PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Maritime resource management: current training approaches and potential improvements

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Shipping can be regarded as a high-risk domain with a large complexity in operations. Accidents and incidents may involve serious danger for seafarers and passengers, as well as for the environment and society at large. Education and training play a crucial role for the safe conduct of ships. While technical skills have been at the core of a mariner’s skillset, non-technical skills (NTS) have become increasingly important for the safe conduct of merchant vessels. Therefore, knowledge in NTS has become a mandatory requirement for officers serving on board. This knowledge is normally taught in courses labelled Bridge Resource Management, Engine room Resource Management, or Maritime Resource Management. While the number of courses in the industry is steadily increasing, research focused on NTS training and its relation to safety in operation seems sparse. This review article aims to provide an overview of scientific literature focused on training NTS for maritime operations published between 2000 and 2018. Based on the reviewed literature the article identifies and discusses current research gaps, trends and potential future directions to improve maritime resource management training.
Twórcy
  • Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
  • University of South-Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway
autor
  • Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
autor
  • Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
Bibliografia
  • 1. Andersen, V., & Bove, T. (2000). A feasibility study of the use of incidents and accidents reports to evaluate effects of Team Resource Management in Air Traffic Control.
  • 2. Safety Science, 35(1), 87-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00024-2 Baker, D. P., Salas, E., King, H., Battles, J., & Barach, P. (2005). The Role of Teamwork in the Professional Education of Physicians: Current Status and Assessment Recommendations. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 31(4), 185-202. doi:10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31025-7
  • 3. Bennett, S. A. (2018). The training and practice of Crew Resource Management. Recommendations from an inductive in vivo study of the flight deck Ergonomics, 1-20. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1506159
  • 4. Burkhardt, J. M., Corneloup, V., Garbay, C., Bourrier, Y., Jambon, F., Luengo, V., Job, A., Cabon, Ph., Benabbou, A., & Lourdeaux, D. (2016). Simulation and virtual reality-based learning of non-technical skills in driving: critical situations, diagnostic and adaptation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(32), 66-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.191
  • 5. Cahill, J., Hurley, O., & Caughan, C. M. (2018). Addressing teamwork problems in healthcare: lessons learned from aviation and sport. 24(9), 448-457. doi:10.12968/bjhc.2018.24.9.448
  • 6. Chauvin, C. (2011). Human Factors and Maritime Safety. Journal of Navigation, 64(4), 625-632. doi:10.1017/S0373463311000142
  • 7. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.-P., & Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • 8. Clay-Williams, R., Hounsgaard, J., & Hollnagel, E. (2015). Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines. Implementation Science, 10(1), 125. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0317-y
  • 9. Crichton, M. T. (2017). From cockpit to operating theatre to drilling rig floor: five principles for improving safety using simulator-based exercises to enhance team cognition. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(1), 73-84. doi:10.1007/s10111-016-0396-9
  • 10. Espevik, R., Saus, E. R., & Olsen, O. K. (2017). Exploring the core of crew resource management course: speak up or stay silent. Exploring the core of crew resource management course: speak up or stay silent, 68(2), 126-132-126-132. doi:10.5603/IMH.2017.0023
  • 11. Fjeld, G. P., Tvedt, S. D., & Oltedal, H. J. W. J. o. M. A. (2018). Bridge officers’ non-technical skills: a literature review. 17(4), 475-495. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0158-z. doi:10.1007/s13437-018-0158-z
  • 12. Flin, R., & Maran, N. (2015). Basic concepts for crew resource management and non-technical skills. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1), 27-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.02.002
  • 13. Flin, R., Martin, L., Goeters, K., Hoermann, J., Amalberti, R., Valot, C., & Nijhuis, H. (2003). Development of the NOTECHS (Non-Technical Skills) system for assessing pilots' CRM skills. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 3, 95-117.
  • 14. Flin, R., O’Connor, P., & Mearns, K. (2002). Crew resource management: improving team work in high reliability industries. 8(3/4), 68-78. doi:doi:10.1108/13527590210433366
  • 15. Flin, R. H., O'Connor, P., & Crichton, M. (2008). Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-technical Skills: Ashgate.
  • 16. Furniss, D., Curzon, P., & Blandford, A. (2016). Using FRAM beyond safety: a case study to explore how sociotechnical systems can flourish or stall. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(5-6), 507-532. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2016.1155238
  • 17.Guinea, S., Andersen, P., Reid-Searl, K., Levett-Jones, T., Dwyer, T., Heaton, L., Flenady, T., Applegarth, J., & Bickell, P. (2018). Simulation-based learning for patient safety: The development of the Tag Team Patient Safety Simulation methodology for nursing education. Collegian. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.09.008
  • 18. Havinga, J., de Boer, R. J., Rae, A., & Dekker, W. S. (2017). How Did Crew Resource Management Take-Off Outside of the Cockpit? A Systematic Review of How Crew Resource Management Training Is Conceptualised and Evaluated for Non-Pilots. Safety, 3(4). doi:10.3390/safety3040026
  • 19. Hayward, B. J. H., Lowe, A. R., & Thomas, M. J. W. (2019). Chapter 15 - The Migration of Crew Resource Management Training. In B. G. Kanki, J. Anca, & T. R. Chidester (Eds.), Crew Resource Management (Third Edition) (pp. 421-447): Academic Press.
  • 20. Harrison, J. (2011). Making the Law of the Sea: a study in the development of international Law (Vol. 80): Cambridge University Press.
  • 21. Helmreich, R. L., & Foushee, H. C. (2019). Chapter 1 - Why CRM? Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Human Factors Training. In B. G. Kanki, J. Anca, & T. R. Chidester (Eds.), Crew Resource Management (Third Edition) (pp. 3-52): Academic Press.
  • 22. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1973, 4, 1-23.
  • 23. Hollnagel, E. (2009). The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off. Why Things. That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company
  • 24. Hollnagel, E. (2011). The Resilience Analysis Grid In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. Woods, & J. Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience Engineering in Practice. A Guidebook. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • 25. Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method. modelling complex socio-technical systems. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited
  • 26. Hollnagel, E. (2015). Why is Work-as-Imagined Different from Work-as- Done? In R. L. Wears, Hollnagel, E., & Braithwaite, J. (Ed.), Resilient Health Care, Volume 2: The Resilience of Everyday Clinical Work: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • 27. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts And Precepts: Ashgate.
  • 28. Hontvedt, M. (2015). Professional vision in simulated environments — Examining professional maritime pilots' performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 71-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.003
  • 29. Håvold, J. I., Nistad, S., Skiri, A., & Ødegård, A. (2015). The human factor and simulator training for offshore anchor handling operators. Safety Science, 75, 136-145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.001 IMO. (1974). SOLAS: International Convention for the safety of life at sea. London: International Maritime Organization.
  • 30. IMO. (2003). Resolution A.947(23) Human Element Vision, Principles and Goals for the Organization. Retrieved from IMO. (2017a). Marpol: Articles, Protocols, Annexes, Unified Interpretations of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, As Modified by the Protocol of 1978 Relating Thereto: International Maritime Organization.
  • 31. IMO. (2017b). STCW International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers: Including 2010 Manila Amendments : STCW Convention Ans STCW Code: International Maritime Organization.
  • 32. The Joint Accident Investigation Commission of Estonia, Finland and Sweden (1997) Final Report on the Capsizing on 28 September 1994 in the Baltic Sea of the Ro-Ro Passenger Vessel MV Estonia. Available at: http://onse.fi/estonia/brindex.html
  • 33. Jimenez, C., Kasper, K., Rivera, J., Talone, A. B., & Jentsch, F. (2015). Crew Resource Management (CRM): What Aviation Can Learn From the Application of CRM in Other Domains. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 946-950. doi:10.1177/1541931215591274
  • 34. Jörgens, R. (2012). Demands on Ship Officers according to the STCW Convention and Maritime Crew Resource Management as a future challenge for shipping. In B. Lemper, T. Pawlik, & S. Neumann (Eds.), The Human Element in Container Shipping. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  • 35. Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • 36. Kontogiannis, T., & Malakis, S. (2013). Strategies in controlling, coordinating and adapting performance in air traffic control: modelling ‘loss of control’ events. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15(2), 153-169. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0209-0.
  • 37. Kuy, S., & Romero, R. A. L. (2017). Improving staff perception of a safety climate with crew resource management training. Journal of Surgical Research, 213, 177-183. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.013. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.013
  • 38. Labaka, L., Hernantes, J., & Sarriegi, J. M. (2015). Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: An empirical study in a nuclear plant. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 92-105. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.009
  • 39. Lay, E., Branlat, M., & Woods, Z. (2015). A practitioner’s experiences operationalizing Resilience Engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 63-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.015
  • 40. Liberian Board of Investigation Report on Stranding of Torrey Canyon. (1967). International Legal Materials, 6(3), 480-487. doi:10.1017/S0020782900050294 Malakis, S., Kontogiannis, T., & Kirwan, B. (2010).
  • 41. Managing emergencies and abnormal situations in air traffic control (part I): Taskwork strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4), 620-627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.019
  • 42. Moffat, S., & Crichton, M. (2015). Investigating Non-technical Skills through Team Behavioral Markers in Oil and Gas Simulation-based Exercises. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1241-1247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.259
  • 43. Morel, G., Amalberti, R., & Chauvin, C. (2009). How good micro/macro ergonomics may improve resilience, but not necessarily safety. Safety Science, 47(2), 285-294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.002
  • 44. Murphy, M., McCloughen, A., & Curtis, K. (2018). Enhancing the training of trauma resuscitation flash teams: A mixed methods study. Australasian Emergency Care, 21(4), 143-149. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2018.10.002. doi:10.1016/j.auec.2018.10.002
  • 45. Nazir, S., Øvergård, K. I., & Yang, Z. (2015). Towards Effective Training for Process and Maritime Industries. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1519-1526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.409
  • 46. NTSB (1990) Grounding of the U.S. Tank Ship Exxon Valdez on Bligh Reef, Prince William Sound, near Valdez, Alaska, March 24, 1989. NTSB/MAR-90/04. Available at: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/R eports/MAR9004.pdf
  • 47. Nicolaides, M., Cardillo, L., Theodoulou, I., Hanrahan, J., Tsoulfas, G., Athanasiou, T., Papalois, A., & Sideris, M. (2018). Developing a novel framework for non-technical skills learning strategies for undergraduates: A systematic review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 36, 29-40
  • 48. O'Connor, P. (2011). Assessing the Effectiveness of Bridge Resource Management Training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21(4), 357-374. doi:10.1080/10508414.2011.606755
  • 49. O'Connor, P., & Flin, R. (2003). Crew Resource Management training for offshore oil production teams. Safety Science, 41(7), 591-609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00013-9
  • 50. Ouyang, M., & Wang, Z. (2015). Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: With a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 74-82.
  • 51. Paige, J. T. (2010). Surgical Team Training: Promoting High Reliability with Nontechnical Skills. Surgical Clinics of North America, 90(3), 569-581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.007
  • 52. Patriarca, R., & Bergström, J. J. C., (2017). Modelling complexity in everyday operations: functional resonance in maritime mooring at quay. Cognition, Technology and Work, 19(4), 711-729. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0426-2
  • 53. Pekcan, C., Gatfield, D., & Barnett, M. (2005). Content and context: Understanding the complexities of human behaviour in ship operation. Paper presented at the RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects International Conference - Human Factors in Ship Design, Safety and Operation, London.
  • 54. Perrow, C. (1999). Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • 55. Praetorius, G., & Hollnagel, E. (2014). Control and resilience within the maritime traffic management domain. Journal of Cognitive engineering and Decision Making (Special Issue on Resilient Cognitive Systems).
  • 56. Praetorius, G., Hollnagel, E., & Dahlman, J. (2015). Modelling Vessel Traffic Service to understand resilience in everyday operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 10-21. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.020
  • 57. Praetorius, G., & Lützhöft, M. (2011). “Safety is everywhere”-The Constituents of Maritime Safety. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1798-1802. doi:doi:10.1177/1071181311551373
  • 58. Righi, A. W., Saurin, T. A., & Wachs, P. (2015). A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 142-152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007
  • 59. Röttger, S., Vetter, S., & Kowalski, J. T. (2013). Ship Management Attitudes and Their Relation to Behavior and Performance. Human Factors, 55(3), 659-671. doi:doi:10.1177/0018720812461271
  • 60. Röttger, S., Vetter, S., & Kowalski, J. T. (2016). Effects of a classroom-based bridge resource management training on knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and performance of junior naval officers. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(1), 143-162. doi:10.1007/s13437-014-0073-x
  • 61. Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Burke, C. S., & Wightman, D. C. (2006). Does Crew Resource Management Training Work? An Update, an Extension, and Some Critical Needs. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 392-412..
  • 62. Salehi, S., Kiran, R., Jeon, J., Kang, Z., Cokely, E. T., & Ybarra, V. (2018). Developing a cross-disciplinary, scenario-based training approach integrated with eye tracking data collection to enhance situational awareness in offshore oil and gas operations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 56, 78-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.08.009
  • 63. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Hollnagel, E., & Baldauf, M. (2012). From Titanic to Costa Concordia—a century of lessons not learned. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 11(2), 151-167. doi:10.1007/s13437-012-0032-3
  • 64. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Hollnagel, E., Baldauf, M., Hofmann, S., & Kataria, A. (2013). Maritime human factors and IMO policy. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(3), 243-260. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.782974
  • 65. Studic, M., Majumdar, A., Schuster, W., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2017). A systemic modelling of ground handling services using the functional resonance analysis method. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 74, 245-260. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.004
  • 66. Sujan, M., Spurgeon, P., & Cooke, M. (2015). The role of dynamic trade-offs in creating safety—A qualitative study of handover across care boundaries in emergency care. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 54-62. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.006
  • 67. Tawfik, D. S., Sexton, J. B., Adair, K. C., Kaplan, H. C., & Profit, J. (2017). Context in Quality of Care: Improving Teamwork and Resilience. Clinics in Perinatology, 44(3), 541-552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2017.04.004
  • 68. Thomas, M. J. W. (2018). Training and Assessing Non-Technical Skills: A Practical Guide. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • 69. Thorogood, J., & Crichton, M. T. (2014). Threat-and-Error Management: The Connection Between Process Safety and Practical Action at the Worksite. SPE Drilling & Completion, 29(04), 465-472. doi:10.2118/167967-PA
  • 70. Todd, D. W. (2017). General Concepts of Patient Safety for the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 29(2), 121-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2016.12.001
  • 71. UNCTAD. (2017). Review of Maritime Transport 2017. Retrieved from Geneve and New York: https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?p ublicationid=1890
  • 72. UNCTAD. (2018). Merchant fleet by flag of registration and by type of ship, annual, 1980-2018. Retrieved from: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableVie w.aspx?ReportId=93
  • 73. Vederhus, L., Ødegård, A., Nistad, S., & Håvold, J. I. (2018). Perceptions of demanding work in maritime operations. Safety Science, 110, 72-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.008
  • 74. Véronneau, S., & Cimon, Y. (2007). Maintaining robust decision capabilities: An integrative human–systems approach. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 127-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.08.003
  • 75. Wachs, P., Saurin, T. A., Righi, A. W., & Wears, R. L. (2016). Resilience skills as emergent phenomena: A study of emergency departments in Brazil and the United States. Applied Ergonomics, 56, 227-237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.012
  • 76. Wachs, P., Weber Righi, A., & Saurin, T. A. (2012). Identification of non-technical skills from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor. Work, 41, 3069-3076.
  • 77. Wahl, A. M., & Kongsvik, T. J. W. J. o. M. A. (2018). Crew resource management training in the maritime industry: a literature review. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 17(3), 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0150-7.
  • 78. Wahlström, M., Seppänen, L., Norros, L., Aaltonen, I., & Riikonen, J. (2018). Resilience through interpretive practice – A study of robotic surgery. Safety Science, 108, 113-128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010
  • 79. Woltjer, R., Pinska-Chauvin, E., Laursen, T., & Josefsson, B. (2015). Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 115-130. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.010
  • 80. Woods, D. D. (2006). Essential Characteristics fo Resilience. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, & N. Leveson (Eds.), Resilience Engineering: Precepts And Concepts (pp. 21-34). Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing Group
  • 81. Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 5-9. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
  • 82. Youngson, G. G. (2016). Nontechnical skills in pediatric surgery: Factors influencing operative performance. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 51(2), 226-230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.062
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9b1d9658-b31d-485e-9b81-bb48e16d883c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.