Effectiveness of current technology in GHG reduction – A literature survey

• Autorzy: Klakeel T. , Anantharaman M. , Islam R. , Garaniya V.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.17.01.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In 2018 during the 72nd session of the Maritime Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) IMO adopted its initial strategy for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from the ships to meet the Paris Agreement Goals, 2015. This is considered as a major milestone in formulizing a clear strategy by IMO towards its objective of reducing the global GHG emissions from the ships. The strategy had two primary objectives: the first was to decrease total annual GHG emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. The second objective was to promote the phasing out of GHG emissions entirely. In 2020, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) conducted a study which revealed that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping had increased by 9.6%. The rise in global maritime trade was identified as the main factor behind this increase. IMO's 2020 study also concluded that reducing GHG emissions by focusing only on energy-saving technologies and ship speed reduction would not be enough to meet the IMO's 2050 GHG reduction target. Therefore, greater attention needs to be given to the use of low-carbon alternative fuels. To understand the effectiveness of currently available technologies in reducing GHG emissions from ships, a literature survey was conducted in this study. The survey examined a range of related articles published between 2018 and 2022. This study aimed to identify the current stage and the quantity of literature available on various technologies and, more importantly, serve as a decision-making support tool for selecting a technology under specific circumstances in a quantitative manner. The technologies were divided into four groups: those that utilize fossil fuels, those that use renewable energy, those that use fuel cells, and those that use low-carbon or alternative fuels. The literature survey was conducted using Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar. The results of this study will also help to identify clear research gaps in comparing the effectiveness of various available technologies to reduce GHG emissions. Ultimately, the aim is to develop a comprehensive strategy that can be used to reduce GHG emissions from shipping and contribute to the global fight against climate change.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

effectiveness evaluation; greenhouse gas; literature review; marine environment; IMO guidelines; hydrogen fuel cell; heavy fuel oil; energy efficiency design index

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 17 No. 1
• Strony: 171--176
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Klakeel T.

• University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

autor

Anantharaman M.

• University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

autor

Islam R.

• University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

autor

Garaniya V.

• University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

Bibliografia

• [1] Romano, A & Yang, Z 2021, ʹDecarbonisation of shipping: A state of the art survey for 2000–2020ʹ, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 214, p. 105936.
• [2] Wang, H.B., Zhou, P.L., Wang, Z.C., 2017. Reviews on current carbon emission reduction technologies and projects and their feasibilities on ships. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 16 (2), 129–136.
• [3] IMO 2018, UN body adopts climate change strategy for shipping, IMO, <https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/06GHGinitialstrategy.aspx>.
• [4] Ayudhia P Gusti, Semin, A.B Dinariyana, Mohammad I.Irawan, Masao Furusho, 2019: Reduction in Ship Fuel Consumption And Emission By Sailing at Slow Speed.
• [5] Psaraftis, HN 2019, ʹThe Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI).
• [6] NK, C 2016, ʹProcedure for calculation and verification of the Energy Efficiency Design Index.
• [7] TRANSPORTATION, ICCT 2020, ʹThe climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel.
• [8] Gabbar, HA, Adham, MI & Abdussami, MR 2021, ʹAnalysis of nuclear‐renewable hybrid energy system for marine shipsʹ, Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 2398‐2417.
• [9] Yunlong Wang, Xin Zhang, Shaochuan Lin, Zhaoxin Qiang, Jinfeng Hao, Yan Qiu, 2022 ‐ Analysis on the Development of Wind‐assisted Ship Propulsion Technology and Contribution to Emission Reduction.
• [10] D.‐S. C. Donghyun Oh, Dae‐Seung Cho , 2022 : Design and evaluation of hybrid propulsion ship powered by fuel cell and bottoming cycle.
• [11] Peng Cheng, TP, Ruiye Li, Ning Lian 2021, ʹResearch on optimal matching of renewable energy power generation system and ship power system.
• [12] Guan, LCaW 2021, ʹSafety Design and Engineering Solution of Fuel Cell Powered Ship in Inland Waterway of China.
• [13] Xiaobing Maod, RY, Yupeng Yuan, FengLi, Boyang Shenb 2021, ʹSimulation and analysis of hydrogen eakage and explosion behaviors in various compartments on a hydrogen fuel cell ship.
• [14] M. Cavo, EG, D. Rattazzii, M. Rivarolo, L. Magistri 2021, ʹDynamic analysis of PEM fuel cells and metal hydrides on a zero‐emission ship: A model‐based approach.
• [15] Francesco Baldi, AAFM 2019, ʹFrom renewable energy to ship fuel: ammonia as an energy vector and mean for energy storage.
• [16] Al‐Aboosi, FY, El‐Halwagi, MM, Moore, M & Nielsen, RB 2021, ʹRenewable ammonia as an alternative fuel for the shipping industryʹ, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, vol. 31.
• [17] Hansson, J, Brynolf, S, Fridell, E & Lehtveer, M 2020, The Potential Role of Ammonia as Marine Fuel‐Based on Energy Systems Modeling and Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysisʹ, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8.
• [18] Kim, K, Roh, G, Kim, W & Chun, K 2020, ʹA Preliminary Study on an Alternative Ship Propulsion System Fueled by Ammonia: Environmental and Economic Assessmentsʹ, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3.
• [19] Pham, V, Kim, H, Choi, JH, Nyongesa, AJ, Kim, J, Jeon, H & Lee, WJ 2022, ʹEffectiveness of the Speed Reduction Strategy on Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Oil Consumption of a Marine Generator Engine for DC Grid Shipsʹ, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 7.
• [20] Feng, S, Xu, SR, Yuan, P, Xing, YY, Shen, BX, Li, ZM, Zhang, CG, Wang, XQ, Wang, ZZ, Ma, J & Kong, WW 2022, ʹThe Impact of Alternative Fuels on Ship Engine Emissions and Aftertreatment Systems: A Reviewʹ, Catalysts, vol. 12, no. 2.
• [21] Lindstad, E, Lagemann, B, Rialland, A, Gamlem, GM & Valland, A 2021, ʹReduction of maritime GHG emissions and the potential role of E‐fuelsʹ, Transportation Research Part D‐Transport and Environment, vol. 101.
• [22] Aksoyoglu, S, Jiang, JH, Ciarelli, G, Baltensperger, U & Prevot, ASH 2020, ʹRole of ammonia in European air quality with changing land and ship emissions between 1990 and 2030ʹ, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 15665‐15680.
• [23] Sui, CB, de Vos, P, Stapersma, D, Visser, K & Ding, Y 2020, ʹFuel Consumption and Emissions of Ocean‐Going Cargo Ship with Hybrid Propulsion and Different Fuels over Voyageʹ, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 8.
• [24] Cheng, P, Liang, N, Li, RY, Lan, H & Cheng, Q 2020, Analysis of Influence of Ship Roll on Ship Power System with Renewable Energyʹ, Energies, vol. 13, no. 1.
• [25] Ye, MN, Sharp, P, Brandon, N & Kucernak, A 2022, System‐level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shippingʹ, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 8565‐8584.
• [26] Stamatakis, ME & Ioannides, MG 2021, ʹState Transitions Logical Design for Hybrid Energy Generation with Renewable Energy Sources in LNG Shipʹ, Energies, vol. 14, no. 22.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).