The role of structural analyses and queries in recognizing damage causes and selecting remedies in historic buildings: case of the Dominican monastery in Lublin

• Autorzy: Halicka Anna , Ostańska Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2022.140176

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rola analiz konstrukcyjnych i kwerendy historycznej w ustaleniu przyczyn uszkodzeń i wyborze metod naprawczych budynków zabytkowych, na przykładzie klasztoru oo. Dominikanów w Lublinie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the process of structural diagnostics of the Dominican monastery in Lublin. In order to establish the underlying cause of cracks, not only in situ investigations but also detailed analyses of documents were executed. Inventory drawings were examined in order to identify the building’s structural system. The query of historical documents and city archives was carried out to understand the structure’s performance. Conclusions were confronted with the crack pattern. It was established that the damage resulted from the original conditions of the structural system in place. These conditions were created in past, when the monastery incorporated sections of the medieval town wall into its structure. The article details structural remedies applied in the course of rehabilitation. The introduction of supporting structures was the effect of a compromise between the necessity of ensuring structural safety and the demand for the minimum impact on the heritage site. The article aims to highlight that the structural assessment of the heritage asset is an investigative process. The work also emphasizes that in spite of numerous up-to-date methods helpful in the structural diagnostics of building structure, the conceptual analyses of the structural system still remain of vital importance. The query of historical documents helps in determining the structural system of a historic building, and vice versa, structural analyses assist in recognizing and supplementing the knowledge of the asset’s history.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono proces diagnostyki konstrukcyjnej klasztoru oo. Dominikanów w Lublinie. Dla określenia przyczyn uszkodzeń budynków zrealizowano nie tylko badania in situ oraz obliczeń konstrukcyjnych, ale także szczegółową analizę dokumentów historycznych. Przeanalizowano rysunki inwentaryzacyjne w celu ustalenia układu konstrukcyjnego. Kwerenda dokumentów historycznych i archiwów miejskich pomogła zrozumieć prace statyczną obiektu. Wnioski z tych analiz były konfrontowane z obrazem zarysowania. Stwierdzono, że uszkodzenia wynikały z „warunków początkowych” systemu konstrukcyjnego - podczas rozbudowy klasztoru w przeszłości wbudowano weń pierwotne średniowieczne mury obronne. Opisano także zastosowane środki naprawcze. Zastosowane konstrukcje wsporcze były kompromisem pomiędzy koniecznością zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa konstrukcji a wymaganiem minimum ingerencji w tkankę historyczną. Celem artykułu jest także wykazanie, że diagnostyka konstrukcyjna budynków zabytkowych jest procesem koncepcyjnym. Podkreślono, że pomimo istnienia wielu współczesnych metod pomocnych w diagnostyce budynków, analizy koncepcyjne systemu konstrukcyjnego mają podstawowe znaczenie. Kwerenda dokumentów historycznych pomaga w zidentyfikowaniu układu konstrukcyjnego budynku zabytkowego i vice versa - analizy konstrukcyjne pomagają w rozpoznaniu i uzupełnieniu wiedzy o zabytku.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

historic building; structural diagnostics; historic documentation; rehabilitation; structural system; damage; Dominican monastery; Lublin

PL

budynek zabytkowy; diagnostyka konstrukcji; dokumentacja historyczna; rehabilitacja; system konstrukcyjny; uszkodzenie; klasztor dominikanów; Lublin

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 68, nr 1
• Strony: 413--430
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Halicka Anna

• Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-8862

autor

Ostańska Anna

• Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-4288

Bibliografia

• [1] E. Radziszewska-Zielina, G. Śladowski, “Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historical building with the use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2017, vol. 26, pp. 53-63.
• [2] L. Czarnecki and D. Van Gemert, “Scientific basis and rules of thumb in civil engineering: conflict or harmony”, Bulletin of Polish Academy of Science: Technical sciences, 2016, vol. 64, pp. 665-673.
• [3] G. Barbieri, M. Valente, L. Biolzi, C. Togliani, L. Fregonese, G. Stanga, “An insight in the late Baroque architecture: An integrated approach for a unique Bibiena church”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2017, vol. 23, pp. 58-67.
• [4] M. P. Sammartino, G. Cau, R. Reale, S. Ronca, G. Visco, “A multidisciplinary diagnostic approach preliminary to the restoration of the country church “San Maurizio” located in Ittiri (SS)”, Heritage Science 2, 2014, vol. 4.
• [5] E. Diz-Mellado, E.J. Mascort-Albea, R. Romero-Hernández, C. Galán-Martín, C. Rivera-Gòmez, J. Ruiz-Jaramillo, A. Jaramillo-Morilla, “Non-destructive testing and Finite Element Method integrated procedure for heritage diagnosis: The Seville Cathedral case study”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, vol. 37, p. 102134.
• [6] M.F. Funari, S. Spadea, P. Lonetti, F. Fabbrocino, R. Luciano, “Visual programming for structural assessment of out-of-plane mechanism in historic masonry structures”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, vol. 31, p. 101425.
• [7] M.A. Nùñez-Andrés, F. Buill, A. Costa-Jover, J.M. Puche, “Structural assessment of Roman wall and vaults in the cloister of Tarragona Cathedral”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2017, vol. 13, pp. 77-86.
• [8] C. Akcay, A. Solt, N.M. Korkmaz, B. Sayin, “Aproposal for the reconstruction of historical masonry building constructed in Ottoman Era (Istambul)”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, vol. 32, pp. 101493.
• [9] ICOMOS: “Recommendation for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage”. 2003. Website of International Council of Monuments and sites. https://www.icomos.org/en/aboutthe-centre/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/165-icomos-charter-principles-forthe-analysis-conservation-and-structural-restoration-of-architectural-heritage. Accessed 10 Feb. 2021
• [10] C. Alessandri, V. Mallardo, “Structural assessments of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2012, vol. 13, Supplement, pp. e61-e69.
• [11] A. Anzani, L. Binda, A. Carpinteri, S. Invernizzi, G. Lacidogna, “A multilevel approach for the damage assessment of Historic masonry towers”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2010, vol. 11, pp. 459-470.
• [12] L. Binda, A. Saisi, C. Tiraboschi, “Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries”, Construction and Building Materials, 2000, vol. 14, pp. 199-233.
• [13] P. B. Lourenço, “Recommendations for restoration of ancient buildings and the survival of masonry chimney”, Construction and Building Materials, 2006, vol. 20, pp. 239-251.
• [14] M-G. Masciotta, L. F. Ramos, P. B. Lourenço, “The importance of structural monitoring as a diagnosis and control tool in the restoration process of heritage structures: A case study in Portugal”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2017, vol. 27, pp. 36-47.
• [15] G. Teza, S. Trevisani, A. Pesci, “The role of geoenvironmental sciences in Cultural Heritage preservation: the case of 1000 year old leaning bell tower of Caorle (Venice)”. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2019, vol. 39, pp. 270-277.
• [16] C. Alessandri, M. Garutti, V. Mallardo, G. Milani, “Crack Patterns Induced by Foundation Settlements: Integrated Analysis on a Renaissance Masonry Palace in Italy”, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 111-129.
• [17] M. Betti, M. Orlando, A. Vignoli, “Static behaviour of an Italian Medieval Castle: Damage assessment by numerical modelling”, Computer Structures, 2011, vol. 89, pp. 1956-1970.
• [18] G. Croci, “General methodology for the structural restoration of historic buildings: the cases of the Tower of Pisa and the Basilica of Assisi”. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 7-18.
• [19] S. Hemeda, “3D finite element coupled analysis model for geotechnical and complex structural problems of historic masonry structures: conservation of Abu Serga church, Cairo, Egypt”, Heritage Science, 2019, vol. 6.
• [20] K. Papadopoulos, “The Restoration of the North-Side Foundation of the Temple of Apollo Epikourios”, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2010, DOI: 10.1080/15583050903121869.
• [21] L. Schueremans, K. Van Balen, K. Brosens, D. Van Gemert, P. Smars, “Church of Saint-James at Leuven: Structural Assessment and Consolidation Measures”, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2007, DOI: 10.1080/15583050601126137.
• [22] “Public records of Lublin City 1465-1810” (in Polish). National Archives in Lublin.
• [23] B. Nowak, “Lublin Guidebook” (in Polish), Test, Lublin, 2000.
• [24] A. Halicka, A. Ostańska, “Selection of repair materials for the restoration of historic monastery masonry” (in Polish), in: Ecology in the building processes. Lublin University of Technology, Lublin 2003, pp. 185-192.
• [25] A. Halicka, A. Ostańska, “Strengthening of the corner of historic Dominican monastery in Lublin” (in Polish), Przeglad budowlany 2004, vol. 7-8, pp. 32-36.
• [26] J. Lewicki, “Free-standing early medieval building in Dominican Monastery in Lublin” (in Polish), in: Medieval sacral architecture in Poland in the light of new research. Biblioteka Poczatków Panstwa Polskiego, Gniezno, 2014, 173-189.
• [27] J. Jasieńko, D. Logoń, W. Misztal, “Trass-lime reinforced mortars in strengthening and reconstruction of historical masonry walls”, Construction and Building Materials, 2016, vol. 102, pp. 884-892.
• [28] M. Corradi, A. Di Schino, A. Borri, R. Rufini, “A review of the use of stainless steel for masonry repair and reinforcement”, Construction and Building Materials, 2018, vol. 181.
• [29] P. Zampieri, N. Simoncello, C.D. Tetougueni, C. Pellegrino, “A review of methods for strengthening of masonry arches with composite materials”, Engineering Structures, 2018, vol. 171, pp. 154-169.
• [30] F.G. Carozzi, C. Poggi, E. Bertolesi, G. Milani, “Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM, SRG and FRP composites: Experimental evaluation”, Composite Structures, 2018, vol. 187, pp. 466-480.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).