PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The contemporary trends of scientific research on ESG and non-financial reporting

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The article addresses the issue of contemporary directions of ESG research with particular emphasis on non-financial disclosure (non-financial reporting) of companies. The aim of the study is to identify areas of ongoing scientific research in the subject. Design/methodology/approach: The conducted research has the character of meta-analysis. The focus was on achievements in two main scientific disciplines: economics and finance, and management and quality sciences. The research covered publications related to non-financial reporting, with ESG aspects - environmental (environmental), social (social) and corporate governance (governance) - as a common thread. Findings: The study of ESG and non-financial reporting is a rapidly evolving area of contemporary research in economics and management. The volatility is driven, on the one hand, by the needs of companies themselves as they adapt to changes in the operating environment, while, on the other hand, ESG and non-financial reporting activities are significantly influenced by regulations that cover an increasingly wide range of companies. Increasingly, researchers are using statistical analysis methods for this purpose, which is slowly becoming a separate sub-discipline in methodology as a science. The development of research tools, including advanced statistical packages, can lead to significant changes in the range of analysis methods - from qualitative methods, based on descriptions, to statistical analysis, using measures of centrality, frequency, or so-called burst-terms analysis. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of the study is the time scope of the research. Only articles from 2004-2021 were included in the main analysis, which was determined by the availability of databases at the time the source material was collected. The research conducted shows the directions of change in the scientific exploration of ESG issues and non-financial reporting, which can be exploited for further analyses by researchers, students, and other entities working on the subject. Originality/value: The research not only show past and current trends in ESG research, but also a change in research methodology, which increasingly uses quantitative methods. This thread represents an attractive area for further scientific exploration.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
225--238
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz.
Twórcy
  • Poznan University of Economics and Business
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alsayegh, M.F., Rahman, R.A., Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910.
  • 2. Belbasis, L., Bellou, V., Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2022b). Conducting umbrella reviews. BMJ Medicine, 1(1), e000071. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000071.
  • 3. Błażyńska, J. (2022). Rozszerzona sprawozdawczość finansowa - wytyczne dyrektywy 2014/95/UE. In: E. Różańska (ed.), Sprawozdawczość niefinansowa. Ujawnianie i atestacja informacji niefinansowych w świetle regulacji i standardów (pp. 62-82). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. https://doi.org/10.18559/978- 83-8211-127-9.
  • 4. Bonczar, M., Ostrowski, P., D'Antoni, A.V., Tubbs, R.S., Iwanaga, J., Ghosh, S.K., Klejbor, I., Kuniewicz, M., Walocha, J., Moryś, J., Koziej, M. (2023). How to write an umbrella review? A step-by-step tutorial with tips and tricks. Folia Morphologica, 82(1), 1-6. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0104.
  • 5. Cant, R., Ryan, C., Kelly, M.A. (2022). A nine-step pathway to conduct an umbrella review of literature. Nurse Author & Editor, 32(2), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.12039.
  • 6. Chen, Z., Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291.
  • 7. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131.
  • 8. Choi, G.J., Kang, H. (2023). Introduction to umbrella reviews as a useful Evidence-Based practice. Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2023.12.1.3.
  • 9. Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R., Nobile, L., Schwizer, P. (2022). Revising the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and the role of board of directors: a lost opportunity? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021- 0102.
  • 10. Diwan, H., Sreeraman, B.A. (2023). From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures. Environment Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 13769-13805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023- 03249-2.
  • 11. Doni, F., Martini, S.B., Corvino, A., Mazzoni, M. (2019). Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5), 781-802. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-12-2018-0423.
  • 12. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
  • 13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
  • 14. Ellili, N.O.D. (2022). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of environmental, social, and governance disclosure papers: current topics and recommendations for future research. Environmental Research Communications, 4(9), 092001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515- 7620/ac8b67.
  • 15. Erkens, M., Paugam, L., Stolowy, H. (2015). Non-financial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, 21(3), 15-92. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.213.0015.
  • 16. European Parliament (2022, December 14). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj.
  • 17. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: the moderating role of disclosure, Global Finance Journal, Vol. 38, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.
  • 18. Fijałkowska, J. (2016). Raportowanie informacji niefinansowych zgodnie z nową dyrektywą UE 2014/95EU jako wyzwanie dla przedsiębiorstw. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, no. 436, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.436.12.
  • 19. Fijałkowska, J., Krasodomska, J., Macuda, M., Mućko, P. (2019). Sprawozdawczość niefinansowa. Regulacja i standaryzacja raportowania niefinansowego przedsiębiorstw. Rozprawy i Studia. T. MCLXII, 1088. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
  • 20. Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.
  • 21. Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684.
  • 22. Gao, F., Dong, Y., Ni, C., Fu, R. (2015). Determinants and economic consequences of nonfinancial disclosure quality. European Accounting Review, 25(2), 287-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1013049.
  • 23. Gao, J., Chu, D., Zheng, J., Ye, T. (2022). Environmental, social and governance performance: Can it be a stock price stabilizer? Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134705.
  • 24. Hoang, T. (2018). The role of the Integrated Reporting in raising awareness of Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) performance. In: Developments in corporate governance and responsibility (pp. 47-69). https://doi.org/10.1108/s2043- 052320180000014003.
  • 25. Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., Avetisyan, E., Kinderman, D., Knudsen, J.S. (2019). Mandatory non-financial disclosure and its influence on CSR: An international comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04200-0.
  • 26. Kawacki, M. (2023). Sprawozdawczość spółek w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. https://doi.org/10.18559/978- 83-8211-180-4.
  • 27. Kell, G. (2021). The Remarkable Rise of ESG. Forbes, pp. 1-8. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgkell/2018/07/11/the-remarkable-rise-ofesg/?sh55e2b117a1695
  • 28. Lament, M. (2017). Raportowanie informacji niefinansowych w zakładach ubezpieczeń w Polsce. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, tom 91.
  • 29. Li, T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., Wang, D.D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663.
  • 30. Lim, W.M., Kumar, S., Ali, F. (2022). Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: 'what', 'why', and 'how to contribute'. Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 481-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941.
  • 31. Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G., Zanellato, G. (2018). Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using Non-Financial Disclosure-De facto and de jure evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041162.
  • 32. Orens, R., Aerts, W., Cormier, D. (2010). Web-Based Non-Financial Disclosure and Cost of Finance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, pp. 1057-1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02212.x.
  • 33. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643- 021-01626-4.
  • 34. Paul, J., Lim, W.M., O'Cass, A., Hao, A.W., Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), pp. O1-O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695.
  • 35. Primec, A., Belak, J. (2022). Sustainable CSR: Legal and Managerial Demands of the New EU Legislation (CSRD) for the Future Corporate Governance Practices. Sustainability, 14(24), 16648. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416648.
  • 36. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, February, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134.
  • 37. Rubik, J. (2018). Raportowanie niefinansowe spółek Respect Index po zmianach. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, nr 269.
  • 38. Senadheera, S.S., Gregory, R., Rinklebe, J., Farrukh, M., Rhee, J.H., Ok, Y.S. (2022). The development of research on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Environment, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511. 2022.2125869.
  • 39. Signori, S., San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J.L., Rusconi, G.(2021). Stakeholder Value Creation: Comparing ESG and Value Added in European Companies. Sustainability, 13, 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031392.
  • 40. Skoczylas, W. (2019). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w świetle analizy zawartości raportów niefinansowych spółek makrosektora produkcja przemysłowa i budowlanomontażowa. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, tom 103.
  • 41. Śnieżek, E., Krasodomska, J., Szadziewska, A. (2018). Informacje niefinansowe w sprawozdawczości biznesowej przedsiębiorstw. Wydawnictwo Nieoczywiste.
  • 42. Świderska, G.K., Bek-Gaik, B. (2016). Dokąd zmierza raportowanie biznesowe? Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, no. 274.
  • 43. Turzo, T., Marzi, G., Favino, C., Terzani, S. (2022). Non-financial reporting research and practice: Lessons from the last decade. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131154.
  • 44. United Nations, The Global Compact (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting the Financial Markets to a Changing World? United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_w ins.pdf, 20.09.2024
  • 45. Walińska, E.M. (2015). Zintegrowany raport - początek końca sprawozdania finansowego? Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, vol. 82(138).
  • 46. Wong, W.C., Batten, J.A., Ahmad, A.H., Mohamed-Arshad, S.B., Nordin, S., Adzis, A.A. (2020). Does ESG certification add firm value. Finance Research Letters, Vol. 39, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593.
  • 47. Xue, R., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Linnenluecke, M.K., Jin, K., Cai, C.W. (2023). The adverse impact of corporate ESG controversies on sustainable investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, 139237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139237
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-99e022c1-d90a-4e41-98fd-202f0ce83515
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.