2014, Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework, “Journal of Business Research”, 67(3).
• 20. Liu H.H., Dejphanomporn P., 2018, Development of Inward Foreign Direct Investments in Thailand: Determinants, Effects and Implications, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(6).
• 21. Liu T., 2018, Long-Term Event Study on Earnings Surprises and Practical Portfolio Construction, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(6).
• 22. Loucks J., Bradley J., Macaulay J., Noronha A., Wade M., 2015, Digital Vortex: How Digital Disruption is Redefining Industries, Global Center for Digital Business Transformation.
• 23. Loukil K., 2017, Technological Innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: What’s the Contribution of Innovation Policy? The Economics and Finance Letters, 4(1).
• 24. Meier C., Sachs S., Stutz C., 2017, Establishing a Digital Leadership Barometer for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME), International conference 2017 Technology, Innovation and Industrial Management.
• 25. Narver J.C., Slater S.F., 1990, The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability, “Journal of Marketing”, 54(4).
• 26. Oberer B., Erkollar A., 2018, Leadership 4.0 : Digital Leaders in the Age, “International Journal of Organizational Leadership”, 7.
• 27. Özşahin M., Zehir C., Acar A.Z., Sudak M.K., 2013, The Effects of Leadership and Market Orientation on Organizational Commitment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99.
• 28. Protcko E., Dornberger U., 2014, The impact of market orientation on business performance - The case of Tatarstan knowledge-intensive companies (Russia), Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(4).
• 29. Salunke S., Weerawardena J., McColl-Kennedy J.R., 2011, Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: Insights from project-oriented service firms, Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8).
• 30. Sandell S., 2013, Digital leaDership how Creativity in Business Can propel your BranD & Boost your results, Rochester, UK: Allen house publishing Company limited.
• 31. Sapienza H.J., Zahra S., Davidson H., 2006, Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda Shaker, “Journal of Management Studies”, 43.
• 32. El Sawy O.A., Amsinck H., Kraemmergaard P., Lerbech Vinter A., 2015, Building the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership: The Lego Experience.
• 33. Schoemaker P.J.H., Heaton S., Teece D., 2018, Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Leadership, California Management Review, 61.
• 34. Schweitzer J., 2014, Leadership and innovation capability development in strategic alliances, “Leadership & Organization Development Journal”, 35(5).
• 35. Ślusarczyk B., 2019, Industry 4.0 - Are We Ready? “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 17(1).
• 36. Sotarauta M., 2005, Shared Leadership and Dynamic Capabilities in Regional Development. In Regionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance, [In] Sagan I., Halkier H., (eds.), “Urban and Regional Planning and Development Series”, Ashgate: Cornwall, UK.
• 37. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A., 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, “Strategic Management Journal”, 18(7).
• 38. Toduk Y., Gande S., 2016, What’s Next In Turkey? A New Leadership Model for Connected Age, Amrop Leadership Series.
• 39. Ulijn J., Duysters G., Meijer E., Hofstede G.J., 2013, Why do International Alliances Fail? Some Insights from Culture and Human Social Biology, Strategic Alliances, Mergers and Acquisitions.
• 40. Velu C., 2015, Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms, Technovation, 35.
• 41. Victor V., Joy Thoppan J., Jeyakumar Nathan R., Farkas Maria F., 2018, Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior and Prospective Purchase Decisions in a Dynamic Pricing Environment - An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach, Social Sciences, 7(9).
• 42. Wang Q., Bradford K., Xu J., Weitz B., 2008, Creativity in buyer-seller relationships: The role of governance, “International Journal of Research in Marketing”, 25(2).
• 43. Wasono L.W., Furinto A., Rukmana R.A.N., 2018, The Effect of Dynamic, Innovation, and Alliances Capability on Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Digital Disruption Era for Incumbent Telecommunication Firm, Proceedings of the international conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
• 44. Wilson G.A., Perepelkin J., Zhang D.Di, Vachon M.A., 2014, Market orientation, alliance orientation, and business performance in the biotechnology industry, “Journal of Commercial Biotechnology”, 20(2).
• 45. Zahra A.S., Sapienza J.H., Davidsson P., 2006, Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda, “Journal of Management Studies”, 43(4).
• 46. Zhu P., 2015, Digital Master : Debunk the Myths of Enterprise Digital Maturity, Lulu Publishing Services.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).