Evaluation of determinant factors influencing the selection of ship management companies

• Autorzy: Riadi A. , Mudaffa F.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.16.04.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Looking at the high flow of the shipping industry and many things related to the ship operations that have to be done every day, several ship owners have collaborated with Ship Management Company (SMC) to assist them in managing their ships' operations. SMC is required to be responsible for the daily operational management of the ship on behalf of the ship owner such as crewing, technical management, administration, and chartering. Seeing the importance of collaboration and the diversity of services provided by the SMC, it is necessary to evaluate each determinant factor by the ship owner for the selection of an SMC to assist the ship owner in choosing an SMC that suits their needs. It is also to improve the service prioritized by the owner to SMC. The purpose of this research is to identify the determinant factors of SMC selection from the owner’s perspective, evaluate the importance of each of these factors, and obtain different views between the owner and SMC in the selection of ship management. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method is used for evaluating weight based on the opinions of the owners and SMC who are experts in their fields. Then, the different perspectives between the owner dan SMC were obtained from the processing result. The results show that owners placed their top priority on factors that they can get the most from SMC, such as human resource factors and services. Meanwhile, SMC placed its priority on cost and its services factors that described the things they must manage well and optimization provided to owners.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maritime transportation; ship management; ship management company; ship companies; fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; Analytical Hierarchy Process; shipping industry; shipowners

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 16 No. 4
• Strony: 711--716
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Riadi A.

• University of Indonesia, West Java, Jakarta, Indonesia

autor

Mudaffa F.

• University of Indonesia, West Java, Jakarta, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. BIMCO, Baltic, & Council, I. M. (2009). SHIPMAN 2009: Standard Ship Management Contract (Sample). BIMCO. https://bimco.org.
• 2. Bistrivci’c, A., Jugovic, A., & Kuzman, Z. (2011). The role of ship management in business activities of shipping companies. Pomorstvo: Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, 25, 29–44.
• 3. Dickie, J. W. (2014). Reeds 21st Century Ship Management. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• 5. Elveny, M., & Syah, R. (2014). Analisis Metode Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Dalam Menentukan Posisi Jabatan. TECHSI, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/techsi.v6i1.166.
• 6. Frankel, E. G. (1982). Ship management systems developments. Maritime Policy & Management, 9(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838200000028.
• 7. Goguen, J. A. (1973). L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, vol. 8 (1965), pp. 338–353. - L. A. Zadeh. Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Information sciences, vol. 3 (1971), pp. 177–200. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 38(4), 656–657. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2307/2272014.
• 8. Goulielmos, A. M., Giziakis, K. V., & Pallari, B. (2011). Advantages and disadvantages of managing own ships by a third party ship management company: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2011.039375.
• 9. Jeon, J.-W., Yeo, G.-T., Thai, V. V, & Yip, T. L. (2016). An evaluation of the success factors for ship management companies using fuzzy evaluation method. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8, 389–405.
• 10. King, J., & Mitroussi, K. (2003). Third-party Ship Management: A Greek Perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100077.
• 11. Lin, T.-Y., Chung, C.-C., & Ho, T.-C. (2019). An Evaluation of the Key Influencing Factors for Tramp Shipping Corporations Selecting Ship Management Companies. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 27(2).
• 12. Mitroussi, K. (2013). Ship Management: Contemporary Developments and Implications. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.08.006
• 13. Neumann, T. (2017). Fuzzy routing algorithm in telematics transportation systems, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 715, 494-505, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66251-0_40.
• 14. Panayides, P. M. (2003). Competitive strategies and organizational performance in ship management. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000084850.
• 15. Panayides, P. M., & Gray, R. (1997). Marketing the professional ship management service. Maritime Policy & Management, 24(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839700000028.
• 16. Panayides, P. M., & Gray, R. (1999). An empirical assessment of relational competitive advantage in professional ship management. Maritime Policy & Management, 26(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/030888399286943.
• 17. Pollalis, A. (2009). Third Party Ship Management Companies and their Legal Relationship with their Principals.
• 18. Puspitasari, D. (2009). Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam. Penentuan Kriteria Penilaian Performa Vendor (Studi Kasus PT. X)No Title [Universitas Indonesia]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-8/20250228-S52017-Dwi Puspitasari.pdf&ust=1669890729691816.
• 19. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
• 20. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
• 21.Tzeng, G., & Teng, J. (1993). Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives. Transportation Planning and Technology, 17(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069308717504.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).