The evolution of the ship owner profile in global container shipping

• Autorzy: Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek Aneta , Czermański Ernest

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17402/342

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Globalization poses new challenges, while also providing development opportunities for strong and dynamic enterprises and new sectors which shape the world markets and economy and contribute to a more global approach to business activities. The business activities undertaken in each country depend on a number of factors, and these factors are often similar due to globalization, though their impacts appear to vary. In addition, changes in economies progress at different speeds, thus this article aims to determine how the impact of change in the global economy influences transformations in ownership in container shipping. The organization and operation of global container shipping is shaped by numerous external factors, i.e. economic, geographical, and political factors. The impact of these factors varies depending on the specific aspect of the container shipping industry being discussed. This paper was motivated by the need to determine the container fleet size and ownership structure in container shipping, and whether these are changing as the industry evolves. The stated aim of this research requires the use of statistical methods and a literature review to allow for a comparative study of the size and ownership relations in container shipping.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cooperation; alliances; container shipping; capital concentration; evolution; ship owner

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: nr 58 (130)
• Strony: 105--112
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek Aneta

• University of Gdańsk Faculty of Economics, Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade 119/121 Armii Krajowej St., 81-824 Sopot, Poland

autor

Czermański Ernest

• University of Gdańsk Faculty of Economics, Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade 119/121 Armii Krajowej St., 81-824 Sopot, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Alphaliner (2019) The World References in Liner Shipping. [Online] Available from: www.alphaliner.com [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 2. AXS Marine (2019) Alphaliner TOP 100. [Online] Available from: alphaliner.axsmarine.com/PublicTop100/ [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 3. Bembenek, B. (2006) Partnerstwo przejawem przedsiębiorczości. In: Kaleta A. et al. (Eds) Przedsiębiorczość i innowacyjność. Wyzwania współczesności. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu 1116, Wrocław, pp. 227.
• 4. Cappellin, R. (2004) International knowledge and innovation networks for European integration, cohesion, and enlargement. International Social Science Journal 56 (180), pp. 207–225.
• 5. Ducruet, C. & Notteboom, T. (2012) The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: spatial structure and regional dynamics. Global Networks 12, 2, pp. 395– 423.
• 6. Grant, R.M. & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004) A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41, 1, pp. 61–84.
• 7. Hecksher (2018) New Japanese carrier ocean network express gets final approval. [Online] Available from: www. hecksher.com/news/new-japanese-carrier-ocean-network -express-gets-final-approval/ [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 8. Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A. & Vaidyanath, D. (2002) Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 28 (3), pp. 413–446.
• 9. Knowler, G. (2016) CMA CGM completes takeover of NOL. [Online] Available from: www.joc.com/maritime-news/container-lines/apl/cma-cgm-completes-takeover-nol_20160905.html [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 10. Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2003) Deconstructing Clusters. Chaotic Concept or Policy Panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3, 1, pp. 5–35.
• 11. Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2005) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? In: Breschi, S. & Malerba, F. (Eds) Clusters, Networks and Innovation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 433–438.
• 12. Morosini, P. (2004) Industrial Cluster, Knowledge Integration and Performance. World Development 32, 2, pp. 305–326.
• 13. Muthusamy, S.K. & White, M.A. (2005) Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View. Organization Studies 26 (3), pp. 415–441.
• 14. Popławski, W., Sudolska, A. & Zastempowski, M. (2008) Współpraca przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w procesie budowania ich potencjału innowacyjnego. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa „Dom Organizatora”.
• 15. Seaspan (2019) Operating fleet. [Online] Available from: www.seaspancorp.com/fleet-summary/operating-fleet/ [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 16. Seemann, P., De Long, D., Stucky, S. & Guthrie, E. (2000) Building Intangible Assets. A Strategic Framework for Investing in Intellectual Capital. In: Morey, D., et al. (Eds) Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works. Chapter 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• 17. SupplyChain247 (2017) Hanjin Shipping is Officially Bankrupt [Online] Available from: https://www.supplychain247. com/article/hanjin_shipping_is_officially_bankrupt [Accessed: May 06, 2019].
• 18. Sznajder, A. (2009) Alianse marketingowe szansą na zwiększenie konkurencyjności. Marketing i Rynek 6.
• 19. Szymoniuk, B. (2008) Korzyści lokalizacji w budowaniu globalnej przewagi konkurencyjnej. Doświadczenia polskich klastrów gospodarczych. In: Rymarczyk, J., Drelich- -Skulska, B & Michalczyk W. (Eds) Regionalizacja globalizacji. Tom 2. Wrocław: Akademia Ekonomiczna.
• 20. Todeva, E. & Knoke, D. (2005) Strategic Alliances & Models of Collaboration. Management Decision 43, 1, pp. 123–148.
• 21. Witkowski, J. (2003) Zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw. Koncepcje – procedury – doświadczenia. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).